Jump to content
The Smoakhouse Forums
Sign in to follow this  
KirtFalcon

The Low Information Diva on the Low Information Network ... LOL

Recommended Posts

Posted on January 6, 2014

by John Hinderaker in Media Bias, The War on the Koch Brothers


Rachel Maddow Is Crazy, Too




MSNBC has had a hard time lately. The network fired Martin Bashir and Alec Baldwin for craziness, on-air and off-air respectively. Melissa Harris-Perry was forced to apologize, first on Twitter and then, tearfully, on the air, for making political hay out of Mitt Romney’s adopted grandson. The network put Ed Schulz out to pasture, and most people wrote Chris Matthews off as a hysteric long ago, so that pretty much leaves Rachel Maddow–amazingly enough–as MSNBC’s supposed voice of sanity. Eliana Johnson has reported on Maddow’s status as the “queen” of MSNBC, who wields more control than anyone else over the network’s often-crazed content.

 

But is Maddow any better than the rest? A recent incident suggests that if anything, she is worse.

Last Thursday, 45 minutes before Maddow’s show began, her producer sent this email to representatives of Koch Industries, with which MSNBC has long been obsessed. Click to enlarge:

 

580x435xMaddowEmail01-600x451.jpg.pagesp

 

The Koch employees who received the email were a bit nonplussed, since Koch had nothing to do with the Florida welfare legislation in question, and had never supported–or, as far as I know, ever heard of–the Florida Foundation for Government Accountability. One of them responded to the producer; by that time, the show was already in progress:

 

580x282xMaddowEmail02-600x292.jpg.pagesp

 

Rachel Maddow, naturally, didn’t wait to learn the facts. Her segment on the Florida law, which required drug testing of all welfare applicants and had just been struck down by a federal judge, was all about Koch–bizarrely so, since Koch had nothing to do with the law in question:

 


Ms. Maddow moved on to a discussion of a 2011 Florida welfare law and a Florida federal court ruling concerning that law, falsely stating that the “Koch brothers . . . have been promoting forced drug tests for people on welfare.” Ms. Maddow based this false statement on her claim that the Florida Foundation for Government Accountability (“FFGA”) was involved in the legislation. This was a knowingly false and malicious statement by Ms. Maddow – Koch is not involved in promoting any such issue and we are not working with the FFGA on any such issue, as we explained to you last night. Indeed, your email from last night shows that you knew Koch had no link to the FFGA or this issue since you stated that Koch “donated to the State Policy Network of which FGGA is a member.” Nevertheless, Ms. Maddow repeatedly and falsely referred to FFGA as a “Koch brothers affiliated group,” a “Koch brothers connected Florida group,” a “Koch brothers related group,” and “this group (FFGA) affiliated with them (Koch) in Florida.”

Given that Koch has zero relationship with FFGA, Maddow based her claims on the fact that Koch has donated risibly small amounts–$40,000 over eight years–to the State Policy Network, and FFGA, which advocated for the Florida law, is a member of the State Policy Network. She used this graphic to explain the connection to her audience:

 

512x288xRachel11.jpg.pagespeed.ic.cBFYGA

 

But this is an utter non sequitur. The State Policy Network–let alone the Koch brothers!–had nothing to do with the Florida legislation. Ms. Maddow perhaps was trying to suggest that the State Policy Network is a funding source for FFGA, so that the Koch brothers have indirectly supported FFGA, albeit to a ridiculously small level (nowhere near $1,000 on a pro rata basis). But that isn’t true either. I happen to know a little bit about this, since I was formerly the Chairman of the Board of a think tank that is a member of the State Policy Network. The SPN is like a trade association of conservative think tanks, with members in every state. The SPN doesn’t support the local groups, like FFGA; on the contrary, the local think tanks pay dues to support SPN. So there is no connection–not even a minute, indirect one–between Koch and FFGA. I repeat: as far as we know, no one at Koch had ever heard of FFGA before Rachel Maddow’s show on Thursday of last week, and Koch did nothing–zero, nada–to support the Florida legislation in question.

 

So Rachel Maddow’s entire segment was one big lie. Her central premise, that the Florida welfare statute was an initiative of the Koch brothers, was false, and she knew it. She made the whole thing up to fool the low-IQ viewers who form MSNBC’s base. But the story gets even worse.

 

In an email dated January 3–follow the link above–Koch asked MSNBC to retract, and apologize for, Maddow’s fabrications. Instead of correcting her misrepresentations, Maddow, in her show on Friday, triumphantly refused, saying “I don’t play requests.” Or, in other words, “I lie with impunity, and MSNBC gives me cover.” The left-wing echo chamber swooned. Daily Kos–remember them?–headlined, “Rachel Maddow Speaks Truth to Powerful Koch Brothers.” Raw Story’s sycophantic take was, “Maddow scorches Koch brothers on ‘correction’ demand: ‘I don’t play requests.’” So if you are a left-winger, blatant lies about conservatives make you a hero.

 

But the corruption goes deeper still. Rachel Maddow says that any company that supports the State Policy Network is “affiliated with” the Florida Foundation for Government Accountability, and is responsible for everything FFGA does. That is wrong, but let’s go with it. Who else, besides Koch, has supported the State Policy Network? You might be surprised: the list includes Microsoft, Facebook, AT&T, Time Warner Cable, GlaxoSmithKline, Kraft Foods, and many more. So Maddow randomly singled out Koch as opposed to any of these other companies as the sponsor of the Florida legislation which, as far as we know, Koch wasn’t even aware of. Well, not randomly, because MSNBC is obsessed with Koch, but you get the point.

 

But wait! A final level of deception remains to be revealed: one of the many companies that have contributed to the State Policy Network is Comcast, which owns MSNBC and is Rachel Maddow’s employer. So in her Thursday broadcast, Maddow could equally well have said that MSNBC “ha been promoting forced drug tests for people on welfare,” and that FFGA is an “MSNBC-affiliated group.” She didn’t do this for obvious reasons. She knew that she was addressing a stupid audience that would never know the difference.

 

If Rachel Maddow is the best that MSNBC has to offer, MSNBC is in even deeper trouble than its steep ratings decline would indicate.

 

PAUL ADDS: Wow! This is surely one of the greatest takedowns ever. I hear they are planning to put up an apartment building on the site where Maddow used to be standing.

 

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2014/01/rachel-maddow-is-crazy-too.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget Keith Olbermann was also let go or left for greener pastures....And was fired again or left again for greener pastures....at ESPN where they told him to shut up about politics...:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the kind of garbage low information libs like LionKing4ever and other Obama loving knee suckers absorb like a sponge and believe without question. There is so much disinformation coming from the Barry lovers that is so far from the truth it's hilarious to believe some people actually believe it. If the liberal media ever decides to quit cover for his lies, deceit and lawlessness, it's over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kirt, as you reference American Thinker, a blog site, rife with misinformation and crazy hatred masked as opinion, then one of the most outrageous liars of our time in Rush is your hero, with World Nut Daily and the Moonies' Washington Times thrown out there as some kind of reliable journalism, not to mention the big daddy and fount of endless drivel in FOX "News", I think you need to move far, far away from that glass house you are standing in and quit your quest to get a snigger from some source you latched onto in the right wing world.

 

When you can't attack the message, attack the messenger...right?

 

In getting to the post itself, is it the truth or a lie?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still trying to figure out why the libs are so opposed to the idea of welfare recipients being drug tested. If you have a JOB, and actually WORK for your $$, you have to take a drug test periodically. But if you live off of taxpayer $$, you can snort, huff, smoke, and tweak all you want, and keep getting paid for it. Where is the EQUALITY in that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably because it costs a lot more than it saves. But we know you conservatives like to spend, spend, spend and take away people's rights.

Like the right to snort coke off of taxpayer $$? Yeah I'm the big infringer! Of course you guys prefer to spend spend spend and spend some more, all with other people's $$.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, if you make MILLIONS, and you benefit from tax subsides and government support, should you also have to take a drug test? Should Congress have to take a drug test on a regular basis?

Any company receiving taxpayer funds of any kind should be required to maintain a stringent drug testing policy, at the company's expense. That means ALL of their employees, starting with upper-level management. And by all means, everyone in congress should have to pee in a cup on a regular basis. Of course, all of the dims being high could explain how Obamacare is such a train wreck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Florida less than 3% on welfare tested positive for illegal drugs before the court system struck it down. I'm sure Fox ( is not ) News is not going to broadcast that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Florida less than 3% on welfare tested positive for illegal drugs before the court system struck it down. I'm sure Fox ( is not ) News is not going to broadcast that.

So is it more about catching or preventing to you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see I struck a nerve with Screaminbuzzard. lol

He still doesn't recognize facts from liberal bs.....

Typical Low Information lefty ..... :lol:

 

Notice he didn't even try to defend Rachael Madcow's false story. Wonder why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe all federal government employees need to be drug tested and not random, at least every quarter, because somebody is on drugs up there in that corner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No nerve struck here just having some fun. Why would I want to defend a story that was done without proper fact checking?

When you get your "so called proper facts" from lunatic lefty websites like the 3sistas politico, there isn't much hope for morons like you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...