old school offenses

[Mr. P]

1 hour ago, upullinmychain said:

Yes sir please 

Done! 

[TheShadowKnows]

On 8/13/2019 at 2:55 PM, Destry said:

Do you foresee more old school offenses this year than in the past? 

It depends if some of these towns want to give thier kids a chance to win or whether they want to get thier “athlete” the ball in space. 

[trueblue82]

1 hour ago, Destry said:

Sounds like he forgot who brung him to the dance

Not sure who you’re referring to. 

[Valhalla]

1 hour ago, JV_COACH said:

It depends if some of these towns want to give thier kids a chance to win or whether they want to get thier “athlete” the ball in space. 

I would think that if you can consistently get the ball into the hands of your best athletes then it is a successful offense.

[trueblue82]

45 minutes ago, Valhalla said:

I would think that if you can consistently get the ball into the hands of your best athletes then it is a successful offense.

I don’t care how good the athletes are, if you don’t get the blocking right, you’re not beating good football teams consistently. 

[Destry]

Just now, trueblue82 said:

Not sure who you’re referring to. 

 

Just now, trueblue82 said:

Not sure who you’re referring to. 

He ran the single wing and made huge improvements and the playoffs. Now he is abandoning the wing in favor of the spread.

[trueblue82]

22 minutes ago, Destry said:

 

He ran the single wing and made huge improvements and the playoffs. Now he is abandoning the wing in favor of the spread.

Ok I see. I don’t disagree with you. Having spoken to a couple of different head coaches, they told me last year that the single wing was much more difficult to prepare for. That was during the season. 

[Vandalman]

Old school at it's best.    Now this is smashmouth.  

 

[upullinmychain]

If you can't defend option football,yall in trouble from the get go. Small school ball is eat up with one variant of the wing or other anymore..people are getting away from the spread more and more.seems coaches come in and take over a program and then jump into misdirection football to give their team a fighting chance till they develope their own system 

I have no problem what so ever with that,growing up in an Era where power run was the norm and controlling the Los was a goal every line coach preached.

Worked many an hour on technic and lived in the weight room...lol

[1jacket]

@ AKA can you add me an EF avatar ?.

[Mr. P]

6 hours ago, 1jacket said:

@ AKA can you add me an EF avatar ?.

Done!

[Mr. P]

5 minutes ago, Greezychef said:

Nice choice.  Can you do me a San Augustine one?

[1jacket]

Thanks AKA, that looks sweet...

[randomuser]

21 hours ago, Vandalman said:

Old school at it's best.    Now this is smashmouth.  

 

Lead/load option, 28/29F, power, veer and a lot of buck sweep in that clip.

[TheShadowKnows]

On 8/15/2019 at 4:34 PM, Valhalla said:

I would think that if you can consistently get the ball into the hands of your best athletes then it is a successful offense.

Not all best athletes are created equal. 

[Valhalla]

1 hour ago, JV_COACH said:

Not all best athletes are created equal. 

That’s true, but the point is to utilize the athletes you have so your offense should be designed to get them the ball in places for them to be successful.

[ronnyham]

On 8/14/2019 at 8:50 PM, Valhalla said:

 

I am a spread guy, but I want to spread it out to run the ball. You can still have an effective ball control offense in spread formations. You dont have to encourage all eleven defenders to be in the box.

I think that’s a good plan as long as you have a QB and WR that they have to respect. If not, now you have less men to create blocking angles, have to have a lot more 1on1 blocks which for some schools is a bad idea. But there are 1000 ways to skin a cat obviously 

[Brahmaball]

Good old school offenses are great. Smashmouth football shows you who has good character when they get run over and react by either getting up and playing even harder or getting out of the way playing scared.