Jump to content

Flat Earth Wackos vs. Scripture, Science and a Spherical Earth.......


CarthDawg77

Recommended Posts

If I was so gullible it wouldn't have taken me 2 years of looking into it. Nobody would ever willingly become a flerfer. We know how far the mainstream goes to make it look crazy. Propaganda has molded the minds of the masses into sheep and they dont even notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I used to think was gullible.  Example: Light scientifically gets dimmer the further away it gets. 

Photo 1: NASA Surface of Mars 2020.

Photo 2:  231,000,000 miles later, that same dull surface is now the 2nd brightest light in our night sky after the moon.

 

 

26034_Perseverance-Looks-Out-Over-Seitah.jpg

dGhVC.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mav01 said:

If I was so gullible it wouldn't have taken me 2 years of looking into it. Nobody would ever willingly become a flerfer. We know how far the mainstream goes to make it look crazy. Propaganda has molded the minds of the masses into sheep and they dont even notice.

Propaganda is exactly what has turned the gullible into flat earth loons .... the ridiculous :poop: you post on here is a prime example ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
5 hours ago, KirtFalcon said:

The first video was not flat, it was slightly curved .... dont know why the difference,  but it still doesnt prove the earth is flat ....

It's not slightly curved, the light bending over the horizon can make you think that for a second or two, especially if the camera is jumpy. No curvature or spin has ever been observed. This would be the easiest thing to prove if it were real. Why would mainstream continually add their own curve? Why not just let it be? The last video is from higher up(almost double)and still no curve...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CarthDawg77 said:

You would think they could just fly over to the edge & peek below... I can’t see Any soldiers up here! Or, at least reach out & slap that invisible wall for us....🧐🤔😬

Would be nice, but no private forms of transportation using fuel is allowed within a certain distance of Antarctica. We gotta keep them penguins safe but everywhere else on earth is fair game to trash and remove resources. Btw, Antarctica is full of natural resources.

I dont know why you keep saying it's full of soldiers.?  Military isn't even allowed due to the treaty. Why not look up the treaty to get a better understanding of things if you question it? That "edge" has you baffled.

I understand others having a hard time with FE but I didnt figure you of all people would struggle so much. Then again, it took me way longer than most to finally realize it without any doubts. I probably still would be iffy on it if not for the Bible backing it up with about 200 verses.

  • LOL! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mav01 said:

It's not slightly curved, the light bending over the horizon can make you think that for a second or two, especially if the camera is jumpy. No curvature or spin has ever been observed. This would be the easiest thing to prove if it were real. Why would mainstream continually add their own curve? Why not just let it be? The last video is from higher up(almost double)and still no curve...

It WAS slightly curved ... also i have seen hundreds of unretouched reconnaissance air still and video raw footage taken at high altitude from SR71 and U2 aircraft that shows the earths curvature ... also zero footage of your imaginary "wall" or "edge" .... I had regular contact with a few of those pilots who flew recon missions out of Osan, AB and a couple of other classified bases and if your flat earth nonsense was true, those brave and patriotic pilots would have been talking about it .... I have given you a few other examples that blow your flat earth nonsense out of the water but you are so gullible   :bait:  with all this manufactured  internet flat earth nonsense you don't know your  10164.pngfrom a hole in the ground ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KirtFalcon said:

It WAS slightly curved ... also i have seen hundreds of unretouched reconnaissance air still and video raw footage taken at high altitude from SR71 and U2 aircraft that shows the earths curvature ... also zero footage of your imaginary "wall" or "edge" .... I had regular contact with a few of those pilots who flew recon missions out of Osan, AB and a couple of other classified bases and if your flat earth nonsense was true, those brave and patriotic pilots would have been talking about it .... I have given you a few other examples that blow your flat earth nonsense out of the water but you are so gullible   :bait:  with all this manufactured  internet flat earth nonsense you don't know your  10164.pngfrom a hole in the ground ....

You really think the military industrial complex is going to allow lower ranking individuals or anyone they cant trust to do anything that blatantly disproves what NASA has been working so hard to prove? Theres tons of pilots AND military specialists that have spoken out,  saying that they couldn't do their job correctly unless the earth was flat and stationary. Just took a little extra thought on their part to realize it. Your "pilots" saw curve from what heights,  because I've seen countless amateur footage from high altitudes that show no curve.? Unless a wide angle lense was used to create the convex and concave effect. 

Air"planes" on their own disprove the globe with just a tiny bit of critical thinking. "Cruising altitude" would not be possible over long distances. Then spin adds a whole new set of problems. Unless you actually believe that the atmosphere AND blackness of outer space spin with us everywhere we go. Which is 3 or 4 different directions according to "science". This sir is " gullible" in my book, but agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mav01 said:

Would be nice, but no private forms of transportation using fuel is allowed within a certain distance of Antarctica. We gotta keep them penguins safe but everywhere else on earth is fair game to trash and remove resources. Btw, Antarctica is full of natural resources.

I dont know why you keep saying it's full of soldiers.?  Military isn't even allowed due to the treaty. Why not look up the treaty to get a better understanding of things if you question it? That "edge" has you baffled.

I understand others having a hard time with FE but I didnt figure you of all people would struggle so much. Then again, it took me way longer than most to finally realize it without any doubts. I probably still would be iffy on it if not for the Bible backing it up with about 200 verses.

You are the one who keeps saying “Antarctica is on lockdown”... that takes Soldiers; Lots of them to prevent ANYBODY from getting by to see, touch & Feel the Dome you speak of;  With respect to “The Treaty”; What treaty? & The Military isn’t even allowed to go to the edge?😳😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CarthDawg77 said:

You are the one who keeps saying “Antarctica is on lockdown”... that takes Soldiers; Lots of them to prevent ANYBODY from getting by to see, touch & Feel the Dome you speak of;  With respect to “The Treaty”; What treaty? & The Military isn’t even allowed to go to the edge?😳😂

Antarctic Treaty that was signed by all major countries shortly after it was explored by the military in the 50s.  Admiral Byrd had some interesting things to say about it after exploring by plane. One being that it was stocked full with resources. It's the longest standing treaty still in place.. Treaties dont tend to last this long. Especially if theres money to be made.

You do realize Antarctica is the coldest most barren place in the world? It's also the highest land mass in the world.  The ice wall ranges from 200 to 500 feet in most places. Military isnt directly needed to keep people away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mav01 said:

Antarctic Treaty that was signed by all major countries shortly after it was explored by the military in the 50s.  Admiral Byrd had some interesting things to say about it after exploring by plane. One being that it was stocked full with resources. It's the longest standing treaty still in place.. Treaties dont tend to last this long. Especially if theres money to be made.

You do realize Antarctica is the coldest most barren place in the world? It's also the highest land mass in the world.  The ice wall ranges from 200 to 500 feet in most places. Military isnt directly needed to keep people away. 

Okay... Have a nice day!😬👌

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mav01 said:

You really think the military industrial complex is going to allow lower ranking individuals or anyone they cant trust to do anything that blatantly disproves what NASA has been working so hard to prove? Theres tons of pilots AND military specialists that have spoken out,  saying that they couldn't do their job correctly unless the earth was flat and stationary. Just took a little extra thought on their part to realize it. Your "pilots" saw curve from what heights,  because I've seen countless amateur footage from high altitudes that show no curve.? Unless a wide angle lense was used to create the convex and concave effect. 

Air"planes" on their own disprove the globe with just a tiny bit of critical thinking. "Cruising altitude" would not be possible over long distances. Then spin adds a whole new set of problems. Unless you actually believe that the atmosphere AND blackness of outer space spin with us everywhere we go. Which is 3 or 4 different directions according to "science". This sir is " gullible" in my book, but agree to disagree.

You are as full of :poop: as a th.jpeg-20.jpgth.jpeg-21.jpg

Edited by KirtFalcon
yo mama
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RETIREDFAN1 changed the title to Flat Earth Wackos vs. Scripture, Science and a Spherical Earth.......
  • RETIREDFAN1 locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...