Jump to content

Recommended Posts

apples and oranges eh? all them Watergate boyz denied it too....... :) Took the news media to get it done.

 

Read a little slower and maybe your liberal mush mind can understand.....THERE WAS REAL LEGITIMATE EVIDENCE on Watergate.....the only "evidence" that they can find now is what some libtard soros #### pulled out of their ....it's all made up.....

 

http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/no-evidence-of-russian-hacking-in-us-election-media-is-silent-about-this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me read a little slower? It's that Pinocchio nose that Breitbart and all your other mind controlled media sources has formed that blocks your ability to see :) I could care less if your boy hoisted one with Putin boyz. If he did, he should have admitted it nor omitted it.

He answered the question he was asked..........:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the bouncing back and forth, 'what's that got to do with it' , I see mention of soros. Yep he's deplorable. Lol, 'what's soros got to do...'

 

I'm wondering if asset forfeiture should first be applied here?

 

In the bouncing back and forth, 'what's that got to do with it' , I see mention of soros. Yep he's deplorable. Lol, 'what's soros got to do...'

 

I'm wondering if asset forfeiture should first be applied here?

 

rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to recuse myself from ever hearing "nothing burger" or "there is no there there" ever again :ermm:

 

It's clearly a nothing burger and there is no there there.........just more dimnazis trying to make their lies stick..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The “Alternative Government” Vs. Trump
March 3, 2017

President Trump gave a good speech on Tuesday night, but his presidency is still hanging by a thread. Attorney Larry Klayman says an “alternative government” in the intelligence community continues to target him. “These intelligence agencies are more powerful than the president himself,” Klayman said [1] on the Fox Business Network. “They have the ability to blackmail people in this administration to the point that the American people’s interests are going to be subverted.”

Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch, said, “How can he [President Trump] represent the interests of the American people when he knows the NSA is likely wiretapping everything he says with foreign leaders and everyone else?”

It may seem like ancient history, but the media used to be concerned about surveillance of American citizens by U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies. After President Trump was elected, such concern suddenly disappeared. In fact, the media became the recipients of illegal leaks of private conversations by Trump administration officials. One such leak forced the resignation of national security adviser Michael T. Flynn.

Claude Barfield, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), writes [2] that there was nothing improper with U.S. intelligence surveillance of phone calls to and from the Russian ambassador. However, in regard to Flynn, existing law does not permit the NSA or FBI to “listen to the communications of Americans who may be caught in…eavesdropping.”

The allegation that Flynn violated “the ancient 18th century Logan Act that forbids diplomatic activity by private U.S. citizens is no longer relevant, according to almost all legal experts,” notes Barfield. So the wiretaps could not be justified on that flimsy basis.

Flynn was forced out on the equally spurious grounds that he forgot to tell Vice President Mike Pence about elements of the conversations he had with the Russian official.

Barfield says that “a criminal—and certainly civil rights—violation did occur with the public leaks of the details of his conversations with the foreign ambassador from someone (or some persons) in the intelligence community.” The leak violated the Espionage Act, which makes intentional disclosure of classified “communications intelligence activities” a felony. What’s more, citing Timothy H. Edgar of Brown University, it is also a crime for national security officials “to leverage legitimate foreign intelligence collection to reveal public information in order to damage [an] individual they do not believe should serve.”

It is well-known that Flynn’s appointment as national security adviser was opposed by elements in the intelligence community, especially the CIA.

Edgar writes [3] that “Flynn himself may be the first victim of civil liberties abuse during the Trump administration.” He says, “If officials had concerns about Flynn, the law requires they lodge those complaints through the system and not through leaks.”

This means that some intelligence officials viewed Flynn as a threat and wanted him out, using any means possible.

Edgar suggests that Flynn call the ACLU for legal help, but a far better course of action would be to call litigator Larry Klayman, who says it’s clear that “the NSA is spying on the President, his White House, and the administration in general.”

Klayman believes that “loyalists to former President Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, and their leftist comrades” are behind the illegal surveillance.....

http://www.worldviewweekend.com/news/article/alternative-government-vs-trump

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mr. P changed the title to 🕵️ The Deep State coup to overthrow Trump

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...