Jump to content

TTman7

Members
  • Posts

    4,185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by TTman7

  1. 30 minutes ago, JETT said:

    Sleep in a drive thru led to death... wake him up and make him move his car, police are called for everything... if this is the case police should be at every bar/night club at closing time with a sloo of officers arresting every drunk who pulls out? Do you think they are not a threat?

    That ALL he did? Nope. 

    Yep. I think they ARE potentially a threat. I've been there and done that on the LE side...ALOT. 

  2. 2 minutes ago, JETT said:

    What happened to freedom yall yell about? If I'm not doing anything wrong yeah ill resist arrest... 

     

     

    Disagree on the second part

    But under the scenario you gave, you broke the law. The officer was giving lawful commands and making a lawful arrest. Noncompliance and resisting could potentially get you or the officer injured or seriously harmed. Wrong move for a law abiding citizen. 

    Really? Oh yeah...right. He'd still be dead from the overdose even if he had complied or not resisted. I agree with you on not agreeing. 👍😉

    • Like 1
  3. 9 hours ago, JETT said:

    Who's to say he didn't know the money was counterfeit? I own a business and we get paid cash on a daily basis... you're telling me if I take some money from a customer and go purchase something and it just so happens to be counterfeit I should be arrested? SMH 

    Maybe. Are you going to resist arrest and/or not comply with lawful commands from the arresting officer? Asking for a friend. 

     

    9 hours ago, JETT said:

    If the knee would've never been put on his neck he would still be here... yall are something else

    If he had complied with lawful commands, he'd still be alive too. Agree or disagree? 

  4. 34 minutes ago, DaveTV1 said:

    If there was a gun found nearby then I would say the officer had the right to shoot him if he wasn't responding.  If all there was were sandwiches then no.  I realize that his Mom said that he wouldn't hurt a fly.  We've seen too many Mom's come to the defense of their children in recent years to say that was a the case.  I just wish this article was updated. 

    Yep. Need more information. 

    Also...being a CHL holder doesn't play a factor in if this was a good or bad shoot by the officer. 

    • Like 1
  5. 3 minutes ago, DaveTV1 said:

    I saw an article today so I read it.  The only crime they had listed was tax evasion.  If this were true the I.R.S. would have already reported that he did owe back taxes and committed tax evasion.  Had that been reported by the I.R.S. it would have been better ground for the Democrat impeachment.  I believe if they had the evidence to prove it that he would have been removed from office.  Spiro Agnew was actually indicted for tax fraud and corruption under Nixon, but only plead nolo contendre to tax evasion.  He resigned from office, and only paid a $10000 fine which was worth about $50,000 by todays standards and placed on three years unsupervised probation.  I can see Trump being accountable for back taxes, and if he pays it back with interest and a fine that's all that will happen.  There is a possibility he could serve jail time for it, but I doubt it.  

    IF true, yea, very doubtful of any jail time...or conviction imo. 

  6. On 12/12/2020 at 6:11 PM, Old49er60 said:

    Actually I 100% believe that the military will support our Constitution and defend our union. While you guys live in a bubble thinking 70 million people are in this country willing to die to keep President Trump in office what is factual is that when bullets fly 99% will not be out there rebelling against our country

     

    On 12/12/2020 at 8:27 PM, TTman7 said:

    What is your evidence that 99% won't be out there rebelling when the bullets start to fly? 

     

    On 12/12/2020 at 8:36 PM, Old49er60 said:

    What is your evidence they will? My guess is it is the same as mine, just an opinion. 

     

    On 12/13/2020 at 11:54 AM, TTman7 said:

    You dont answer a question WITH a question. So I won't answer until you answer the original question asked of you. 

    You said it is a fact, therefore you can't hide behind it being an opinion. What's your evidence? 

     

    On 12/13/2020 at 6:27 PM, Old49er60 said:

    Welcome to your opinion. You seem to be the type that just wants to argue, have fun with that

     

    On 12/13/2020 at 6:35 PM, TTman7 said:

    Sure...run away. Don't answer my questions, and don't address the issues I brought up with your post. 

    Run professor, run!! 

    @Old49er60 you never answered my question. You just ran away. 

    Answer the question. 

  7. 1 hour ago, DaveTV1 said:

    The way I see it present your cases, and show your articles that could possibly indict him on the forum.  We all know he loves to post negative articles in length in regards to the Trump.  Now he declines to do so, and wants me to Google what he thinks he knows.  I'm not going google anything, show me the proof in the pudding, and not conjecture or speculation.  

    Yep, I agree. You're preaching to the choir, lol. 

  8. 3 minutes ago, DaveTV1 said:

    While I don't like President Trump as a man, why was he not indicted before ?  I would also think that the statute of limitations may have already expired on many of those counts that you think may have happened.  I've heard some say that he may pardon himself, but I highly doubt it.  Many of his past dealings have already been tried in court, and his holdings have paid fines levied by the State of New York.  So what crimes/bad things he did will he be indicted for.  You seem to think he will be, but be more specific in what you are referring to. I've learned more about Trump in the past four years, and I don't see him as a Bernie Madoff.  Trump University wasn't a Ponzi scheme it was more like the Dale Carnegie Training or Zig Ziglar sales training.  So please name what you actually think he will be indicted for, instead of being vague.  

    He said to Google it (in an earlier post) when I asked him also. 

     

  9. 17 hours ago, Old49er60 said:

    Actually I 100% believe that the military will support our Constitution and defend our union. While you guys live in a bubble thinking 70 million people are in this country willing to die to keep President Trump in office what is factual is that when bullets fly 99% will not be out there rebelling against our country

     

    15 hours ago, Old49er60 said:

    I do not express my personal life, see already on here people make a forum personal and I wont get into that.

    What is your evidence they will? My guess is it is the same as mine, just an opinion. 

    So, no, you didn't serve. So your "100%" belief isn't worth 💩

    You dont answer a question WITH a question. So I won't answer until you answer the original question asked of you. 

    15 hours ago, TTman7 said:

    What is your evidence that 99% won't be out there rebelling when the bullets start to fly? 

    You said it is a fact, therefore you can't hide behind it being an opinion. What's your evidence? 

  10. 3 hours ago, Old49er60 said:

    If Texas attempts to secede then it would be because an  election. Next we answered those questions in 1865, if an attempt is made those responsible should be arrested and held for treason. 

    Evidence? Because the Texas GOP statement I saw referred to having a union of states that actually abides by the Constitution. 

    Held for treason? Are they even going to get a trial or just be held for it? How long would you hold them? And how do you expect to get them in custody in the first place? 

     

×
×
  • Create New...