<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Political Arena</title>
	<description>Smoakhouse Forum Political Arena</description>
	<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:46:37 -0400</pubDate>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[he wants to be obama, Pelosi's nightmare]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112298</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9oy06MAEoo&feature=player_embedded" target="_blank">Get 'em Colonel</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:36:53 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112298</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Unemployment at "9.6"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112180</link>
		<description>Really at 16%.  But when the republicans take over, that number reported by our unbiased media will somehow rise above 10% to make republicans look bad and obama look better.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:07:32 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112180</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Day the dims Took Over</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112131</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009 it was actually January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, the start of the 110th Congress. The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.<br />For those  who are listening to the  liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this: <br /><br />January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the House: <br /><br />At the time: <br /><br />The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77 <br /><br />The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5% <br /><br />The Unemployment rate was 4.6% <br /><br />George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION &lt;http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/George_W__Bush_Jobs.htm&gt; ! <br /><br />Remember the day... <br />January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee. <br /><br />The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?<br /> <br />BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!!! <br /><br />THANK YOU DEMOCRATS for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOS! (BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy).<br /><br />And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac???? <br /><br />OBAMA <br /><br />And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie??? <br /><br />OBAMA and the Democratic Congress<br /><br />So when some one tries to blame Bush... <br /><br />REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!" Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving.<br />Set the record straight on Bush! &lt;http://brucehough.blogspot.com/2009/04/setting-record-straight-on-george-w.html&gt; <br /><br />"It's not that liberals aren't smart, it's just that so much of what they know isn't so" -Ronald Reagan<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:37:45 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112131</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[A Harley Davidson Biker's Tale]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112125</link>
		<description><![CDATA[A Harley Biker is riding by the zoo in Washington, DC when he sees a little girl leaning into the lion's cage. Suddenly, the lion grabs her by the collar of her jacket and tries to pull her inside to slaughter her, under the eyes of her screaming parents. <br /> <br /> The biker jumps off his Harley, runs to the cage and hits the lion square on the nose with a powerful punch. <br /> <br /> Whimpering from the pain the lion jumps back letting go of the girl, and the biker brings her to her terrified parents, who thank him endlessly. A reporter has watched the whole event. <br /> <br /> The reporter addressing the Harley rider says, 'Sir, this was the most gallant and brave thing I've seen a man do in my whole life.' <br /> <br /> The Harley rider replies, 'Why, it was nothing, really, the lion was behind bars. I just saw this little kid in danger and acted as I felt right.' <br /> <br /> The reporter says, 'Well, I'll make sure this won't go unnoticed. I'm a journalist, you know, and tomorrow's paper will have this story on the front page...  So, what do you do for a living and what political affiliation do you have?' <br /> <br /> The biker replies, ‘I'm a U.S. Marine and a Republican’ <br /> <br /> The journalist leaves. <br /> <br /> The following morning the biker buys the paper to see if it indeed brings news of his actions, and reads, on the front page: <br /> <br /> “U.S. MARINE ASSAULTS AFRICAN IMMIGRANT AND STEALS HIS LUNCH” <br /> <br />  <br /> ...and THAT pretty much sums up the media's approach to the news these days...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:10:02 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112125</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>If George Bush was an idiot...</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112080</link>
		<description><![CDATA[If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved? <br />  <br />If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?<br /><br />If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never even read, would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?<br /><br />If George W. Bush joined the country of  Mexico  and sued a state in the  United States  to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder who's side he was on? <br /><br />If George W. Bush had put 87000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?<br /><br />If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87000 American workers unemployed would you support him?<br /><br />If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a TelePrompTer installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how  inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? <br /> <br />If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved? <br /> <br />If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? <br /> <br />If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? <br /> <br />If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? <br /><br />If George W. Bush had given the Queen of  England  an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky? <br />  <br />If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of  Saudi Arabia  , would you have approved? <br />  <br />If George W. Bush had visited  Austria  and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a  minor slip? <br /> <br />If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved? <br />  <br />If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States , would you have said that he is clueless.<br /><br />If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas , would you havethought he was a self important, conceited, egotistical jerk.<br />If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment? <br /> <br />If George W. Bush had misspelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is? <br />  <br />If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite? <br /><br />If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low  over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown   Manhattan   causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually  get what happened on 9-11? <br />  <br />If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in  New Orleans , would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue  with claims of racism and incompetence? <br /> <br />If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in  America  , would you have approved. <br />  <br />If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?  <br /><br />So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 15 months -- so you'll have two years and nine months to come up with an answer.<br /><br />Every statement in this email is factual and directly attributable to Barrack Hussein Obama.  Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable.<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:02:20 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112080</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>I hope the troops left in Iraq arent</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112079</link>
		<description>but Im afraid they are going to be, as our vacationer in chief pulls down the Iraq invasive forces.  Of course this isnt his war, and even though he will take credit for whatever victory we get out of it.  Yet he and every swinging one of the libs voted against the surge that got us to a sort of victory.  Wonder if obamahama narcississist will have the courage to admit Bush was right?  Nah, he wouldnt stoop so low as to give any human being any credit, because he is in charge now!!</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:06:41 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112079</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>I thought the idea was to get rid of the cockroaches?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112054</link>
		<description><![CDATA[We Need A Revolution, Not A Movement<br /><br />by Chuck Baldwin<br /><br />August 27, 2010<br /><br />Archived column: <a href="http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?p=2172" target="_blank">http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?p=2172</a><br /><br />The elections of 2008 (and the early elections of 2010) produced<br />two significant phenomena: the "Ron Paul Revolution," and the<br />"Tea Party Movement." And, mark it down: both of them will have<br />profound effects upon the upcoming November elections--and upon<br />the 2012 elections as well. Call them what you want, however,<br />America doesn't need another movement; it needs a genuine revolution.<br /><br />The Tea Party movement, while still a force with which to be<br />contended, has already been diluted and compromised. The primary<br />elections plainly reveal the reality of this fact. The high spots<br />so far are the defeats of Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania and Bob<br />Bennett in Utah. The low spots so far are the reelection of John<br />McCain in Arizona and the election of Dan Coats in Indiana.<br /><br />John McCain's election, in particular, demonstrates how many<br />conservatives and "revolutionaries" still don't get it. If any<br />State in the union should have an up-close-and-personal look at<br />what we are up against, it would be the people of Arizona. After<br />all, they are on the front lines in the fight of one of the most<br />important battles currently being waged in our country: illegal<br />immigration. And John McCain is one of the worst offenders in terms<br />of facilitating and encouraging this illegal invasion. Yet the people<br />of Arizona reelected McCain to the US Senate. (It would interesting<br />to know how many illegal aliens voted for McCain, would it not?)<br /><br />Then again, John McCain received the enthusiastic endorsement of<br />former Alaska governor, Sarah Palin. This endorsement obviously<br />brought McCain thousands of Tea Party votes that otherwise would<br />have gone to his principal opponent, J.D. Hayworth. McCain is<br />not the only Big-Government globalist neocon to receive Palin's<br />endorsement. Many of Palin's endorsees are neocons; which leads<br />to one of the biggest problems with any so-called conservative<br />movement: allowing celebrity-type "conservatives" to become the de<br />facto leaders and spokesmen for what should be a true grassroots,<br />people-generated rebellion. Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck are the two<br />biggest culprits in this regard.<br /><br />Mark my words: Palin and Beck may see themselves as part of a<br />conservative "movement," but they want nothing to do with an<br />old-fashioned, honest-to-God, Patrick Henry-style revolution. In<br />fact, they are doing everything in their power to keep such a<br />revolution from taking place.<br /><br />This does not mean that Palin and Beck do not contribute some good<br />things to freedom's fight. They do. The problem is, for every<br />good thing they contribute they counterbalance it by supporting<br />establishment principals, such as John McCain and Newt Gingrich,<br />and attacking non-establishment players and ideas, which serves<br />only to keep the Big-Government power structure firmly ensconced<br />in Washington, D.C.<br /><br />Get real, folks, and start thinking for yourselves. Ask yourself why<br />Fox News never (or hardly ever) invites non-establishment patriots<br />to appear on their network. Why do you not see former Assistant<br />Secretary of the Treasury Paul Craig Roberts on Fox News? Why do<br />you not see former Georgia congressman and Presidential candidate<br />Bob Barr on Fox News? Why do you not see former Minnesota governor<br />Jesse Ventura on Fox News? Why do you not see former Director of the<br />US Office of Economic Opportunity and Presidential candidate Howard<br />Phillips on Fox News? Why do you not see Presidential candidate<br />Chuck Baldwin on Fox News? The list is endless.<br /><br />Fox News is not "fair and balanced." It is as controlled and<br />manipulated as any other media news network. The only thing it<br />balances is the other networks' infatuation with the Democrat Party,<br />by promoting Republican candidates and ideas. What it does not do<br />is educate and inform the American people with the truth as to what<br />both major parties are doing to destroy our country. But remember,<br />Fox News is owned by Keith Rupert Murdoch, the same man who helped<br />finance Hillary Clinton's campaign for the US Senate, and who is as<br />much of a globalist as anyone in Washington, D.C., or New York City.<br /><br />As an aside, and speaking of Hillary Rodham, I predict that<br />she will replace Vice President Joe Biden BEFORE the 2012<br />elections. I've said that in private for many weeks, and now say<br />it in this column--remember, you heard it here. The Clinton-Bush<br />Crime Syndicate (CBCS) needs Hillary in the White House badly,<br />and Obama has readily accepted a subservient role in the criminal<br />affairs of CBCS (for very profitable reasons, no doubt). And with<br />the CBCS bosses pretty much running things at the White House (they<br />don't worry about domestic or social issues, providing that these<br />do not interfere with their international criminal activities),<br />is it any wonder that Obama has already taken more vacations than<br />most Presidents take during an entire term?<br /><br />And it is the influence of globalists and neocons upon national<br />and international politics that the likes of Sarah Palin and Glenn<br />Beck simply do not get--or do not want to get. And because many Tea<br />Partiers are so enamored with these two (and allow them to do much<br />of their thinking for them), they remain clueless as well.<br /><br />Ladies and gentlemen, America is in the throes of socialist and<br />Marxist political upheaval. The curtain could fall at any time. The<br />American people need to wake up to this truism: a "conservative"<br />movement--even a conservative Tea Party movement--will not save<br />us. The only thing that will save us is an old-fashioned State<br />revolt.<br /><br />Arizona had the opportunity to become a modern-day version of 1775<br />Massachusetts. But Arizona has probably forfeited that leadership<br />role by 1) reelecting John McCain, and 2) being willing to allow<br />federal courts to dictate law to a sovereign State. Instead of<br />taking its case to the federal courts, Arizona should simply<br />tell the federal government that it will enforce its own State<br />laws (including the newly enacted anti-illegal immigration law)<br />regardless of what any federal court says or doesn't say. At some<br />point, that is exactly what some State (or group of states) in this<br />union is going to have to do, or liberty will be forever lost.<br /><br />As long as freedom lovers are content to remain satisfied with<br />the status quo by allowing party politics and media celebrities to<br />dominate their efforts, there will be no stopping this socialist<br />avalanche that is crashing down upon us. The Tea Party movement<br />of 2010 (if left free of Big-Government neocons) could certainly<br />translate into positive developments this November; that is for<br />sure. A revival of the "Ron Paul Revolution" in 2012 could also<br />make a significant contribution, but it is going to take a State<br />revolution to seal the deal. I, for one, am ready.<br /><br />*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these<br />editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now<br />be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:<br /><br /><a href="http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=19" target="_blank">http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=19</a><br /><br />&copy; Chuck Baldwin<br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:41:13 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112054</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Mosque</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112051</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://eca.state.gov/culprop/afcp/project_listings/search_results.cfm?search=mosque&submit=Search#" target="_blank">Ambassadors Fund For Cultural Preservation</a><br /><br />My friend says our tax dollars fund this stuff. Just click on the links under <i>Project Title</i>. The friend also pointed out the dates (years) that these things were funded. Can you believe some of the years noted were years of  Republican majority?  <img src="http://www.smoaky.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/shocked.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":shocked:" border="0" alt="shocked.gif" /> <br />Indeed I am shocked!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:23:23 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112051</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Eddie Bernice of Dallas, made a name for herself</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112036</link>
		<description><![CDATA[protecting black folks from 'ole whitey.  <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/082910dntexcongress.2c049bb.html" target="_blank">Then turns around and  shafts those folks for her kin</a>  Tsk, Tsk.  Money can really ruin ya Eddie.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:40:40 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=112036</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck Rally</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111942</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I can take and leave Beck, but I do think he had a "right" to have the rally.  And doubt if he even thought about the Matin Luther King deal--- most people, even Blacks, dont either. But, in all the hoopla, did anyone on this forum or on others hear that blacks were not welcome at this rally and that this was a racist rally?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:46:45 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111942</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Your $20.00 bill is</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111877</link>
		<description><![CDATA[f<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2578695/posts" target="_blank">fixing to be worth $10.00</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:32:05 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111877</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Free speech and the Third Circuit</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111859</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow - great job on the judge's part!!!!!!!!   <img src="http://www.smoaky.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/notworthy.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":notworthy:" border="0" alt="notworthy.gif" />    And to think... in liberal land....<br /><br />Now, as in all cases in front of any federal court, if the Michigan student decide to bring a case against the Michigan college, now they have a standing.<br /><br />Course, that also opens up the yeyaw for Prop 8... across the country...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:55:39 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111859</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Carts and Horses</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111837</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.europac.net/commentaries/carts_and_horses" target="_blank">Reich believes that the cart pushes the horse. In his worldview, businesses produce goods and services simply because consumers spend. </a><br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:13:30 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111837</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>So why is illegal immigration such a big deal?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111823</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/08/25/mexican-government-migrants-dead-ranch-killed-zetas-drug-gang/" target="_blank">http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/08/25/me...etas-drug-gang/</a><br /><br /><br />Survivor Details Massacre of 72 Migrants by Drug Cartel in Mexico<br /><br /><br />In the article they said this happened 100 miles from Brownsville, so my question is what if this was only happening 100 miles from your house would this make you more open to illegal immigration or more open to enforcing the laws?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:32:32 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111823</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>McCain in</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111814</link>
		<description><![CDATA[August 24, 2010<br /><br />By Frosty Wooldridge<br /><br />In an almost bewildering U.S. Senate seat run-off, John McCain spent $20 million to defeat  challenger J.D Hayworth.  A grizzled old man, with extraordinary amounts of money, bought the Arizona senate seat one more time. <br /><br />McCain, a 21th century anachronism, completely out of touch with today’s world—and one of the big reasons for America’s current $700 billion annual trade deficit, insourcing-offshoring-outsourcing of jobs, 15 million unemployed, 41.1 million subsisting on food stamps, 20 million illegal aliens, nine year war in Iraq and Afghanistan and a $13 trillion federal deficit—will get another crack at doing his darnedest to destroy this republic.<br /><br />Einstein said, “The problems in the world are so enormous they cannot be solved with the level of thinking that created them.”<br /><br />Arizona writer Don Hank said, As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly.<br /><br />Yet the ‘fools’ of Arizona returned McCain to Congress. Go figure!<br /><br />This constitutional republic no longer features, “…of the people, by the people, for the people.”<br /><br />New line: this constitutional republic stands for, “of the money, by the rich, for the elite.”<br /><br />It’s possible the 1776 Federalists finally triumphed!<br /><br />Jefferson, Monroe, Madison and Washington writhe in their graves.<br /><br />Arizona voters returned to the vomit of John McCain. He serves none other than the moneyed corporations, private interests, elite and privileged.  Yet, Arizona fools returned him to their folly back for another six years of incompetence.<br /><br />Since the immigration amnesty in 1986, signed by McCain as he promised to secure the borders for all time, he did nothing to stop the onslaught of 20 million illegal migrants, millions through Arizona, and today—we suffer a full-blown constitutional crisis with anchor babies and 20 million humans calling for their legalization for breaking our laws.<br /><br />I shake my head, roll my eyes and wonder how Arizona voters can be THAT stupid!  They passed SB 1070 because of John McCain’s ineptitudes for the past 26 years.  They suffer 57,000 cars stolen every year because of McCain’s incompetence. Arizona suffers the most kidnappings in the United States via McCain’s corruption at the highest levels. Arizona suffers incredible unemployment, crime, drunk driving illegals, trashed schools and bankrupting hospitals—yet they still voted the old dog back into his U.S. Senate seat.<br /><br />The movie, “Dumb and Dumber” could not equal the folly of the dogs returning to their vomit.<br /><br />The question remains: why would an old man, so rich and so totally a failure in Congress—once again attempt to mount the horse and grab the reins for one more power gallop into the Halls of Congress? <br /><br />As in feudal Europe, kings and queens never gave up power.  That’s why Thomas Jefferson and George Washington hated them so much. It’s why they created a ‘people-driven’ republic. But the ‘people’ fail themselves in their inability to make articulate decisions. <br /><br />We can expect more of the same failures now facing us to continue mounting with the re-election of John McCain and others like him in Congress that brought this nation to its knees. <br /><br />##<br /><br />How is the Tea Party working for you today?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:32:10 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111814</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>More from that religion of peace</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111808</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.newsbusters.org/graphics/trans.gif" border="0" class="linked-image" /><br /><b><a href="http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/eyeblast-tv-staff/2010/08/25/video-holocaust-survivor-cursed-out-ground-zero-mosque-supporter" target="_blank">Video: Holocaust Survivor Cursed Out By Ground Zero Mosque Supporter</a></b><br />By <a href="http://www.newsbusters.org/user/eyeblast-tv-staff" target="_blank"><!--coloro:#ff4010--><span style="color:#ff4010"><!--/coloro-->EyeBlast.tv Staff<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--></a> | Wed, 08/25/2010 - 16:47<br /><br />In a stunning display at a protest over the Ground Zero mosque, a Holocaust survivor was berated by a mosque supporter. The mosque supporter spews vulgarities at the holocaust survivor and at one point even says he "didn't learn his lesson". Content warning, we did not bleep out the profanities. <br /><br /><br /><br />Read more: <a href="http://www.newsbusters.org/#ixzz0xebXeoha" target="_blank">http://www.newsbusters.org/#ixzz0xebXeoha</a><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:05:48 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111808</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>B.O. could be a long term problem</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111797</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<b><!--coloro:#440000--><span style="color:#440000"><!--/coloro-->HEAT OF THE MOMENT<br /><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--></b><!--fonto:Palatino Georgia Times New Roman Times serif--><span style="font-family:Palatino Georgia Times New Roman Times serif"><!--/fonto--><!--coloro:#000000--><span style="color:#000000"><!--/coloro--><br /><b>Global warming fix equals 'smelly, dehydrated, unsanitary' people</b><br /><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--><!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><!--fonto:Palatino Georgia Times New Roman Times serif--><span style="font-family:Palatino Georgia Times New Roman Times serif"><!--/fonto--><!--coloro:#000000--><span style="color:#000000"><!--/coloro--><br /><b>Author warns 'body odor' bigger threat than 'war on carbon'</b><br /><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--><!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><!--fonto:Times New Roman--><span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><!--/fonto--><!--sizeo:-1--><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo-->Posted: August 24, 2010<br />8:45 pm Eastern<br /><br /><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--sizeo:-1--><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo-->© 2010 WorldNetDaily <!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc-->&lt;/FONT&gt;function legalChars(input,fieldName){   var tfld = input.value.replace(/^&#092;s+|&#092;s+$/, '');   // value of field with whitespace trimmed off   var illegalChars= /[&#092;(&#092;)&#092;&#092;,&#092;;&#092;:&#092;"&#092;[&#092;]]/ ;      if (tfld.match(illegalChars)) {      alert('Please enter valid characters in your '+fieldName+'.');      input.focus();      return false;   }   return true;}function mandatoryText(input,fieldName){   if(input.value == '' || input == null){      alert('Please enter your '+fieldName+'.');      input.focus();      return false;   } else {      return true;   }}function validEmail(field,fieldName) {   with (field) {      apos=value.indexOf("@");      dotpos=value.lastIndexOf(".");      if (apos  <br /><br />Drawing on Sussman's scientific knowledge as an acclaimed and award-winning meteorologist, <a href="http://superstore.wnd.com/store/item.asp?DEPARTMENT_ID=6&SUBDEPARTMENT_ID=20&ITEM_ID=3672" target="_blank">"Climategate"</a> provides ample evidence of manipulated and fabricated "scientific findings" to support global warming and the "broadly intrusive legislative remedies" required to provide its remedy. The book garnered major media attention and informed legions of tea party members on the West Coast, where Sussman is the morning host of KSFO – the fourth largest radio market in the nation. <br /><br />Certainly, public outcry contributed to the administration's and Congress' quiet – but as Sussman cautions, temporary – abandonment of pursuing cap and trade legislation. <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41254.html#ixzz0xBcVVci6" target="_blank">Politico</a> described the setback as "one of the sharpest rebukes to a sitting president in recent memory." <br /><br />Still, too much is invested for the initiative to stall for long, Sussman warns. In <a href="http://superstore.wnd.com/store/item.asp?DEPARTMENT_ID=6&SUBDEPARTMENT_ID=20&ITEM_ID=3672" target="_blank">"Climategate,"</a> Sussman became the first author to detail the plan to bring "Big Brother" into every American home via the Smart Meters and the Smart Grid. The Smart technology will allow unseen bureaucrats to literally control each household's appliances, <u><!--coloro:#009900--><span style="color:#009900"><!--/coloro-->air conditioner<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--></u> and heater. <br /><br />"That Smart Meter is going to run your life," says Sussman. "And it will be the tool allowing a handful of elites to become filthy rich. If the Senate passes this bill and it's successfully reconciled with the House bill, we will have taken a giant step closer to living in Orwell's Oceania." <br /><br />The Smart Meter will replace the standard electric and gas meters attached to homes and buildings nationwide, says Sussman. They utilize remote technology to measure and record energy usage minute-by-minute. <br /><br />Sussman said that months before the Smart Meters were set into law, Franklin Raines, former chairman of government-sponsored mortgage giant Fannie Mae – and adviser to both Presidents Clinton and Obama – received patents titled "System and Method for Residential Emissions Trading." <br /><br />Not only do the patents give Fannie Mae the exclusive rights for identifying and measuring energy savings in homes by way of the Smart Meter, Sussman says they "seduce consumers with promises of energy savings occurring by 'replacing older appliances with more energy-efficient appliances; upgrading domestic hot-water <u><!--coloro:#009900--><span style="color:#009900"><!--/coloro-->heating systems<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--></u>; upgrading heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modifying lighting; fuel switching and renovating the entire home,' and speak of 'installing insulating insulation in attics and exterior walls; installing more efficient windows; and reducing infiltration.'" <br /><br />"Citizens," Sussman said, "will be muscled into participating in this program via government giveaways. Upgrades to appliances and weatherization improvements will be partially offset with rebates. Likewise, reductions in energy use will be rewarded with up to $8,000 in cash." <br /><br />Homes and buildings that effectively meet the new code will gain a certificate from the coming "Energy Performance Labeling Program," said Sussman. "Without the certificate you will likely not be able to sell your home, or obtain a loan to refinance your property. <br /><br />"While Americans are in a tizzy spending money to reduce their carbon footprint," he said, "a handful of political cronies are going to be getting really green – with passive income peeled off the backs of Mr. and Mrs. America." <br /><br />&lt;/DIV&gt;]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:23:58 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111797</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A little change.... but big meaning?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111778</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.justice.gov/" target="_blank">DOJ Website</a>  Gone is red white and blue, now the black and white.  Notice the quote of common law--- supposedly a quote of 1930's international law proponents.  You know , this is scary.  Why cant these people realize we have the greatest nation on earth?  And why do they want to open it up to the failed European, socialist way of thinking?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:45:56 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111778</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Marine General: obama gives confidence to enemy</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111774</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/08/24/conway-us-withdrawal-deadline-boosts-taliban-in-afghan-war/" target="_blank">Nothing we havent talked about</a>  Another General obama will have to fire for telling the truth. obama's incomptence matches his ignorance and adds upto his impudence, which is killing our nation.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:28:52 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111774</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Do you think people would be more willing to give</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111762</link>
		<description><![CDATA[he was not so heavy handed and at the same time wishy washy, voting "Present"?  Take NASA for example.  Congress would not let him kill it, so he ordered executive branches to cut funding etc and then set it up as a Muslim pride thing?  So he went against the people.  Health care--people didnt want it, he with his Super majority passed it over the will of the majority-- and those dems are going to pay for it, because it is becoming apparent that it is gonna not be free to those folks who thought it was.   The Mosque thing, He votes "Present"-- and sells out even his own liberal friends.  He makes a knee jerk executive order to please the greenies about drilling in the gulf- and puts folks out of work.  So if he negoiated with America, could it have helped him?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:35:35 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111762</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Larry Gatlin and the hard-working man</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111743</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.smoaky.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/notworthy.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":notworthy:" border="0" alt="notworthy.gif" />   <img src="http://www.smoaky.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":thumbsup:" border="0" alt="thumbsup.gif" /> <br /><br /><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/08/22/larry-gatlin-roger-miller-working-man-gulf-drilling-greenpeace-curley-gatlin/" target="_blank">http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/08/22/...-curley-gatlin/</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:21:41 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111743</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coulter, Beck go AWOL in culture war</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111706</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=193757" target="_blank">Coulter, Beck go AWOL in culture war</a><br /><br />I listened to Bryan Fischer live on AFR last Friday Aug. 20 discussing Coulter and Beck.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 06:30:53 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111706</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck problems?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111701</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<br /><a href="http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-times/article.php?articleid=6434" target="_blank">http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-...?articleid=6434</a><br />Ed Decker Responds to Donna Rogers' Article Criticizing The Radio Program of Brannon Howse On Glenn Beck's Divine Destiny Meeting <br /><br /><br />After reading  Donna Rogers' remarks regarding Brannon Howse's  statement re: Glenn Beck's   "Divine Destiny" movement, I would suggest that before she publishes any further criticisms of Brannon, she should at least do enough research to spell his name correctly. She should also take a good look at why Beck's claim of true Christianity causes so many Christian pastors and leaders to object publicly.<br /><br />To begin with, she quotes one single comment from an hour-long program from which to launch her criticism, of not only Brannon, but also all the other Christians who are not fawning over Beck.<br /><br />That said, I am touched by the zeal of her comments about the purity of Glenn Beck's purposes and his divine call to be today's King Hezekiah and like King Jehoshaphat in his work to restore the nation, but she misses the intent of Brannon Howse's statements by a country mile. <br /><br />Using a similar, Biblical association, I would have to compare Brannon to the apostle Paul who, when warning about false teachers among the believers, said:<br /><br /> <br /><br /><i>For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.  But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him. 2 Cor 11:2-4 KJV</i><br /><br />You see, it is not Beck's good works that matter in the end. It is his testimony of salvation through Jesus that matters. Lot's of great men and women who do great works of good out there, bearing great fruit, but are decidedly not Christian. There are two kinds of fruit the Bible discusses. The fruit of your life to which Rogers refers with regard to testing Beck and the fruit of your doctrine , which Brannon and I clearly discussed. <br /><br />It is back to the Question Jesus asked, "Who do men say that I am?" There-in is the rub and the danger to orthodox Christian  doctrine when men like Beck, speaking as oracles of God, define faith, religion and right standing with God and feel compelled to draw the confused among us back to the core principles they so fully represent.<br /><br />Let's cut to the chase here. Glenn Beck is a dedicated Temple Mormon who claims that 80% of the Mormon faith is built around the temple and the  "Time and all eternity" effects of the rituals there-in. [see: <a href="http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/mormon-glenn-beck-on-succesful-marriage/7d5c9d2abd18c90f99937d5c9d2abd18c90f9993-166644090209?q=Glenn%20beck%20mormonism" target="_blank">www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/mormon-glenn-beck-on-succesful-marriage/7d5c9d2abd18c90f99937d5c9d2abd18c90f9993-166644090209?q=Glenn%20beck%20mormonism</a>  <br /><br />According to LDS scripture and sacred instructions worthy Mormons receive in the temple, the god Beck serves is a physical, exalted man who lives with a harem of goddess wives on a planet near the great star Kolob. This god, Elohim, is the god of this one planet earth only. He is a man/god raised up from within this universe.<br /><br /><br /><br />The God of the Bible is the One who created the universes.  The Bible says that he is not a man, there were no gods before Him, none beside Him or after Him, and He knows not any.  This True God created all the heavens and was before all creation. He did not have to earn his godhood being obedient to some other god up the chain of command.<br /><br />Beyond that, As crazy as this may sound, understand that Glenn Beck learned all the secret/sacred signs, tokens and special handshakes he will need as he, hopefully, enters his own godhood, receives his own planet and goddess wives to help him populate it. Yes, Glenn Beck strives to become a god, himself.<br /><br /><br /><br />The Jesus Beck serves, is not God come in the flesh. He is a separate 'god' who was elected to be our savior by a council of other gods. The Jesus of Mormonism is the spirit brother and equal of Lucifer until the council voted in Jesus.<br /><br /><br /><br />This Jesus died on the cross so all mankind would be resurrected to be judged for their works, their obedience to the laws and ordinances of the [LDS] Gospel.<br /><br /><br /><br />Sorry, Donna Rogers, this is not the God and Jesus of Christianity. They are distorted figures of a false gospel, the one Paul warns about in the above scripture. <br /><br /><br /><br />You list a group of Christian leaders as though it would impress us that Beck has to be a Christian..  I say shame on them that they would sell their birthrights as pastors called to defend their flocks from false teachers and deceivers for bowls of porridge and a few minutes of stage time with this foolish, deceived and dangerous man who feels called to bring us all back to the truth.<br /><br />While he is busy digging up pre-Columbian Hebrew scrawlings in Tennessee, trying to build a groundwork for bringing us all into the Book of Mormon fables, he ought to take a few moments   and be honest about his true faith, the one he hides so well in his warm fuzzy way, the one where he is planning his own godhood.<br /><br />Click here to hear the complete one hour radio program of Brannon Howse that Donna is criticizing:<br /><a href="http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-radio/episode.php?episodeid=17190" target="_blank">http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-...episodeid=17190</a><br /><br /><b>Ed Decker, founder of Saints Alive, was a Mormon for 20 years of his adult life. He was a member of the Melchizedek priesthood, a Temple Mormon and active in many church positions. Through a crisis in his life, Ed met the real Jesus and his life was changed forever. An active author, speaker and evangelist, Ed has brought the light of Biblical truth to uncountable thousands of those lost in spiritual darkness. Today, the work of Saints Alive Ministries has expanded worldwide and includes ministry to other groups such as the Masonic Lodge.</b><br /><br /><a href="http://www.saintsalive.com/" target="_blank">www.saintsalive.com</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.eddeckerblog.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">www.eddeckerblog.blogspot.com</a> <br /><br /><a href="http://www.eddecker.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">www.eddecker.wordpress.com</a> <br /><br />Here is Donna Rogers' original article posted on the 9-12 website. <br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:29:28 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111701</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[China's Military Buildup]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111670</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<div align='center'><b><!--fonto:arial--><span style="font-family:arial"><!--/fonto--><!--sizeo:5--><span style="font-size:18pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo--><!--coloro:#002b5e--><span style="color:#002b5e"><!--/coloro-->U.S. Sounds Alarm at China's Military Buildup  <!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--></b></div><br /><div align='center'><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703908704575433933444265178.html" target="_blank">http://online.wsj.com/</a></div><br /><!--fonto:verdana sans serif--><span style="font-family:verdana sans serif"><!--/fonto--><!--sizeo:2--><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo-->The Pentagon voiced alarm over China's military buildup, saying it was expanding its advantage over Taiwan and investing heavily in ballistic and cruise missile capabilities that could one day pose a challenge to U.S. dominance in the western Pacific.<br /><br />In its annual report to Congress on Chinese military capabilities, the Pentagon also cited China's advances in electronic warfare. The U.S. government has been the target of cyber intrusions the report says appear to have originated in China and aimed to steal military secrets. "These intrusions focused on exfiltrating information, some of which could be of strategic or military utility," the report said. <br /><br />Though their two countries are increasingly interlinked economically, ties between the U.S. military and the People's Liberation Army of China have deteriorated since January, when the Obama administration notified Congress of a plan to sell Taiwan up to $6.4 billion in arms.<br /><br />Defense Secretary Robert Gates has appealed to the Chinese to re-engage to reduce the risk of military miscommunications. But U.S. officials say they have seen few signs of a thaw.<br /><br />Washington has long voiced alarm over China's military buildup opposite Taiwan. In this year's report, which was delivered months behind schedule, the Pentagon said China's military edge over Taiwan was continuing to "shift in the mainland's favor," the main argument used by the Obama administration in approving the arms deal.<br /><br />A particular concern for the U.S. is China's development of an antiship ballistic missile with a projected range of nearly 1,000 miles. The missile is meant to give the PLA the capability of attacking ships in the western Pacific, the report said. <br /><br />Some experts say the missile could herald the end of U.S. naval domination. Others say the PLA has yet to conduct any realistic tests of the conventionally armed ballistic missile and has no reliable way of targeting U.S. carrier task forces when they are at sea because China doesn't have enough low-earth-orbit reconnaissance satellites. <br /><br />A senior defense official called the antiship missile a "great concern" but added: "They still have a long way to go." <br /><br />The new missile is part of what the Pentagon described as "the most active land-based ballistic and cruise missile program in the world."<br /><br />The report said China's military has established information-warfare units to develop viruses to attack computer systems of its adversaries as well as tactics to protect its own networks. The ability to conduct cyber attacks fits within China's broader goal of conducting asymmetric warfare to exploit weaknesses in stronger enemies like the U.S. <br /><br />The report referenced cyber intrusions it says appear to have originated within China. It is unclear whether these were conducted by or at the behest of the Chinese military. <br /><br />The Wall Street Journal reported last year, and U.S. officials recently acknowledged publicly, that the Pentagon's largest weapons program, the Joint Strike Fighter, had been infiltrated. Investigators believe attackers in China were behind the effort to siphon off engineering designs and other information.<br /><br /><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc-->]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:08:20 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111670</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Carolina colleges MAKING students buy healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111653</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/19/anti-abortion-activists-unsatisfied-opt-clause-public-universities/" target="_blank">http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/19/anti-...c-universities/</a><br /><br />"Following complaints last week, Erskine Bowles, the president of the University of North Carolina school system, directed Pearce and Pearce, Inc., the South Carolina company that provides its insurance plan, to give students an opportunity to opt-out of a provision that would pay up to $500 per abortion, with a 20 percent deductible. The UNC school system consists of 16 four-year public universities throughout the state.<br /><br />Effective this fall, <b>under a new policy that was approved by the UNC Board of Governors one year ago, all UNC system students must have health insurance</b>. They can opt out of the university plan, which costs roughly $350 per semester, if they provide proof of insurance from another source -- for example, a parent's policy. As of Wednesday, more than 102,000 of roughly 225,000 students in the school system had elected not to utilize the university's plan, said Joni Worthington, a UNC spokeswoman."<br /><br />The inmates are running the aslym, apparently.<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:34:07 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111653</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Our new dictator for life</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111626</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_RECESS_APPOINTMENTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2010-08-19-17-09-48" target="_blank">Chavez in obama clothing</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:29:08 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111626</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[I guess Rick Perry is not as bad for Texas' schools afterall]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111606</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.texasinsider.org/?p=32131" target="_blank">What will really happen with democrat plan</a>  Why was Texas singled out?  Why did Doggett do this?  When will people underdtand that government handouts are not free?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:41:46 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111606</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Debra Medina for We Texans</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111592</link>
		<description><![CDATA["By now most recognize that the 2011 Texas Legislature will be forced<br />to grapple with an anticipated $18 billion budget shortfall.  What we<br />may not realize is that the day of reckoning has arrived and Texans<br />are paying the price for years of big government policies right here<br />in our home state.<br /><br />The U.S. Economic Freedom Index documents that Texas has fallen from<br />being the 8th most economically free state in the United States to<br />being #31 on the list.<br /><br />In fact, we're at 49 when it comes to regulations and government<br />size.<br /><br /><a href="http://special.pacificresearch.org/pub/sab/entrep/2008/Economic_Freedom/map.html" target="_blank">http://special.pacificresearch.org/pub/sab...reedom/map.html</a><br /><br />Every measure of economic freedom recognizes that private property<br />ownership is key to prosperity.  If Texas is to protect freedom and<br />insure prosperity for all Texans, we must eliminate property taxes."<br /><br />Operation Secure the Blessing is uniting the voices of grassroots<br />activists from all across this great state with weekly action items.<br />We must ensure that the message is heard loud and clear from the<br />Texas Panhandle to the Rio Grande Valley and from El Paso to Beaumont<br />and all points in between, "If I paid for it, it's mine - Eliminate<br />Property Tax in Texas!"<br /><br />Specific action items each week ensures maximum impact with our<br />legislature.  Together we will make a difference but we need everyone<br />doing their part.  Make sure to set aside 15 minutes each week to<br />contact your legislators and tell them private property ownership is<br />essential to prosperity and freedom.  We must repeal property taxes<br />in Texas.<br /><br />Here's another good article for the freedom and prosperity library:<br />The Case for Private Property -<br /><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?WeTexans/9b7a62e9a6/f4f8ef26ae/cec15a9191" target="_blank">http://cts.vresp.com/c/?WeTexans/9b7a62e9a...26ae/cec15a9191</a><br /><br />Texas can't afford not to Repeal Property Taxes NOW!<br /><br />For Liberty,<br />Debra Medina<br /><br />Sustaining Patrons     We Texans is providing that critical link<br />between hard working citizens and our state legislature.  We're<br />fighting to secure the essential elements of freedom, private<br />property ownership and state sovereignty.<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:13:53 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111592</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Move over Fannie and Freddie - Bawney says you need to go</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111590</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4313485?test=latestnews" target="_blank">http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4313485?test=latestnews</a><br /><br />Now, I could only muster watching about 3 minutes of this thing... the amount of lies he says in the first 3 minutes will blow your mind....<br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:05:47 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111590</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>State Rep. Joe Driver of Garland double-billed for travel</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111581</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->11:10 PM CDT on Monday, August 16, 2010<br /><br />AUSTIN – State Rep. Joe Driver of Garland, who rails against the evils of runaway government spending, admitted Monday that he has pocketed thousands of dollars in taxpayer money for travel expenses that his campaign had already funded. <br /><br /> The veteran Republican legislator, faced with findings from an investigation by The Associated Press, acknowledged in an interview that for years he has been submitting the same receipts – for luxury hotels, airline tickets, meals, fees and incidentals – to both his campaign and to the Texas House. He has also been collecting thousands of dollars in state mileage reimbursements for travel in vehicles for which his campaign has shelled out more than $100,000 since 2000. <br /><br />JOE DRIVER The AP's review of hundreds of pages of state and campaign travel records found that Driver double-billed for at least $17,431.55 in travel expenses, much of it at upscale out-of-state hotels, since 2005. The number could go higher, but House travel records before mid-2005 have already been destroyed. Driver has been in office for 18 years. The double-billing figure does not include the vehicle expenses. <br /><br />A conservative on the powerful House Appropriations Committee, which oversees how state dollars are spent, Driver said he thought it was OK to bill two entities for the same expenses. He said he routinely pays hotels and airlines with donated political funds and then submits the same expenses to the state, taking the taxpayer money for himself. <br /><br />"Now you're scaring the heck out of me," Driver told the AP, adding: "It pretty well screws my week." <br /><br />He vowed to pay back the state for any dollars that he was not entitled to receive. <br /><br />Two ethics watchdogs say that lawmakers who submit the same expenses to two different entities could run afoul of both civil and criminal law. Fred Lewis, an independent political watchdog who has been urging ethics reform in Texas, said Driver is probably not the only legislator collecting taxpayer money for travel that their donors actually pay for. <br /><br />"It's essentially double-dipping," Lewis said. "This is a very serious problem. ... It's wrong, because you can't ask the state to reimburse you for something for which you have not incurred an expense." <br /><br />Chad Dunn, general counsel for the Texas Democratic Party, said he would ask the Travis County district attorney's Public Integrity Unit to open a formal investigation. <br /><br />Driver insists he thought the double-billing was perfectly appropriate – until talking about it with the AP. <br /><br />"Well, it doesn't sound like it is now. If you bring it up that way," he said. <br /><br />Driver, former chairman of the House Law Enforcement committee, said that state ethics authorities approved the arrangement years ago, but he couldn't remember who told him that or when it was. He said he was told to just keep the state money and not reimburse his campaign for the expenditure. <br /><br />The Ethics Commission says it doesn't provide such advice because campaign money can't be legally converted to personal use. <br /><br />Ethics Commission deputy general counsel Tim Sorrells said any state reimbursements for campaign travel would have to "go back to the campaign, not for your personal use." <br /><br />Over the years, Driver has double-billed for numerous Southwest Airlines  tickets to Austin from Dallas "to attend to legislative duties," records show. But his biggest reimbursements came during legislative conferences held out of state. <br /><br />In August 2006, Driver's campaign paid $1,122.06 for him to stay at the Hotel Palomar in San Francisco  to attend the annual meeting of the American Legislative Exchange Council. Reports show the campaign also paid $450 in registration fees and $849.19 for a United Airlines flight. <br /><br />All of the receipts for those expenses were then submitted to the state for reimbursements. The state wouldn't pay $10.80 for the movie Driver watched, but it picked up the balance for the Hotel Palomar, paid him for the registration fees and $800 for the United Airline tickets – the maximum amount the state would pay for the flights. For that trip, at least $2,361.26 was double-billed, records show. <br /><br />There were several other reimbursements that netted Driver more than $1,000 in taxpayer payments, including more than $1,200 for a trip to Memphis, Tenn., in the final days of the 2009 legislative session. On that trip, House journals show Driver as present and voting in Austin on April 30 at least two dozen times – even though the travel records indicate he was traveling to Memphis during the proceedings. <br /><br />The next day, on May 1, 2009, Rep. Tryon Lewis, R-Odessa, made a motion to have Driver excused to tend to "important business in the district." Driver didn't check out of the Memphis Marriott until May 3. <br /><br />Driver, who faces Democrat Jamie Dorris in November, has made fiscal conservatism a hallmark of his re-election strategy. On his campaign website, Driver says in 2010 "taxpayers are in revolt against the big spending habits of liberals in government." <br /><br />First elected to the House in 1992, he didn't have "a clue" when he first began claiming reimbursements for travel paid for by his campaign, he said. <br /><br />"If I knew it was wrong, I wouldn't have done it that way," Driver said. "I wouldn't have done it just to make money." <br />________<br />AT A GLANCE: REP. JOE DRIVER <br />Legislative career: First elected in 1992. Former chairman of House Law Enforcement Committee. Faces Democrat Jamie Dorris in November. <br /><br />Occupation: Insurance sales and service <br /><br />Academic:  Bachelor's degree, North Texas State University (now the University of North Texas), 1971 <br /><br />Personal: Age 62; lives with wife, Deanne, in Garland; two grown children<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br /><br />Yet another argument for term limits. He should resign immediately and another candidate take his spot.<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:16:07 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111581</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Should the State consolodate small schools?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111580</link>
		<description>Should the State of Texas force smaller schools to consolodate? I DO NOT THINK THEY SHOULD AT ALL! But, there are economic advantages to this question. One is that when you consolodate students, you consolodate facilities, therefore less cost. The Texas Educational system is facing some very tough financial decisions. The same goes for the school districts. Hopefully, it does not come to this, but it could be a decision to be made someday.</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:26:07 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111580</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Obama's Islamic America]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111566</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/12/obamas-islamic-america/" target="_blank">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/a...slamic-america/</a><br /><br /><br />President <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/barack-obama/" target="_blank"><!--coloro:#164a6e--><span style="color:#164a6e"><!--/coloro-->Obama<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--></a> says Islam has always been part of America, which raises the question, does the president know something about American history that we don't?........<br /><br />.....Throughout most of American history, the Muslim world was perceived as remote, alien and belligerent. Perhaps the president was thinking about the Barbary Pirates and their role in the founding of the U.S. Navy, or Andrew Jackson's dispatch of frigates against Muslim pirates in Sumatra in the 1830s. Maybe he was recalling Rutherford B. Hayes' 1880 statement regarding Morocco on "the necessity, in accordance with the humane and enlightened spirit of the age, of putting an end to the persecutions, which have been so prevalent in that country, of persons of a faith other than the Moslem, and especially of the Hebrew residents of Morocco." Or <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/grover-cleveland/" target="_blank"><!--coloro:#164a6e--><span style="color:#164a6e"><!--/coloro-->Grover Cleveland<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--></a>'s 1896 comment on the continuing massacre of Armenian Christians: "We have been afflicted by continued and not infrequent reports of the wanton destruction of homes and the bloody butchery of men, women and children, made martyrs to their profession of Christian faith. ... It so mars the humane and enlightened civilization that belongs to the close of the nineteenth century that it seems hardly possible that the earnest demand of good people throughout the Christian world for its corrective treatment will remain unanswered."]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:00:48 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111566</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>2 presidents and the Marines</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111565</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIHz5tevLAw" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIHz5tevLAw</a><br /><br />They know it and we know it.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:29:13 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111565</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cliff Kincaid does not appear to be a friend of the Log Cabin</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111556</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff443.htm" target="_blank">© 2010 Cliff Kincaid - All Rights Reserved</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:47:11 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111556</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Coach Ken: Taunting and payback</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111507</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.billbennett.com/" target="_blank">Click on Coach Ken  audio at right</a>  Sorry guys, I didnt think I could load this, so I just posted the link.  It will be worth your while to listen to one of us.  I think Coach Ken was head coach at Allen and several other places.  Powerful message.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:55:29 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111507</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>No one trusts the media</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111457</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/142133/Confidence-Newspapers-News-Remains-Rarity.aspx" target="_blank">Gallup Poll</a>  And arent we supposed to believe Gallup, the dems sure throw it out there when it favors them.  Newsweek sold for a dollar, DMN padded their readership to sell ads. so on and so on.  Did anyone see Louie Gohmert on Channel 7, and what Anderson Cooper did to him?  Ive never watched Cooper, but what I saw how they edited Louie, what misinformation.  Media is way lower than used car salesmen in the rankings.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:33:02 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111457</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kathie Glass--Texas Governor?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111453</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.kathie4guv.com/" target="_blank">http://www.kathie4guv.com/</a><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:51:37 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111453</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Lone Voice of Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111443</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/14/business/economy/14fed.html?_r=1" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/14/business...14fed.html?_r=1</a><br /><br />One guy has it right and the Keynesians are snickering in the corner.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:09:03 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111443</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Washington Parasite, Maxine Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111442</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/13/rep-waters-violated-house-rules/?test=latestnews#content" target="_blank">blames Bush for her problems</a>  1. This is getting old. 2. If this was the truth, why wasnt brought out long ago?  3.  When cornered, Libs and Dems always blame Bush. 4. I guess Bush is the devil himself.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:39:35 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111442</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Where's the beef?]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111441</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100813/ap_on_el_se/us_us_senate_sc/" target="_blank">This guy is well qualified now to be a politician</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:10:45 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111441</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Proof That The Free Press is Gone!</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111438</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100813/pl_yblog_upshot/which-white-house-reporters-had-lunch-with-obama" target="_blank">http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100...unch-with-obama</a><br /><br />The White House only invited "certain" members (Jake Tapper didn't get the invite), and swears these people to secrecy?!?!  This from the "most transparent" administration in history!!!<br /><br />Where in the hell do I live?  What freakin country are we in?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:52:21 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111438</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA["Islam has always been a part of America"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111437</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/08/barack-obama-islam-has-always-been-a-part-of-america/" target="_blank">Do we have an idiot for President?</a>  Or does he KNOW exactly what he is doing , putting out misinformation for the uneducated liberalls to grasp, and ponder and in the name of tolerance allow Muslims to take over.  And no........... Jews do not want to rule the world, just want a homeland.  And no, Christians dont want to rule the world, just would like everyone to know Jesus.  But Muslims do want to rule the world.  By the way......... obama's tough schedule today is that he is off from noon until 8 tonight at which time he is hosting a Ramadan meal in the White House.<br /><br />Always a part of America?  Im still looking for all those Sheiks on the Mayflower.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:41:44 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111437</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A tale of current events</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111432</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Just received this - pretty much sums it up.<br /><br />"How's this for apocalyptic literature? This was written by a<br />pastor's wife in biblical prose as a commentary of current<br />events. It is brilliant. <br /><br />And it came to pass in the Age of Insanity that the people<br />of the land  called America, having lost their morals, their<br />initiative, and their will  to defend their liberties, chose<br />as their Supreme Leader that person  known as "The One."<br /><br />He emerged from the vapors with a message that had no<br />meaning; but He  hypnotized the people telling them, "I am<br />sent to save you." My lack of experience, my questionable<br />ethics, my monstrous ego, and my association  with evil<br />doers are of no consequence. I shall save you with  hope and<br />Change. Go, therefore, and proclaim throughout the land <br />that he who proceeded me is evil, that he has defiled the<br />nation,and  that all he has built must be destroyed. And the<br />people rejoiced, for  even though they knew not what "The<br />One" would do, he had promised that  it was good; and they<br />believed. And "The One" said "We live in the  greatest<br />country in the world. Help me change everything about it!" <br />And the people said, "Hallelujah! Change is good!" <br /><br />Then He said, "We are going to tax the rich fat-cats." And<br />the  people said "Sock it to them!" "And redistribute their<br />wealth." And the people said, "Show us the money!" And then<br />he said,  "redistribution of wealth is good for everybody."<br />"4" <br />And Joe the plumber asked," Are you kidding me? You're going<br />to  steal my money and give it to the deadbeats??" And "The<br />One" ridiculed and taunted him, and Joe's personal records<br />were hacked and  publicized.<br />One lone reporter asked, "Isn't that Marxist policy?" And<br />she was banished from the kingdom! <br /><br />Then a citizen asked, "With no foreign relations experience<br />and  having zero military experience or knowledge, how will<br />you deal with radical terrorists?" And "The One" said,<br />"Simple. I shall sit with them and talk with them and show<br />them how nice we really are; and they will forget that they<br />ever wanted to kill us all!" And the peoplesaid, <br />"Hallelujah!! We are safe at last, and we can beat our<br />weapons  into free cars for the people!" <br /><br />Then "The One" said "I shall give 95% ofyou lower taxes."<br />And one,  lone voice said, "But 40% of us don't pay ANY<br />taxes." So "The One" said, "Then I shall give you some of<br />the taxes the fat-cats pay!"  And the people said,<br />"Hallelujah! Show us the money!"  Then "The One" said, "I<br />shall tax your Capital Gains when you sell  your homes!" And<br />the people yawned and the slumping housing market collapsed.<br />And He said, "I shall mandate employer-funded health care<br />for every worker and raise the minimum wage. And I shall<br />give every person unlimited healthcare and medicine and<br />transportation to the  clinics." And the people said, "Give<br />me some of that!"  Then he said, "I shall penalize employers<br />who ship jobs overseas." And the people said, "Where's my<br />rebate check?" <br /><br />Then "The One" said, "I shall bankrupt the coal industry and<br />electricity rates will skyrocket!" And the people said,<br />"Coal is dirty, coal is evil, no more coal! But we don't<br />care for that part about higher electric rates." So "The<br />One" said, Not to worry. If  your rebate isn't enough to<br />cover your expenses, we shall bail you out. Just sign up<br />with the ACORN and you troubles are over!" <br /><br />Then He said, "Illegal immigrants feel scorned and slighted.<br />Let's  grant them amnesty, Social Security, free education,<br />free lunches, free medical care, bilingual signs and<br />guaranteed housing..." And the people said, "Hallelujah!"<br />and they made him king!<br /><br /><b>And so it came to pass that employers, facing spiraling<br />costs and  ever-higher taxes, raised their prices and laid<br />off workers. Others simply gave up and went out of business<br />and the economy sank like unto a rock dropped from a cliff.<br />The banking industry was destroyed. Manufacturing slowed to<br />a crawl. And more of the people were without a means of<br />support.</b><br /><br />Then "The One" said, "I am the "the One"- The Messiah - and<br />I'm here to save you! We shall just print more money so<br />everyone will have enough!" But our foreign trading partners<br />said unto Him. "Wait a minute. Your dollar is not worth a<br />pile of camel dung! You will have to pay more... And "The<br />One" said, "Wait a minute. That is unfair!!" And the world<br />said, "Neither are these other idiotic programs you have<br />embraced. Lo, you have become a Socialist state and a<br />second-rate power. Now you shall play by our rules!"<br /><br />And the people cried out, "Alas, alas!! What have we done?"<br />But yea verily, it was too late. The people set upon The One<br />and spat upon him and stoned him, and his name was dung. And<br />the once mighty nation was no more; and the once proud<br />people were without sustenance or shelter or hope. And the<br />Change "The One" had given them was as like unto a poison<br />that had destroyed them and like a whirlwind that consumed<br />all that they had built. <br /><br />Andthe people beat their chests in despair and cried out in<br />anguish,  "give us back our nation and our pride and our<br />hope!!" But itwas too  late, and their homeland was no more."<br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:58:30 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111432</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Libs Boycott Target</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111430</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Liberal-groups-push-to-apf-2321043209.html?x=0" target="_blank">http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Liberal-grou...043209.html?x=0</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />I think it's good for Target that they are doing this, but isn't it Target that doesn't allow Salvation Army ringers at their stores around Christmas?? I can't remember if it was them or some other store. Maybe they are starting to roll in the right direction??]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:16:22 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111430</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Solution For Restoring America!</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111424</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://myauctionfinds.com/files/2010/06/stamps1.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" /><br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:48:44 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111424</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>HOW REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS PLAY AMERICANS AS FOOLS BY USING THE THIRD WAY</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111410</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-tube/video.php?videoid=4404" target="_blank">and it was the Rio Summit that led to U.N. Agenda 21</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:05:48 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111410</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Grinch Who Stole Conservatism</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111408</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=1056" target="_blank">http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=1056</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:10:41 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111408</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Is she a quitter?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111404</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100812/NEWS/8120308" target="_blank">Lesbian Quits West Point</a>  If she cant stand the pressure, how would she hold up as an Officer?  I really do  not feel sorry for her.  If there are others at West Point, and they are making it, then they have more strength than her?  And the name calling is in every school.  Seems that the more folks try to force this on kids, the more they are rejecting it.  Around school, kids call each other gay or the other word in a demeaning manner, and in response to poor teenage behavior than when I was in school.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:27:53 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111404</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Say what you want</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111403</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/08/11/troops-returning-from-iraq-and-afghanistan-get-a-little-surprise-at-dallasft-worth-airport/" target="_blank">But at least he is a good guy</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:07:08 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111403</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>TJC and its new proposed tax hike</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111401</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Just received this... Tyler's gone kinda bonkers...<br /><br />"If you're not prepared to have the Commissioners Court raise your taxes, then you're not likely prepared for this one:<br /><br />What:  First of two public hearings on the TJC proposal to increase<br />property taxes<br /><br />When:  Thursday, August 12 @ 11:00 a.m. (the second public hearing<br />will be Thursday, August 19 @ 11 AM)<br /><br />Where:  Board Room, White Administrative Services Center on the Tyler<br />Junior College campus<br /><br />You are asked to attend this meeting tomorrow.  Please sign up to<br />speak as individual taxpayers against a tax increase of this size.  An<br />official Grassroots statement will be presented at the second public<br />hearing, but we need YOU to show up tomorrow AND then again next<br />Thursday!  If we don't speak out, they will think the taxpayers do not<br />care!<br /><br />Facts you need to know compiled from Appraisal District information,<br />the TJC web site and the Tyler Morning Telegraph:<br /><br />The Tyler Junior College Board of Trustees is proposing to increase<br />taxes by 33.57%.  The proposed rate increase is 4.6 cents on the tax<br />rate.<br /><br />The average taxable value of a residence homestead in the TJC District<br />last year was $129,446. Based on last yearâ€™s tax rate of .136950 per<br />$100 of taxable value, the amount of taxes imposed last year on the<br />average home was $177.28.<br /><br />The average taxable value of a residence homestead in the TJC District<br />this year is $125,771. If the governing body<br />adopts the effective tax rate for this year of .138983 per $100 of<br />taxable value, the amount of taxes imposed this year on the average<br />home would be $174.80.  [Note:  the effective tax rate would bring in<br />the SAME amount of taxes as last year and takes into consideration the<br />decline in taxable values.]<br /><br />If TJC adopts the proposed tax rate of .182926 per $100 of taxable<br />value, the amount of taxes imposed this year on<br />the average home would be $230.07.<br /><br />Important points to remember:  TJC is also taxing businesses.  Where<br />possible, business will pass tax increases down to consumers.  To say<br />that people over-65 are not impacted by property tax increases is<br />false.  This is insulting to the over-65 crowd because it says they<br />only care about themselves and do not care about the impact on younger<br />families or the economy as a whole.<br /><br />Part of this rate increase is to pay for $24.5 million in maintenance<br />tax notes the TJC Board approved in 2009 to cover what they called<br />"failing infrastructure."  The funds were to be used to replace<br />leaking roofs, foundation problems, a failing electrical power grid,<br />sewer and water systems.  The Board chose maintenance tax notes to<br />borrow the money instead of going to the voters.  They chose<br />maintenance tax notes because that financing method cannot be recalled<br />by the voters as can certificates of obligation.<br /><br />In 2009, the TJC Board finally started setting aside a little less<br />than one cent on the tax rate to start a "pay as you go" preservation<br />fund for facilities.  Wonder why it took 84 years for an elected board<br />to decide it would be smart to set aside tax dollars each year to keep<br />buildings repaired instead deferring maintenance and allowing the<br />facilities to decline?  All the years that there was a booming<br />economy, TJC set aside no money for the buildings and now that we have<br />sales tax in decline and a declining economy, they bring forward a<br />whopping tax increase!<br /><br />It is important to look at the impact of property tax increases on the<br />community as a whole.  Increasing taxes during this kind of economic<br />climate further damages the economy.<br /><br />TJC Salary increases from Sunday's Tyler Morning Telegraph:<br /><br />TJC proposed a budget of about $30.9 million for faculty and staff<br />salaries for the 2011 fiscal year, about a $1.3 million increase from<br />the previous year in which about $29.6 million was budgeted for<br />salaries.<br /><br />Full-time faculty salaries for the 2011 fiscal year are proposed to<br />increase by about $416,000 -- about $15.5 million from about $15.1<br />million.<br /><br />Part-time faculty salaries also increased in the 2011 proposed budget<br />to about $2.5 million from about $2.3 million in the previous budget.<br /><br />Its $26.2 million salary budget was steady during 2009-10 and 2008-09.<br />In 2007-08, the college budgeted about $24 million.<br /><br />"We tried to improve (salaries) and now I'm worried, really worried,<br />that we're going to lose ground," Metke said.<br /><br />TJC gave all full-time employees a 2 percent across-the-board raise in<br />September 2008. After the college was certain enrollment would<br />increase and funding was available, full-time employees received an<br />additional 2-percent raise, along with $500 in January 2009.<br /><br />With that raise, TJC Metke and TJC Provost Homer "Butch" Hayes'<br />salaries went to $243,309 from $233,388 (4.24% increase) and to<br />$140,000 from $118,262 (18.4% increase) respectively."<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:57:19 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111401</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Afghanistan civilians</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111400</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://my.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20100812/47bd689e-5e9b-4a49-8328-c44c0dcb13cd" target="_blank">http://my.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=2...28-c44c0dcb13cd</a><br /><br />'Bout had enough of reading stories like this...'bout time we say the devil with 'em, literally.  If they won't stand up on their own, they deserve what they get.  This war has become so PC it's a mockery to our armed forces.  Having our tax dollars to pay for "civilian" deaths seems odd to me... war is heck, it's not pretty.<br /><br />No matter what we do there, as soon as we leave, they'll come back in.  All they have to do is wait.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:13:15 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111400</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>More Professing US is Bankrupt</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111399</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/38654017" target="_blank">http://www.cnbc.com/id/38654017</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-11/u-s-is-bankrupt-and-we-don-t-even-know-commentary-by-laurence-kotlikoff.html" target="_blank">http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-11/u...-kotlikoff.html</a><br /><br />I'm not sure it can be salvaged.   <img src="http://www.smoaky.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbdown.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":thumbdown:" border="0" alt="thumbdown.gif" />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:59:17 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111399</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>I have gotten an inside lesson in European Socialism</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111389</link>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a Swedish friend spending the last two weeks with us and I have been picking his brain about Euro Socialism and I have to admit my mind has been opened and I have learned some things<br /><br />For all those that say Obama and the left wants us to be more like Euro Socialist, that is plain not true<br /><br />Here in America the left want to take from the the rich and give to the poor while excluding the rich..basically making them foot the bill but not be able to take part in any of the programs<br /><br />In European countries, EVERYONE pays in and EVERYONE is eligible for the services. There is no one group funding for everyone.<br /><br />He has been telling me in Sweden most unemplyed DO try their hardest to find work ASAP even when on the dole as they look. <br /><br />I guess the thing I can now respect about their way of doing it is as I said EVERYONE is eligible and EVERYONE pays in.<br /><br />That of course will never happen here because one side wants the Richer folks to pay but only the poor can enjoy the services the rich pay for.<br /><br />Now not saying I am for their way, I am just more educated now on HOW they do it]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111389</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Harry Reid: I cant imagine any Hispanics voting republican</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111378</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/harry-reid-i-dont-know-how-anyone-hispanic-heritage-could-be-republican" target="_blank">In nother words you are too stupid to do without us democrats!!</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:41:13 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111378</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Family feud--In democrat party!</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111374</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/10/democrats-advocacy-groups-blast-cuts-food-stamps-fund-m-jobs/" target="_blank">Cutting food stamps to buy off teacher unions</a>  Well,  well.  Those compasionate liberals.  Or do they vote money just to stay in power and really dont care aout the poor.? Dont know about you , but if I was down and out, I would show up at a church full of conservatives before I  showed up at a democrat picnic wanting some help.  <br /><br />While we are on teachers, many conservatives are going after the "public" sector retirement system--well that gets close, but I will probally teach until 65 or 70.  But do they have a point about say a guy who started teaching at 22, worked his way to a 200,000  Supt job ( I dont begrudge that salary, as if he has 500 employees- that is still smaller than CEOS make) and then retires at 53?  He would have 30 years, so his indicator is 60.3%.  60.3% of 200000 is 120,000 a year.  If he lived for 30 more years, which is highly possible , he will collect over 3 million. At 6% he didnt contribute near that, I  think that is what is making folks look at it.  Of course Congress does even better in retirement!!!!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:13:16 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111374</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Texas Transportation</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111366</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://texasturf.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=902&Itemid=2" target="_blank">Can transportation survive politics? </a><br /><br /><a href="http://texasturf.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=900&Itemid=2" target="_blank">Trans Texas Corridor TTC-35 officially DEAD! While we celebrate this victory, there are three active Trans Texas Corridor routes currently moving forward: TTC-69, La Entrada de Pacifico, and Ports to Plains.</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:57:18 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111366</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Queen Michelle Antoinette and</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111363</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dotpenn.com/images/stories/articles/2009-08/barack_obama_the_french_sun_king.jpg" target="_blank">King Louie, Louie obama</a>  Let them eat cake..............]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:00:20 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111363</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Lamar Smith on the House floor</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111360</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZthnwAEFIE" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZthnwAEFIE</a><br /><br />Wish it would've been longer.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:44:07 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111360</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Mexico's supreme court and same sex marriages]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111359</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/08/10/mexicos-supreme-court-rules-nationwide-recognition-mexico-citys-sex-marriages/" target="_blank">http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/08/10/me...-sex-marriages/</a><br /><br />Maybe some folks will move... out of America.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:34:16 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111359</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Obama at UT</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111350</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Received this and articulates from a person who was there... interesting!<br /><br />"A few notes from Mondayâ€™s Obama Remarks at the University of Texasâ€¦<br /><br />By Greg Holloway, Austin Tea Party Patriots<br /><br />Thanks to our Congressman, Lamar Smith, Judy and I were invited to attend the remarks given by President Obama at the University of Texas on Monday.  We had the pleasure of meeting Susan Heckmann, Rep. Smithâ€™s liaison, at UT and spending the afternoon with her.  Here are a few bits of information you may not have read about in the paper or seen on the news:<br /><br />Long lines â€“ Although everyone had a ticket, all attendees were required to go through security to enter Gregory Gym, where the event was held.  Imagine 3,500 folks lined up pretty much single file to get in.  Thatâ€™s how long the line was.  It took us about 1 hour, 15 minutes from the end of the line to the door.  It wasnâ€™t a bad wait, however.  There were two stations in line from which ice cold water was distributed.  A very nice touch by UT.<br /><br />Security â€“ Security was fairly quick.  Frankly, it was easier than the security line at the airport.  Judy noted that, although we are required to have a picture ID to hear a President speak, we are not required to have a photo ID to vote for one.<br /><br />The Gym â€“ Gregory Gym was well air-conditioned.  It was fairly easy to find a seat near our designated area.  Most of the Longhorns football team, all in matching shirts, were  lined up with Sally Brown (the coachâ€™s wife) in the front row of the balcony just to the left of the stage.<br /><br />The beginning â€“ Much to our surprise, the event started on time.  More importantly, it started with the crowd standing for the Pledge of Allegiance and the National Anthem.  Very nice.  Just as nice were short introductory speeches by three UT students.  The President was introduced by a doctoral candidate, Rian K. Carkhum, who was very impressive.  We met her afterwards.<br /><br />The speech â€“ We were prepared for a very partisan speech.  Instead, the speech minimized the Presidentâ€™s personal references and focused on why we want more students to attend and complete degree work in college.  Of course, the President couldnâ€™t help but note that he thought that the federal takeover of the student loan program would save $60 billion and pave the way for 8 million more college students by 2020.  Canâ€™t say I really follow that logic.  The President did give props to some of the local Democrat office holders in the crowd (Doggett, Watson, Leffingwell and Sheila Jackson Lee of Houston), but overall it was a fairly non-partisan address.<br /><br />The crowd â€“ Applause was energetic, but not wild.  Lots of folks did not applaud at all.  The UT football team was immobile.  There was only one single shout of â€śYes we canâ€ť from the crowd, which was a great blessing.  (The MoveOn.org rally we attended in connection with the healthcare fight last summer was nauseating by comparison.)  The crowd was extremely civil and well-behaved.<br /><br />Final thoughts â€“ Bill White should have attended.  Rick Perry showed gumption by meeting the President at the landing of Air Force One and handing him a letter requesting more border security. <br /><br />tylerteaparty.org"]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:39:12 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111350</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tyler and property taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111349</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Received this from the Tyler Tea Pearty and saw a bit of a different way of looking at it... interesting, never actually thought about it like that.<br /><br />"County Commissioners will hear public comment on a proposed 14% increase of property taxes this morning and again on Aug 17th at 9:30AM.<br /><br />Commissioners Warr and Phillips seem to lean toward cutting employee hours or salaries.  Hampton & McGinnis want no cuts.<br /><br />Real US unemployment is estimated to be between 18 and 20%.  We might ask the Court what is the County employee unemployment rate? Concomitantly, 1 in 5 home mortgages are underperforming.  How many County employees are unable to make timely mortgage payments?<br /><br />Should  private citizens who are 18% unemployed and 20% behind on there home payments be asked to shoulder all sacrifice for an increased county budget?<br /><br />Shouldn't county employees who are close to 100% employed, make $11 more per hour than the private sector and are not behind on their mortage payments understand their responsibility in shouldering some or most of this new tax burden?<br /><br />This morning's Tyler Paper reports that since 2000, the county's levy (income) has jumped from $18M to $38M because the assessed valuation has jumped from $7B to $13.5B (93% increase) and the tax rate from 22.95 cents to the proposed 33 cents  (a 44% increase in the same time period.<br /><br /><br />A recent report from El Paso stated that the property values had devaluated so much in that area, that tax revenues wouldn't fulfill county costs.  The County Commissioners Court there plans to raise property taxes dramatically to cover the difference!<br /><br />Folks...it's time to face facts!  America's problems are OUR problems.  Property tax increased affect ALL of us!  Apartment complexes have to pay them too...taxes go up...rent goes up.  It's time to buck up or stay in the truck!<br /><br />tylerteaparty.org"]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:56:31 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111349</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Can't sing the national anthen at the Lincoln Memorial]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111345</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Must be within "certain feet" to be able to do so.....so it won't offend... OFFEND WHO?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/09/students-lincoln-memorial-told-stop-singing-national-anthem/?test=latestnews" target="_blank">http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/09/stude...test=latestnews</a><br /><br />I'm past the point of this type of NONSENSE!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:19:24 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111345</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[obama's answer to the economy]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111332</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/10/education/10obama.html?_r=1" target="_blank">60% should graduate college</a>  Uh, why?  This is hype to make folks feel good, enroll more uneducated into our colleges.  Then when the grad rates are not 60% the govt will tell colleges to reduce the standards.  Problem fixed.  Then a job at McDonalds will require a college degree and more with the old sheepskin standing in unemployment lines.    Our Ivy league elite running the country, never have run a business, so they are going to make everyone an executive.  Hmmmm, who is going to do the work?  We are running off all our aleins, and folks are actually turning down 10-20 an hour jobs up north to stay on unemployment.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:24:41 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111332</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral College why do have it</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111325</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<b><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->The wolves are at the door!<br />By Henry Lamb<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--></b><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->                                                         <br /><!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><a href="http://www.screencast.com/t/ZmQ0MTdhZT" target="_blank"><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto--><!--coloro:#0000ff--><span style="color:#0000ff"><!--/coloro-->To listen, click here<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--><!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--></a><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->America is not a democracy.  It was never intended to be a democracy.  The founders worked hard to see that the new government they created was not a democracy, but a growing segment of the population seems hell-bent on transforming this great nation into a democracy in which the rights of the minority are systematically ignored.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->The United States of America was quite deliberately designed to be a federal republic.  The founders recognized the highest governing authority on earth to be the individual.  They realized that they, as individuals, had the authority and the intelligence to create a new system of government, empowered by the consent of the governed to do only those specific chores that the people stipulated in a written Constitution.  <!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->They recognized that in such a government, there would need to be direct accountability to the electorate for every official empowered to make laws that restricted the freedom of individuals.  This new federal republic had to recognize and honor the state governments that were already constructed, and the local governments within these states, if the new federal republic were to have any chance of succeeding.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->The Constitution these men formulated contained two provisions to ensure that the new government would forever remain a federal republic: a Senate chosen by state governments; and a President chosen indirectly by what came to be known as the Electoral College.  The 17<sup>th</sup> Amendment destroyed a major safeguard of the federal republic by allowing Senators to be chosen by the public, rather than by the states.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->The 17<sup>th</sup> Amendment was a significant part of the wave of progressivism ushered in by the Wilson administration in 1913.  Imposition of the income tax, the Federal Reserve, the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, began the attack by progressives on the federal republic the founders had so carefully constructed.  <!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->The Electoral College is the last and only element of the Constitution that keeps the United States of America from being formally transformed into a direct democracy.  Now, the progressives have taken aim, and are attacking this last bastion of the federal republic.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->Direct election of Senators came as the result of a Constitutional Amendment, which can be reversed as was the prohibition amendment - another progressive-era mistake.  The war on the Electoral College is taking a different path: states are enacting legislation that authorizes all the state's electors to be awarded to the national winner of the popular vote, regardless of the how the people voted in the state.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, and now Massachusetts have all enacted legislation that pledges to assign their state's electors to the winner of the national popular vote in the presidential election, regardless of how the voters in the state voted.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->Prior to this new war on the Electoral College, in all states except Nebraska and Maine, all the state's electors were assigned to the candidate who received the most votes in the state.  This is the winner-take-all system.  This system assures that small states have a say in the selection of the President.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->Progressives argue that the winner-take-all system is not democratic.  So be it.  It was not designed to be democratic; it was designed to help balance the power between and among the states and the various branches of government.  It was designed to make government function as a federal republic rather than a democracy.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->Few people understand the importance of the Electoral College because schools have all but erased the subject from the curriculum.  The Electoral College is cumbersome, it is confusing, it is frustrating for the supporters of Al Gore who saw the Electoral College bestow the presidency on George W. Bush who received fewer popular votes than did Al Gore.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->Consider the effect of eliminating the Electoral College:  direct democracy.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->The president would be chosen by urban population centers.  There would be no need to campaign in rural states.  There would be no need to be concerned about the needs and cares of rural people. There would be no interest in the minority.  <!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->The genius of the American system of governance is the carefully developed balance of power between the states and the federal government, the various branches of government, and between conflicting philosophies of governance.  When the minority is driven from the debate, or ignored, tyranny reins.  <!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->The first 18 months of the Democratic regime in Washington has demonstrated how the majority can ignore the minority and the Constitution.  In the cycle of governance, democracy is the last phase before anarchy.  The founders wanted no part of a democracy; they created a federal republic.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br /><!--fonto:Calibri--><span style="font-family:Calibri"><!--/fonto-->A democracy is often described as two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.  The wolves are at the door of our federal republic.<!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><br /><br />Distributed by www.ChristianWorldviewNetwork.com <br /><a href="http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-times/article.php?articleid=6385" target="_blank">http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-...?articleid=6385</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:18:06 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111325</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>1,200 National Guard troops .....</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111323</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/70702" target="_blank">http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/70702</a><br /><br /><b>CNSNews.com)</b> -- The 1,200 National Guard troops that are being deployed incrementally to the southwest border “will not be doing direct law enforcement,” said U.S. National Guard Bureau Director of Communications Jack Harrison when asked if the forces would be interdicting drugs and undocumented immigrants.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:23:05 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111323</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cartoon</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111313</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.creators.com/editorialcartoons/michael-ramirez.html" target="_blank">http://www.creators.com/editorialcartoons/...el-ramirez.html</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 00:03:46 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111313</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Mises?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111311</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Have any of you ever checked out the Ludwig Von Mises Institute? They focus on the Austrian School of Economics....<br /><br /><br />Thomas Woods, Jr. wrote the new book "Nullification: How to resist federal tyranny"...He is one of their Sr. fellows...<br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:57:27 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111311</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[As obama follows Hoover's model....]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111288</link>
		<description>Spend our way out of recession and then find huge deficits, so tax, and tax the folks who dont have money, and then layoffs, and yall know the snowball............... Do you have a plan for the upcoming depression?  I have some property clear and paid off, can garden and hunt, need some money  for property taxes.  That brand new $4000   FEMA trailer I looked at (And some would not live in it) and let go is looking good for a backup.  131,000 jobs lost in this summer of recovery yesterday.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:09:21 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111288</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>School teachers, administrators cuss Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111287</link>
		<description>for not taking the federal money................then whine about passing TAKS Standards, but  flunking Federal AYP and being on the front page.  I do not judge a school by those standards, but the media sure does.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:20:16 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111287</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Romer leaves WH - this will blow your mind.</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111271</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/08/romer_to_leave.php" target="_blank">http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/a...er_to_leave.php</a><br /><br />Now once reading the article, as I occasionally do, I'll skim down and read the comments.  It absolutely is hilarious to me to see what these progressive liberals (socialists in sheep's clothing) say about the present administration, even though, they openly say they voted for 'em and donated to 'em...<br /><br />Now, this one just about had me rolling....<br /><br />"Uggh. Another progressive leaves an administration already lacking progressive voices.<br /><br />Summers was the worst pick ever, along with that weasel Geithner and Rahm "Karl Rove" Emanuel. At least Romer was a progressive voice to counter the the Harvard/Chicago axis that represents Goldman Sachs, Wall St and the kind of unfettered, unregulated, "free"-market larceny that has been eroding this country's economic vitality for 30 years, while making the rich much richer still. Summers and company are the same ding-dongs and charlatans posing as economic gurus who have enabled the on-going plunder of America. Looks like Romer finally got fed up with the status-quo Obama admin that only pays occasional lip-service to doing what's needed after 30 years of systematic dismantling of the New Deal and consumer protections. From the beginning, it was obvious she was only picked as part of the economics team to provide window dressing to placate progressives, while it was always Summers and Geithner who ran the show.<br /><br />I'm sickened by the Obama admin at this point. Time and time again they have shown an overly eager willingness to throw progressives under the bus - whether it's chucking key principles immediately while getting almost nothing in return, or quickly firing progressives when the Right whines too much. People like Van Jones and Romer should be held onto - while Rahm, Summers and Geithner should never have been appointed in the first place. Hell, Rahm is quite outspoken about taking progressives for granted - he doesn't even hide his disdain for them.<br /><br />From foreign policy to domestic policy, this admin can best be described centrist or a hair center-right. Better than the previous admin, to be sure, but you can't really say they are up to the challenge of this time in history. Obviously I am more to the left, but I'm not dogmatic about it. For progressives, it's really not about getting our pet programs enacted or our pet ideologies catered to - it's about addressing the unique times we find ourselves in. After 30 years of uninterrupted free-market policies that have seen regulations gutted, our manufacturing base shipped over-seas, and general plunder run amok to the point where most of the economy is built on fraud... well, the times scream for a more vigorous progressive rollback of the damaging, failed policies of the corporate right. Incrementalism, splitting the difference, triangulation, and all the usual fluffy bipartisan #### (read: capitulation to corporate interests) isn't going to begin to address the fundamental problems this nation is saddled with - and everytime those are tried, it only blows up in the administration's face. The needed solutions are watered down to the point where they cannot address the problems effectively, and the wingnuts STILL demonize the president as a radical and vote in lock-step against him on every initiative. No matter how watered down the policies, and how many progressive principles and programs are dumped overboard, the wingers foam at the mouth, get concessions, and then end up voting No. And support for the adminsitration continues to ebb. So what is getting accomplished here? <br /><br />Mr President, your lame centrist policies and constant sops to the Right are not what the country desperately needs, and they will never result in the Right hating you less. You end up with ineffective policies not up to the moment, and losing ground politically - not so much with progressives as with Independents. Contrary to the CW, Indy's are not centrists and moderates - they are pragmatic and results-oriented, and respect a president who shows strong commitment to a set of values, be they right or left. Ronald Reagan was on the worng side of the majority of Americans on almost every issue - and yet he won Indies and more than a few democrats because he stuck to his principles and defended them vigorously. Will you ever get that, Mr President? Tell your political team and Rahm Emanuel to stfu, and do what you know is right for the country at this moment in history. And for God's sake, don't ever act on anything because you're afraid the right will say bad things about you. <br /><br />Dump the corporate Wall St toads in your admin, and get some progressives back on your economics team. Show Summers, Timmy, and Rahm the door, and recruit a new team. Bring back Romer, bring back Van Jones, and appoint some people committed to providing some counter-balancing antidote to this 30 year long experiment in free-market theivery. And tell Fox News to kiss your radical black ***. <br /><br />Arne | August 5, 2010 7:36 PM "<br /><br />I'm a little confused...LOL... if they want socialism, and not a free capitalism republic, why don't they just move?  Seriously!<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:35:04 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111271</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>ICE and AFL-CIO</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111267</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thefoxnation.com/border-patrol/2010/08/05/border-agents-revolt-against-ice-director" target="_blank">http://www.thefoxnation.com/border-patrol/...st-ice-director</a><br /><br />Now, this takes the cake... wonder if AFL-CIO administrators knew that their affiliate was going to put something like this out?  <br /><br />Kinda one of those...uh, now wait a minute, who do ya think your organization sent your money to which politician/s????<br /><br />Interesting comments, though...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:23:58 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111267</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Your political compass...</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111255</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.politicalcompass.org/test" target="_blank">http://www.politicalcompass.org/test</a><br /><br />Just for fun, I thought it would be interesting to post results and see if we think they are at all accurate.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-2.75&soc=-3.90" target="_blank">http://www.politicalcompass.org/printableg...5&soc=-3.90</a><br /><br />Theres mine.<br />My only complaint really was that there was no moderate or indifferent option.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:39:13 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111255</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>obama: gonna buy your vote</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111250</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/drudge.html" target="_blank">Huge bailout on mortgage industry</a>  Well guys, if this flies., you and I will own more houses with out tax money.  Poor little ole youngsters who were forced to buy big homes and pay for them, the govt is here to bail your #### out!! Maybe I ought to just quit paying on everything and vote obama too!  Oh, and those of you who think this idea is cool, read the article--banks are and have been getting ready for this hosejob--thats why you cant get a loan.  Thats why there is no work!  Comprende?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:27:31 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111250</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Kagan and Obama's birth certificate]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111245</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=187797" target="_blank">http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=187797</a><br /><br />Well, well, well....pay backs...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:56:37 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111245</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>IS THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT DESTINED FOR FAILURE?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111230</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave201.htm" target="_blank"> Only a return to Truth and Morals can save this nation</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.ptsalt.com/" target="_blank">Somebody Make a Play! Coach Dave Daubenmire</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:32:13 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111230</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>MILITARY HOMOSEXUAL SCANDAL TIED TO WIKILEAKS TREASON</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111229</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff440.htm" target="_blank">Cliff Kincaid applies the hammer to wikileaks</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:22:53 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111229</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Trouble With Unconstitutional Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111228</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Trouble With Unconstitutional Wars<br />By Ron Paul<br /><br />8-03-10<br /><br />Our foreign policy was in the spotlight last week, which is exactly where it should be. Almost two years ago many voters elected someone they thought would lead us to a more peaceful, rational co-existence with other countries. However, while attention has been focused on the administration's disastrous economic policies, its equally disastrous foreign policies have exacerbated our problems overseas. Especially in times of economic crisis, we cannot afford to ignore costly foreign policy mistakes. That's why it is important that U.S. foreign policy receive some much needed attention in the media, as it did last week with the leaked documents scandal.<br /><br />Many are saying that the Wikileaks documents tell us nothing new. In some ways this is true. Most Americans knew that we have been fighting losing battles. These documents show just how bad it really is. The revelation that Pakistani intelligence is assisting the people we are bombing in Afghanistan shows the quality of friends we are making with our foreign policy. This kind of thing supports points that Rep. Dennis Kucinich and I tried to make on the House floor last week with a privileged resolution that would have directed the administration to remove troops from Pakistan pursuant to the War Powers Resolution.<br /><br />We are not at war with Pakistan. Congress has made no declaration of war. (Actually, we made no declaration of war on Iraq or Afghanistan either, but that is another matter.) Yet we have troops in Pakistan engaging in hostile activities, conducting drone attacks and killing people. We sometimes manage to kill someone who has been identified as an enemy, yet we also kill about 10 civilians for every 1 of those. Pakistani civilians are angered by this, yet their leadership is mollified by our billions in bribe money. We just passed an appropriations bill that will send another $7.5 billion to Pakistan. One wonders how much of this money will end up helping the Taliban. This whole operation is clearly counter-productive, inappropriate, immoral and every American who values the rule of law should be outraged. Yet these activities are being done so quietly that most Americans, as well as most members of the House, don't even know about them.<br /><br /><b>We should follow constitutional protocol when going to war. It is there for a reason. If we are legitimately attacked, it is the job of Congress to declare war. We then fight the war, win it and come home. War should be efficient, decisive and rare. However, when Congress shirks its duty and just gives the administration whatever it wants with no real oversight or meaningful debate, wars are never-ending, wasteful, and political. Our so-called wars have become a perpetual drain on our economy and liberty.</b><br /><br />The founders knew that heads of state are far too eager to engage in military conflicts. That is why they entrusted the power to go to war with the deliberative body closest to the people -- the Congress. Decisions to go to war need to be supported by the people. War should not be covert or casual. We absolutely should not be paying off leaders of a country while killing their civilians without expecting to create a lot of new problems. This is not what America is supposed to be about.<br />#############<br /><br />Article can be found at campaignforliberty.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:04:59 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111228</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Feds should reimburse CA for illegals</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111225</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nbcsandiego.com/blogs/prop-zero/California-Shouild-Be-Reimbursed-for-Costs-of-Illegal-Immigration-99774029.html" target="_blank">http://www.nbcsandiego.com/blogs/prop-zero...n-99774029.html</a><br /><br />Interesting.... so CA's in the hole for around $19 billion, and costs of illegals is $5 billion in California....wonder if they remember how to connect the dots?<br /><br />Do you ever wonder, how do they know what the cost of illegals is?  Did they check their legal status when applying for free healthcare, free education, free housing, and free.....?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:16:30 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111225</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA["WE THE PEOPLE" SO WHAT?]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111223</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newswithviews.com/Evensen/greg155.htm" target="_blank">destruction of sovereign America</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:28:29 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111223</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Newsweek Sold for $1</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111222</link>
		<description><![CDATA[....that's 98 cents too much......<br /><br /><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=187265" target="_blank">http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=187265</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:14:57 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111222</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Such class...</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111213</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93Ka7y8XrPc&feature=popt00us08" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93Ka7y8XrPc...ture=popt00us08</a><br /><br />Some real winners we have here.<br />Why don't they do literally everyone else a favor and just leave?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:17:11 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111213</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Virginia won</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111211</link>
		<description><![CDATA[and so it begins.....<br /><br /><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/02/judge-permits-virginia-health-care-law-challenge-continue/?test=latestnews" target="_blank">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/02...test=latestnews</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 08:56:18 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111211</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA["The federal government can do most anything in this country]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111193</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the mentality of so many of the elected officials in our federal government. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/congressman-at-town-hall-the-federal-government-can-do-most-anything-in-this-country/" target="_blank">Federal government can do most anything in this country</a><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:50:48 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111193</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Economic Plan for America</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111162</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/07.10/plan.html" target="_blank">From THE SILVER BEAR CAFE</a><br /><br />From the article:<br /><br />Both parties are captured by corporate lobbyists, the military industrial complex and Wall Street. Lobbyists spend $40 billion per year "convincing" politicians that their ideas should be implemented. Politicians DO NOT represent the people. They represent those who give them the most money. Radical earth shattering change is needed to save this country. Incremental steps won't work. We need a leader wielding a sledgehammer.<br /><br />The Federal Reserve must be audited. It must be a complete audit with nothing off-limits done by the GAO. When the audit reveals that the Federal Reserve has committed crimes against the citizens of the United States, it should be disbanded. The country grew tremendously from 1789 until 1913 without a Federal Reserve. The Treasury can issue the money of the U.S. The money should be backed by hard assets. It would require a basket of hard assets including gold, silver, uranium, oil, natural gas, and agricultural products.<br /><br />The ideologues in the Republican Party and Democratic Party are not worried about a 3rd Party. They say that there is no way a 3rd Party could create an infrastructure to win in 2012. What they fail to realize is that people are sick and tired of their two party games. The names change, but the game remains the same. Both parties have failed the American people. The American people have failed. It is time to make a stand, before it is too late. 2012 is our last chance.<br /><br />I  believe that Ron Paul and his Campaign For Liberty should break away from the Republican Party and either form a new 3rd Party or just take over the existing Constitution Party structure. The name is right. The ideas are consistent. I would vote for Ron Paul, but he is 72 years old and he may be too diplomatic. We need a bomb thrower. I think we need Chris Christie to take on Washington DC the way he has taken on the Unions and the Democrats in NJ. A Constitution Party ticket of Chris Christie for President and Paul Ryan as VP would be a winnable option. This would be revolutionary. It would require these two men to abandon the corrupt Republican Party and do what is best for the country. Party politics is dying rapidly due to incompetence and corruption. It is time to start over.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:48:14 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111162</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BREAKING NEWS!</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111161</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The last liberal in Texas has died. At the pearly gates, he reportedly told Saint Peter that he would enter heaven only if he could be assured that he'd never encounter Rick Perry there. Saint Peter laughed and told him not to worry, it would never happen. Nonetheless, just as the liberal was checking into his green, solar-paneled penthouse, he looked out his window and saw a guy with a humongous coif of black hair, wearing a Gucci camouflage jumpsuit and carrying a hunting rifle. The guy was pushing some angels around and shouting, "Get out of my way – let me get on down the road."<br /><br />Well, the liberal raced right back to Saint Pete's office, mad as hell. "You promised me!" he said. "But I just looked out my window and there he was! Rick Perry!<br /><br />Saint Peter had to chuckle. "That wasn't Rick Perry, "he said. "That was God. He just <i>thinks</i> he's Rick Perry." <br /><br />NOTE: This is from the <i>Texas Monthly</i> article by none other than Kinky Friedman on page 78 of the August 2010 issue. Like him or not - Kinky will make you laugh. That is; <i>if</i> you have a smidgeon of a sense of humor<br /><br />I Like Kinky's suggestion: We should refer to the winner of the race for Governor of Texas as the lesser of two boll weevils.<br /><br />WARNING: This is a joke, it is not a true story – so don't run off & smoke up the search engines trying to debunk it with a myth buster report from snopes or drudge. If you are easily offended, well then I apologize and you should not have read it.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:18:28 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111161</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Charlie Rangel, Maxine Waters...both</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111149</link>
		<description>in front of ethics committee for cheating, and crooked deals.  Watch em, get their hands spanked and nothing will be done.  Why?  Liberal elitism, they will talk their way out of it, Rangel is blaming Fox news etc.  This bunch and obama and his thugs  makes Nixon look like a Saint.  And the bad thing is, that folks know it, and shrug and go on.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:44:05 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111149</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Saddest Movie Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111146</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://youtu.be/DfgaiqOqaRc" target="_blank">http://youtu.be/DfgaiqOqaRc</a><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:57:57 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111146</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>If our Attorney General says states can make their own laws</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111143</link>
		<description>why cant states make their own immigration laws?</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:34:09 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111143</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>obama: Black race is like mongrels,</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111142</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee, Mr. President, cant you choose a little better wording without your telepropmpter?  Sure we all mixtures of different people, even white folks.  But are you allowed to say mongrel, but white mongrels dont know enough to call someone a black or white mongrel?  <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/111611-obama-calls-african-americans-a-mongrel-people-" target="_blank">"I did the view, cause Michelle watches it</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:32:47 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111142</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The End of America</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111127</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.infowars.com/the-year-america-dissolved/" target="_blank">http://www.infowars.com/the-year-america-dissolved/</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:57:19 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111127</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Obama's War]]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111117</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=181965" target="_blank">Where are protests of Obama's wars?</a><br /><br /><a href="http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/10-reasons-why-we-might-not-see-anything-less-than-a-trillion-dollar-deficit-for-decades-to-come" target="_blank">There is no sanity. We are broke. </a><br /><br /><a href="http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/how-are-u-s-troops-in-afghanistan-supposed-to-defeat-the-taliban-when-iran-keeps-sending-them-arms-and-the-saudis-keep-sending-them-money" target="_blank">I keep thinking we should have attacked Saudi Arabia after 911</a><br /><br /><a href="http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/memorial-day-shocker-how-the-u-s-government-really-handles-veterans-benefits-deny-deny-deny-until-they-die" target="_blank">How are we going to care for our veterans? Don't forget there are still many from the Vietnam era.</a><br /><br /><a href="http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/millions-of-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-going-right-into-the-pockets-of-corrupt-government-officials-in-afghanistan" target="_blank">Total disregard for our troops and U.S taxpayers</a><br /><br /><a href="http://original.antiwar.com/vlahos/2010/07/26/new-antiwar-republicans/" target="_blank">Warhawks may need to join the Dems. Taking a Look at New ‘Antiwar’ Republicans</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=176033" target="_blank">Ann Coulter, "Bill Kristol and Liz Cheney must resign immediately".</a><br /><br /> <img src="http://www.smoaky.com/forum/style_emoticons/default/cripple.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":cripple:" border="0" alt="cripple.gif" />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:23:21 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111117</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>11,000 Spooks Per Al-Qaeda Member</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111116</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul685.html" target="_blank">On the Bloated Intelligence Bureaucracy</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:15:22 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111116</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronald Reagen debates Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111113</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6DmjBneGBc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6DmjBneGBc</a><br /><br /><br />Ronald Reagan blows away Barack Hussein Obama on socialism, healthcare, the Consititution and Liberty.<br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:04:28 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111113</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ronald Reagen tells Obama to shut up</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111111</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgTgenwl2aA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgTgenwl2aA</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:20:38 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111111</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Key cause of AIDS 'off the table']]></title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111110</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Key cause of AIDS 'off the table' Bill Bumpas - OneNewsNow - 7/28/2010 6:00:00 AM<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" target="_blank">http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php</a>var addthis_pub = 'onenewsnow'; <img src="http://www.onenewsnow.com/uploadedImages/Media/Images/AIDS.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" />At last week's International AIDS Conference in Vienna, Austria, the Obama administration pledged the support of the U.S. in the global fight against AIDS. But one pro-family activist points out that an important aspect is missing from the undertaking.<br /><br /> <br /><br /><br /><br />Both President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made prerecorded speeches at the close of the conference, committing the nation's dedication to fight the disease. However, one key factor seemed to be absent from the rhetoric, says a prominent pro-family activist.<br /><br />"It's not a big mystery about what helps cause AIDS, and yet one key portion -- homosexual practice, homosexual sex -- is just off the table," notes Peter LaBarbera, president of <a href="http://americansfortruth.com/" target="_blank">Americans for Truth About Homosexuality</a> (AFTAH). "And then we wonder why we can't keep this disease in check."<br /><br />He compares this issue to the Wizard of Oz or the emperor who has no clothes. "There's a lot of talk about fighting AIDS, but they're not really serious about one of the key causes, which is homosexual behavior," he laments.<br /><br />Instead, LaBarbera says, President Obama promotes it. He wishes the president would take serious action to combat the disease -- like shutting down homosexual bathhouses.<br /><br />"Bathhouses are places where men can go practice this dangerous sexual activity in secret," the AFTAH president explains. "They can bring it home. If they're bisexual, they can bring it back to their wife or their girlfriend and be the conduit for AIDS into the heterosexual community."<br /><br />Based on the fact that the Obama administration has avoided the issue, the pro-family activist concludes that it is politically incorrect to talk about the dangers of homosexual behavior.<br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:08:43 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111110</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan schools Chrissy Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111097</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/07/26/paul-ryan-schools-chris-matthews-tax-hikes-budgets-and-economics" target="_blank">on taxes, tax cuts</a>  Chrissy gets cheesed and it is so obvious he loves democrats, but Ryan learned him.  We need this guy out front.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111097</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barney Frank again</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111093</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/sorry_barney_no_discount_BSco6dW9b1VTgrL7GcCFrN" target="_blank">http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/sorry_barn...9b1VTgrL7GcCFrN</a><br /><br />Just plain sick on SOOOO many levels!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:58:43 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111093</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Mexican officials patrolling Staten Island...</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111092</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local-beat/Mexican-Man-Pummeled-in-Latest-Staten-Island-Hate-Attack-99325314.html" target="_blank">http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local-beat/...k-99325314.html</a><br /><br />Excuse me????????????   They're just going to keep on slamming this down our throats... and it's gonna backfire on 'em.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:55:17 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111092</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Whitehouse signs off on Lockerbie bomber</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111080</link>
		<description>release.  Come to find out the guy wasnt dying.  Hmmm.  But Libya gives BP a huge contract.  If George Bush was in bed with oil, obama is under the covers!!  And I dont mind big oil, but I do mind hypocricy.  Heard a guy speaking who lost a loved one on that plane, and he is none too happy--and he is a Princeton Prof!!  Gosh, even obama sells out his environemntal wackos.</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:37:45 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111080</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Nebraska, immigration and the ACLU, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111079</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://my.earthlink.net/article/us?guid=20100727/dd83a6a9-62fb-4050-8ca3-820db305b7e0" target="_blank">http://my.earthlink.net/article/us?guid=20...a3-820db305b7e0</a><br /><br />Pretty darned bad a town can't vote on something and have a bunch of lawsuits being filed.<br /><br />Just exactly who's breaking the law here......]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:54:39 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoaky.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=111079</guid>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>