TheShadowKnows Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 Why the Left Has to Suppress Free Speech January 19, 2021 Updated: January 19, 2021 biggersmaller Print Let us begin with this fact: The left always suppresses speech. Since Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917, there has been no example of the left in control and not crushing dissent. That is one of the important differences between liberal and left: Liberalism and liberals believe in free speech. (The present leftist threat to freedom in America, the greatest threat to freedom in American history, is made possible because liberals think they have more to fear from conservatives than from the left. Liberals don’t understand that the left regards liberals as their useful idiots.) The left controls universities. There is little or no dissent allowed at universities. The left controls nearly every “news” medium. There is little or no dissent in the mainstream media—not in the “news” sections and not in the opinion sections. The left controls Hollywood. No dissent is allowed in Hollywood. That is why we have “cancel culture”—the silencing and firing of anyone who publicly dissents from the left, and even “publicly” is no longer necessary. The National Association of Realtors has just announced that if you express dissenting views (on race, especially) in private, you may be fined and lose your membership in the organization—which effectively ends your career as a realtor. So, we return to the opening question: Why does the left need to crush all dissent? This is a question made all the more stark because there is no parallel on the right: Conservatives don’t shut down dissent or debate. The answer, though the left will not acknowledge it, is the left fears dissent. And they do so for good reason. Leftism is essentially a giant balloon filled with nothing but hot air. Therefore, no matter how big the balloon—the Democratic Party, The New York Times, Yale University—all it takes is a mere pin to burst it. Leftism is venerated by intellectuals. But there is little intellectual substance to leftism. It is a combination of doctrine and emotion. The proof? Those with intellectual depth don’t stifle dissent; they welcome it. That is why universities are so opposed to conservatives coming to speak on campus. One articulate conservative can undo years of left-wing indoctrination in a one-hour talk or Q and A. I know this from personal experience on campuses. You can, too. Watch the speeches given by any conservatives allowed to speak on a campus—many of these talks are still on YouTube—and you will see large halls filled with students yearning to hear something other than left-wing pablum. Look at their faces, filled with rapt attention to ideas they never heard that are clearly having an impact. Universities are entirely right to fear our coming to speak. We come with the pin that bursts their $50,000-a-year balloon. That is also why it is so hard to get any of them to debate any of us. In 35 years of radio, I have never mistreated or bullied a guest. I was unfailingly polite to an icon of the left, Howard Zinn, the America-hating author of the America-hating “A People’s History of the United States.” I even invited a UCLA political science professor and violinist, one of seven members of the Santa Monica Symphony Orchestra who refused to play when I conducted the orchestra in a Joseph Haydn symphony in the Disney Concert Hall—solely because I’m a conservative. Despite his public letter, in which he accused me of holding “horribly bigoted positions” and wrote, “Please urge your friends to not attend this concert, which helps normalize bigotry in our community,” I nevertheless invited him on my national radio show. He agreed. I had him in studio for an entire hour and treated him and his wife (who accompanied him) with great respect, despite my contempt for his false accusations and his advocacy of the cancel culture. Every American should hear that hour. Unfortunately for the emotional and intellectual health of our society, he, Zinn, and a few others were anomalies. Of the 100 or so left-wing authors, professors, and columnists invited to appear on my show, almost none has responded in the affirmative. They prefer NPR, where they are never challenged. The opposite, however, isn’t true: Every conservative intellectual I know says yes to every one of the (very few) left-wing invitations we receive. Of course, we are almost never invited. We regularly invite leftists. Leftists almost never invite us. They claim it’s because we are not up to their intellectual level and they have no desire to waste their time. One would think that the opportunity to publicly show how vapid we conservatives really are would be too good to pass up. Leftists don’t debate us or appear as guests on our shows and prevent us from speaking whenever possible, because they (correctly) fear conservatives. Race-baiters such as Ibram X. Kendi or Ta-Nehisi Coates or “White Fragility” author Robin DiAngelo would never debate Larry Elder, for example. Why won’t they? Because they would be shown to be the intellectually shallow purveyors of hate they are. Deep down, they know it. Larry Elder is one of many conservative black intellectuals who left-wing blacks (and whites) refuse to debate. Now you know why the left suppresses free speech: because they have to. If there is free speech, there is dissent. And if there is dissent, there is no more left. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShadowKnows Posted January 19, 2021 Author Share Posted January 19, 2021 Just now, BoHogg said: Exhibit A. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObiOne Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 4 minutes ago, TheShadowKnows said: Exhibit A. Have you heard one liberal on this site condemn censoring the voices of conservatives? I haven't. I have seen several support it though. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShadowKnows Posted January 19, 2021 Author Share Posted January 19, 2021 1 minute ago, ObiOne said: Have you heard one liberal on this site condemn censoring the voices of conservatives? I haven't. I have seen several support it though. Their religion is statism, so I do not expect them to understand anything other then to bark when they hear the dog whistle and gnash their teeth when they hear the truth instead of the dog whistle. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 11 minutes ago, ObiOne said: Have you heard one liberal on this site condemn censoring the voices of conservatives? I haven't. I have seen several support it though. And note that they use silly emojis instead of attempting to refute what's in the article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 Just now, BoHogg said: @RETIREDFAN1see your own is turning on you like Trump has Nah....i started doing it to piss off libnuts.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 17 minutes ago, BoHogg said: @RETIREDFAN1see your own is turning on you like Trump has To be fair, you didn't exactly attempt to refute the article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlahBlah Posted January 19, 2021 Share Posted January 19, 2021 1 hour ago, TheShadowKnows said: Their religion is statism, so I do not expect them to understand anything other then to bark when they hear the dog whistle and gnash their teeth when they hear the truth instead of the dog whistle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamewatcher63 Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 4 hours ago, BoHogg said: BoHogg...more of a useful idiot by the minute...keep up the good work, Comrade... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepeSilvia Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 4 hours ago, TheShadowKnows said: Why the Left Has to Suppress Free Speech January 19, 2021 Updated: January 19, 2021 biggersmaller Print Let us begin with this fact: The left always suppresses speech. Since Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917, there has been no example of the left in control and not crushing dissent. That is one of the important differences between liberal and left: Liberalism and liberals believe in free speech. (The present leftist threat to freedom in America, the greatest threat to freedom in American history, is made possible because liberals think they have more to fear from conservatives than from the left. Liberals don’t understand that the left regards liberals as their useful idiots.) The left controls universities. There is little or no dissent allowed at universities. The left controls nearly every “news” medium. There is little or no dissent in the mainstream media—not in the “news” sections and not in the opinion sections. The left controls Hollywood. No dissent is allowed in Hollywood. That is why we have “cancel culture”—the silencing and firing of anyone who publicly dissents from the left, and even “publicly” is no longer necessary. The National Association of Realtors has just announced that if you express dissenting views (on race, especially) in private, you may be fined and lose your membership in the organization—which effectively ends your career as a realtor. So, we return to the opening question: Why does the left need to crush all dissent? This is a question made all the more stark because there is no parallel on the right: Conservatives don’t shut down dissent or debate. The answer, though the left will not acknowledge it, is the left fears dissent. And they do so for good reason. Leftism is essentially a giant balloon filled with nothing but hot air. Therefore, no matter how big the balloon—the Democratic Party, The New York Times, Yale University—all it takes is a mere pin to burst it. Leftism is venerated by intellectuals. But there is little intellectual substance to leftism. It is a combination of doctrine and emotion. The proof? Those with intellectual depth don’t stifle dissent; they welcome it. That is why universities are so opposed to conservatives coming to speak on campus. One articulate conservative can undo years of left-wing indoctrination in a one-hour talk or Q and A. I know this from personal experience on campuses. You can, too. Watch the speeches given by any conservatives allowed to speak on a campus—many of these talks are still on YouTube—and you will see large halls filled with students yearning to hear something other than left-wing pablum. Look at their faces, filled with rapt attention to ideas they never heard that are clearly having an impact. Universities are entirely right to fear our coming to speak. We come with the pin that bursts their $50,000-a-year balloon. That is also why it is so hard to get any of them to debate any of us. In 35 years of radio, I have never mistreated or bullied a guest. I was unfailingly polite to an icon of the left, Howard Zinn, the America-hating author of the America-hating “A People’s History of the United States.” I even invited a UCLA political science professor and violinist, one of seven members of the Santa Monica Symphony Orchestra who refused to play when I conducted the orchestra in a Joseph Haydn symphony in the Disney Concert Hall—solely because I’m a conservative. Despite his public letter, in which he accused me of holding “horribly bigoted positions” and wrote, “Please urge your friends to not attend this concert, which helps normalize bigotry in our community,” I nevertheless invited him on my national radio show. He agreed. I had him in studio for an entire hour and treated him and his wife (who accompanied him) with great respect, despite my contempt for his false accusations and his advocacy of the cancel culture. Every American should hear that hour. Unfortunately for the emotional and intellectual health of our society, he, Zinn, and a few others were anomalies. Of the 100 or so left-wing authors, professors, and columnists invited to appear on my show, almost none has responded in the affirmative. They prefer NPR, where they are never challenged. The opposite, however, isn’t true: Every conservative intellectual I know says yes to every one of the (very few) left-wing invitations we receive. Of course, we are almost never invited. We regularly invite leftists. Leftists almost never invite us. They claim it’s because we are not up to their intellectual level and they have no desire to waste their time. One would think that the opportunity to publicly show how vapid we conservatives really are would be too good to pass up. Leftists don’t debate us or appear as guests on our shows and prevent us from speaking whenever possible, because they (correctly) fear conservatives. Race-baiters such as Ibram X. Kendi or Ta-Nehisi Coates or “White Fragility” author Robin DiAngelo would never debate Larry Elder, for example. Why won’t they? Because they would be shown to be the intellectually shallow purveyors of hate they are. Deep down, they know it. Larry Elder is one of many conservative black intellectuals who left-wing blacks (and whites) refuse to debate. Now you know why the left suppresses free speech: because they have to. If there is free speech, there is dissent. And if there is dissent, there is no more left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 Just now, gamewatcher63 said: BoHogg...more of a useful idiot by the minute...keep up the good work, Comrade... You sound mad, tomorrow will cheer you up at noon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamewatcher63 Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 9 minutes ago, JETT said: You sound mad, tomorrow will cheer you up at noon I will probably be sitting on the toilet around that time...will be previewing the incoming administration 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 6 minutes ago, gamewatcher63 said: I will probably be sitting on the toilet around that time...will be previewing the incoming administration Don't be so hypocritical, give your new president a chance LMMFAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamewatcher63 Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 5 minutes ago, JETT said: Don't be so hypocritical, give your new president a chance LMMFAO He will be forever known as an illegitimate president...74 million voters plus 26% of independents and even 10% of democrat voters think the election was stolen. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-president-trump-robbed-poll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 2 minutes ago, gamewatcher63 said: He will be forever known as an illegitimate president...74 million voters plus 26% of independents and even 10% of democrat voters think the election was stolen. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-president-trump-robbed-poll Pull up how many ppl think trump should've been impeached and removed from office during trial while your at it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 10 hours ago, JETT said: You sound mad, tomorrow will cheer you up at noon Not a Democrat, huh?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 9 hours ago, JETT said: Don't be so hypocritical, give your new president a chance LMMFAO You should’ve done that too. Hypocrite much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HearEmaGrowlin Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 10 hours ago, JETT said: Don't be so hypocritical, give your new president a chance LMMFAO Yet you never gave Trump a chance. The never Trumpers from both sides are just swamp rats who didn’t want Trump messing up their get wealthy off their position within the government scheme. The one thing the Founding Fathers missed was not putting term limits on elected officials. Had they done that Nancy Pelosi wouldn’t have a mansion she paid for with underhanded deals with lobbyists or foreign nations. Also, we’d have way more folks who are there to actually serve our country for a relatively short time and then go back to their normal life. I understand that can derail your career outside of politics so make the limit four or five terms so being a Senator, etc would be a short career in and of itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 10 hours ago, JETT said: Don't be so hypocritical, give your new president a chance LMMFAO I gave Barry sotero 100 days before commenting because he won legitimately......pedojoe can kiss off...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 1 hour ago, DB2point0 said: Not a Democrat, huh?! Nope, but I'd rather any republican or Democrat as long as they aren't a trump FACTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 1 hour ago, DB2point0 said: You should’ve done that too. Hypocrite much? I said that in a sarcastic way to bait clowns in and lucky me I got a bite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShadowKnows Posted January 20, 2021 Author Share Posted January 20, 2021 12 hours ago, JETT said: Don't be so hypocritical, give your new president a chance LMMFAO Most American media has become no different from the state-controlled media in China. In addition, major social media platforms are censoring peoples’ voices. And they are doing so almost exclusively to members of just one political party or viewpoint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShadowKnows Posted January 20, 2021 Author Share Posted January 20, 2021 15 hours ago, BlahBlah said: I agree your religion is a bore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted January 20, 2021 Share Posted January 20, 2021 14 minutes ago, TheShadowKnows said: I agree your religion is a bore. You know his religion by a emoji? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now