RJ31 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Originally posted by Bobcat1976You guys have me in the dark... You know some things that I don't know... Anyway... Do you know any passing stats on NL? Honestly, I don't have any numbers to look at, but right off the top of my head, I'd say Faulkner has about 800-1200 yards passing and roughly 10 tds. Very few INTs. Maybe three. He throws the ball maybe 10-15 times per game typically, but NL will not throw the ball unless they have to in most situations. The passing game is very effective, because teams HAVE to commit to the run. When you run the ball at someone ten times and then throw the play action, it typically works. That's been NL's passing game this year. Sometimes we'll drop straight back and throw it, but usually we're rolling out or running play action. Faulkner has a very good arm. We have some decent receivers and a really good TE. Faulkner can also run very effectively when pressured. He is a mobile QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNMLady Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Originally posted by bordertownMallett is 6'7" and 255#. He can see over everyone and throw the ball with people hanging Christmas lights on him. :whome:Thanks for the giggle, that was funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 North Lamar total offense.... 3,868 yards - 3,016 rushing, 852 passing Total defense... 2,506 yards - 1,191 rushing, 1,315 passing Quarterback John Faulkner is 38-for-76, 852 yards, 9 TD, 2 INT Aside from Smith, no receiver or rusher has 250 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bleedsbluengold24 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Originally posted by MNMLady Originally posted by bordertownMallett is 6'7" and 255#. He can see over everyone and throw the ball with people hanging Christmas lights on him. :whome:Thanks for the giggle, that was funny. He's not kidding. Dude looked llike a Niemam Marcus Christmas catalog against us. I especially liked the star on top of his helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ31 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I was close! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat1976 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I read a post from either bordertown or THSfanatic (I think) that said NL was the only team all year to sack Mallet more than once in a game, and I think he said that NL got him 3 times. That is impressive. Pressure is the biggest thing when you face a passing team. Give a good QB time and he will find someone. No secondary can cover well after about 6 or 7 seconds. I can only remember Fry taking 2 sacks this year. He almost never stands in the pocket or takes big drop-backs. He usually throws either within 2 or 3 seconds or rolls out. You never know if he is passing or not. He play fakes on almost every play and either leaves the ball with the RB, or keeps it and runs it or drops back a step and throws. He has 4 receivers on almost every play 2 wides, a wing back, and a TE. Very tough to stop. No team has held them to less that 4 scores (one team, dist. champs WH, held them to 2 TDs and two FGs). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat1976 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Originally posted by Living4ChristNorth Lamar total offense.... 3,868 yards - 3,016 rushing, 852 passing Total defense... 2,506 yards - 1,191 rushing, 1,315 passing Quarterback John Faulkner is 38-for-76, 852 yards, 9 TD, 2 INT Aside from Smith, no receiver or rusher has 250 yards. Do you have these totals on the Bobcats?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ31 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 This has the makings of a track meet. NL's running game vs. Hallsville's passing game. Should be entertaining anyway. I think both teams will struggle defensively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat1976 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 From what I'm reading both teams have a balanced attack.. NL runs more than pass... H'ville passes more but they both can mix it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ31 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 NL CAN have a balanced attack when they want to, but I don't know that I would characterize what we do as being balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat1976 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 RJ31, Do you recall if NL has played H'ville before, seems like we were in the same district a few years back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ31 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 It would've had to have been before 1993. We haven't been in a district or played (to my knowledge) Hallsville at any point since then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat1976 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I did a little digging... Hallsville was in the same district with NL in '88 & '89 Hallsville won 37-19 in '88 & 49-6 in '89 I looked all the way back to 1937 (Bobcats first year) and those are the only times they have played Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 These aren't official stats, but this is what I came up with from the stats that I have on file from this year.... Hallsville total offense Palestine - 41 rushing, 141 passing Atl. - 165 rushing, 200 passing Mt. Pleasant - 382 rushing, 83 passing Nacogdoches - 129 rushing, 197 passing Henderson - 104 rushing, 259 passing Marshall - 158 rushing, 285 passing Whitehouse - 137 rushing, 256 passing Kilgore - 162 rushing, 106 passing Jacksonville - 247 rushing, 130 passing Pine Tree - 294 rushing, 143 passing Total yards gained: 3,619 (1,819 rushing, 1,800 passing) Hallsville total defense Palestine - 203 rushing, 146 passing Atl. - 241 rushing, 23 passing Mt. Pleasant - 280 rushing, 69 passing Nacogdoches - 49 rushing, 98 passing Henderson - 97 rushing, 180 passing Marshall - 601 rushing, 26 passing Whitehouse - 157 rushing, 227 passing Kilgore - 150 rushing, 73 passing Jacksonville - 216 rushing, 48 passing Pine Tree - 205 rushing, 100 passing Total yards allowed: 3,189 (2,199 rushing, 990 passing) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geauxtiger3 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 that marshall game looks so bad.. :fear: 601 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optionQB Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 NL 35 H 28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Originally posted by geauxtiger3that marshall game looks so bad.. :fear: 601 I know! Hallsville was able to hold Carmon Boyd-Anderson, Kameron Rhodes, Hakeem Colbertt and others in check, but Marshall ate them alive....take away that one game and the stats look pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPTTIGER Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 good luck to our fellow 11-4a reps. the N.L. Panthers.... Get that running game going and roll into the second round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geauxtiger3 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Originally posted by Living4Christ Originally posted by geauxtiger3that marshall game looks so bad.. :fear: 601 I know! Hallsville was able to hold Carmon Boyd-Anderson, Kameron Rhodes, Hakeem Colbertt and others in check, but Marshall ate them alive....take away that one game and the stats look pretty good. very true. the defense came around after that game for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat1976 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 That Marshall game was ugly. They got the ball first, scored in about 4 play drive (all running) kicked an on-side kick-off, recovered it, scored in about 4 more running plays. When Hallsville's offense 1st touched the ball they were down 14-0. Mix in two interceptions and two fumbles that gave the Mavs a short field and the fact that the Mavs averaged about 12 yds per play for the game and you see it was not a pretty site. Pretty amazing that Hallsville was able to put up 27 pts and over 440 yrds of offense themselves (you would not think they had enough possession time to do that much, given the domination of the Mavs offense) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geauxtiger3 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 yeah, no kidding. 1000+ offense for the night is something else! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catmaniac Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Sounds like it ought to be a great game. It should be! It's one of those times when it is a true #2 vs #2 unlike alot of 1st round games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ31 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Looks like Hallsville's run defense is suspect. That's not good for Hallsville. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geauxtiger3 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 RJ, that was earlier in the year and Marshall has about 4 guys they run in every angle, hole, side of the field.. NL has.. Smith? Hallsville run defense has gotten a lot better over the course of the season along with their pass defense.. there are some quick boys on that side of the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ31 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 You're wrong on both counts. Hallsville gave up over 200 yards rushing in both of their last two games. Check the stats. NL has 600 yards rushing that weren't Smith's. He's the man, but we've got other players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now