buckeyebob Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Chapel Hill will be 4A. They got some big groups coming up. We will all be 4A...now CH ,may move to 5A...we will have to get used to the new numbering...East Texas seems to be growing...Pitt may be over the number & be in Div 1...heck, we are so close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 We will all be 4A...now CH ,may move to 5A...we will have to get used to the new numbering...East Texas seems to be growing...Pitt may be over the number & be in Div 1...heck, we are so close. Yea bob. That's what I said yesterday a little after 10am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 The 2a split has been good for us in football I wish they could do it for all sports and the districts could all be the same. I know it is because travel on Tuesday night in basketball baseball and volleyball etc. But if the could it would be better for competition and just overall non confusion. Like well that team is in our football district but they aren't in our basketball district etc I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrossFace Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 By looking at a map it is obvious you got 7 and 8 wrong. You passed a school that is further away than any other one in 8. Just my observation in looking at a map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrossFace Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Also Division 2 6-3A you have a school in there that is no longer in the UIL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR88 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Wait... so if all of the classes are being renamed up one level.... then 3A in 2014 is what today's 2A is right? So it really isn't a change? 2A already does the split... The teams that are currently 3A won't be affected because they will be 4A... Or am I wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeyebob Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Wait... so if all of the classes are being renamed up one level.... then 3A in 2014 is what today's 2A is right? So it really isn't a change? 2A already does the split... The teams that are currently 3A won't be affected because they will be 4A... Or am I wrong? Wrong...the UIL rules say 3A because the change to 4A does not take effect until the start of the 2014 School Year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Wrong...the UIL rules say 3A because the change to 4A does not take effect until the start of the 2014 School Year Bob, he said 2014. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleCat95 Posted March 9, 2013 Share Posted March 9, 2013 It looks like Padilla just threw those projections together. He has Rockdale and Center in the same district. That's got to be at least 3-hours on a bus one-way. No dis-respect to him, but no way that happens! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagles66 Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Looks like Texarkana L-E will 3A Div I and Texarkana PG 3A Div II Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 I would see the mock div 2 more like 7 Atlanta Pitt PG Gilmer Spring Hill Tatum 8 Rains Canton Mineola Van Bullard Gladewater Would Tatum have the enrollment to move up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckNut Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Would Tatum have the enrollment to move up? I see Gilmer going with atl and pg someone has to be in their district and Gilmer, Pitt and Sp Hill are the closest. If Tatum has the numbers they will be in there if not Gladewater will be this would be the most logical scenario, but logic and UIL don,t Ghaw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whousecats Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 The current numbers are:5A - 245 schools4A - 250 schools3A - 190 schoolsI really believe with 3A being split into two divisions, that you will see that number bump up to around225 schools. Taking the bottom 36 schools in the current 4A and moving them down to achieve that number would have the top number in 3A at around 1300. So I think the top of 3A(future 4A) will be 1250-1300.That would make the followingnumbers fit the UIL's goal of having a 2.0 ratio top to bottom since they won'tcompete against each other for state championships.3A division 2: 450 to 875 3A diviision 1: 876 to 1300 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 The current numbers are: 5A - 245 schools 4A - 250 schools 3A - 190 schools I really believe with 3A being split into two divisions, that you will see that number bump up to around 225 schools. Taking the bottom 36 schools in the current 4A and moving them down to achieve that number would have the top number in 3A at around 1300. So I think the top of 3A(future 4A) will be 1250-1300. That would make the following numbers fit the UIL's goal of having a 2.0 ratio top to bottom since they won't compete against each other for state championships. 3A division 1: 450 to 875 3A diviision 2: 876 to 1300 Good stuff... But I'd swap the two divisions. D1 is big school, D2 small school. That's the way it is now with 1A and 2A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 3A division 1: 450 to 875 3A diviision 2: 876 to 1300 . I think you have that backwards, the smaller enrollment schools would be division 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whousecats Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Sorry that was a typo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sackem Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Just keep the same districts for all sports. Don't play VB in one town and have a football game in another town. Same schools in basketball as football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 ^ I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now