Jump to content
The Smoakhouse Forums

Elysian Fields @ Harleton


Elysian Fields @ Harleton   

42 members have voted

  1. 1. Elysian Fields @ Harleton

    • Jackets
      32
    • Wildcats
      10

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, BIGILL79 said:

Sitting 5 starters is a bold move but in a non-district contest somewhat understandable. Hind sight is always 20/20. My feeling is that pre-district games are like glorified practice. It’s nice to win but not necessary. However, you have to get your starters the reps to fine tune themselves for District. Harmony should do well in District 9. Definitely should make the post season.

Sitting 5 starters makes a hugh difference, I wonder was it due to injuries. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Saw video. From the point where Harleton went up 14-6 midway thru the first qt it was 38-6 EF. That is with EF getting inside the 20 a few times and not scoring.  A fumble that killed a drive.  EF pla

EF by two 30 packs. 

EF by as many as Ford will allow ! EF handing out some cans of WHOOP ... well some reality pie anyways. 

Posted Images

I can't remember a time I've seen 5 starters given the night off because the coach didn't figure he would need them that night, even in a non-district game. I've seen them pulled after the half, but can't recall ever seeing them sat all night for anything other than discipline or injury. Sounds like a good excuse for a loss though. I saw Harmony get tired on defense after #24 pounded on them and the Harleton defense stand tall. Just what I saw though.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mavgrad98 said:

I can't remember a time I've seen 5 starters given the night off because the coach didn't figure he would need them that night, even in a non-district game. I've seen them pulled after the half, but can't recall ever seeing them sat all night for anything other than discipline or injury. Sounds like a good excuse for a loss though. I saw Harmony get tired on defense after #24 pounded on them and the Harleton defense stand tall. Just what I saw though.

No coach is just going to sit 5 starters week 4 because they think they’ll win. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mavgrad98 said:

I can't remember a time I've seen 5 starters given the night off because the coach didn't figure he would need them that night, even in a non-district game. I've seen them pulled after the half, but can't recall ever seeing them sat all night for anything other than discipline or injury. Sounds like a good excuse for a loss though. I saw Harmony get tired on defense after #24 pounded on them and the Harleton defense stand tall. Just what I saw though.

That doesn’t mean starters didn’t play. Backup players can get tired. Even moreso. 
 

i never said that the coach said their were not injuries. Just that if he thought they were really going to need them to win, they probably all would have played. 
 

but add this was a non dist game, he felt they could win anyway, the best decision for his team was to sit them. 
 

i give all the credit to Harleton for beating them no matter who lined up. 
 

i have no dog in the fight, all you can do is play who is on the field. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Eagle1986 said:

Harmony also sat 5 starters against Harleton per their coach.  Didn’t want to risk injury and thought they could win anyway. Over calculation on his part. But in a non dist game, guess he could gamble like that.  Harleton will play hard, but just doesn’t have the depth and talent that EF does. In the 2 games i have watched online for EF they just bring waves of talent at every position. At RB they have 4 guys that are studs, 7,4,11,1 and I know 4 is really not a RB but can play it along with WR and TE. Not counting his play at LB. at QB one of the best Dual threats in East Texas.  OL is 7 deep.  WR has weapons all over, I do hope the injury to 17 last week will have him back soon. 
 

DL is 8 deep of very solid guys and that is not really counting big 72 that they haven’t really had to use that much on defense, but he will be so much fresher imo the final 3 dist games. The LB’s are probably best group in 3A you will see.  4,31,11, 7.   They bring it.   Also have depth behind them. 
 

I see this game pretty lopsided after maybe a tight first qt. 

Gonna call bull💩 on this excuse.  

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NATUREBOY98 said:

Gonna call bull💩 on this excuse.  

Agreed nobody sits 5 starters lol now I know I seen a lot of young guys playing for Harmony when we played them so that’s prob more the problem. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was stated on the FSSW Friday Night Football App that Harmony had 4 starters out when we played them, week 1.  I recall the same 4 starters were out when we played them last season as well. Now 5 sat...something contagious I guess.😉3868142A-F92B-40E2-9FBA-929610A14035.jpeg

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Wild74 said:

120348355_10219129077517432_378113121049

Thank you sir!

If that was the line, I'd definitely take the Jackets to cover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take the over as well! 39 pts.... In the words of Joe Biden, "Come on man!"

(I realize it's an algorithm spitting that score out) 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BIGILL79 said:

I would take the over as well! 39 pts.... In the words of Joe Biden, "Come on man!"

(I realize it's an algorithm spitting that score out) 

I think we win by 21+ and set my prediction on score for a total of 48 I think they try shorten game so we might only score 35 or so. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This comes up every now and then due to the rivalry of the two schools so I did some searching, actually a lot of searching and found all but 4 scores

 

                    Waskom VS EF Series

Year played and score

1.      1938  No Game

2.      1939  No Game

3.      1940   EF 26 Waskom 6      First Game in Series

4.      1941   EF 41 Waskom 20 

5.      1942   Waskom 27 EF 6    & Waskom 20 EF 18 Waskom & EF played twice.

6.      1943 EF 19 Waskom 14 Marshall archives

7.      1944

8.      1945

9.      1946 EF 14 Waskom 8 

10.   1947 Waskom 36 EF 7   

11.   1948 Waskom 25 EF 12  

12.   1949 Waskom 22 EF 12 

13.   1950  EF 32 Waskom 12

14.   1951 Waskom 52 EF 31 & Waskom 18 EF 12

15.   1952 

16.   1953  EF 30 Waskom 20

17.   1954  EF Vs. Waskom  Waskom lost Andrew Philpot

18.   1955  EF 54 Waskom 12

19.   1956  EF 18 Waskom 6

20.   1957

21.   1958  EF 28 Waskom 0

22.   1959  Waskom 54 EF 0 

23.   1960  Waskom 8 EF 8

24.   1961  Waskom 44 EF 0 

25.   1962  Waskom 42 EF 0

26.   1963  Waskom 56 EF 6

27.   1964  Waskom 28 EF 20

28.   1965  Waskom 22 EF 22 Tie Per Steve Ratcliff Game played at EF

29.   1966  Waskom 22 EF 0 

30.   1967  EF 48 Waskom 0

31.   1968  Waskom 46 EF 0

32.   1969  Waskom 47 EF 0

33.   1970  EF 51 Waskom 0

34.   1971  EF 27 Waskom 0

35.   1972  Waskom 26 EF 13 

36.   1973  Waskom 14 EF 0  

37.   1974  Waskom 8 EF 7

38.   1975   Waskom 30 EF 20

39.   1976   Waskom 39 EF 6

40.   1977   Waskom 27 EF 0

41.   1978   Waskom 19 EF 7

42.   1979 Waskom 19 EF 0

43.   1980 Waskom 32 EF 12

44.   1981 Waskom 27 EF 20

45.   1982   EF 26 Waskom 13

46.   1983 Waskom 46 EF 8

47.   1984 EF 25 Waskom 8

48.   1985 EF 14 Waskom 0

49.   1986 EF 56 Waskom 0

50.   1987 Waskom 14 EF 14

51.   1988 Waskom 38 EF 16

52.   1989 EF 30 Waskom 14

53.   1990 EF 9 Waskom 0

54.   1991 EF 34 Waskom 7 Found score Panola Watchman Archives

55.   1992 Waskom 54 EF 0

56.   1993 Waskom 7 EF 0

57.   1994 Waskom 13 EF 12

58.   1995   EF 22 Waskom 20

59.   1996   EF 42 Waskom 32

60.   1997   EF 28 Waskom 12

61.   1998   EF 54 Waskom 12

62.   1999   EF 43 Waskom 0

63.   2000   EF 22 Waskom 15

64.   2001   EF 43 Waskom 0

65.   2002   EF 45 Waskom 13

66.   2003   EF 34 Waskom 7

67.   2004   EF 21 Waskom 7

68.   2005   Waskom 28 EF 14

69.   2006   EF 34 Waskom 18

70.   2007   EF 48 Waskom 3

71.   2008   EF 42 Waskom 12

72.   2009   EF 41 Waskom 0

73.   2010   EF 41 Waskom 14

74.   2011   EF 21 Waskom 14

75.   2012   EF 41 Waskom 33

76.   2013   Waskom 60 EF 13

77.   2014   Waskom 49 EF 26

78.   2015   Waskom 45 EF 0

79.   2016   EF 40 Waskom 20

80.   2017 Waskom 30 EF 27

81.   2018 Waskom 28 EF 26

82.   2019 Waskom 28 EF 19

Waskom 38 Wins EF 38 Wins 3 ties   could not find 4 years’ worth of scores

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Wild74 said:

This comes up every now and then due to the rivalry of the two schools so I did some searching, actually a lot of searching and found all but 4 scores

 

                    Waskom VS EF Series

Year played and score

1.      1938  No Game

2.      1939  No Game

3.      1940   EF 26 Waskom 6      First Game in Series

4.      1941   EF 41 Waskom 20 

5.      1942   Waskom 27 EF 6    & Waskom 20 EF 18 Waskom & EF played twice.

6.      1943 EF 19 Waskom 14 Marshall archives

7.      1944

8.      1945

9.      1946 EF 14 Waskom 8 

10.   1947 Waskom 36 EF 7   

11.   1948 Waskom 25 EF 12  

12.   1949 Waskom 22 EF 12 

13.   1950  EF 32 Waskom 12

14.   1951 Waskom 52 EF 31 & Waskom 18 EF 12

15.   1952 

16.   1953  EF 30 Waskom 20

17.   1954  EF Vs. Waskom  Waskom lost Andrew Philpot

18.   1955  EF 54 Waskom 12

19.   1956  EF 18 Waskom 6

20.   1957

21.   1958  EF 28 Waskom 0

22.   1959  Waskom 54 EF 0 

23.   1960  Waskom 8 EF 8

24.   1961  Waskom 44 EF 0 

25.   1962  Waskom 42 EF 0

26.   1963  Waskom 56 EF 6

27.   1964  Waskom 28 EF 20

28.   1965  Waskom 22 EF 22 Tie Per Steve Ratcliff Game played at EF

29.   1966  Waskom 22 EF 0 

30.   1967  EF 48 Waskom 0

31.   1968  Waskom 46 EF 0

32.   1969  Waskom 47 EF 0

33.   1970  EF 51 Waskom 0

34.   1971  EF 27 Waskom 0

35.   1972  Waskom 26 EF 13 

36.   1973  Waskom 14 EF 0  

37.   1974  Waskom 8 EF 7

38.   1975   Waskom 30 EF 20

39.   1976   Waskom 39 EF 6

40.   1977   Waskom 27 EF 0

41.   1978   Waskom 19 EF 7

42.   1979 Waskom 19 EF 0

43.   1980 Waskom 32 EF 12

44.   1981 Waskom 27 EF 20

45.   1982   EF 26 Waskom 13

46.   1983 Waskom 46 EF 8

47.   1984 EF 25 Waskom 8

48.   1985 EF 14 Waskom 0

49.   1986 EF 56 Waskom 0

50.   1987 Waskom 14 EF 14

51.   1988 Waskom 38 EF 16

52.   1989 EF 30 Waskom 14

53.   1990 EF 9 Waskom 0

54.   1991 EF 34 Waskom 7 Found score Panola Watchman Archives

55.   1992 Waskom 54 EF 0

56.   1993 Waskom 7 EF 0

57.   1994 Waskom 13 EF 12

58.   1995   EF 22 Waskom 20

59.   1996   EF 42 Waskom 32

60.   1997   EF 28 Waskom 12

61.   1998   EF 54 Waskom 12

62.   1999   EF 43 Waskom 0

63.   2000   EF 22 Waskom 15

64.   2001   EF 43 Waskom 0

65.   2002   EF 45 Waskom 13

66.   2003   EF 34 Waskom 7

67.   2004   EF 21 Waskom 7

68.   2005   Waskom 28 EF 14

69.   2006   EF 34 Waskom 18

70.   2007   EF 48 Waskom 3

71.   2008   EF 42 Waskom 12

72.   2009   EF 41 Waskom 0

73.   2010   EF 41 Waskom 14

74.   2011   EF 21 Waskom 14

75.   2012   EF 41 Waskom 33

76.   2013   Waskom 60 EF 13

77.   2014   Waskom 49 EF 26

78.   2015   Waskom 45 EF 0

79.   2016   EF 40 Waskom 20

80.   2017 Waskom 30 EF 27

81.   2018 Waskom 28 EF 26

82.   2019 Waskom 28 EF 19

Waskom 38 Wins EF 38 Wins 3 ties   could not find 4 years’ worth of scores

1944 & 1945 they may not have even played due to the War and 52 & 57 I could not find the scores in the Waskom annuals. So this years game will see the tie broken if someone doesn't come of with a score from those years missing. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Wild74 said:

This comes up every now and then due to the rivalry of the two schools so I did some searching, actually a lot of searching and found all but 4 scores

 

                    Waskom VS EF Series

Year played and score

1.      1938  No Game

2.      1939  No Game

3.      1940   EF 26 Waskom 6      First Game in Series

4.      1941   EF 41 Waskom 20 

5.      1942   Waskom 27 EF 6    & Waskom 20 EF 18 Waskom & EF played twice.

6.      1943 EF 19 Waskom 14 Marshall archives

7.      1944

8.      1945

9.      1946 EF 14 Waskom 8 

10.   1947 Waskom 36 EF 7   

11.   1948 Waskom 25 EF 12  

12.   1949 Waskom 22 EF 12 

13.   1950  EF 32 Waskom 12

14.   1951 Waskom 52 EF 31 & Waskom 18 EF 12

15.   1952 

16.   1953  EF 30 Waskom 20

17.   1954  EF Vs. Waskom  Waskom lost Andrew Philpot

18.   1955  EF 54 Waskom 12

19.   1956  EF 18 Waskom 6

20.   1957

21.   1958  EF 28 Waskom 0

22.   1959  Waskom 54 EF 0 

23.   1960  Waskom 8 EF 8

24.   1961  Waskom 44 EF 0 

25.   1962  Waskom 42 EF 0

26.   1963  Waskom 56 EF 6

27.   1964  Waskom 28 EF 20

28.   1965  Waskom 22 EF 22 Tie Per Steve Ratcliff Game played at EF

29.   1966  Waskom 22 EF 0 

30.   1967  EF 48 Waskom 0

31.   1968  Waskom 46 EF 0

32.   1969  Waskom 47 EF 0

33.   1970  EF 51 Waskom 0

34.   1971  EF 27 Waskom 0

35.   1972  Waskom 26 EF 13 

36.   1973  Waskom 14 EF 0  

37.   1974  Waskom 8 EF 7

38.   1975   Waskom 30 EF 20

39.   1976   Waskom 39 EF 6

40.   1977   Waskom 27 EF 0

41.   1978   Waskom 19 EF 7

42.   1979 Waskom 19 EF 0

43.   1980 Waskom 32 EF 12

44.   1981 Waskom 27 EF 20

45.   1982   EF 26 Waskom 13

46.   1983 Waskom 46 EF 8

47.   1984 EF 25 Waskom 8

48.   1985 EF 14 Waskom 0

49.   1986 EF 56 Waskom 0

50.   1987 Waskom 14 EF 14

51.   1988 Waskom 38 EF 16

52.   1989 EF 30 Waskom 14

53.   1990 EF 9 Waskom 0

54.   1991 EF 34 Waskom 7 Found score Panola Watchman Archives

55.   1992 Waskom 54 EF 0

56.   1993 Waskom 7 EF 0

57.   1994 Waskom 13 EF 12

58.   1995   EF 22 Waskom 20

59.   1996   EF 42 Waskom 32

60.   1997   EF 28 Waskom 12

61.   1998   EF 54 Waskom 12

62.   1999   EF 43 Waskom 0

63.   2000   EF 22 Waskom 15

64.   2001   EF 43 Waskom 0

65.   2002   EF 45 Waskom 13

66.   2003   EF 34 Waskom 7

67.   2004   EF 21 Waskom 7

68.   2005   Waskom 28 EF 14

69.   2006   EF 34 Waskom 18

70.   2007   EF 48 Waskom 3

71.   2008   EF 42 Waskom 12

72.   2009   EF 41 Waskom 0

73.   2010   EF 41 Waskom 14

74.   2011   EF 21 Waskom 14

75.   2012   EF 41 Waskom 33

76.   2013   Waskom 60 EF 13

77.   2014   Waskom 49 EF 26

78.   2015   Waskom 45 EF 0

79.   2016   EF 40 Waskom 20

80.   2017 Waskom 30 EF 27

81.   2018 Waskom 28 EF 26

82.   2019 Waskom 28 EF 19

Waskom 38 Wins EF 38 Wins 3 ties   could not find 4 years’ worth of scores

@Timboslice79see up until the last couple years EF was ahead and now it’s tied which makes this year an even more interesting game I can’t wait! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...