Monte1076 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 If anyone's interested in reading it. Seems to only be 4 pages. https://mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/High-Profile-Cases/27-CR-20-12646/Notice-of-Motion-and-Motion.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 The other jurors need to come out and say it did or did not influence me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted May 5, 2021 Author Share Posted May 5, 2021 4 minutes ago, JETT said: The other jurors need to come out and say it did or did not influence me I don't know if the judge will call them back in for further questioning or not. I don't know how many of them want their names/faces revealed. Do you think Chauvin has a case for a possible mistrial/retrial? I really don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, Monte1076 said: I don't know if the judge will call them back in for further questioning or not. I don't know how many of them want their names/faces revealed. Do you think Chauvin has a case for a possible mistrial/retrial? I really don't know. IMO, with the evidence provided by both sides it wouldn't matter how many trials or who the jurors were, he'd be found guilty again..... and rightfully so, somewhere there has to be a line drawn not allowing this type of treatment in America, yet we have so many upset and wanting it overturned... I don't get it, I guess a murder caught on camera isn't enough evidence in America, Rodney king, Emmett till all over again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted May 5, 2021 Author Share Posted May 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, JETT said: IMO, with the evidence provided by both sides it wouldn't matter how many trials or who the jurors were, he'd be found guilty again Possibly, sure, but that's not the point. If a juror or jurors were unfairly biased going in (or possibly felt going in that they had to rule a certain way), that's a problem, wouldn't you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, JETT said: IMO, with the evidence provided by both sides it wouldn't matter how many trials or who the jurors were, he'd be found guilty again..... and rightfully so, somewhere there has to be a line drawn not allowing this type of treatment in America, yet we have so many upset and wanting it overturned... I don't get it, I guess a murder caught on camera isn't enough evidence in America, Rodney king, Emmett till all over again I don't think so many want it overturned as they want to make sure the jury was fair. The guy was guilty but I have seen guilty people walk like OJ Simpson, the jury said he was not guilty but this guy is being a idiot not for wearing that shirt but for talking after the trial. Bad move on his part. You wouldn't want a Klansman setting in as one of your juror's and I am sure this guy would want a BLM person judging him either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 7 minutes ago, Monte1076 said: Possibly, sure, but that's not the point. If a juror or jurors were unfairly biased going in (or possibly felt going in that they had to rule a certain way), that's a problem, wouldn't you agree? I agree, but who said this was the case? Because a guy where's a shirt he's biased? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 4 minutes ago, Wild74 said: I don't think so many want it overturned as they want to make sure the jury was fair. The guy was guilty but I have seen guilty people walk like OJ Simpson, the jury said he was not guilty but this guy is being a idiot not for wearing that shirt but for talking after the trial. Bad move on his part. You wouldn't want a Klansman setting in as one of your juror's and I am sure this guy would want a BLM person judging him either. A guy wearing a shirt with BLM doesn't make him part of that group, it also had MLK on it, yeah I know, ppl hated him to SMH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 30 minutes ago, JETT said: The other jurors need to come out and say it did or did not influence me All it took was one alternate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 19 minutes ago, JETT said: IMO, with the evidence provided by both sides it wouldn't matter how many trials or who the jurors were, he'd be found guilty again..... and rightfully so, somewhere there has to be a line drawn not allowing this type of treatment in America, yet we have so many upset and wanting it overturned... I don't get it, I guess a murder caught on camera isn't enough evidence in America, Rodney king, Emmett till all over again So make an example, instead of giving proper justice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted May 5, 2021 Author Share Posted May 5, 2021 3 minutes ago, JETT said: I agree, but who said this was the case? Because a guy where's a shirt he's biased? That's why the judge might want to question him again. And Chauvin's attorney lists other reasons in the appeal as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 13 minutes ago, Monte1076 said: Possibly, sure, but that's not the point. If a juror or jurors were unfairly biased going in (or possibly felt going in that they had to rule a certain way), that's a problem, wouldn't you agree? He’s just for racial justice, not proper and fair justice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 1 minute ago, Monte1076 said: That's why the judge might want to question him again. And Chauvin's attorney lists other reasons in the appeal as well. Isn't that chauvins lawyers job to do whatever he can to save his client? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte1076 Posted May 5, 2021 Author Share Posted May 5, 2021 Just now, JETT said: Isn't that chauvins lawyers job to do whatever he can to save his client? Yes, but the guy in the BLM shirt isn't the sole reason cited. There are others. That's why I posted the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 If there was a hung jury and one of the white jurors were later found to be a klan supporter, would you have an issue? this wouldn’t be proper justice either to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAWG91 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 Not rocket science. If you're wearing a shirt that says "get your knees off my neck," associate yourself with marxist BLM movement which advocates for violence against police, and then go into a courtroom and essentially say you've no dog in fight, you shouldn't be allowed to sit in judgement of the police officer in question. That's not to say that the police officer on trial should be set free, only that he deserves a trial by an unbiased jury. At minimum, they should find out what kind of an influence this guy had on the jury. Who knows, maybe they ignored him and thought he was a lunatic. I don't know, but it's worth finding out, otherwise we're in another example of banana republic and kangaroo courts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 1 hour ago, DB2point0 said: If there was a hung jury and one of the white jurors were later found to be a klan supporter, would you have an issue? this wouldn’t be proper justice either to me Did Rodney king, Emmett till get fair trial, or justice? Was you as concerned about those cases? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 1 hour ago, DB2point0 said: He’s just for racial justice, not proper and fair justice I'll be for proper and fair justice as soon as all criminals get the same sentencing by their crimes and not their race, don't you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 1 hour ago, Monte1076 said: Yes, but the guy in the BLM shirt isn't the sole reason cited. There are others. That's why I posted the link. Ok well let's see how it plays out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straw Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 1 hour ago, JETT said: A guy wearing a shirt with BLM doesn't make him part of that group, it also had MLK on it, yeah I know, ppl hated him to SMH Only the Democrats hated MLK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 13 minutes ago, Straw said: Only the Democrats hated MLK Democrats of old, which ppl have testified as being voters of that party on this very thread and now vote republican... hmmm go figure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnjoyLife Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 I think Chauvin was guilty...but I also think this juror likely had his mind made up before the trial even started. Hate to spend all that $ just to get the same result again but a re-trial seems like the only way to ensure a fair outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 1 hour ago, EnjoyLife said: I think Chauvin was guilty...but I also think this juror likely had his mind made up before the trial even started. Hate to spend all that $ just to get the same result again but a re-trial seems like the only way to ensure a fair outcome. I believe they all had their minds made up as did most common sense Americans, hence the reason it took only 10 hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 4 hours ago, JETT said: Did Rodney king, Emmett till get fair trial, or justice? Was you as concerned about those cases? I was still playing little league when the Rodney king episode happened so I really can’t say if I was concerned about it. I bet you weren’t born either so you weren’t concerned with it either. So really, I don’t know anything of it honestly. Don’t feel like researching it either just to answer a question on sdc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB2point0 Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 4 hours ago, JETT said: I'll be for proper and fair justice as soon as all criminals get the same sentencing by their crimes and not their race, don't you agree? I would agree that punishment should be the same for first time offenders. After first offense, your record should come into play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now