Jump to content

East Texas Basketball Leaders


Pittsburg

Recommended Posts

Friday, January 18, 2008: Longview News-Journal

 

EAST TEXAS BASKETBALL LEADERS: BOYS

 

POINTS

 

Player, team Avg.

 

Kendall Wright, Pittsburg 24.5

 

Willie Moody, Avinger 20.0

 

Dominick Walker, Pine Tree 17.9

 

David Williams, Jefferson 17.5

 

Kirk Parsons, Harmony 17.2

 

Larry Mike, MP Chapel Hill 16.9

 

Tavares Allison, Carthage 16.0

 

Mark Farmer, Pittsburg 16.0

 

Stephan Tarpley, Spring Hill 15.4

 

Cordell Roberson, Jefferson 14.3

 

Jackson McCurdy, White Oak 13.9

 

Kyle Strickland, Hawkins 13.8

 

Arturo Torres, MP Chapel Hill 13.7

 

Seth Hubbard, Beckville 13.6

 

Rance Craig, MP Chapel Hill 12.8

 

Carlos Brown, Pittsburg 12.2

 

Terrance Sparkman, Pine Tree 11.8

 

Eric Gibbs, Avinger 11.8

 

Kenneth Harrison, Linden-Kildare 11.5

 

Trevor Coppedge, White Oak 11.3

 

John Brunson, MP Chapel Hill 11.3

 

Drew Hightower, Beckville 11.1

 

Richard Lyles, Carthage 11.0

 

Corderall Epps, Avinger 10.3

 

Rico Jessup, Pittsburg 10.1

 

Cal Dickey, Pittsburg 10.0

 

Carson Mizner, Harmony 10.0

 

Jakosh Williams, Jefferson 9.6

 

Corey Stevenson, Hawkins 9.3

 

Derek Pate, Linden-Kildare 9.0

 

Devonta Greenleaf, Linden-Kildare 8.9

 

Antonio McNeil, Jefferson 8.6

 

Colby Seahorn, Harmony 8.1

 

Blake Ware, White Oak 7.6

 

J.T. Thomas, Pine Tree 7.3

 

Carl Corman, White Oak 7.3

 

Jadarius Hicks, Carthage 7.2

 

REBOUNDS

 

Player, team Avg.

 

Dominick Walker, Pine Tree 11.9

 

Mark Farmer, Pittsburg 10.0

 

Cordell Roberson, Jefferson 9.8

 

Kirk Parsons, Harmony 8.9

 

Corderall Epps, Avinger 8.6

 

Cody Loyd, Avinger 8.6

 

Terrance Sparkman, Pine Tree 8.5

 

Stephan Tarpley, Spring Hill 7.6

 

Seth Hubbard, Beckville 7.4

 

LaMarius Love, Linden-Kildare 7.2

 

Winston Manley, Spring Hill 7.0

 

Willie Moody, Avinger 6.9

 

Carl Corman, White Oak 6.8

 

Matt Leftwich, MP Chapel Hill 6.8

 

Steven Wright, Jefferson 6.7

 

Kenneth Harrison, Linden-Kildare 6.3

 

Tavares Allison, Carthage 6.1

 

Colton Bunn, Harmony 6.1

 

Arturo Torres, MP Chapel Hill 6.1

 

Kendall Wright, Pittsburg 6.0

 

Cal Dickey, Pittsburg 6.0

 

Larry Mike, MP Chapel Hill 6.0

 

Byron Kirkling, Carthage 5.8

 

Jackson McCurdy, White Oak 5.6

 

DeKori Lawson, Linden-Kildare 5.6

 

Garrett Wallace, Beckville 5.3

 

Antonio McNeil, Jefferson 5.2

 

Greg Gaston, Linden-Kildare 5.2

 

Eric Gibbs, Avinger 5.1

 

Blake Ware, White Oak 5.0

 

ASSISTS

 

Player, team Avg.

 

Rico Jessup, Pittsburg 7.0

 

Kendall Wright, Pittsburg 6.5

 

Carlos Brown, Pittsburg 5.1

 

Matt Leftwich, MP Chapel Hill 5.0

 

Richard Lyles, Carthage 4.9

 

Jakosh Williams, Jefferson 4.8

 

Cordell Roberson, Jefferson 4.6

 

Eric Gibbs, Avinger 4.5

 

Kyle Strickland, Hawkins 4.1

 

Steven Wright, Jefferson 4.0

 

Ryan Gattis, Hawkins 3.9

 

Jeff Chandler, Spring Hill 3.8

 

Devonta Greenleaf, Linden-Kildare 3.8

 

Jermone Linwood, Avinger 3.7

 

Connor Sharp, White Oak 3.3

 

Jamarcus Peters, Pine Tree 3.1

 

Stephan Strochein, Harmony 2.7

 

Corey Stevenson, Hawkins 2.6

 

Tavares Allison, Carthage 2.5

 

Seth Hubbard, Beckville 2.3

 

Dominick Walker, Pine Tree 2.2

 

Jadarius Hicks, Carthage 2.2

 

J.T. Thomas, Pine Tree 2.1

 

Colton Bunn, Harmony 2.1

 

Robby Fowler, Pine Tree 2.0

 

Willie Moody, Avinger 2.0

 

Corderall Epps, Avinger 2.0

 

BLOCKS

 

Player, team Avg.

 

Carl Corman, White Oak 4.3

 

Mark Farmer, Pittsburg 3.2

 

Cal Dickey, Pittsburg 3.0

 

Terrance Sparkman, Pine Tree 2.1

 

Rico Jessup, Pittsburg 1.5

 

Clarence Lee, Jefferson 1.4

 

Kirk Parsons, Harmony 1.4

 

Winston Manley, Spring Hill 1.3

 

Cordell Roberson, Jefferson 1.3

 

Cody Loyd, Avinger 1.3

 

Dominick Walker, Pine Tree 1.2

 

Antonio McNeil, Jefferson 1.1

 

Garrett Wallace, Beckville 1.1

 

Corderall Epps, Avinger 1.1

 

Kendall Wright, Pittsburg 1.0

 

STEALS

 

Player, team Avg.

 

Kendall Wright, Pittsburg 6.0

 

Rico Jessup, Pittsburg 5.1

 

Matt Leftwich, MP Chapel Hill 4.7

 

Eric Gibbs, Avinger 4.2

 

Carlos Brown, Pittsburg 4.0

 

Tavares Allison, Carthage 4.0

 

Devonta Greenleaf, Linden-Kildare 3.9

 

Jerome Linwood, Avinger 3.6

 

Jakosh Williams, Jefferson 3.4

 

Rance Craig, MP Chapel Hill 3.2

 

Kenneth Harrison, Linden-Kildare 3.2

 

Richard Lyles, Carthage 3.1

 

David Williams, Jefferson 3.1

 

Corderall Epps, Avinger 2.9

 

Cordell Roberson, Jefferson 2.7

 

Arturo Torres, MP Chapel Hill 2.7

 

Kyle Strickland, Hawkins 2.6

 

Corey Stevenson, Hawkins 2.5

 

Steven Wright, Jefferson 2.4

 

Kirk Parsons, Harmony 2.4

 

Ryan Gattis, Hawkins 2.3

 

DeKori Lawson, Linden-Kildare 2.2

 

Tyler Leath, Spring Hill 2.1

 

Carson Mizner, Harmony 2.1

 

Stanley Moore, Linden-Kildare 2.1

 

Mark Farmer, Pittsburg 2.0

 

Chris Brown, Pittsburg 2.0

 

Willie Moody, Avinger 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Pitt has 5 kids averaging 72.5 points per game? Does anyone else score? If so what is Pittsburg averaging a game?

 

 

Here are some points from other games this year to see who scores for Pittsburg....

 

PITT: Kendall Wright 33, Rico Jessup 11, Mark Farmer 9, Chris Brown 4, J. Duncan 4, Paul Kibler 2, Carlos Brown 2, Omar Saleh 2.

 

PITT: — Kendall Wright 35, Mark Farmer 8, Carlos Brown 8, Paul Kibler 6, Rico Jessup 6, Jared Duncan 4, Chris Brown 3, Cal Dickey 2, Omar Saleh 2. Threes: 8 (Wright 5, Kibler 2, Brown).

 

PITT: Farmer 27; K. Wright 24; Dickey 11; C. Brown 9; Jessup 8; Ch. Brown 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still doesn't show season average or did they start keeping stats when whataburger was over?

 

No, thats counting Whataburger tournament. And they had ten games before that and they were 6-4 with lossing to #5 Martins Mill and #9 Tyler Chapel Hill and beating Clarksville, and playing in a Longview and Tatum tournament. They were all around the same points % for all the games so i just started with the Whataburger tournament because I forgot what the other scores were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as biased as this sounds, there is no way that list is correct without trentson hill on it...i haven't seen a game where he didn't score less than 16 points...

 

 

Well if you are from Mt. Pleasant I'm sure He would not be on their if you dont report your scores to the LNJ.

 

(Remember the topic! Longview Area!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you are from Mt. Pleasant I'm sure He would not be on their if you dont report your scores to the LNJ.

 

(Remember the topic! Longview Area!)

yes i see that....look at some names and schools on there...MP Chapel Hill....pittsburg? neither of which are longview area.

 

so it must just be from submitting them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes i see that....look at some names and schools on there...MP Chapel Hill....pittsburg? neither of which are longview area.

 

so it must just be from submitting them.

 

 

Pitt is less than 30 mins away MPCH plays a lot of Longview area teams, and we are talking about compaired to Tyler Area teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I checked Maxpreps who had 12 games listed for Pitt and added the scores for Peaster, Mt Vernon, Rusk and Martin Mills for 16 games out of 20 per their record. Looks like I am missing the Longview tourney games other than Pinkston. They are averaging 66.56 points per game in those 16 games. They would have had to score near 100 plus in the other 4 games just to get average up to the 5 players listed at 72.5 points per game. It is nice to recognize your kids but...accuracy might count for something!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I checked Maxpreps who had 12 games listed for Pitt and added the scores for Peaster, Mt Vernon, Rusk and Martin Mills for 16 games out of 20 per their record. Looks like I am missing the Longview tourney games other than Pinkston. They are averaging 66.56 points per game in those 16 games. They would have had to score near 100 plus in the other 4 games just to get average up to the 5 players listed at 72.5 points per game. It is nice to recognize your kids but...accuracy might count for something!!!!!

 

 

Love the haters, its right like it is. Stop your mess, have respect, show some class please. Dont post on this topic if you dont have good things to say about all the teams on here, not just Pitt. Other wise, stop being a hater, which you are :thumbdown: Mount Vernon was already added in, so right their, you dont know what your doing, and Maxpreps is always wrong and never as the right scores or all the games. (And if your averaging the 5 players then do you have the players points per game? Then adding each of those up to find out what theirs was in each game, and then adding and subtracting other players that played in each game and players that did not play in some games, then adding them with the whole teams score and then dividing that?) didnt think so. That average of 75 is for the total points of the games, not each players points in each game.

 

And now in district, which is all that matters, they are averaging 79 points per game and allowing 59.5

 

And stop whining to me, its from the LNJ. Its from the games they have... dont just get on something just to complain, id hate to be around someone that complains about everything all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the haters, its right like it is. Stop your mess, have respect, show some class please. Dont post on this topic if you dont have good things to say about all the teams on here, not just Pitt. Other wise, stop being a hater, which you are :thumbdown: Mount Vernon was already added in, so right their, you dont know what your doing, and Maxpreps is always wrong and never as the right scores or all the games. (And if your averaging the 5 players then do you have the players points per game? Then adding each of those up to find out what theirs was in each game, and then adding and subtracting other players that played in each game and players that did not play in some games, then adding them with the whole teams score and then dividing that?) didnt think so. That average of 75 is for the total points of the games, not each players points in each game.

 

And now in district, which is all that matters, they are averaging 79 points per game and allowing 59.5

 

And stop whining to me, its from the LNJ. Its from the games they have... dont just get on something just to complain, id hate to be around someone that complains about everything all day.

 

Someone needs some remedial math. I will make it simple for you. If your team is averaging less than than the FIVE players averages reported it is IMPOSSIBLE. Show me which scores on maxpreps is inacurrate. Doubtful! It doesn't make me classless because I used some math skills to figure out the stats your coach submitted are wrong. How about some respect for the coaches that take the time to do it RIGHT and the kids that get over looked because someone wants to smudge stats.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone needs some remedial math. I will make it simple for you. If your team is averaging less than than the FIVE players averages reported it is IMPOSSIBLE. Show me which scores on maxpreps is inacurrate. Doubtful! It doesn't make me classless because I used some math skills to figure out the stats your coach submitted are wrong. How about some respect for the coaches that take the time to do it RIGHT and the kids that get over looked because someone wants to smudge stats.

 

 

GET A LIFE! The stats are correct, just go watch them play. Tell your coach to schedule a warm-up game and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a comical thread.....all I am going to say is that anyone who has seen them play, and kept up with box scores, and own a basic calculator, knows some statistics do not add up correctly.

Boydawg........ quit getting so offended when all the rest of the mathematically proficient people of the world point out the obvious boosting of team/individual numbers reported to the paper. It doesn't mean Pittsburg isn't any good, it just means some basic math concepts have been skipped or ignored.

Best of luck in District!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have to back sports on this one...not hating either..i realize many of the pitt players need to be on that list. but i have heard at least three coaches comment that there is no way the stats reported are accurate from pitt. unless you are only averaging two games u dont get .5 or .0 endings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have to back sports on this one...not hating either..i realize many of the pitt players need to be on that list. but i have heard at least three coaches comment that there is no way the stats reported are accurate from pitt. unless you are only averaging two games u dont get .5 or .0 endings

 

Sorry, but my CPA brain is working overtime on that one. Possibly one of the funniest comments since this site was started.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but my CPA brain is working overtime on that one. Possibly one of the funniest comments since this site was started.
my bad, you are right that didnt come out right...you probably dont get .5 or .0 that many times...it could happen, but with all that data highly unlikely to happen 19 times as in pitts stats indicate..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might not be the leading scorer BUT, your coach didnt send in his stats, so therefore, he is the leading scorer for this week, as a matter of fact, he could lead the entire state in scoring very easily, but he has a good team around him and everyone is getting their share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...