KirtFalcon Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 CONSERVATIVES did choose Dr. Paul........you liberals bowed down to your master rove and chose mccant and mittens...... CONSERVATIVES with enough sense to realize he was a foreign policy/national security disaster DIDN'T choose Ron Paul .... thank God! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SideTracker Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 CONSERVATIVES did choose Dr. Paul........you liberals bowed down to your master rove and chose mccant and mittens...... Of course. No other politician that holds the credentials of Dr. Paul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 +1/2 I am sure you don't because it would cause you to take a serious look at what you support. I certainly don't support your view, I think your view gave us Obama Care You should read your own quote, it is very apropos All I need is for you to read it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SideTracker Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 And since the question was asked earlier who I support, it is still 100% Mr Paul!!!!!!! Well, it's probably better than supporting Rove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 They get arms from multiple sources .... always have, always will ...... and those "multiple sources" get them from us....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Rove don't have any power anymore, probably never did And I've got some beach front property in Colmesneil for sell........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 and those "multiple sources" get them from us....... not all, most are made outside the U.S. there are far more AKs, foreign made RPGs and many other types of small arms available from foreign sources than we supply .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 not all, most are made outside the U.S. there are far more AKs, foreign made RPGs and many other types of small arms available from foreign sources than we supply .... Can you prove that, or are you just pulling stats out of your ears again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SideTracker Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 not all, most are made outside the U.S. there are far more AKs, foreign made RPGs and many other types of small arms available from foreign sources than we supply .... It's like a spreading disease ...make 'em here , make 'em there. There is no such thing as too many bullets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Can you prove that, or are you just pulling stats out of your ears again.... I base that on years of logistics briefings I have sat through with comparison statistics ... I'm basically talking about small arms. Yes, we produce and export the most, but when you add up all the other countries exports it exceeds our exports .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Well we supplied Iraq, and many of the countries in the Middle East is that not also true? Yes, we supplied Iraq, just like many other countries .... trying to keep the oil flowing freely among other things ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 So with the vast amount of military arms we have sent to the area wouldn't it also be reasonable that they would have these also? Everyone has them, so what's your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 I base that on years of logistics briefings I have sat through with comparison statistics ... I'm basically talking about small arms. Yes, we produce and export the most, but when you add up all the other countries exports it exceeds our exports .... So pulling it out of your ears, then......... Everyone has them, so what's your point? The exact same point Senator Paul was making........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 So pulling it out of your ears, then......... The exact same point Senator Paul was making........ Sen Paul is a babe in the woods and would change his toon on a lot of things, if he was elected POTUS and was responsibility for our national security ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Sen Paul is a babe in the woods and would change his toon on a lot of things, if he was elected POTUS and was responsibility for our national security ..... So, not only turning into buddha, but a prophet as well......anyway, we won't ever find out because the fix is in.....either Velma Jeane Clinton or Shrub will be making the call...... As for "our national security"...what is the purpose for keeping it secure, if we are not going to be FREE....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/declassified-docs-hillary-aided-rise-of-isis/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Yep the Canadian is so experienced......... He is an American, and after the bar was set by Obamanation it will not be hard to clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 So, not only turning into buddha, but a prophet as well......anyway, we won't ever find out because the fix is in.....either Velma Jeane Clinton or Shrub will be making the call...... As for "our national security"...what is the purpose for keeping it secure, if we are not going to be FREE....... A lot of brave men and women have died protecting our freedom so mental midgets like you have the freedom to spout nonsense about their efforts to keep us free .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 A lot of brave men and women have died protecting our freedom so mental midgets like you have the freedom to spout nonsense about their efforts to keep us free .... No, Since 1950, they have served, fought, and died as a mercenary force for the banks, through no fault of their own.....my freedom is in danger from my government more than it is from any group in the Middle East, and has been since 1913.......when will they come and fight over here to protect my freedom from the usurpers in power who are the REAL threats to it??? ....unfortunately, you brainwashed sheep keep giving those usurpers more power, instead of joining the movement to reign them in.....and so I ask once again, for you national security NAZI's.....if we are not going to be FREE, why even bother being secure??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Here's a good essay tracing the FOUNDING FATHER'S viewpoints on what exactly the term natural born citizen meant to them....therefore, it's what they were meaning when they wrote The Constitution...... http://birthers.org/USC/Vattel.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 According to the Founders....barry is a usurper and ineligible to be president......Senator Cruz AND Rubbero are ineligible to run for the office........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 And yet I would have no issue with that You DON'T have an issue with it...... :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 According to the Founders....barry is a usurper and ineligible to be president......Senator Cruz AND Rubbero are ineligible to run for the office........ They are both eligible to run....you know that you are trying to be a hard head....:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 They are both eligible to run....you know that you are trying to be a hard head.... :P NOT according to the original intent of the Founders.....try reading the essay and following up on the links provided....learn something..... :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 If they were ineligible they wouldn't be running Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now