Wild74 Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Left Calls for Death of Supreme Court, America After Rulings TodayPundit Press ^ | 6/30/14 | Aurelius Posted on Monday, June 30, 2014 1:06:41 PM by therightliveswithus As usual, when a ruling has gone against liberals, their faux "civility" has washed away to show their true side: anger, contempt, and violent intentions. Liberals took to social media to voice their homicidal rage because the Supreme Court decided two major rulings today: that people cannot be forced by the government to provide contraception if it specifically conflicted with their religious beliefs, and that unions cannot force non-members to give them money. Like the civil people they are, liberals decided that anyone who disagrees with them deserves death and, for the heck of it, the United States itself should be destroyed. Here are just a few examples. "Murder the Supreme Court:" Help me kill them: "Death to America:" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted June 30, 2014 Author Share Posted June 30, 2014 And so, so consistent! The absolute hypocrisy and duplicity of the American statist left defies logical explanation! Putting aside for the moment that “statist left” and “logical” should NEVER APPEAR in the same rant, the just announced Hobby Lobby decision by the Supremes displayed it for all to see. All, that is, except the looney 47% who are receiving all the “free” #### and other goodies dispensed by the left to keep them voting for Democrat hacks who promise more and more of the free ####. At the time the left rammed through the (Un)Affordable Care Act, there were loud protests from the few million or so sane citizens still living here that it would interpose fedzilla into the formerly sacred relationship between patient and doctor. The equally looney “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it” left quickly waved a collective imperious hand and uttered a royal “Tsk, tsk”, dismissed the objectors and returned to destroying the fabric of the country. Comes now the favorable Hobby Lobby decision and comes now two pro-abortion radical feminazis to – where else – MSNBC to decry and lament over the decision. One was Rep. Nita Lowey from NYC (aka Gomorrah on the Hudson) and another woman representing one of the several Margaret Sanger eugenics inspired pro-abortion groups still murdering babies in the former safety of their mothers’ wombs. Their first and only opposition argument? Though I suspect you have figured this out, better brace yourself: “It would interfere with the sanctity of the relationship between a woman and her doctor.” And before you hit the reply button with “What about the hypocrisy of the pro-life right in celebrating Hobby Lobby?” You may have overlooked the third and silent party in the discussion: The unborn baby! The pro-aborts maintain that a fetus is NOT a human being either until birth or the third trimester. (I’ll believe that when a human female delivers a chicken or a cow.) And a number of courts here and in other nations regularly rule in support of that erroneous notion. And while we’re discussing “hypocrisy”, can you explain this to me? How is it that those same courts correctly rule in cases involving intentional or accidental serious injury to or death of a pregnant woman that if her unborn baby is injured or dies, her baby constitutes a SECOND victim of the trauma or crime and the jury/judge nearly always factors that into the civil judgment or criminal sentence? That concept comes down to us from the over 2,000 year old law found in the Bible. And here’s one final piece of law from that Good Book: “A double-minded man (or woman) is UNSTABLE in ALL his (or her) ways”. What does that say about 21st century America? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue82 Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Larry I'm curious why you're not calling out these people for their outrageous claims. If Wild or Kirt was making statements like that, you'd be all over it. I guess violence is ok if it for the cause of baby-killing, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted June 30, 2014 Author Share Posted June 30, 2014 So, who wrote that second part, Wild? Know it wasn't you, as they used punctuation, grammar and spelled the big words right. I figured your being a hypocrite would not let you answer the author. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted June 30, 2014 Author Share Posted June 30, 2014 Reminder: Hobby Lobby Provides Coverage for 16 Types of ContraceptionTownhall ^ | June 30, 2014 | Katie Pavlich After today's Supreme Court ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby, the left and Democrats are predictably claiming the 5-4 decision bans contraception for women. Matt Canter @mattcanter DSCC: Nearly every GOP candidate supports radicalmeasures that would block birth control &roll backwomen’s health care rights even further 10:34 AM - 30 Jun 2014 3 Retweets Sandra Fluke @SandraFluke Supreme Court rules that bosses can deny employeescoverage of birth control. #HobbyLobby #NotMyBossBusiness 9:24 AM - 30 Jun 2014 177 Retweets 55 favorites That claim is completely false. Not to mention, Hobby Lobby itself provides coverage of 16 different types of contraception to its employees. The Green family has no moral objection to the use of 16 of 20 preventive contraceptives required in the mandate, and Hobby Lobby will continue its longstanding practice of covering these preventive contraceptives for its employees. However, the Green family cannot provide or pay for four potentially life-threatening drugs and devices. These drugs include Plan B and Ella, the so-called morning-after pill and the week-after pill. Covering these drugs and devices would violate their deeply held religious belief that life begins at the moment of conception, when an egg is fertilized. Facts matter, but to the left, emotion on this issue wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted July 1, 2014 Author Share Posted July 1, 2014 Left-wingers want to ‘burn down’ Hobby Lobby after SCOTUS winTwitchy ^ | 06/30/14 | Twitchy Staff | Hey Larry after you check my spelling you might want tocomment on this....haha The Authoritarians (aka Liberals/Leftist) are furious over the SCOTUS Hobby Lobby court ruling. Even to the point of making terrorist threats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
galloping_gobbler Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 So, who wrote that second part, Wild? Know it wasn't you, as they used punctuation, grammar and spelled the big words right. When you have been beaten on the central issue of a discussion, attack person who is correct with shots about grammar and beliefs. Just another page out of the Leftist Playbook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue82 Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 So contraception is baby-killing?Abortion is. The plaintiff in this case already pays for 16 different kinds of contraception. It's the abortion pill they object to. Learn to read. It will really improve your life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTFAN99 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 It's not the abortion pill that they object too. Maybe you should read about how plan b, Ella, and IUDs work. Hypocrisy at its finest. http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2014/04/01/hobby-lobby-401k-discovered-to-be-investor-in-numerous-abortion-and-contraception-products-while-claiming-religious-objection/ apparently they are not abortion pills “They don’t act after fertilization.” As the Times noted, emergency contraception like Plan B, ella and the hormonal IUD do not work by preventing fertilized eggs from implanting in the womb. Instead, these methods of birth control delay ovulation 0r thicken cervical mucus to prevent sperm from reaching the egg, meaning that fertilization never even occurs. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/06/health/research/morning-after-pills-dont-block-implantation-science-suggests.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 I think hobby lobby is misguided on the issue, BUT, they do cover 16 of the 20 types of contraceptives that should prevent you from needing the Plan b pill. I think its just more media hype to further divide us. If you really think about it, its not that big of a deal. To be honest, if you got them to cover 80%, of what you require, that is a win for the liberals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immortal13 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Larry, how to you live in this state and not get your ### kicked on a daily basis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immortal13 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 How to you Immortal? English please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parentofredheads Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 ^ You know... one of these days somebody's gonna come up to you and say, "I'M YOUR HUCKLEBERRY." Should prove interesting....that is, if you say your political beliefs outloud versus on line....LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parentofredheads Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Don't live on a compound, near any Big Thicket, generally stay downwind of stoopid people, but really not scared to say what I think outloud, anywhere, Parent. Scary for people to think that online lives are the real deal, actually, because I have seen many, many crazies on here than I don't want in my neighborhood, their views alone, but I am sure they are precious in person. Not you, but people! Just saying... one of these days somebody's gonna say... "I'M YOUR HUCKLEBERRY." And hint - apparently you're not staying downwind of too many "stoopid" people cuz... well.....LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGirl Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Rrrrrrrreow cat fight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immortal13 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Oh my bad for the typo. Question still stands how a liberal pansy could avoid daily ###whippings in this state. Must be hard for you to have to keep your nonsense down to a low whisper in public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Larry, I would stomp a mud hole in your liberal #### and walk it dry .... stay downwind (:lol:) of that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGirl Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Ironic how the "conservatives" here were the first to suggest violence against people who may publicly voice a different opinion than themselves. Seems the republicans here want to be the left's dingleberry...uh I mean huckleberry ... In a thread meant to point out the violent threats of the left the republicans show a remarkable resemblance to that which they claim to oppose. Good yob! GOPher it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGirl Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Just saying... one of these days somebody's gonna say... "I'M YOUR HUCKLEBERRY." And hint - apparently you're not staying downwind of too many "stoopid" people cuz... well.....LOL Hint: stoopid - someone or something so stupid it has to be spelled with 2 O's. ... I think you just may have qualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted July 2, 2014 Author Share Posted July 2, 2014 You third party jack legs crack me up....:lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted July 2, 2014 Author Share Posted July 2, 2014 Shameless smear of the supremes (stupid libs get hoisted on their own petard) NY POST ^ | 7/2/14 | RICH LOWRY Posted on Wednesday, July 02, 2014 8:36:30 AM by Liz .....the USSC’s 5-4 decision in the Hobby Lobby case ...held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act forbids forcing contraceptive coverage its owners object to on religious grounds (that act as abortifacients). Sen. Harry Reid (Dem-Nev), displaying his unfailing instinct for the inane, tweeted, “It’s time that five men on the Supreme Court stop deciding what happens to women”......he seems to believe that the court was deliberating The Fate of Women’s Freedom in the US. WH Press Secy Josh Earnest said Pres Obama “believes women should make personal health-care decisions for themselves, rather than their bosses deciding for them.” Taking this non sequitur and running with it, Sen. Patty Murray (Dem-Wash) opined that the decision “takes us closer to a time in history when women had no choice and no voice.” The left can’t get its head around the idea that the law or the Constitution sometimes limits the means whereby it seeks to achieve its ends. The 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed with large bipartisan majorities, creating a broad protection for religious liberty.....ergo, that govt can’t create a substantial burden on someone’s exercise of religion unless it is using the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling government interest. Surely, if liberal lions Ted Kennedy and then-Pres Bill Clinton had foreseen how the act would eventually get in the way of the left’s coercive cultural agenda, they never would’ve supported it in the first place. (Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted July 2, 2014 Author Share Posted July 2, 2014 US. WH Press Secy Josh Earnest said Pres Obama “believes women should make personal health-care decisions for themselves, rather than their bosses deciding for them.” But they will force them to pay? LOL! Of all the hypocritcal arguments, this takes takes brassiness to another level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeyefan1984 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Ironic how the "conservatives" here were the first to suggest violence against people who may publicly voice a different opinion than themselves. Seems the republicans here want to be the left's dingleberry...uh I mean huckleberry ... In a thread meant to point out the violent threats of the left the republicans show a remarkable resemblance to that which they claim to oppose. Good yob! GOPher it! Hmm, and just how many conservatives are on here suggesting violence? Oh, this must be where a liberal lumps all conservatives together because it promotes an *agenda*. I could have said all liberals and been just like you, but I'm not like that. So let's see ThatGirl, are you going to stick to your guns on this and prove me right? or, are you going to admit that you only meant Kirt and *still*, prove me right? Oops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGirl Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Hmm, and just how many conservatives are on here suggesting violence? Oh, this must be where a liberal lumps all conservatives together because it promotes an *agenda*. I could have said all liberals and been just like you, but I'm not like that. So let's see ThatGirl, are you going to stick to your guns on this and prove me right? or, are you going to admit that you only meant Kirt and *still*, prove me right? Oops. Where did I say ALL? > just kirt and < "ALL"If I had been talking about real conservatives I would have omitted the quotes. Oops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
galloping_gobbler Posted July 4, 2014 Share Posted July 4, 2014 Gobble, gobble. Did someone say something? "Political correctness is tyranny with manners." - Charlton Heston Yes, someone did, but sadly, your head is too far up a pucker hole to know it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted July 4, 2014 Author Share Posted July 4, 2014 Where did I say ALL? > just kirt and < "ALL" If I had been talking about real conservatives I would have omitted the quotes. Oops I have never seen Kirk suggest violence funny how knee jerk liberals like cat girl act like they are third party or above it all..:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now