JasonDellaRosa

Celina isn't that surprising -- they were only three over the cutoff last time. They added 42 kids and the number went up 75

Lone Oak is dropping to Division II

Era's district was a five-team last year. Campbell dropped out and did independent six-man.

I don't understand this thinking when third and fourth place teams, regardless of the sport, continue to win in the playoffs. Just because it's the way we used to do it when there were half as many teams doesn't work these days.

Texas High would be out. The worst John Tyler can do in a three-way tie with Sherman and Texas High is -1. They won by 16 and could lose by as many as 17. Texas High is at -3. They beat Sherman by 13 and lost to John Tyler by 16. Right now Sherman is -13. That is why Sherman has to win by at least 11. They would go to -2 and be ahead of Texas High for the fourth seed. If they win by 13 or more, John Tyler is the four and Sherman is the three.

John Tyler has clinched a playoff spot. Sherman would clinch a playoff spot with a win and a West Mesquite win or a win by at least 11 points and a Texas High victory. John Tyler would be ahead of West Mesquite or Texas High on points if either school was involved in the three-way tie with Sherman and John Tyler. Tyler is playing to avoid the fourth seed.

The max for that district is 14 points Whitewright needs a win, a Cooper loss and a Chisum loss to get in.

Cooper can clinch a playoff spot with a win and a Blue Ridge win or a loss and a Chisum loss and a Whitewright loss. Chisum would be eliminated with a loss and a Chisum win or a loss and a Chisum loss and a Whitewright win.

You don't vote against it if have evidence and a really good reason to vote that way. You know why? Because the next time it will be your kids dealing with a vote and you don't want the schools you've voted against in the past to deny the eligibility out of spite and retaliation Any vote that goes to the UIL committee is a 50-50 shot at getting overturned. I've seen cases I thought would get upheld and didn't. I've seen ones I thought would get overturned and weren't. And if the DEC denies, there is no downside to appealing. A 50 percent shot is better than 0

If you don't know about Argyle's athletic success, you havent paid attention to Texas High School sports for the past decade

That one seems pretty straightforward to have to go to UIL Committee

No. 3 was their main QB in the scrimmage last week

They are perhaps the worst regional site when it comes to track updates

Might as well hire Peterman. Worked out well when he replaced Mathis the last time

Considering they had never won a championship before, they had no reason to

Not only did they run off a state championship winning coach, after doing so they then reached back out to him, seemingly thinking he'd want to come back after the nonsense they put him through. No one with a strong resume should want to take that job seeing everything that's going on.

Game was cancelled due to weather

He stepped down due to health reasons. Had a heart attack right before their playoff game

They certainly would, since it would mean making the state championship game. I think every team in the state would sign up for that right now.

33 sacks 18 INTs 10 fumbles (missing three games)

Wasnt on the ballot

As I posted on another thread -- you can't vote on players who aren't on the ballot

He's at a different position this year. His numbers were being compared to linebackers instead of defensive backs. And he had 8 INTs in regular season last year, which is going to look good on the DB ballot.

The only Newton kids on the ballot on offense were the running back and the quarterback. There were no Newton kids on the ballot on the defense. So please don't tell me kids were nominated when they obviously weren't.

If kids aren't nominated then you can't vote for them