Jump to content

⚖️ SCOTUS


RETIREDFAN1

Recommended Posts

I heard tonight CNN was going to drop another Bombshell.

When Kav was just two months old he exposed himself to his mother of all people during a diaper change.

Fienstein is suppossed to ask for a delay to find out if she will take the stand or if FBI will investigate.

 

Gossip - What ya going to do - lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard that Peter Strzok's sister-in-law works with Christine Blasey Ford's brother. 

Totally a coincidence though. 

Welcome to the show where everything's made up and the truth doesn't matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, osup116 said:

I heard tonight CNN was going to drop another Bombshell.

When Kav was just two months old he exposed himself to his mother of all people during a diaper change.

Fienstein is suppossed to ask for a delay to find out if she will take the stand or if FBI will investigate.

 

Gossip - What ya going to do - lol

Stop screwin’ around & Vote....The Republicans need to Stop indulging this stupidity & Confurm him!😡

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ScreamingEagle said:

It is valid seeing how he’s complaining about the vote being delayed when the Republicans did worse by never allowing a vote to take place. It’s showing how hypocritical they are. 

Just like Democrats would be if they were asked if they believed Bill Clinton's accusers? Hillary doesn't believe them. Do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ScreamingEagle said:

Bring them to testify. If he’s guilty he’s guilty. 

They said Clinton did it. Isn't that enough? I mean, isn't that what's going on with Kavanaugh? Especially with the chorus of "we believe survivors!"

If that's the case, then by definition you must believe Paula Jones and Juanita Broaderick. Correct?

What about the recent story of Cory Booker? Or Keith Ellison? Do YOU believe those women? After all, they said it happened. Again, by definition you have to believe the women. Right?

See where I'm going here?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My view is we are going to have at least 3 to 4 new GOP seat in the senate after the mid term, and if the dimwits succeed in this spectacle and they can only succeed if one or two Senators won't vote for him, that being the two ladies if I was Trump I would find the most conservative judge he can find. I hope the current nominee makes it but retribution for what the dimwits have done to this man and his family should be swift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, ScreamingEagle said:

I’m not saying that I believe them or not. Just that their story deserves to be heard then I could come to a conclusion. 

ALL of them? Even the ones that accused Cory Booker and Keith Ellison? Just want to see how consistent you are. Because if we're supposed to believe women by default when they accuse a man of sexual misconduct (even knowing that sometimes they lie or are possibly politically motivated), then you have to believe Keith Ellison's accuser and Bill Clinton's accusers, too. Correct?

And wouldn't "let them tell their story" or "let them testify" run counter to believing them by default?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 gang rapes? 10?!!!! This woman witnessed TEN gang rapes? 

Uh, was there a point where maybe, oh I dunno, maybe she either tells someone or, uh, doesn't go to a party with these guys

But no...  not only does she NOT tell someone at the time, she waits decades to tell it. THEN, she doesn't tell it immediately once the first charges come out, but she waits....   until what? 

 

Again...  I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Is this real life? If this were a Lifetime movie of the week, I'd be rolling my eyes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ScreamingEagle said:

No it wouldn’t run counter to it. All of them have the right to tell their story.  How many times do I have to say it?

As long as you're consistent.

Then tell me...why are most of the Democrats believing the Cavanaugh accusers, but apparently not believing the Corey Booker, Keith Ellison, and Bill Clinton accusers?

We've heard Paula Jones' story and Juanita Broaddrick's story. Do you believe them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll tell you what's going on.  The liberal activists in conjunction with the dimocrats have gone out and made a list of every potential Constitutional conservative Supreme Court nominee and have begun manufacturing dirt they can use on any one nominated by a republican president.  They can't get their liberal agenda passed through congress so they have undergone staking the courts with left wing activist judges, especially the Supreme Court.  I guarantee you they are manufacturing dirt on every person President Trump has on his list of potential SC nominees ... You can expect this kind of smear campaign on any conservative that gets nominated for the SC from President Trump of any other republican president.  This is what the confirmation process has come down to ... the liberal dimocrats have take in it down to the lowest possible gutter politics imaginable ... can it get any worse? .....

Edited by KirtFalcon
Yo Mama
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ScreamingEagle said:

Jones’ story has some holes in it and Broaddrick’s was even denied by her. Also, how do you know that most Democrats believe that? Have you personally asked most Democrats?

What about Slick Willie flying around with a known pedophile with underage girls and attending "parties" on his private island?  .... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ScreamingEagle said:

Jones’ story has some holes in it and Broaddrick’s was even denied by her. Also, how do you know that most Democrats believe that? Have you personally asked most Democrats?

There are holes in Kavanaugh's accusers stories, too.

Isn't it interesting that the second woman was unsure if it was even Kavanaugh until she met with Democratic lawyers? Do you find that suspicious in any way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Greezychef said:

This is real life.  

Ford: "I am a victim of a crime that happened 36 or maybe 37 years ago. I don't recall any details, but recently remembered that Kavanaugh did it. I want to tell my story. I want to testify before Congress to stop his nomination!"

Congress: "Okay, we will set it up for Monday at 10am."

Ford: "Whoa, wait a minute. I have conditions. I want him to tell his side of the story first."

Kavanaugh: "I have no idea what she's talking about."

Ford: "And I just remembered the names of other people who took part."

Other People: "We have no idea what she's talking about."

Ford: "And my best friend was there, too. She'll back me up."

Best Friend: "I have no idea what she's talking about."

Ford: "And I want a full investigation by the FBI first."

FBI: "Uh, that's actually not what we do."

Ford: "I might not be available Monday at 10am. It depends."

Media: "Kavanaugh is a monster! See how the white male patriarchy is conspiring to destroy her credibility and cover up for his crimes!"

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CarthDawg77 said:

https://apple.news/AU6k7DyHcRrWKX6LEdnlsTA

There is so much “Manufactured 🐂💩” in this story that it isn’t Possible to be believed....

All of them after 2002 after she told her psychiatrist or whatever title they held.  It's her husband, and three close friends.  These weren't people she went to high school with to my knowledge according to the article I read this morning.  Today I heard a third person is coming forward with accusations, but the article didn't post what they were.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ScreamingEagle said:

I’m not saying that I believe them or not. Just that their story deserves to be heard then I could come to a conclusion. 

I wouldn't doubt for a second that it happened to both women in high school and college.  I know how those parties were, and I usually left when stuff like that started happening.  I didn't drink though back then.  I've never seen a "Girls Gone Wild" video, but we know stuff like that happens, and I saw too many teen movies back in the day to say stuff like that didn't happen.  However, to say Kavanaugh did it, and have only an accuser say it doesn't give it much weight in my opinion.  We all heard rumors back in the day.  Some were true, and some weren't.  We already know the FBI has done an investigation on Kavanaugh to vet him for his current position, and past judgeships.  They found nothing then, why do those that oppose him think they'll find something now.  This morning I saw a video of Joe Biden defending Clarence Thomas during his hearing, and he was adamant about the FBI background check on him.  It does seem orchestrated to me though, as soon as one accuser is shot down, here comes another.  They get shot down with no witnesses, and here comes the porn lawyer with another, but no accusations have been made that I know of.  Will there be a fourth ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...