Jump to content

💩 Sen. Kamala Harris (D-California) for President?


RETIREDFAN1

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said:

Oh to them it is Barry! If Alex Jones says so then its fact. Kinda like the Sandy Hook Shooting being some fakes government conspiracy. I just get a kick out of the loons who buy the garbage . Yet look the other way when it is proven Donald Paid off Pornstars and Playmates. Oh but this... its disqualifying for Harris if its true. ha ha

To be clear, I couldn’t care less about Kamala’s or anyone else’s personal lives. Her policy preferences are what disqualifies her from getting my vote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘Redlining’ is an issue for a lot of people in my neck of the woods, but it relates to affordable homeowners insurance with roof coverage. Couple that with sky high property taxes, and you can quickly price people under on the backend, so don’t see the value of helping with home ownership, if that isn’t addressed, first. 

  • Stinks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

‘Redlining’ is an issue for a lot of people in my neck of the woods, but it relates to affordable homeowners insurance with roof coverage. Couple that with sky high property taxes, and you can quickly price people under on the backend, so don’t see the value of helping with home ownership, if that isn’t addressed, first. 

Here’s a novel idea... How about people only buy houses which They can afford to pay for! If they want a nicer home, get a better job which pays more so that buying and paying for it is not a burden  to themselves, OR OTHER TAXPAYERS....IT Really Works!🤨

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

‘Redlining’ is an issue for a lot of people in my neck of the woods, but it relates to affordable homeowners insurance with roof coverage. Couple that with sky high property taxes, and you can quickly price people under on the backend, so don’t see the value of helping with home ownership, if that isn’t addressed, first. 

Plans like this one, while I don't think it is realistic and just a play for more votes, is why we had the housing crisis before.  When the income doesn't match the property, yet people give them money anyway... what happens (ed)?  The housing market crashed.  Foreclosures took over Atlanta, GA while I was there.  The state affected the least by this crisis and the George Bush free money Oprah style giveaway was Texas.  Why?  Anyone?  Has to do mostly with the largely conservative law making that made land and housing affordable during the recession...  Ms. Harris needs to study up on the Lone Star state before she does something that would be devastating and really make us sell out to China like many feared during the Recession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GunnyHighway said:

Another Lie. Banning assault weapons is NOT banning all guns. I support the act of banning assault weapons even by executive order.

It's veiled in the wording. How many shootings are actually done with a so-called "assault weapon" versus a handgun?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GunnyHighway said:

Mass Shooting are done overwhelmingly with Assault style weapons.  But the Claim on the post is a Lie. She want Assault weapons gone. NOT all guns. So the post is just a LIE.

In 2012, there were 8,855 total firearm-related homicides in the United States, with 6,371 of those attributed to handguns. In 2012, 64% of all gun-related deaths in the U.S. were suicides. In 2010, there were 19,392 firearm-related suicides, and 11,078 firearm-related homicides in the U.S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WASHINGTON — Kamala Harris bemoaned the influence of the powerful and connected elite last Tuesday when she called on top Justice Department officials to recuse themselves from any matter related to Jeffrey Epstein. She said their former law firm's work on behalf of the financier accused of sexual abuse "calls into question the integrity of our legal system."

Yet the same day, Harris' husband headlined a Chicago fundraiser for her presidential campaign that was hosted by six partners of that firm — Kirkland and Ellis, according to an invitation obtained by The Associated Press.

Harris, a California senator and Democratic presidential candidate, was one of several White House hopefuls to blast the handling of Epstein's case in Florida a decade ago, when his lawyers negotiated a deal with federal prosecutors that allowed him to avoid the possibility of years in prison. But her decision to move ahead with the fundraiser hosted by Kirkland and Ellis partners while criticizing the firm underscores the tension that can arise when a politician's rhetoric collides with his or her need to raise money to sustain a presidential campaign.

"If any connection with Kirkland and Ellis is a stain on (senior Justice Department officials), why isn't a connection with the law firm for the receipt of campaign contributions a stain on her own campaign?" said Paul S. Ryan, an attorney for the good-government group Common Cause.

Ian Sams, a Harris spokesman, said there wasn't a problem with accepting the campaign contributions because the firm is big and the partners who hosted the fundraiser didn't work on Epstein's plea agreement.

"The people involved in that case have not supported her campaign, and she wouldn't want that support anyway," Sams said.

The firm and the six partners named on the event invitation did not respond to requests for comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Twitter deemed presidential hopeful Kamala Harris utterly “destroyed,” after fellow candidate Tulsi Gabbard landed dizzying verbal haymakers on the former California prosecutor. Naturally, ‘Russian bots’ were swiftly blamed.

Wednesday night’s Democratic debate was not an enjoyable one for Harris, who went into the faceoff as a darling of the media and among the frontrunners for her party’s nomination. On the stage in Detroit, Hawaiian Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard grilled Harris on her record as California’s attorney general.

In under a minute, Gabbard shredded Harris to pieces for jailing more than 1,500 nonviolent marijuana offenders while admitting in a radio interview that she had smoked marijuana in college, and for her “tough-on-crime” stances. “She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row… she kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor… and she fought to keep the cash bail system in place,” Gabbard continued, leaving Harris unable to counter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...