🕵️ The Deep State coup to overthrow Trump

[DAWG91]

3 minutes ago, CarthDawg77 said:

You Cannot charge someone who MIGHT have done something illegal in this country, commie... Go to North Korea if that is your logic.

You also cannot charge someone with the crime of "crime."  Just crime, no specifics.  This is pretty freaking absurd. 

Prosecutor:  your honor the defendant is guilty.

Judge:  guilty of what?

Prosecutor:  being a criminal.

Judge:  what crime did they commit?

Prosecutor:  just plain old criminality. Plus i dont like the mean things the defendant says on twitter.  Grab a rope!

[osup116]

This is so funny  - Dems Go for the impeachment. We will see you in 2024 cause you can kiss this election  goodbye. The truth will come out on how this all got started. While during the impachment proceedings the dem party leaders are served it is not going to look good.

 

 

[REX]

From the latest IG report I present to you Obama's FBI:

 Source: https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

[DAWG91]

The funniest part of all this is that all these libs keep saying the only reason Trump wasnt indicted is because he's a sitting president.  What's lost on them is that,  had he not won the 2016 election,  there would've never even been an "investigation" to begin with.  . This whole charade was 110% political from the start.  If you are too blindly partisan to see that,  then seek help!  Turn off the tv for crying out loud.  They're lying to you....

[Hagar]

M6 biggest laugh was when a reporter ask GoNadler if they’d call Mueller to appear before Congress.  GoNadler went completely speechless for several moments.  I don’t think he wants Mueller to appear, because he fears the questions Repubs may ask.  So essentially he said no.  What a Lick.

[DAWG91]

20 minutes ago, Hagar said:

M6 biggest laugh was when a reporter ask GoNadler if they’d call Mueller to appear before Congress.  GoNadler went completely speechless for several moments.  I don’t think he wants Mueller to appear, because he fears the questions Repubs may ask.  So essentially he said no.  What a Lick.

Barr said,  under oath,  that the justice dept policy of not indicting a sitting potus had NO BEARING on the decision not to prosecute.  Now the muleman comes out today and says it's the only reason they didnt charge potus.  There's only one solution to this:  put Bob Mueller under oath and see if he still says the same thing. I think the lesson from all this ugly mess is that being hated by your opponents doesn't make you a criminal.

[REX]

3 minutes ago, DAWG91 said:

Barr said,  under oath,  that the justice dept policy of not indicting a sitting potus had NO BEARING on the decision not to prosecute.  Now the muleman comes out today and says it's the only reason they didnt charge potus.  There's only one solution to this:  put Bob Mueller under oath and see if he still says the same thing.

That's a cool story bro, but it doesn't explain why no one in the Trump orbit was charged for anything pertinent to the 2016 election....what about Don Jr? What about anyone in the campaign? I'm not talking about BS charges based on unrelated crimes or crimes from a decade ago. So you can't indict a sitting president, ok, what about anyone else?

You know why? Because they got nothing.

[DAWG91]

6 minutes ago, REX said:

That's a cool story bro, but it doesn't explain why no one in the Trump orbit was charged for anything pertinent to the 2016 election....what about Don Jr? What about anyone in the campaign? I'm not talking about BS charges based on unrelated crimes or crimes from a decade ago. So you can't indict a sitting president, ok, what about anyone else?

You know why? Because they got nothing.

Oh believe me, i know.  I made the same point earlier in the thread.  Nevermind potus cant be indicted, NOBODY was indicted.  Not for anything related to collusion or obstruction.  Same old swamp noise.

[DaveTV1]

5 hours ago, DAWG91 said:

Yet nobody NOT the president was charged either.  Nobody.  In fact,  no charges were brought against ANYONE for ANYTHING related to the supposed reasoning for the investigation.  Instead we got idiotic perjury trap indictments meant to strong arm Trump associates into parroting the democrat propaganda,  but none did. Last but not least,  even if justice dept policy allowed for the indictment of a sitting president,  had Trump been indicted for obstruction on this it would've gone nowhere.  Let's not forget these lunatic liberals were saying Trump was colluding by asking russia for hillary's emails during a campaign rally and obstruction was talking bad about the uranium mule and his band of clintonite's on twitter.  So dumb...

Exactly, what were all of Trumps underlings charged with ?  Lying to the F.B.I. .  I've already covered how easy that is.  Manafort was charged with something he did before Trump was even running for office.  Michael Cohen for tax and bank charges from his taxi business.  None of these indictments had anything to do with the election.  Yet people are still clamoring over it.  Amazing how dumb they can be to think President Trump colluded and then covered anything up.  Where are the signs of a cover up ?

[Wild74]

2 minutes ago, DaveTV1 said:

Exactly, what were all of Trumps underlings charged with ?  Lying to the F.B.I. .  I've already covered how easy that is.  Manafort was charged with something he did before Trump was even running for office.  Michael Cohen for tax and bank charges from his taxi business.  None of these indictments had anything to do with the election.  Yet people are still clamoring over it.  Amazing how dumb they can be to think President Trump colluded and then covered anything up.  Where are the signs of a cover up ?

There is no cover up never was, it is nothing more Dave than lying, scub bag dimwits keeping the thing going for political purpose and they are being aided by the also ready to believe a lie media. 

[DaveTV1]

4 hours ago, btex said:

His statement, his letter to Barr, yes they all have a purpose. It is up to congress to look into it more. Now we know the dems will say impeach, that will get no where. The GOP will scream his innocence, but in the end he is not. What should occur is the GOP and DEM should give us some quality candidates for the 2020 election, congress should quit being bought and sold by the highest bidder, and the people should retake our country

What is he guilty of ?  How did Russia help him in any shape manner or form ?  Just show me one piece of evidence.  I realize that many have said that 13 Russians and 3 Russian Companies used propaganda to sway voters where are those supposed meme's , ads, or whatever type of propaganda that they supposedly used that helped get President Trump elected, because I didn't see a single one of them.  What ballot machines were tampered with, and what votes were changed from Hillary to Trump ?  Where is that evidence ?  Where were the supposed rallies held, and who spoke at the rallies ?  Even if the Russians did hold a rally there is nothing wrong with that. They also held rallies for Hillary.  Did she collude with Russia as well ?  http://fortune.com/2018/02/17/russian-organized-rallies-election-meddling/ 

I've seen the last few pages on this, and this thread is the most redundant thread I have seen in the History of SDC, and redundancy is the lowest form of intelligence to me.  The Democrat Socialist Party is the worst at using this tactic believing that if you say it enough times over and over again people will believe it.  That doesn't make it so.  If you're going to impeach Trump do it, and get it done and over with.  The only thing I see with an impeachment process with them is who has enough votes to actually impeach President Trump, so we are seeing the election of a sitting President by the House of Representatives and The Senate, and not based on fact.  When in fact, this was all started with the Steele Report and the FISA courts.  They found nothing to impeach Trump with while spying on his campaign, and they begin another investigation which also delivered a big bag of nothing.  If I thought Trump was guilty, I would be the first to call for it if I could link him to anything worth being impeached over.  I've stated this numerous times that I do not like President Trump as a person, and I never have.  I even made fun of him a few years ago when I saw a cologne in a convenience store with his name on it.  I can say that he is not guilty of colluding with anyone nor is he covering anything up.  There is no evidence to support these accusations, and anyone that thinks there is is just hoping to remove him from his office simply, because they feel the same way I do about him as a person.  As the President of this country I give him an A rating for the things he's done for the people of America.  It's not just for white people, but even people of color. We do have a border crisis, yet the left keeps the blinders on about it.  

[DaveTV1]

4 hours ago, ScreamingEagle said:

I will when he starts demonizing ethnic minorities and putting them in cages away from their families. Oh wait, maybe I will when he begins using the gas chambers. 

Yet you were silent when President Obama did the exact same thing.  Hypocrite.  

[Wild74]

11 minutes ago, DaveTV1 said:

What is he guilty of ?  How did Russia help him in any shape manner or form ?  Just show me one piece of evidence.  I realize that many have said that 13 Russians and 3 Russian Companies used propaganda to sway voters where are those supposed meme's , ads, or whatever type of propaganda that they supposedly used that helped get President Trump elected, because I didn't see a single one of them.  What ballot machines were tampered with, and what votes were changed from Hillary to Trump ?  Where is that evidence ?  Where were the supposed rallies held, and who spoke at the rallies ?  Even if the Russians did hold a rally there is nothing wrong with that. They also held rallies for Hillary.  Did she collude with Russia as well ?  http://fortune.com/2018/02/17/russian-organized-rallies-election-meddling/ 

I've seen the last few pages on this, and this thread is the most redundant thread I have seen in the History of SDC, and redundancy is the lowest form of intelligence to me.  The Democrat Socialist Party is the worst at using this tactic believing that if you say it enough times over and over again people will believe it.  That doesn't make it so.  If you're going to impeach Trump do it, and get it done and over with.  The only thing I see with an impeachment process with them is who has enough votes to actually impeach President Trump, so we are seeing the election of a sitting President by the House of Representatives and The Senate, and not based on fact.  When in fact, this was all started with the Steele Report and the FISA courts.  They found nothing to impeach Trump with while spying on his campaign, and they begin another investigation which also delivered a big bag of nothing.  If I thought Trump was guilty, I would be the first to call for it if I could link him to anything worth being impeached over.  I've stated this numerous times that I do not like President Trump as a person, and I never have.  I even made fun of him a few years ago when I saw a cologne in a convenience store with his name on it.  I can say that he is not guilty of colluding with anyone nor is he covering anything up.  There is no evidence to support these accusations, and anyone that thinks there is is just hoping to remove him from his office simply, because they feel the same way I do about him as a person.  As the President of this country I give him an A rating for the things he's done for the people of America.  It's not just for white people, but even people of color. We do have a border crisis, yet the left keeps the blinders on about it.  

I would like to see impeachment start also so I can see the dimwits evidence that they have found that Mueller didn't

[DaveTV1]

2 hours ago, REX said:

From the latest IG report I present to you Obama's FBI:

 Source: https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

Exactly it was a coup that failed, and now they're covering their tracks with Comey in the lead.  I would guarantee that there were more than just two agents that felt the same way.  We just don't know about that yet.  If anyone knows how to cover their tracks it's the F.B.I. and C.I.A., it's simple that these two were caught with their pants down literally and figuratively.  

[CarthDawg77]

This is great!

[Hagar]

4 hours ago, DaveTV1 said:

Exactly it was a coup that failed, and now they're covering their tracks with Comey in the lead.  I would guarantee that there were more than just two agents that felt the same way.  We just don't know about that yet.  If anyone knows how to cover their tracks it's the F.B.I. and C.I.A., it's simple that these two were caught with their pants down literally and figuratively.  

Brennan & Flapper are throwing Comey under the bus already.   As did Lynch when she said she never told anyone to call it a “matter” about Hillary’s Emails.   It’s CYA time in DC, and it looks like Comey is their scapegoat.   Comey’s Guilty as sin, but there’s many more, like the three above.  

[DAWG91]

God Bless America!

[Hagar]

Great video.   What does it say about the Democrats, when a regular black guy, running his YouTube show, has more sense that they do?  I’m beginning to think quite a few blacks are starting to see the Dems for what they are.  The more that escape from the Plantation, the better off America is.

[TheNameIsDalton]

Yesterday’s presser was a farce meant to be political theatre.

 

1.  Mueller’s words stated “insufficient evidence to support indictment for conspiracy.” (Obstruction for the absence of a crime, which is impossible by the way)

2.  The man then goes on to say he can’t say if the was or wasn’t a crime committed with a crazy play on words Btex quoted over and over yesterday. (So Btex please see #1 on the list.  Also, in the United States of America that mean Innocent)

3.  Mueller was an independent investigator.  Come to find out from a number of legal professionals, he was way out of line with his comments in the presser.  His only job was to present his report to the AG. (Which he did, and the report was read and deciphered by Barr)

4. Continued political pressure from the left forced Mueller to turn the attention to Barr.  The spin from the left is that Barr is covering for Trump, which is far from the truth.  (The actual truth is that Barr has begun an investigation of the investigators.  This has a few people nervous)

5.  The Russia Gate scandal is actually so insignificant it shouldn’t be mentioned.  The catalyst for all this BS was over literally nothing that affected the election.  (The left would have you believe that they hacked voting machines and made changes)

6.  The American people have been experiencing for the last two years the democrats insurance policy.  That’s correct.  This entire exercise was their insurance policy Incase they lost.  They lost, and even before so started their investigation illegally, on the premise they were probably going to win anyway.  

7.  Most of the democrats are yelling for impeachment before and even after yesterday’s press conference.  Why, because there is evidence?  No, there is no evidence.  The real reason?

 

THEY CAN’T BEAT HIM

 

and they know it

 

[KirtFalcon]

Mueller proved yesterday that he is a partisan hack ...

[TheNameIsDalton]

3 minutes ago, KirtFalcon said:

Mueller proved yesterday that he is a partisan hack ...

 

He also kind of broke the law.  His findings are not supposed to be interpreted by him. He presents facts to be interpreted by the AG.  I’m hearing what he did yesterday was highly unethical and immoral.  It was politically motivated.  His one mission was to discredit Barr and turn him into the bad guy.  Mueller is a hack and wimp.  

 

[Wild74]

Either the American people will sour on the democrats continue BS or they will say we can't get rid of all the democrats so lets just get rid of Trump and maybe things will go back to the normal BS

[TheNameIsDalton]

4 minutes ago, btex said:

Hey look my prediction from yesterday was 100% correct. TES is so strong in his followers. 

Piper since he broke the law Barr should charge him. Lets see where it goes.

Funny Trump who is never short on words doesnt want anyone testifying when the report and the people all prove him to be 100% innocent.  

 

 

You do realize that Trump and the White House COOPERATED FULLY and more than they had to for the investigation team?

You do realize after Barr’s findings Trump doesn’t owe you, Congress, or anyone else ANYTHING?

 

I don’t know what your prediction was.  I do know what “insufficient evidence means”.  That means INNOCENT in the USA. 

Due process is clearly spelled out.  It doesn’t matter what terminology Mueller wants to use to muddy the water or suggest there may be more than what his own findings have said.  

 

Mueller has stated “my reports speaks for itself.”

 

Yes it does.  We can all read it.  It’s there for the public.  

 

In the words of Sarah Sanders “Case closed”

[KirtFalcon]

21 hours ago, btex said:

No matter how many times you say it this is the exact words from Mueller.

"If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so," Mueller said. "We did not however make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime."

"It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge," he said.

There should have never been a Mueller "investigation" ... the whole thing was predicated on a phony dossier paid for by the Hilldabeast and the DNC.  Not to mention all the conflicts of interest with Mueller/Comey and all the instigators being Hilldabeast supporters.  This whole thing was a set up and the perpetrators need to be held accountable.  The only thing Donald Trump did that he wasn't supposed to do was win an election ... tru storie ...

[KirtFalcon]

5 minutes ago, btex said:

I said yesterday that we would shortly see the right wing media attack Mueller the person, and PPPPPPPPPOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF here it is. 

If trump was not president he would be preparing for his trial right now

#butthurt Mueller was the "insurance policy" Strzok was referring to .... Mueller was part of the conspiracy to get rid of Trump ... he is as guilty as the rest of the treasonous hacks ...