BarryLaverty Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 ‘Details’ are not innuendo and memes and right wing blogs and radio rambling, but bigger point, Kurt, is there a low you won’t go to about women who are Democrats in leadership roles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue82 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 28 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: Oh to them it is Barry! If Alex Jones says so then its fact. Kinda like the Sandy Hook Shooting being some fakes government conspiracy. I just get a kick out of the loons who buy the garbage . Yet look the other way when it is proven Donald Paid off Pornstars and Playmates. Oh but this... its disqualifying for Harris if its true. ha ha To be clear, I couldn’t care less about Kamala’s or anyone else’s personal lives. Her policy preferences are what disqualifies her from getting my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarthDawg77 Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 https://apple.news/AebZMuoFSS5S8lzLf9k3SVA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Rab Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 13 minutes ago, CarthDawg77 said: https://apple.news/AebZMuoFSS5S8lzLf9k3SVA so basically, they are going to help poor people buy $300,000 homes that they couldn't afford on their salaries... even with $25k down... not to mention $100B that we don't have and can't afford... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osup116 Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 And will be taken away in less than 5 years because taxes will not be paid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarthDawg77 Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, osup116 said: And will be taken away in less than 5 years because taxes will not be paid And valued at about 1/10th what they originally sold for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarthDawg77 Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, btex said: This seems like an absolutely stupid plan.............. Agreed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Rab Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 11 hours ago, btex said: This seems like an absolutely stupid plan.............. If it gains traction, every democrat nominee will support it and have their own version of it. Guaranteed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarryLaverty Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 ‘Redlining’ is an issue for a lot of people in my neck of the woods, but it relates to affordable homeowners insurance with roof coverage. Couple that with sky high property taxes, and you can quickly price people under on the backend, so don’t see the value of helping with home ownership, if that isn’t addressed, first. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarthDawg77 Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said: ‘Redlining’ is an issue for a lot of people in my neck of the woods, but it relates to affordable homeowners insurance with roof coverage. Couple that with sky high property taxes, and you can quickly price people under on the backend, so don’t see the value of helping with home ownership, if that isn’t addressed, first. Here’s a novel idea... How about people only buy houses which They can afford to pay for! If they want a nicer home, get a better job which pays more so that buying and paying for it is not a burden to themselves, OR OTHER TAXPAYERS....IT Really Works!🤨 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Rab Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 11 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said: ‘Redlining’ is an issue for a lot of people in my neck of the woods, but it relates to affordable homeowners insurance with roof coverage. Couple that with sky high property taxes, and you can quickly price people under on the backend, so don’t see the value of helping with home ownership, if that isn’t addressed, first. Plans like this one, while I don't think it is realistic and just a play for more votes, is why we had the housing crisis before. When the income doesn't match the property, yet people give them money anyway... what happens (ed)? The housing market crashed. Foreclosures took over Atlanta, GA while I was there. The state affected the least by this crisis and the George Bush free money Oprah style giveaway was Texas. Why? Anyone? Has to do mostly with the largely conservative law making that made land and housing affordable during the recession... Ms. Harris needs to study up on the Lone Star state before she does something that would be devastating and really make us sell out to China like many feared during the Recession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 8 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: Another Lie. Banning assault weapons is NOT banning all guns. I support the act of banning assault weapons even by executive order. It's veiled in the wording. How many shootings are actually done with a so-called "assault weapon" versus a handgun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 She doesn't consider the constitution when makes those kind of statements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 18 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said: Mass Shooting are done overwhelmingly with Assault style weapons. Do you have a link to back that up? What about the daily shootings in places like Chicago that aren't committed by "assault" weapons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarthDawg77 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 *Kamala Harris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Rab Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 5 hours ago, GunnyHighway said: Mass Shooting are done overwhelmingly with Assault style weapons. But the Claim on the post is a Lie. She want Assault weapons gone. NOT all guns. So the post is just a LIE. In 2012, there were 8,855 total firearm-related homicides in the United States, with 6,371 of those attributed to handguns. In 2012, 64% of all gun-related deaths in the U.S. were suicides. In 2010, there were 19,392 firearm-related suicides, and 11,078 firearm-related homicides in the U.S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Her radical agenda and dishonesty would spell doom for her in the general election ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REX Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 WASHINGTON — Kamala Harris bemoaned the influence of the powerful and connected elite last Tuesday when she called on top Justice Department officials to recuse themselves from any matter related to Jeffrey Epstein. She said their former law firm's work on behalf of the financier accused of sexual abuse "calls into question the integrity of our legal system." Yet the same day, Harris' husband headlined a Chicago fundraiser for her presidential campaign that was hosted by six partners of that firm — Kirkland and Ellis, according to an invitation obtained by The Associated Press. Harris, a California senator and Democratic presidential candidate, was one of several White House hopefuls to blast the handling of Epstein's case in Florida a decade ago, when his lawyers negotiated a deal with federal prosecutors that allowed him to avoid the possibility of years in prison. But her decision to move ahead with the fundraiser hosted by Kirkland and Ellis partners while criticizing the firm underscores the tension that can arise when a politician's rhetoric collides with his or her need to raise money to sustain a presidential campaign. "If any connection with Kirkland and Ellis is a stain on (senior Justice Department officials), why isn't a connection with the law firm for the receipt of campaign contributions a stain on her own campaign?" said Paul S. Ryan, an attorney for the good-government group Common Cause. Ian Sams, a Harris spokesman, said there wasn't a problem with accepting the campaign contributions because the firm is big and the partners who hosted the fundraiser didn't work on Epstein's plea agreement. "The people involved in that case have not supported her campaign, and she wouldn't want that support anyway," Sams said. The firm and the six partners named on the event invitation did not respond to requests for comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REX Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 Source here: Yahoo News Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarthDawg77 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 Kamala Harris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNameIsDalton Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 She’s trash. She needs to go back to where she is from as well. Hahaha!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REX Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 Twitter deemed presidential hopeful Kamala Harris utterly “destroyed,” after fellow candidate Tulsi Gabbard landed dizzying verbal haymakers on the former California prosecutor. Naturally, ‘Russian bots’ were swiftly blamed. Wednesday night’s Democratic debate was not an enjoyable one for Harris, who went into the faceoff as a darling of the media and among the frontrunners for her party’s nomination. On the stage in Detroit, Hawaiian Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard grilled Harris on her record as California’s attorney general. In under a minute, Gabbard shredded Harris to pieces for jailing more than 1,500 nonviolent marijuana offenders while admitting in a radio interview that she had smoked marijuana in college, and for her “tough-on-crime” stances. “She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row… she kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor… and she fought to keep the cash bail system in place,” Gabbard continued, leaving Harris unable to counter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REX Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 https://www.rt.com/usa/465579-kamala-harris-destroyed-tulsi/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now