It seems like the big issue of this week has been this summer's upcoming Beijing Olympics. Protests have broken out in Tibet and around the globe due to concerns over China's human rights record and its lack of involvement in settling the crisis in Sudan.
The question is, should President Bush boycott the Opening Ceremony? I've heard this sentiment tossed around the past few days. Hill dog was the first candidate to publicly come out and say that President Bush should boycott the Opening Ceremony, followed by Obama. McCain took a more careful approach by saying President Bush should "monitor the situation and keep his options open."
I think this brings up an interesting crossroads. On the one hand, if President Bush were to boycott the Beijing Opening Ceremony, it would send a strong message to China about the how the US feels. However, China could retaliate by temporarily ending their purchase of US Government bonds, which of course would hurt the US financially. On the other hand, if the US were to attend the Beijing Opening Ceremony, it would send mixed messages about its stance on human rights; the last thing the US needs is another reason for the world to be upset with them. Of course, all of this is speculative.
I think McCain brings up an interesting point. Should we wait and see what happens? Personally, I don't see much changing in the three or four months leading up to the Olympics, mostly because it's an unreasonbly short time for a nation to change its record on something as huge as human rights. Having said that, it isn't impossible, and China may very well feel the pressure and decide that it's time to change.
If President Bush were to boycott the Opening Ceremony, he wouldn't be alone. Angela Merkel and Gordon Brown of Germany and Great Britain, respectively, have already announced that they will not be attending the Opening Ceremony.
Any thoughts? Let's try to keep this civil and non-partisan, please.