MiddleFinger

Do you have a point?

What about it?

Better than below .500.

Didn't clarify? Not beating the good teams in conference is super arbitrary?!?

Reading is tough. What part of winning record in conference do you not understand? 2012 Arkansas 2-6 Ole Miss 3-5 Auburn 0-8 Miss St. 4-4 Bama 7-1 Mizzou 2-6 2013 Arkansas 0-8 Ole Miss 3-5 Vandy. 4-4 Miss St. 3-5 2014 Arkansas 2-6 Auburn. 4-4 2015 Miss St 1-2

Not true.

.

Since they joined the SEC, the Aggies have one win over a team above .500 in conference.

If A&M wins Ole Miss will be unranked. Nothing debatable about that.

What does this have to do with this A&M thread?

Did you? The post I quoted mentions A&M zero times.

What on earth are you talking about? I though Minnesota was better than they are in week 1. How does that make me look bad? They were barely outside of the Top 25 at the time. Turns out they are trash. Who cares? A&M has beat 0 Top 25 teams and will likely start 10-1 with 0 Top 25 wins. Nothing to do with TCU, Minnesota, LSU, or Texas. Just pointing out the gauntlet that is SEC football.

I'm not arguing Minnesota. I'm talking about A&M. Follow the bouncing ball. You are actually proving my point. Minnesota was receiving Top 25 votes at the beginning of the year. It looked like a good road win for TCU, turns out it wasn't.

Doh? I am right. Who cares about a team's ranking when the game is played early on? Committee sure as hell doesn't.

True! I really did find it odd though.