1stSuperScot Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 I suppose that I could go back to my assertion that without God , there is no "goodness" - but that truth was way to cerebral for strawberry.:sad2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straw Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Originally posted by 1stSuperScotI suppose that I could go back to my assertion that without God , there is no "goodness" - but that truth was way to cerebral for strawberry.:sad2: "Truth" was the wrong word, I think you meant theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bleedsbluengold24 Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 GAME ON!!!:banging: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straw Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Originally posted by bleedsbluengold24GAME ON!!!:banging: Haha, you live for this!:whome: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Middle Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Originally posted by strawberry66"Truth" was the wrong word, I think you meant theory. Ahahahahaha... Superscot give me some research on your theory of "God!" /tongue in cheek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveTV1 Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 That's right! You jealous? Oh yeah, that reminds me. In the Boise OU thread, you posted "OMG!" If that means the same as all the other OMG's, then you, by definition, can't use that term.:evil2: Can I use the terms Fudge, Flip, Fetching, Dog Gonit, Dagnabit, Nip It In The Bud, Goodness Gracious, Great Balls of Fire, Sacre Bleu, Dangit or in the immortal words of Roger Miller "Dang Me, Dang Me might as well take a rope and hang me" ? I'm taking this thread on a different tangent, again. :yay: As for the Boise State/Oklahoma game, I knew Boise State was going to win that game. Now they're debating if it's hook and ladder or hook and lateral ? :whome: Geeze Louise, can we get over it and move on. The way I see it, I look for the good in people, I don't worry about their "shortcomings", we all have them. I just hope we learn and gain from each other, and become a better person, regardless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bleedsbluengold24 Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 I think different tangent is always an understatement with you Dave. The debate between Scot, Middle, Strawberry, the occasional rant by WhouseDlineo4, and myself about God, goodness, truth, theory, Christianity, liberalism, etc, etc, started sometime ago. You're welcome to join in. The more the merrier. But you're going to have to stay on topic. The BSU game reference was only to jab strawberry about a term he used (OMG). You'll have to get him to tell you why that is funny. But if you're going to join in, you have to start by answering the question the thread poses, "Is it possible to be a Christian and a Liberal??" and back your statement up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stSuperScot Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Originally posted by Middle Originally posted by strawberry66"Truth" was the wrong word, I think you meant theory. Ahahahahaha... Superscot give me some research on your theory of "God!" /tongue in cheek You've already confessed that you can't hang with my superior logic, intelligence and debating skills!!!! So see http://www.carm.org/ Knock yourself out! :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straw Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Originally posted by 1stSuperScot You've already confessed that you can't hang with my superior logic, intelligence and debating skills!!!! So see http://www.carm.org/ Knock yourself out! :thumbsup: Haha! That website is hilarious. Thanks for the link Super. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPure Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Answer: No, not if you are a Christian that considers God's Word absolute truth. If you don't hold that belief, then I don't believe that you are a Christian; therefore, you are then free to be a liberal who just uses God's Word out of context to justify an ungodly ideaology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lhornfan Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 This topic brought JPure out of the woodworks. Quite frankly if you take the political definitions of a Liberal and a Conservative, neither could be a Christian. Both parties believe in some things that are non-Christian like. The Conservatives want to immediately bring up abortion against the Liberals, and the Liberals would bring up spreading the wealth, death penalty or something else. Bottom line is neither party is the answer to Christianity. Just like our last presidential election. I voted for Bush because he was the lesser of two evils, and he was opposed to abortion. But then he sends our troops to Iraq for a war that even he is now saying was a mistake.:banging: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPure Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Never heard President Bush say that the war was a mistake. And, you are confusing Conservative with Republican. They are not the same. President Bush sold himself as a Conservative but he is consistently proving that he is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lhornfan Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 I can't quote Bush saying the war was a mistake, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see he's crawfishing along with his advisors on any questions concerning Iraq. With the good things Bush and his administration have accomplished, he is going to be remembered as the president that didn't learn from the Vietnam "conflict". We've all heard history repeats itself. I assumed it took more than 30 years though. Back on topic: What makes one a Liberal? What makes one a Conservative? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPure Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Yes, history is repeating itself. Dems are trying to make us lose a war for purely political reasons, again. That's what happened in Vietnam, Mr. History Expert. When the "surge" works he'll be remembered as the President that had the balls to finish a war no matter what political attacks were hurled his way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bleedsbluengold24 Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 "If" the surge works, JPure, "If" the surge works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stSuperScot Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 "If" the surge works, do you think we'll ever know it? I.e., hear it from the MSM or the opposition party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bleedsbluengold24 Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 The gloves are really going to have to come off for this "surge" to work. Don't get me wrong, I'm for it if it will get us to a point where we can go home. Frankly, I don't think it is nearly drastic enough. But if it doesn't work, you may be right Scot. According to W, everything we did prior to the new plan has been successful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now