Jump to content

Chauvin trial: Another false media narrative collapses


RETIREDFAN1

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Monte1076 said:

We'll never really know, but I wonder how the jury is interpreting things.

I also wonder why so many women on the jury? 
id like to hear both attorneys arguments for and against the makeup of the jury, that would be interesting to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trashyhound said:

I also wonder why so many women on the jury? 
id like to hear both attorneys arguments for and against the makeup of the jury, that would be interesting to me. 

Well, remember, during jury selection, the judge can dismiss jurors as well. But I believe the prosecutor and the defense attorney have to agree on the jury. They can both strike "for cause" or "pass" for cause. If I'm not mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Monte1076 said:

Well, remember, during jury selection, the judge can dismiss jurors as well. But I believe the prosecutor and the defense attorney have to agree on the jury. They can both strike "for cause" or "pass" for cause. If I'm not mistaken.

I believe you’re correct, but I’m not sure. 
But regardless, knowing why both sides strike, pass, or agree would be interesting to hear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trashyhound said:

She didn’t seem biased at all. (Sarcasm)

 She nodded right along with the prosecution at every question she’d been prepped for, and shook her head no or looked confused when answering the defense. Even questions with obvious answers asked by the defense she balked at. Regardless of her intellect, her integrity is nonexistent. 

I was talking about dude who did autopsy my bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...