Wild74 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore says he will continue to recognize ban on same-sex marriageAL.COM ^ | 27 JANUARY 2015 | AL.COM Posted on 1/27/2015, 6:50:23 PM by Extremely Extreme Extremist Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore has released a letter to Gov. Robert Bentley saying that he intends to continue to recognize the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and urging the governor to do so. Moore's office released the three-page letter that was delivered to the governor this morning in response to a federal judge's ruling Friday striking down the ban. "As Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, I will continue to recognize the Alabama Constitution and the will of the people overwhelmingly expressed in the Sanctity of Marriage Amendment," Moore wrote. (Excerpt) Read more at al.com ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 good deal ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue82 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Back when Bush nominated Roberts for SCOTUS, I was hoping we'd get Moore instead. I knew there weren't enough republicans with cajones in the senate to get him approved, but it would have been worth it to see Ted Kennedy's head explode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Good move by Judge Moore.......let the revolution begin....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 What a nut, and he should be removed promptly from office. Only the voters can do that....and THEY like him...... :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShadowKnows Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 It is good to see men who stand for what is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Yeah, that Alabama, right there on the forefront of intelligence and progressive thought. "progressive" = communist, so no, there isn't much of your "progressive" thought in Alabama....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Yeah, that Alabama, right there on the forefront of intelligence and progressive thought. we don't need your ignorant idea of regressive thought .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted February 10, 2015 Share Posted February 10, 2015 http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/judge-roy-moore-the-law-is-very-clear/ How's all those gopper appointees on the Supreme Court working out for you, kirt???? Looks like it'll be 7 - 2 IN FAVOR of the perverts when they finally rule.....just ask Clarence Thomas....he knows the fix is in....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted February 10, 2015 Author Share Posted February 10, 2015 http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/judge-roy-moore-the-law-is-very-clear/ How's all those gopper appointees on the Supreme Court working out for you, kirt???? Looks like it'll be 7 - 2 IN FAVOR of the perverts when they finally rule.....just ask Clarence Thomas....he knows the fix is in....... Best article I have seen written on the subject. I believe it will come down to 5-4 split in the SCOTUS even though it is 7-2. Kennedy & Roberts are the real turn coats and Kennedy I think voted against the DOMA and voted to uphold California's voters while Roberts didn't. Alito is not showing his hand for some reason as he voted with the minority before on both issues. The other 4 are solid sodomite supporters, two of them may even be Lesbians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted February 10, 2015 Share Posted February 10, 2015 http://news.yahoo.com/justice-thomas-court-signals-support-gay-marriage-161755545--politics.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted February 10, 2015 Author Share Posted February 10, 2015 Kennedy is setting in what should have been Robert Borks seat...RIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted February 10, 2015 Author Share Posted February 10, 2015 From the article: "It has similarly declined to grant certiorari to review such judgments without any regard for the people who approved those laws in popular referendums or elected the representatives who voted for them," wrote Thomas. "In this case, the Court refuses even to grant a temporary stay when it will resolve the issue at hand in several months." The Scotus truly is drunk on its own power Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted February 10, 2015 Author Share Posted February 10, 2015 Mark Levin’s idea for a convention of the states under Article V of the Constitution may be the remedy for Federal courts’ intrusion into the area of marriage contracts, historically a state responsibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted February 10, 2015 Share Posted February 10, 2015 Mark Levin’s idea for a convention of the states under Article V of the Constitution may be the remedy for Federal courts’ intrusion into the area of marriage contracts, historically a state responsibility.[/size] Several states have Article V legislation filed in their sessions.....it's a shame that TEXAS is not one of them......however, CONGRESS, as one of it's checks on the court, could, with a majority vote in both (gopper controlled houses by the way) remove this from the jurisdiction of the courts....it could do that to abortion as well...... Article I, Section 8, Clause 9 (powers of Congress) To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court; Article III, Section 2 In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted February 10, 2015 Share Posted February 10, 2015 Bigots trying to use the Constitution again to justify their fear and prejudice again...ah, it's a beautiful Tuesday morning! The Constitution is clear on this limit to the courts......however, you won't ever see a gopper OR a dim use this power because they need the courts to keep people focused off them at election time....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/cnn-anchor-americans-rights-do-not-come-from-god/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 Mark Levin: 'Our Rights Do Come From God' February 13, 2015 - 2:32 PM By Michael Morris Nationally syndicated radio show host Mark Levin, commenting on Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore’s claim that our rights come from God, pinpointed the fundamental difference between the left and the right. “[T]he left does not believe in fundamental human rights,” says Levin. “They believe in fundamental quote, unquote rights dispensed by government, and this is where the problem rests!” “Very interesting interview on CNN today, between Chris Cuomo and the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Roy Moore, and it really does get to the nub of the matter,” said Levin. “Whether you agree with the chief justice or not on his various views of particular cases, there’s no denying what he says in this interview, and there’s no denying that Chris Cuomo believes what he says in this interview.” Levin, giving a hat-tip to CNSNews, then played the clip. Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore : “Because our rights, contained in the Bill of Rights, do not come from the Constitution. They come from God. It’s clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence.” Chris Cuomo : “Our laws do not come from God your honor, and you know that. They come from man.” Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore : “Well then let me ask you one question. Let me ask you one question Chris. Is the Declaration of Independence law?” Chris Cuomo : “You would call it organic law, as the basis for future laws off of it.” Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore : “I would call it the organic law, because the United States code calls it ‘organic law.’ It is organic law, because the law of this country calls it ‘the organic law of our country’ – means, where our rights come from – and if they come from there, men can’t take them away.” Chris Cuomo : “Our rights do not come from God. That’s your faith. That’s my faith. But that’s not our country. Our laws come from collective agreement and compromise.” Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore : “Well, now that’s not a matter of faith sir.” “’Our rights do not come from God,’” repeated Levin. “’That’s your faith. That’s my faith. But that’s not our country,’ he says. 'Our laws come from collective agreement and compromise.’ And earlier he used the word ‘power.’” “Rights are not about laws,” said Levin. “Rights are not about power. Where do these unalienable rights come from – these involatile rights, the right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?” Levin then answered saying, “They don’t come from man. They don’t come from a collection of men that we call government. These are rights. You are born with these rights. They don’t come from reason. They don’t come from logic. They are. Period.” “The right to live,” remarked Levin, “is not a right conferred by man. Birth, supposed to not be a right conferred by man.” “You see ladies and gentlemen, we have certain rights outside of government,” said Levin. “We have certain rights that belong to us as individual human beings – not because some Congress says so, not because some president says or Supreme Court says so, or the EPA says so, not because Chris Cuomo says so; it’s because it is so.” “This is a fundamental, if not the fundamental issue, around which this nation was founded – that our rights do not come from man, that our rights come from God,” said Levin. “Now many of you out there may not believe in God,” said Levin. “You may not be sure if you believe in God. I talked about this at some length the other day; I’ve written about it in ‘Liberty and Tyranny.’ That’s perfectly fine. Believe or don’t believe, whatever you want.” “But that’s not how the nation was founded,” declared Levin. “And the fact that we are a tolerant society, the fact that we are at tolerant society is because of this insistence we have in the Declaration of Independence that each and every one of you, each and every one of us, have unalienable rights. And Barack Obama can’t take them away, John Boehner, McConnell, Harry Reid, no justice, no group of justices, no judge, nobody. Nobody can take them away.” “They’re outside of government,” repeated Levin. “They’re bigger than mankind!” “No, you don’t have to believe me,” said Levin. “You don’t have to believe me. No I’m not talking about passing statutes or codes or ordinances and that sort of thing, obviously that involves politics and government. I am talking about fundamental human rights.” “And the left does not believe in fundamental human rights,” Levin said. “They believe in fundamental quote, unquote rights dispensed by government, and this is where the problem rests!” http://cnsnews.com/blog/michael-morris/mark-levin-our-rights-do-come-god Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLine06 Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 I am flat out appalled and disturbed. Wonder how Cuomo feels about the 10 Commandments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/we-need-more-roy-moores/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted February 25, 2015 Author Share Posted February 25, 2015 Roy Moore is a hero because he is the same in season and out of season He is a real hero and seems to understand the constitution better than those liberal left wing hacks on the courts who have done nothing but #### up to the powers that be to get a lifetime appointment. Sodomite loving heathens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted May 30, 2015 Author Share Posted May 30, 2015 Judge Roy Moore: Impeach Ginsburg for Marrying Two Men Ahead of SCOTUS Ruling on Gay Marriage By Penny Starr | May 28, 2015 | 4:02 PM EDT 2.5K Shares FacebookTwitterMore Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore spoke at the Family Research Council's Watchmen on the Wall pastors' retreat on May 21, 2015. (CNSNew.com/Penny Starr) (CNSNews.com) – On May 17, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg officiated the marriage of two men and used the occasion to cite her constitutional right to do so. In June, the high court – including Ginsburg’s vote - will announce its decision on whether homosexual marriage is guaranteed by the Constitution. That’s grounds for impeachment, Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore told CNSNews.com in an exclusive interview. “She’s basically thumbing her nose in front of the other justices that she’s going to say what she wants to say and do what she wants to do, and she’s going to ignore the rules of ethics,” Moore said, adding that judges are bound by those rules. “I think there’s grounds for the legislature of the United States and Congress to act,” Moore said. “They could act to impeach her; they could remove her for bad behavior, because judges serve for good behavior under Article 3 (of the Constitution). Moore said the fact that Ginsburg made a public statement that she had a right under the Constitution to perform a same-sex wedding, under the ethics rules, is bad behavior given her role in deciding the Obergefell v. Hodges case. “They could find that’s bad behavior and subject to impeachment and removal,” Moore said. The New York Times’ Maureen Dowd wrote about the wedding and Ginsburg’s remarks during the ceremony. “Wearing her black robe with her signature white lace collar, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided over the marriage on Sunday afternoon of Michael Kahn, the longtime artistic director of the Shakespeare Theater Company in Washington, and Charles Mitchem, who works at an architecture firm in New York,” Dowd wrote. “The gilded setting was elegant: Anderson House in the Embassy Row neighborhood, the headquarters in Washington of the Society of the Cincinnati, a club for the descendants of the French and American soldiers who fought in the Revolutionary War,” Dowd wrote. “During the ceremony, the couple slipped black and gold Harry Winston rings onto each other’s fingers. “But the most glittering moment for the crowd came during the ceremony," Dowd wrote. “With a sly look and special emphasis on the word ‘Constitution,’ Justice Ginsburg said that she was pronouncing the two men married by the powers vested in her by the Constitution of the United States. “No one was sure if she was emphasizing her own beliefs or giving a hint to the outcome of the case the Supreme Court is considering whether to decide if same-sex marriage is constitutional,” Dowd wrote. Moore’s Foundation for Moral Law, in fact, petitioned the court claiming two of the nine judges should recuse themselves from the same-sex marriage decision – Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, who has also officiated a same-sex wedding. The foundation, under the leadership of Moore’s wife Kayla Moore, issued a press release in April on the recusal motion. “Canon 3A(6) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges provides that ‘A judge should not make public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court.’ 28 U.S.C. sec 455(a) mandates that a Justice ‘shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.’ “Because they have performed same-sex marriages, and because Justice Ginsburg has spoken publicly in favor of same-sex marriage, the foundation contends that those justices are predisposed to rule in favor of same-sex marriage and are unable or unwilling to consider this case impartially, and that their words and actions give the appearance of bias, if not bias itself.” “Common sense dictates that one who has performed same-sex marriages cannot objectively rule on their legality,” Kayla Moore said in the announcement of the motion. “If these justices participate in this case, the court’s decision will forever be questioned as being based on their personal feelings rather than on the Constitution itself. “With far less evidence of bias [Alabama Supreme Court] Chief Justice Roy Moore voluntarily did not vote on the recent Alabama Supreme Court case regarding same-sex marriage. “Justices Ginsburg and Kagan should follow his example,” Kayla Moore said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 If the goppers didn't agree with her, they would......unfortunately, they aren't any different from the dims on this........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted May 30, 2015 Author Share Posted May 30, 2015 If the goppers didn't agree with her, they would......unfortunately, they aren't any different from the dims on this........ They are a bunch of cowards on this issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 They are a bunch of cowards on this issue And every other issue, too....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now