Jump to content
The Smoakhouse Forums

Recommended Posts

I'll take Assange's word for it, just as I did with Jose Canseco on the steroid usage. Jose has yet to be proven wrong an any accusation that he made in his book "Juiced". Assange has yet to lie yet to the public about political behavior. I can't say the same for the accusations Swedish sexual assault case, although it was closed initially.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't trust Assange... but that's okay. I don't trust Putin, Obama, or the mainstream media.

 

But extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Barring that, at least some evidence.

 

If Russia was involved, great. Show me the evidence. But all this posturing is weak sauce. Obama's desperation is showing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't trust Assange... but that's okay. I don't trust Putin, Obama, or the mainstream media.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't get it. For a guy who's spent his entire professional career (and presidency) trying to massage his image, what does he hope to accomplish by picking a fight with freakin' Russia in his last days of office?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't get it. For a guy who's spent his entire professional career (and presidency) trying to massage his image, what does he hope to accomplish by picking a fight with freakin' Russia in his last days of office?

The Rothschilds WANT a war......barry does what he's told by his masters.......just like all the rest of them except Trump and a couple of others........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Rothschilds WANT a war......barry does what he's told by his masters.......just like all the rest of them except Trump and a couple of others........

 

It ain't the Rothschilds that scare me... it's those dang Hardinschilds. :shudder:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't trust Assange... but that's okay. I don't trust Putin, Obama, or the mainstream media.

 

But extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Barring that, at least some evidence.

 

If Russia was involved, great. Show me the evidence. But all this posturing is weak sauce. Obama's desperation is showing.

I don't trust Assange in my computer or around any women, other than that he's been truthful. He might be truthful in what he stating his innocence in Sweden, but I don't know for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^

 

That's the Washington Times, libtarded reporting...remember?

 

The Washington TIMES is one of the only legitimate journals remaining.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uhhh you might want to check your sources on that before you start calling anyone a fool.

How's the NEW YORK TIMES.........

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uhhh you might want to check your sources on that before you start calling anyone a fool.

It was a friendly fool. Like what up foo?

How many times in the past year and a half have I brought up URANIUM ONE?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...