Jump to content
The Smoakhouse Forums
Sign in to follow this  
WestHardinfan1

Primary/Caucus Number Comparisons

Recommended Posts

In Iowa, there were 30,495 citizens who voted in the Republican Caucus....as soon as the dims finish cheating bernie and release their "numbers" I'll post them and compare....we'll keep a running total as the primary/caucus season rolls on, though with the caveat that in open primary states some republicans may be voting in the dim primary to try to stir things up.......:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iowa: 

GOP.....30,495

DIM.....TBD

 

Total to date:

GOP....30,495

DIM.....TBD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, WestHardinfan1 said:

Iowa: 

GOP.....30,495

DIM.....TBD

 

Total to date:

GOP....30,495

DIM.....TBD

It could take Weeks to tabulate the “Found Votes”....🤨

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CarthDawg77 said:

It could take Weeks to tabulate the “Found Votes”....🤨

Yeah...and I can't wait to hear the libnuts on here bragging about numbers........the dim numbers will be huge and the GOP numbers won't all because the GOP primary for President is meaningless.....lol....I MAY cross over and vote bernie in the Texas primary just to screw things up for the dimturd establishment.......:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't pay attention to caucus numbers, because many people do not even vote in those. It also doesn't take into account Independent voters.  I'm not a registered Republican to my knowledge anymore.  I know when I first went to register to vote I did check Republican, but I have never voted in a single caucus.  Mainly, because I'm usually working on those dates.  I think that most Americans vote when the main elections are held. Even in National Elections voter turnout is low.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the Party who wants everything under gov't control?



Hard pass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dimtards in Iowa screwed up so bad we STILL don't have numbers.....maybe we will get some from New Hampshire tonight.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, WestHardinfan1 said:

Dimtards in Iowa screwed up so bad we STILL don't have numbers.....maybe we will get some from New Hampshire tonight.......

They've had 8 days to count, and no hanging chads.  They must have a bunch of chimps counting for them.  I take that back.  Chimps are smarter than those idiots in Iowa.  

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DaveTV1 said:

They've had 8 days to count, and no hanging chads.  They must have a bunch of chimps counting for them.  I take that back.  Chimps are smarter than those idiots in Iowa.  

 

🙊🙉🙈

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

9 25.7% 71,759
9 24.4% 68,141
6 19.8% 55,164
0 9.3% 25,899
0 8.4% 23,475
0 3.6% 10,035
0 3.2% 9,001
0 2.8% 7,880
0 0.4% 1,195
0 0.3% 905
0 0.1% 143
0 0.1% 137
0 0.1% 123
0 0.1% 96
0 0.1% 86
0 0.1% 81
0 0.1% 80
0 0.1% 76
0 0.1% 66
0 0.1% 64
0 0.1% 55
0 0.1% 51
0 0.1% 46
0 0.1% 38
0 0.1% 30
0 0.1% 29
0 0.1% 27
0 0.1% 24
0 0.1% 22
0 0.1% 19
0 0.1% 11
0 0.1% 10
0 0.1% 9
 
Other candidates
0 1.5% 4,063

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 85.5% 120,476
0 9.2% 12,949
0 0.6% 850
0 0.6% 794
0 0.3% 478
0 0.3% 402
0 0.2% 242
0 0.1% 191
0 0.1% 135
0 0.1% 111
0 0.1% 78
0 0.1% 69
0 0.1% 66
 
avatar_anonymous.png
0 0.1% 61
0 0.1% 61
0 0.1% 58
0 0.1% 45
 
Other candidates
0 2.7% 3,855

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both of those with 87% reported.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was a humanities major...  so what's the total votes by party?    ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, AKA said:

I was a humanities major...  so what's the total votes by party?    ;) 

STILL waiting for 100% from Iowa AND New Hampshire......these dims don't know how to count evidently.......:rofl:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, WestHardinfan1 said:

STILL waiting for 100% from Iowa AND New Hampshire......these dims don't know how to count evidently.......

A former student of mine posted this on his Facebook: 

Quote

For the turnout for incumbents going back to Reagan in New Hampshire, here are the respective counts:
76,797 Bill Clinton
65,033 Ronald Reagan
52,962 George W. Bush
49,080 Barack Obama

Trump has 114,466 without even the final numbers in yet, with just 84 percent of the vote in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, AKA said:

A former student of mine posted this on his Facebook: 

120476 with 87% reported......

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, WestHardinfan1 said:

120476 with 87% reported......

That seems like a lot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, AKA said:

That seems like a lot. 

More than any other incumbent has ever received.....hard to do when there isn't a real race in your primary....many people cross over and vote in the contested one.....lol.....I'm thinking about getting people here to cross over and vote for bernie........:rofl:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, WestHardinfan1 said:

More than any other incumbent has ever received.....

But haven't they heard that orange man is bad? 

It's enough to make a man question his faith in the power of the mainstream media.  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seen a post by someone complaining that The Burn had more votes in both Iowa and NH but was two delegates behind  Buttplugg. I think ole Burn is starting to feel the shaft from Buttplug so to speak....😎

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, WestHardinfan1 said:

More than any other incumbent has ever received.....hard to do when there isn't a real race in your primary....many people cross over and vote in the contested one.....lol.....I'm thinking about getting people here to cross over and vote for bernie........:rofl:

They tried to pin that on Wesley Hunt who is running for the 7th Congressional District.  He did so for "Operation Chaos".  I support him, so hopefully people will do their research.  https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/politics/texas/article/Houston-GOP-candidate-Wesley-Hunt-explains-old-14957294.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...now that Iowa finally figured out how to count, let's try this again........

100% reporting
Votes displayed are State Delegate Equivalents, which represent the number of state convention delegates that determine how many pledged delegates each candidate will receive
    Votes
Candidate Delegates Percent Count
13 26.2% 563
12 26.1% 562
8 18% 388
6 15.8% 340
1 12.3% 264
0 1% 22
0 0.3% 7
0 0% 0
0 0% 0
0 0% 0
0 0% 0
0 0% 0
 
Uncommitted
0 0.2% 4
 
Other candidates
0 0.1%

1   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
100% reporting
40 delegates available
    Votes
Candidate Delegates Percent Count
39 97.1% 31,464
1 1.3% 426
0 1.1% 348
 
Other candidates
0 0.5% 151

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...