Jump to content

Tucker Carlson:'Trump's Lawyer Refused To Show Evidence of Fraud'


BarryLaverty

Recommended Posts

Wow, when Tucker turns on you so completely and calls you on your nonsense, shouldn't you be tucking your 'conservative' tail and calling it a day? What say you, @Wild74

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tucker-carlson-trumps-attorney-got-angry-when-they-pressed-her-for-evidence-of-voter-fraud-062143725.html

Tucker Carlson claims Trump's attorney 'got angry' when they pressed her for evidence of voter fraud

Stephen Proctor
·2 min read
 
 
 

On Tucker Carlson Tonight Thursday, rather than push the idea of a fraudulent presidential election, Carlson called out one of President Trump’s attorneys, Sidney Powell, for failing to provide evidence of fraud. Powell has repeatedly claimed that voting machines were rigged in favor of Joe Biden, and that Trump actually won the election by millions of votes. In a bizarre press conference earlier in the day, Powell even claimed that deceased Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who died in 2013, had something to do with the rigging of the machines. Carlson said that he has tried on numerous occasions to get Powell to appear on the show and provide evidence backing up her claims, but to no avail.

“We took Sidney Powell seriously. We had no intention of fighting with her, we’ve always respected her work,” Carlson said. “We simply wanted to see the details. How could you not want to see them? So we invited Sidney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour. We would have given her the entire week, actually, and listened quietly the whole time at rapt attention. That’s a big story. But she never sent us any evidence despite a lot of requests, polite requests. Not a page. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her.”

In stark contrast to Powell’s claims, officials at the Department of Homeland Security released a statement saying that the 2020 presidential election was the most secure in U.S. history. According to Carlson, despite Powell’s continued insistence that the machines were rigged, she has yet to provide evidence of such, even to the Trump campaign.

“We checked with others around the Trump campaign, people in positions of authority, they told us Powell has never given them any evidence either, nor did she provide any today at the press conference,” Carlson said. “Powell did say that electronic voting is dangerous, and she’s right, we’re with her there. But she never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one.”

 
  • Stinks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the lawyer did not tip his hand, when the media is in on the corruption. 

 Barry your so full of Bolshevik it is not even funny anymore. You call good evil and evil good, so when it comes to how you see things, you have no moral ability to see, the truth. You can see your feels all day long, but objective truth is far beyond your post-modern thinking. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

HER hand, you mean? She didn't 'tip her hand' on a huge Trump backer's show on a national stage which could bolster his case? Yeah, that sounds very normal. 

You dumb son of a Barry, you do not tip your hand to anybody. The case does not need to tipped to anybody,  you post proves that the Bolsheviks were watching also.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you give your Supreme Court argument to Tucker Carlson. 

Why would you tell anyone who might spill the beans to media. 

Media does not run our country. 

Bad Spin 

Good Job Yahoo - Good Job Tucker 

Only person who needs evidence is ABC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, osup116 said:

Why would you give your Supreme Court argument to Tucker Carlson. 

Why would you tell anyone who might spill the beans to media. 

Media does not run our country. 

Bad Spin 

Good Job Yahoo - Good Job Tucker 

Only person who needs evidence is ABC

So you feel that legal matters really should be conducted like Perry Mason? 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Old49er60 said:

I do not share his politics but according to you guys anyone who does not line up with President Trump must be a liberal. I have asked for evidence a number of times on here and nothing is produced. When some conspiracy theory is thrown out and shown false you guys claim everyone is lying. It just shows that President Trump has power over some and so much so that they will refuse to look at facts. 

You have yet to produce anything more than opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Puh-leaze. All Trump has is the public domain to spin his yarns. This lawyer realized that she had nothing of legal worth to share, and she was trying to save herself humiliation. 

Not Really he has lawyers - and 4 constitutional Justices 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...