toohottohandle Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 MP 3-2 over paris. close. paris that good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 MP 3-2 over paris. close. paris that good Paris has good speed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toohottohandle Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 3-2 though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 North Lamar over Pittsburg 5-3 in a shootout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cesarsoccer Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 So what are the standings now? MP, 9-0, 27 pts. SS, 8-1, 24 pts. What does the rest look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 So what are the standings now? MP, 9-0, 27 pts. SS, 8-1, 24 pts. What does the rest look like? Mount Pleasant 9-0-0-0 27 Sulpher Springs 8-1-0-0 24 North Lamar 5-3-1-0 14 Texas High 4-4-1-0 13 Paris 4-5-0-0 12 Pittsburg 3-6-0-0 9 Pleasant Grove 2-5-1-1 9 Liberty Eylau 0-8-0-0 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bordertown Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 Something is off in those standings. I know NL has 2 SO wins and the SO wins & loses do not balance. The points could be correct though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cesarsoccer Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 Mount Pleasant 9-0-0-0 27 Sulpher Springs 8-1-0-0 24 North Lamar 5-3-1-0 14 Texas High 4-4-1-0 13 Paris 4-5-0-0 12 Pittsburg 3-6-0-0 9 Pleasant Grove 2-5-1-1 9 Liberty Eylau 0-8-0-0 0 According to these records, North Lamar should have 17 pts. and T-High should have 14 pts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cesarsoccer Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 Okay, here it is as of 02/28: MP, 9-0, 27 pts SS, 8-1, 24 pts TH, 4-5, 13 pts NL, 4-5, 12 pts Paris, 4-5, 12 pts Pitt, 4-5, 11 pts PG, 3-6, 9 pts LE, 0-9, 0 pts MP vs. SS 02/29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 Okay, here it is as of 02/28: MP, 9-0, 27 pts SS, 8-1, 24 pts TH, 4-5, 13 pts NL, 4-5, 12 pts Paris, 4-5, 12 pts Pitt, 4-5, 11 pts PG, 3-6, 9 pts LE, 0-9, 0 pts MP vs. SS 02/29 Last time I try to fix a cut and paste without proofreading after... I'm glad someone's on the ball. I was jus' tryin' to help :bangin: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 Okay, here it is as of 02/28: MP, 9-0, 27 pts SS, 8-1, 24 pts TH, 4-5, 13 pts NL, 4-5, 12 pts Paris, 4-5, 12 pts Pitt, 4-5, 11 pts PG, 3-6, 9 pts LE, 0-9, 0 pts I Think Bordertown is right. North Lamar has 2 wins vs LE, 2-0 vs Pitt for 3 wins. Then 2 SO wins vs Pitt and PG. 9 + 4 for 13 pts for North Lamar 3-4-2-0 THS is 4-4-0-1 (SOL vs PG), Wins vs LE, NL, Pitt, & LE. 13 pts Pittsburg has wins over LE, PG and Paris, and a SOL to N.Lamar 9+1 =10 Losses to MP(2),NL SS, and THS 3-5-0-1 PG is 2-5-1-1 = 9 Someone please doublecheck me. My data comes from varied sources. I also have lysdexia... :updown: That would make things... MP, 9-0-0-0, 27 pts SS, 8-1-0-0, 24 pts TH, 4-4-0-1, 13 pts NL, 3-4-2-0, 13 pts Paris, 4-5-0-0, 12 pts Pitt, 3-5-0-1, 10 pts PG, 2-5-1-1, 9 pts LE, 0-9-0-0, 0 pts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOCCERCOACH41 Posted March 1, 2008 Author Share Posted March 1, 2008 I Think Bordertown is right. North Lamar has 2 wins vs LE, 2-0 vs Pitt for 3 wins. Then 2 SO wins vs Pitt and PG. 9 + 4 for 13 pts for North Lamar 3-4-2-0 THS is 4-4-0-1 (SOL vs PG), Wins vs LE, NL, Pitt, & LE. 13 pts Pittsburg has wins over LE, PG and Paris, and a SOL to N.Lamar 9+1 =10 Losses to MP(2),NL SS, and THS 3-5-0-1 PG is 2-5-1-1 = 9 Someone please doublecheck me. My data comes from varied sources. I also have lysdexia... :updown: That would make things... MP, 9-0-0-0, 27 pts SS, 8-1-0-0, 24 pts TH, 4-4-0-1, 13 pts NL, 3-4-2-0, 13 pts Paris, 4-5-0-0, 12 pts Pitt, 3-5-0-1, 10 pts PG, 2-5-1-1, 9 pts LE, 0-9-0-0, 0 pts M.p beat sulphur 1-0 N.Lamar 1-0 over p.g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tightlines24 Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 Pittsburg-6 LE-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texcards Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 Standings as of 3-1-08 Place School Points Wins Losses Differential 1 Mt. Pleasant 30 10 0 21 2 Sulphur Springs 24 8 2 13 3 North Lamar 16 6 4 4 4 Paris 15 5 5 3 5 Texas High 13 4 6 -2 6 Pittsburg 13 4 6 -4 7 Pleasant Grove 9 3 7 -5 8 Liberty Eylau 0 0 10 -30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 On Friday 2-29 Paris 7 THS 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted March 3, 2008 Share Posted March 3, 2008 Standings as of 3-1-08 Place School Points Wins Losses Differential 1 Mt. Pleasant 30 10 0 21 2 Sulphur Springs 24 8 2 13 3 North Lamar 16 6 4 4 4 Paris 15 5 5 3 5 Texas High 13 4 6 -2 6 Pittsburg 13 4 6 -4 7 Pleasant Grove 9 3 7 -5 8 Liberty Eylau 0 0 10 -30 I got a slightly different count on differential, based on scores I have kept up with. Looks like 1 and 2 are wrapped up, barring something improbable... 3 and 4, Looking very interesting. North Lamar has the tough schedule from here out, having 4 matches against teams that have already beaten them. Paris will have an easier go of it, playing teams they went 3-1 against, with a 3-2 loss to Pittsburg. Pittsburg is hanging tough, with a 500 record against their remaining schedule, and Sulphur Springs soon. P.Grove will need help, and needing every win to help themselves. Mount Pleasant will be their toughest challenge. Not bad for a team with 2 returning starters. Team W-L-SOW-SOL Pts GF GA Diff Mount Pleasant 10 - 0 - 0 - 0 30 37 8 31 Sulphur Springs 8 - 2 - 0 - 0 24 31 13 18 North Lamar 4 - 4 - 2 - 0 16 29 18 11 Paris High 5 - 5 - 0 - 0 15 30 21 9 Texas High 4 - 5 - 0 - 1 13 27 24 3 Pittsburg 4 - 5 - 0 - 1 13 25 28 -3 Pleasant Grove 2 - 6 - 1 - 1 9 17 22 -5 Liberty Eylau 0 - 10 - 0 - 0 0 2 63 -61 Prediction: Mount Pleasant 42 Sulphur Springs 36 Paris High 21 North Lamar 19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bordertown Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 I believe the difference is that the there is a maximum goal differential per match - 3 if I remember. Beating a team 7-0 is the same as 3-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elchido Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 I believe the difference is that the there is a maximum goal differential per match - 3 if I remember. Beating a team 7-0 is the same as 3-0. What if you beat them 5-4, what would happen in that case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bordertown Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 +1, I may be wrong but +3 is the max for one game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Standings as of 3-1-08 Place School Points Wins Losses Differential 1 Mt. Pleasant 30 10 0 21 2 Sulphur Springs 24 8 2 13 3 North Lamar 16 6 4 4 4 Paris 15 5 5 3 5 Texas High 13 4 6 -2 6 Pittsburg 13 4 6 -4 7 Pleasant Grove 9 3 7 -5 8 Liberty Eylau 0 0 10 -30 Humble apologies, :wub: TEXCARDS has it nailed... I went back and looked at the scores, and counted the differentials with 3 max difference per match. I had fogotten about that. :blush: The Paris Paper had an article that said Paris and N.Lamar were tied for 3rd??? Maybe I'm not the only one counting above my limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toohottohandle Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 any update Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 any update Tonight's matches... Paris and North Lamar Texas High and Sulphur Springs Moumt Pleasant and Liberty Eylau Pleasant Grove and Pittsburg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cesarsoccer Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I think the winner of the Paris/NL game will get in as the 3-seed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futfan Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 I think the winner of the Paris/NL game will get in as the 3-seed. If Paris wins, yes, but North Lamar has a tougher schedule, and even if they win that game, they could still end up 4th. I think 4th will be very interesting. North Lamar and Paris in the third and fourth spots, but Pitt, Texas High can move up if they get help. Even PG is not mathematically out. I don't know about the other games, but the PG/Pitt game that was going to be in Pittsburg was cancelled, and moved to the 15th(sat), probably moved back to PG. TH going to SS, and LE going to MP probably got cancelled to, nothing in the paper for scores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tightlines24 Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Texas High and Sulfur are looking at Monday. Paris and North Lamar tonight at 5pm Mt Pleasant -4 LE - 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now