Jump to content

BarryLaverty

Members
  • Posts

    8,653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

BarryLaverty last won the day on September 15

BarryLaverty had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

1,033 profile views

BarryLaverty's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/15)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare

Recent Badges

2.1k

Reputation

  1. (Psssst. were your ears burning? Think he was talking about you.)
  2. See all that on here on a regular basis. What a shame! I feel crocodile tears coming on. https://www.yahoo.com/news/bottomless-self-pity-american-conservatives-110109527.html The bottomless self-pity of American conservatives Ryan Cooper, National correspondent Wed, November 24, 2021, 5:01 AM An elephant. Illustrated | iStock The last decade has seen conservatives making great political hay mocking liberal undergrads. Taking a handful of examples wildly out of context, right-wing provocateurs like Milo Yiannopoulos sneered endlessly about how these students wanted "trigger warnings" before exposure to traumatizing ideas or "safe spaces" where they supposedly wouldn't have to hear hard truths. Conservative pundit Ben Shapiro sold mountain ranges of merch mocking supposed liberal "snowflakes" whose feelings can't handle empirical reality. Today the shoe is on the other foot. Now it is conservatives who now want to be protected from discomfort — and we're not just dealing with blue-haired liberal arts students who fit the snowflake stereotype if you squint. This time, actual government institutions with real power are involved, and right-wing self-pity is bottomless. Take the recent spree of conservative book banning. Numerous school districts in Utah, Missouri, Florida, and Virginia have pulled books from libraries, typically in response to pressure from right-wing parents whipped into a froth by conservative elites like Virginia governor-elect Glenn Youngkin (R). Texas state Rep. Matt Krause complied a list of 850 books deserving of suppression because they "might make students feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress because of their race or sex." Books by Nobel laureate Toni Morrison, Ernest Gaines, and especially the graphic novel Gender fancyboy: A Memoir are common targets. In Texas, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott explained why he was demanding education officials draw up a list of books to be pulled from schools: "As you are aware, a growing number of parents of Texas students are rightfully outraged about highly inappropriate books and other content in public school libraries." Our little Chets and Khrystals need to be protected from books with sexual or upsetting content! (One hopes they don't have cell phones or computers with an internet connection.) Now, there is a minor distinction here. Yiannopoulos and Shapiro focused their ire on college students who were supposedly infantilizing themselves by refusing to toughen up and read, I don't know, Rumble Fish. (One right-wing campus group amusingly attempted to mock this stereotype by dressing up in diapers themselves.) That implies that high school just might not be the right time for the more scandalous books. But conservative pundits aren't making fine distinctions. Right-wing school boards generally aren't saying these books are inappropriate for children under 18, but that they are offensive and bad, full stop — or, in the case of some members of the Spotsylvania County, Virginia school board, that they should also be burned. Besides, high school has traditionally been the age at which people start reading difficult texts about real life. After all, just one year separates a high school senior from a college freshman. Neither are right-wing colleges like Liberty University proclaiming themselves places where students read all the most inflammatory, challenging books to expand their minds after they turn 18 — on the contrary, the curriculum of its undergrad English degree is just as uptight and restrictive as its honor code, which forbids gay or transgender couples from having sex even if they are married. All this suggests conservatives aren't upset about censorship per se; they just want to be the ones doing the censoring. Perhaps even more telling is the trend of conservatives stealing Holocaust valor. On the one hand, they want to shelter their kids from uncomfortable works of literature—but on the other, they're willing to raise the horrors of the Holocaust the moment they endure a slight inconvenience. When COVID-19 vaccine mandates first became a topic of wide discussion, conservatives like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene(R-Ga.) and former President Donald Trump's acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell immediately reached for the Holocaust comparison. On Shapiro's podcast in July, right-wing blowhard Candace Owens said did too. "During the Holocaust the Nazis referred to the Jewish people as 'rats' as another form of dehumanization," she said, and "right now, in this country, in America, conservatives are being dehumanized." In June, a Washington Republican state legislator pinned a Star of David to his chestwhile giving a speech against about vaccine mandates. This is part of a long history of conservatives screaming that anything they don't like is Hitler, and the messaging has filtered down to the rank-and-file. In September, anti-mandate protesters in Iowa carried Stars of David in protests against a hospital's vaccine mandate, while a school board candidate in Shawnee Heights, Kansas, compared mask mandates to the Holocaust. In October, the mayor Anchorage apologized after he said Star of David-adorned anti-mask protesters were a "credit" to the Jewish people. And this month, star-sporting protesters showed up at the Kansas legislature to complain about vaccine mandates. More protesters, these ones carrying swastikas in addition to Stars of David, showed up to the office of New York State Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz (D) — who is Jewish, incidentally — to whine about his proposal to mandate coronavirus vaccination to attend public school. Even for American conservatives, whose victim complex runs deeper than the ocean's abyssal plain, this is astoundingly offensive. I never thought it would be necessary to explain this, but apparently it is: The Nazis did not seize power and tell local Jews they would have to wear a mask in public locations, or get vaccinated or tested weekly for COVID if they wanted to work at a business with more than 100 employees. Instead — and let me emphasize this part, because it's pretty important — the Nazis killed 6 million Jews and tortured, hunted, and exiled millions more. Anyone throwing a red-faced tantrum at a city council meeting, squalling like a fussy baby over public health policies that might easily save their own life, is not in a comparable position. Indeed, as writer Talia Levin points out, the truth is exactly the opposite: The immediate cause of a substantial fraction of Holocaust deaths was communicable illness, like typhus, which constantly broke out in concentration camps due to malnutrition and unsanitary conditions. A courageous scientist named Rudolf Weigl actually developed the first typhus vaccine to help Holocaust victims. He gave it to members of the Polish resistance and even smuggled thousands of doses into the Warsaw Ghetto at great personal risk. As a longstanding student of the right-wing mindset, it's not surprising to me that conservatives constantly reach for the Holocaust as an analogy whenever their political hardship amounts to the pain of a paper cut. If an entire galaxy of 500 quadrillion sentient kittens — every one of them possessing Christ-like decency and kindness — were snuffed out by Space Hitler and his quasar gun, they'd compare themselves to that, too. Still, it's pretty dang pathetic
  3. Thankful for President Biden's leadership. (Washington Post) Business Weekly jobless claims plunge to 199,000, the lowest level in more than 50 years Claims fell more than 71,000 from last week, marking the eighth straight week of declines By Taylor Telford and Aaron Gregg Today at 8:43 a.m. EST The number of Americans filing initial unemployment claims fell to 199,000 — the lowest level since November 1969 — the Labor Department reportedWednesday. Claims were down more than 71,000 in the week that ended November 20 compared to the previous week. This marks the eighth straight week of declines and represents a major turning point as claims fell well below levels seen before the pandemic. In 2019, average weekly jobless claims hovered around 220,000. It’s a stark contrast to this time last year, when weekly unemployment claims were still hovering around 700,000, and a reflection of a tight labor market where companies are under pressure to retain and expand their workforces. “It is fair to say we didn’t see that coming,” Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at Bankrate, said Wednesday in comments emailed to The Post. “Getting new claims below the 200,000 level for the first time since the pandemic began is truly significant, portraying further improvement.” A pandemic picture that was, up until recently, brightening, coupled with the protracted labor shortage, has cut down on layoffs that wracked the economy in the early days of the coronaviruspandemic. Hiring strengthened in October, with the U.S. adding 531,000 jobs. The unemployment rate dropped from 4.8 percent to 4.6 percent. It remains a far cry from its pre-pandemic low of 3.5 percent in February 2020, but marks a significant improvement over the course of 2021. In January, the unemployment rate stood at 6.3 percent. The Labor Department’s monthly jobs report, which will be released next week, is expected to shed more light on the complex dynamics of the labor market. While jobless claims have ticked lower in recent weeks, more than 4.4 million workers (representing roughly 3 percent of the labor force) quit their jobs in September, a record high according todata from Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  4. Try not to remove my reaction, maybe, this time?
  5. Why aren't you out there in the street as a policeman or in the military or in at least a militia? You seem to be such a badass.
  6. None involved were my heroes. Didn't know any of them until they were dead or wounded.
  7. If he stayed home and didn't take a weapon to a protest, he would have been just fine, and no one would have been shot by him. Amazing that 'conservatives' think teenagers shouldn't be able to vote or cannot think for themselves, until one shoots people they don't like.
  8. So, he was being molested as a child, recognizing that, shot that person? That's just garbled and odd. Why not just say if someone you disagree with or who might have priors is on the street, killing them is justifiable? Try again.
  9. I had a very strong feeling for a number of reasons that he wouldn't be found guilty. I think people being giddy over a teenager killing people and getting away with it is more than a little sad.
×
×
  • Create New...