Jump to content



Photo

The choice is clear: Conservative Principles vs. Big Government "Republicanism"


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 harrier

harrier

    Natural

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,608 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:"It's not about Left vs. Right... It's about Liberty vs. Oppression"-Ben Swann

Posted 04 May 2012 - 09:30 AM

Another infiltrator of the GOP establishment.

Supported Debra Medina. :)
Supports God given property rights. From my own perspective NO MAN should have "rights" to our private property EXCEPT those who have provided us loans to purchase such property. Once that loan is satisfied NO MAN should have any claim to our private property yet that is exactly what property taxes do. Regardless if the "note" is satisfied , those with property never own their property outright always having a rent on that property via taxation.
Supports property tax elimination or reform last I knew of. Supports freedom. NOT supportive of special interest politics.

+ + + +
Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers:for they shall be called the children of God.
+ + + +
--------------------------

"Capitalism should not be condemned, since we haven't had capitalism." -Dr. Ron Paul

“Wasting a vote is sometimes voting for somebody that you don't really believe in."
-Ron Paul

----------

 

The Road To Serfdom

 

F.A. Hayek

 

To the socialists of all parties.

-----------

 

"Planning" is the grand panacea of our age. But unfortunately its meaning is highly ambiguous. In popular discussion it stands for almost any policy which it is wished to present as desirable...When the average citizen, be he Nazi or Communist or Summer School Liberal, warms to the statement that "What the world needs is planning," what he really feels is that the world needs that which is satisfactory.
Lionel Robbins, Economic Planning and Economic Order (London:Macmillan, 1937), p. 3.

 


#2 Wild74

Wild74

    Natural

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,579 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Waskom, Texas

Posted 04 May 2012 - 03:43 PM

Na, just another republican with a different view, once in she would join the good old boys system

   He once said wisely: "Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains. Winston Churchill


#3 harrier

harrier

    Natural

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,608 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:"It's not about Left vs. Right... It's about Liberty vs. Oppression"-Ben Swann

Posted 04 May 2012 - 08:57 PM

:lol:

Wild, it's David Simpson the incumbent State Representative District 7 running not Debra Medina.

Simpson is the legislator that presented a bill pertaining to TSA groping but the good ol boys in Texas government left Simpson hanging when receiving threats from the Fed it would shut down flights in Texas if that bill passed.

+ + + +
Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers:for they shall be called the children of God.
+ + + +
--------------------------

"Capitalism should not be condemned, since we haven't had capitalism." -Dr. Ron Paul

“Wasting a vote is sometimes voting for somebody that you don't really believe in."
-Ron Paul

----------

 

The Road To Serfdom

 

F.A. Hayek

 

To the socialists of all parties.

-----------

 

"Planning" is the grand panacea of our age. But unfortunately its meaning is highly ambiguous. In popular discussion it stands for almost any policy which it is wished to present as desirable...When the average citizen, be he Nazi or Communist or Summer School Liberal, warms to the statement that "What the world needs is planning," what he really feels is that the world needs that which is satisfactory.
Lionel Robbins, Economic Planning and Economic Order (London:Macmillan, 1937), p. 3.

 


#4 Colmesneilfan1

Colmesneilfan1

    Smoakhouse Libertarian

  • Administrators
  • 33,336 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colmesneil, Texas

Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:06 PM

:lol:

Wild, it's David Simpson the incumbent State Representative District 7 running not Debra Medina.

Simpson is the legislator that presented a bill pertaining to TSA groping but the good ol boys in Texas government left Simpson hanging when receiving threats from the Fed it would shut down flights in Texas if that bill passed.


Texas should have called the bluff and told them to kiss our butts.....

Mark 16: 16..."16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned."

Acts 2: 38...."38And Peter said to them, "Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."

Acts 22: 16...."16And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name."

I Peter 3: 21...."21Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,"

The above Scripture is from the English Standard Version

#5 harrier

harrier

    Natural

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,608 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:"It's not about Left vs. Right... It's about Liberty vs. Oppression"-Ben Swann

Posted 05 May 2012 - 08:14 AM

Na, just another republican with a different view, once in she would join the good old boys system



Oops , already mentioned HE is not SHE. HE just happened to be a supporter of Medina in the last gubernatorial Republican primaries. I would challenge you to convince me either Simpson or Medina will cave. The establishment RINOs already tried discrediting Medina. Simpson has made it through his rookie term as state rep. One never knows. However IMO these two are in it for other reasons than the chumps people continue to support in the Texas GOP, chumps otherwise known as RINOs and NWO globalists.

+ + + +
Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers:for they shall be called the children of God.
+ + + +
--------------------------

"Capitalism should not be condemned, since we haven't had capitalism." -Dr. Ron Paul

“Wasting a vote is sometimes voting for somebody that you don't really believe in."
-Ron Paul

----------

 

The Road To Serfdom

 

F.A. Hayek

 

To the socialists of all parties.

-----------

 

"Planning" is the grand panacea of our age. But unfortunately its meaning is highly ambiguous. In popular discussion it stands for almost any policy which it is wished to present as desirable...When the average citizen, be he Nazi or Communist or Summer School Liberal, warms to the statement that "What the world needs is planning," what he really feels is that the world needs that which is satisfactory.
Lionel Robbins, Economic Planning and Economic Order (London:Macmillan, 1937), p. 3.

 


#6 harrier

harrier

    Natural

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,608 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:"It's not about Left vs. Right... It's about Liberty vs. Oppression"-Ben Swann

Posted 05 May 2012 - 08:17 AM

Texas should have called the bluff and told them to kiss our butts.....


Case in point, the chumps that make up the Texas GOP are spineless shills and control freaks. Control freaks that are just as much about centralized government as the Fed.

+ + + +
Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers:for they shall be called the children of God.
+ + + +
--------------------------

"Capitalism should not be condemned, since we haven't had capitalism." -Dr. Ron Paul

“Wasting a vote is sometimes voting for somebody that you don't really believe in."
-Ron Paul

----------

 

The Road To Serfdom

 

F.A. Hayek

 

To the socialists of all parties.

-----------

 

"Planning" is the grand panacea of our age. But unfortunately its meaning is highly ambiguous. In popular discussion it stands for almost any policy which it is wished to present as desirable...When the average citizen, be he Nazi or Communist or Summer School Liberal, warms to the statement that "What the world needs is planning," what he really feels is that the world needs that which is satisfactory.
Lionel Robbins, Economic Planning and Economic Order (London:Macmillan, 1937), p. 3.

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users