
Monte1076
Members-
Posts
17,809 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Monte1076 last won the day on July 17
Monte1076 had the most liked content!
About Monte1076
Recent Profile Visitors
2,271 profile views
Monte1076's Achievements
-
What I'm supporting, if you weren't so obtuse (like you like to claim I am) is accurate reporting. The reporter said something inaccurate, attributed it to him, and he corrected her. I'd assume you'd be OK with that, regardless of who it was. Or is it OK to report inaccurately about people you don't like, and the things that they said? So let me spell it out for you. You're an educator, I shouldn't have to do this. 1. The reporter attributed something to him that he quoted from a Canadian government media source. In other words, she said he made the statement, when he was quoting a source, and stated that he was quoting "media reports". Meaning someone else wrote a story, and he simply noted what he was saying was from "media reports". 2. He corrected her, and said that no, he did not say that directly. He was quoting a media source tied to the Canadian government that said as such. 3. She still asked him why he said it, telling him it wasn't true, even though he literally just told her that he was quoting a media source tied to the Canadian government. 4. He then asked her if the Canadian government media source was inaccurate, to which her response was "I have no opinion on that". If you'd actually watch the video, you'd see the exchange. But I don't think you want to.
-
https://spectator.org/bidenomics-the-high-price-of-gaslighting/
-
Reporter: "Do you think it's irresponsible to call the bridge explosion a terrorist attack?" Pierre Poilievre: "I didn't. I cited a news report that said the Canadian Government did." Reporter: "Do you think it's irresponsible to call the bridge explosion a terrorist attack?"