85lobo Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Michael once again has some legal troubles. Just read that ESPN has cancelled his show with ESPN 103.3 in Dallas as well. http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=4889392 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxBroadcaster Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 The case really has nothing to do with the show being removed other than they announced it quicker than intended. He has been getting beat in ratings since day one and they had already planned on taking him off the air after the SB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino2K Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 :sleeping: So, what's new?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShadowKnows Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Hate to hear that for him, put himself in a bad situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THSfanatic Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Hate to hear that for him, put himself in a bad situation. True......TO doesn't seem so bad to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveTV1 Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 It sounds like another cash cow story to me. Last year it was Ben Roethlisberger, and now Michael Irvin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 I know...the fact that no criminal charges were ever filed makes it look bogus to me, too...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youngblood Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 I'll be very surprised if this doesn't turn out to be complete BS. Smells too fishy to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTwannaSAY2u Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 I'll be very surprised if this doesn't turn out to be complete BS. Smells too fishy to me. IM WILLING TO BET ITS ALL REAL....NOT THE RAPE PART THO....IM SURE THERE ARE OTHER WOMAN OUT THERE HE'S MESSING WITH..HE PROB. TRIED TO CALL IT OFF AND SHE WAS LIKING THE $$$$ IM SURE HE WAS GIVING HER...HELL HAS NO FURY LIKE A WOMAN SCORNED...###### THEM OFF & THEY WILL FIND A WAY !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTwannaSAY2u Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 It sounds like another cash cow story to me. Last year it was Ben Roethlisberger, and now Michael Irvin. IM SURE BEN WAS INNOSCENT...OF RAPE BUT NOT MESSING AROUND....LIKE ALL THE OTHER STORIES THAT SOUND THE SAME AS THIS ONE, MAN TRYS TO CALL OFF-WOMAN GETS ANGRY......THE N.F.L. PLAYERS RULE IS...LOVE THY NEIGHBOR---JUST DONT GET CAUGHT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NDNJOE Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 I think if there was any evidence that he raped this woman there would have been charges filed 3 YEARS ago. He filed a counter suit for $100M to clear his name. It's just another person looking for some cash out of a famous athlete. As far as his radio show, I thought he was hillarious especially when Nate Newton was on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayseed Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Eric Williams and Pacman Jones have both been called in as character witnesses for the defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
85lobo Posted February 9, 2010 Author Share Posted February 9, 2010 I think if there was any evidence that he raped this woman there would have been charges filed 3 YEARS ago. He filed a counter suit for $100M to clear his name. It's just another person looking for some cash out of a famous athlete. As far as his radio show, I thought he was hillarious especially when Nate Newton was on. I agree. The woman didn't get the money she was after, so she's bringing it back up. Pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacegolfer Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 I agree. The woman didn't get the money she was after, so she's bringing it back up. Pathetic. "IF" he was with her, it does not mean there was rape involved. Too many ladies target players for a good time and change their mind after their experience. Maybe they see $$$$$ just ringing up, thinking the players will try to keep it quiet. I understand how "victims" are emotionally prevented from speaking out. I just don't think this is the case here. This is just a waste of time and money now. No evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldandwhite Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 Eric Williams and Pacman Jones have both been called in as character witnesses for the defense. :smirk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayouBengal Posted February 9, 2010 Share Posted February 9, 2010 I don't think there is much to it to be honest. She's probably a crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now