Jump to content
The Smoakhouse Forums

Pleasant Grove (11-2) vs. Pittsburg (10-3) Class 4A (D-II) Quarterfinals


Who wins  

112 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins

    • Pittsburg
      35
    • Pleasant Grove
      77


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 345
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hats off to both teams for making it this far. I will be heading that way as a neutral fan to see who will be representing our district from here out. Safe travels to all that are traveling. Looking f

Same thing that some Gilmer fans said for the second game

My phone put the H at the end.  Defending champion Pleasant Grove ,(Notice the defending champion at the beginning) will be ready. 

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, Unbiased1 said:

That is not accurate. I watched the game on the internet, it was PI, and the announcers even agreed. He completely cut off his route not having a clue where the ball was. And don’t start with the adopted stripe family, Pitt got a huge penalty and scored after Jimmerson was sacked for a big loss. ALL of the personal fouls were good calls. I can honesty say I didn’t see the recovery, so not arguing that. 

So your saying it wasn’t defensive holding?   Just for the fun of it I will watch the game again.   But you do have a right to be wrong on the PI on 19.   It wasn’t.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, downtheline said:

So your saying it wasn’t defensive holding?   Just for the fun of it I will watch the game again.   But you do have a right to be wrong on the PI on 19.   It wasn’t.   

They showed a replay of the PI call and I still thought it was. I can assure you if it wasn’t called the PG faithful would be growling. The game didn’t come down to those penalties. There were 2 INTs and one for pick six, that was the difference in that game. Pitt could not get running game rolling, and take away that pick six, and they walk out of there winners. Way too many variables in that game to blame officiating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tip my hat to the Pirates! This was one of those games where you felt the loss of Jackson. Jimmerson wasn’t hardly touched and he made the Hawks pay for it. The Pitt receivers had some serious YAC. Bruce Garrett is just a beast! Tough as nails. Pitt shredded the Hawks secondary even when we knew it was coming. I stand corrected on Pitt. They are indeed a much better team than I thought. 4th qtr drive for PG was textbook clock killing. Almost 7 minutes on that drive. Great job by all of the players. What a great game! Made the miserable drive in the rain worth it. 

GO HAWKS!

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, unclebubba said:

Watched it on the internet.  Great game!  Both teams have a lot to be proud of.  Officiating played no role in the outcome!

Any idea where and when they’ll play Iowa park. Should be a bit easier, Holliday beat them 14-0 in their opening gm this season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, DocAcs15 said:

I don’t think Pitt’s depth was an issue like everyone thought it would be.  Legs looked pretty fresh at the end of the game.

 i would agree

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, toohottohandle said:

What a game!!  It was a great game to watch and too bad anyone had to lose. Pretty sure PG will back to back.

not so fast...gotta win next friday and then beat silsbee or cuero(most likely)

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hobby said:

Great game PG hate we lost but we did feel like this was the state game after watching GR and Iowa Park Hope y'all win it all and yes you do miss #40

You said it! Landon’s absence was felt in this one. Burris is solid but we simply cannot get pressure on QBs without blitzing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats PG. Pitt is obviously a solid opponent but 41 points scored on PG...what happened? That is not good...

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, DocAcs15 said:

I don’t think Pitt’s depth was an issue like everyone thought it would be.  Legs looked pretty fresh at the end of the game.

yeah, playing at the Star helps that out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nonothing said:

Congrats PG. Pitt is obviously a solid opponent but 41 points scored on PG...what happened? That is not good...

IMO, the Pitt QB and WRs were hands down the best PG has seen, and will see this year. They were just that good.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Nonothing said:

Congrats PG. Pitt is obviously a solid opponent but 41 points scored on PG...what happened? That is not good...

No pressure on Jimmerson and I mean NONE! He had time to get the ball to receivers in open space! When they were in open space they were nothing short of almost impossible to tackle. Not since Atlanta had the Grove given up 40 points. I am not impressed with # 23 on the Hawks don’t know what happened to 21 but #23 looks like he is scared or something. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...