Jump to content

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, WETSU said:

 I have zero doubt's Jimbo and A&M could "whip" texas in a home game right now.

You beat one team last year with a winning record.  One.  And that was a four loss Florida team that ended up being, as you guys say, a "bdf type" game where a defensive stop was a rarity.  My bad, two winning teams against an NC team that had nearly all it's studs opt out.  Forgive us if we don't believe the almighty Jimbo would "whip" Texas because you beat four terrible teams that fired it's coaches and an LSU team that was not any good last season, all .500 or below teams.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Tweeted out by a Sooner fan this afternoon: Horns and Aggies blame each other for their rivalry staying dead to this day, but I gotta say, Texas trying to join the SEC and Aggie panicking about i

I just don’t believe that. 

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Red90fly said:

You beat one team last year with a winning record.  One.  And that was a four loss Florida team that ended up being, as you guys say, a "bdf type" game where a defensive stop was a rarity.  My bad, two winning teams against an NC team that had nearly all it's studs opt out.  Forgive us if we don't believe the almighty Jimbo would "whip" Texas because you beat four terrible teams that fired it's coaches and an LSU team that was not any good last season, all .500 or below teams.

 

Its cool. Maybe now you can forgive me for not thinking a HC with a 46-35 record and a program that is on its 3rd HC in 7 seasons is not exactly in a position to assume dominance over anyone... 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

WETSU, 90% of UT or OU fans don’t think the SEC is a cake walk. OU has hands on experience in the Championship Bowl games. Personally, I don’t like the super conference concept. While dished by others, the Big 12 was the only Power 5 conference to crown a true conference champion. Ten teams seems to be an ideal size. Every team in the Big 12 played every team an equal number times in the every sport. It is impractical in larger leagues. But mega conferences are a sign of the times.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BlackwellSooner said:

Off-topic,but a quick question:  Whatever happened to Immortal13?  I only visit occasionally, but I remember that he used to be a regular on SDC.  Sometimes a bit hard to get along with, at least IMO.

Anyway, back to the regular programming... somebody might give a quick response, thanks.

Immortal13 posts on Surlyhorns. Haven’t seen him here in forever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know how A&M's Board of Regents meeting went Friday. ESPN reported it was about the schools contract obligations with the SEC.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, 514 said:

Does anyone know how A&M's Board of Regents meeting went Friday. ESPN reported it was about the schools contract obligations with the SEC.

Monday 5pm from what I saw earlier. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just saw that on College Football Live. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, 514 said:

I just saw that on College Football Live. Thanks.

So is the meeting supposed to be about their SEC contract obligations? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A&M is not acting like people who were/are in the know.  If they knew about the deal to bring Texas and OU they’d already have had this meeting months ago.

 I still don’t think they knew. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Hookemhorns88 said:

Immortal13 posts on Surlyhorns. Haven’t seen him here in forever.

Thats DB

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HearEmaGrowlin said:

A&M is not acting like people who were/are in the know.  If they knew about the deal to bring Texas and OU they’d already have had this meeting months ago.

 I still don’t think they knew. 

Its already been reported they knew. 

This meeting is stupid. Its not even 100℅ about realignment. But the timing of it just makes A&M look stupid regardless of what they actually talk about.... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, WETSU said:

Its already been reported they knew. 

This meeting is stupid. Its not even 100℅ about realignment. But the timing of it just makes A&M look stupid regardless of what they actually talk about.... 

Yeah, I think they should not have scheduled the meeting, because it makes it look like they didn’t know and they’re reacting. 
I know it’s been reported they knew, but that certainly could just be political smoke. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, MrBuddyGarrity said:

What's up with that 5pm meeting Monday in College Station? (Board of Regents)

I’m leaving for CS this morning. Might have more insider information by Monday. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, BlackwellSooner said:

Off-topic,but a quick question:  Whatever happened to Immortal13?  I only visit occasionally, but I remember that he used to be a regular on SDC.  Sometimes a bit hard to get along with, at least IMO.

Anyway, back to the regular programming... somebody might give a quick response, thanks.

I miss Typer Woods. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, HearEmaGrowlin said:

Yeah, I think they should not have scheduled the meeting, because it makes it look like they didn’t know and they’re reacting. 
I know it’s been reported they knew, but that certainly could just be political smoke. 

Other schools are reporting A&M was involved and not left out of discussions. I don't think its smoke. I think the smoke is this meeting. The BOR is meeting is the smoke. This meeting is nothing more than a way to sit back and count money while pretending to be upset over this so the donors who oppose it are happy. The meeting means nothing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, ANTI said:

You're really trying to make a case for Casey Thompson/Hudson Card > Haynes King? 

Sheesh....and I'm a Horns fan.

Not at all. I’m simply pointing out that neither team has a QB that has taken any real, meaningful snaps. The hype about which program has the better QB is based solely on a bias. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, WETSU said:

Other schools are reporting A&M was involved and not left out of discussions. I don't think its smoke. I think the smoke is this meeting. The BOR is meeting is the smoke. This meeting is nothing more than a way to sit back and count money while pretending to be upset over this so the donors who oppose it are happy. The meeting means nothing. 

HEY, that is a good point. BOR having a fake emergency meeting to keep the faithful happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, ANTI said:

If you've truly seen all 3 like I have, there is no bias in saying King is better than Thompson/Card. Especially Card.

Anias Smith is probably the only player on A&M's roster faster than King, he's athletically gifted + has a stronger arm than both Card and Thompson. 

I saw the kid from JT pick him off a few times when King threw his direction. My point is that actual game snaps with defenses game planning against you are way different than mop up duty or playing protected in practice. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HearEmaGrowlin said:

HEY, that is a good point. BOR having a fake emergency meeting to keep the faithful happy.

It makes more sense than A&M not having a clue about any of this until now. 

I'm also not convinced it was leaked from A&M. I know it was from a writer that covers A&M, but I do not believe it was their leak. It just makes no sense if you're A&M to leak that at this time in this way. If its already a done deal as its being talked about you leaked it too late. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Lhornfan said:

I saw the kid from JT pick him off a few times when King threw his direction. My point is that actual game snaps with defenses game planning against you are way different than mop up duty or playing protected in practice. 

Agreed. I actually thing King is limited as a practice guy. His legs are such a weapon and you don't see that in a scrimmage or practice. 

But your point is correct. Nobody knows what's really going to happen with QB for these two teams just yet. Its picking two unknowns based off the color jersey not anything meaningful. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WETSU said:

It makes more sense than A&M not having a clue about any of this until now. 

I'm also not convinced it was leaked from A&M. I know it was from a writer that covers A&M, but I do not believe it was their leak. It just makes no sense if you're A&M to leak that at this time in this way. If its already a done deal as its being talked about you leaked it too late. 

It is all very interesting and kind of weird.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...