Jump to content

🤡 Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California)


RETIREDFAN1

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...
  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
10 minutes ago, Wild74 said:

Bug Eyes will not step down but I think he is a good person to have out in front of the democratic party, totally corrupt and a clown that keeps on going.  

Schiff looks like he has an electric pickle up his rear & it is set on High!😂

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CENTEXFAN said:

The investigation was started by Republicans.  Remember Republicans controlled all 3 branches of govt in 2016-2018.  

It was highly supported by Democrats as well, and there was even a conflict of interest shown, because of his ties to Comey.  Don't be so blind.  

 

From Wikipedia :  Mueller's appointment to oversee the investigation immediately garnered widespread support from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress.[71][72] Newt Gingrich, former Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives and prominent conservative political commentator, stated via Twitter that "Robert Mueller is a superb choice to be special counsel. His reputation is impeccable for honesty and integrity."[73] Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) said, "Former Director Mueller is exactly the right kind of individual for this job. I now have significantly greater confidence that the investigation will follow the facts wherever they lead." Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) stated, "former FBI dir. Mueller is well qualified to oversee this probe".[71] Some, however, were quick to point out an alleged conflict of interest. "The federal code could not be clearer—Mueller is compromised by his apparent conflict of interest in being close with James Comey," Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), who first called for Mueller to step down over the summer, said in a statement to Fox News. "The appearance of a conflict is enough to put Mueller in violation of the code. … All of the revelations in recent weeks make the case stronger."[74]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I listened to a person today who had been in front of a congressional committee. One of the things that he pointed out was that he has to swear an oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, so help him god. But those on the committees DO NOT HAVE TO take that same oath. Wonder why? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DannyZuco said:

I listened to a person today who had been in front of a congressional committee. One of the things that he pointed out was that he has to swear an oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, so help him god. But those on the committees DO NOT HAVE TO take that same oath. Wonder why? 

Excellent point. Everyone there should be required to take the same oath at all hearings ... The people being questioned should also be allowed the same amount of time to answer questions as the people asking the questions  ...  No cutting them off before they can answer ...

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mr. P changed the title to 🤡 Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California)

125 House Republicans co-sponsor resolution to censure Schiff over 'parody' reading of Trump-Zelensky call

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/125-house-republicans-co-sponsor-resolution-to-censure-schiff-over-parody-reading-of-trump-zelensky-call

 

Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Mr. P changed the title to Shifty Schiff Sch💩itt Head & the dimwits press on despite lack of “witness” testimony

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...