blesseddaily Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 So...your opinion is "for real" and all others are just "stuff"??? That's pretty funny stuff!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 So...your opinion is "for real" and all others are just "stuff"??? That's pretty funny stuff!!! WATCH...IS ALL I GOT TO SAY :highfive: :highfive: :highfive: :highfive: :highfive: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player73 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 teague's speed will match up just fine with crockett and malakoff.with that being said and reading what yall say about yall's speed it looks like these games could come down to the men in the trenches.i like the lions chances down there also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 QUOTE (maxjean @ Jun 25 2010, 04:42 AM) * lorena leopards 11/27/09 TBA Coldspring-Oakhurst (Coldspring, TX) *** Location: A&M Consolidated 33-29 (W) 12/04/09 TBA Carthage (Carthage, TX) *** Location: Corsicana 21-28 (L) madisonville mustangs Navasota (Navasota, TX) * 16-21 (L) navasota rattlers Gilmer (Gilmer, TX) *** Location: lufkin,tx 35-42 (L) crockett had coldspring beat like a drum Coldspring-Oakhurst (Coldspring, TX) 26-32 (L) crocket had several scores called back but didnt play well at madisonville. @ Madisonville (Madisonville, TX) 0-6 (L) this may not prove anything but yall can convince yourself all you want that teauge,troup,malakoff will give them a game but i am telling you crockett is a better team than you realize.they were very young last year also they had ups and downs of a young team. SOME OF YALL ARE STILL NOT PUTING 2 +2 TOGETHER,FOR A YOUNG TEAM THEY DID PRETTY GOOD UP AGAINST SOME STRONG TEAMS. AS IS,BE HONEST PEOPLE HOW WOULD TROUP ,TEAUGE,MALAKOFF FAIRED AGAINST THESE TEAMS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player73 Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 we are talking about district 11 2a in the year of 2010.i dont care what happened last year because it has no bearing on what's going to happen this year.none of these teams are going to be the exact team of last year and last time i looked everyone is 0-0 at this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 we are talking about district 11 2a in the year of 2010.i dont care what happened last year because it has no bearing on what's going to happen this year.none of these teams are going to be the exact team of last year and last time i looked everyone is 0-0 at this time. DREAM ON.BUT YOU ARE FOOLIN YOURSELF IF YOU DONT COMPREHEND THOSE RESULTS I PUT UP FROM LAST YEAR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 DREAM ON.BUT YOU ARE FOOLIN YOURSELF IF YOU DONT COMPREHEND THOSE RESULTS I PUT UP FROM LAST YEAR. LAST I LOOKED GILMER AND CARTHAGE WERE STATE CHAMPS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
player73 Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 in earlier posts i said that crockett has talent and will be a good football team this year there is no doubt about it.you keep saying other people dont understand this and that about crockett.i really not sure about troup,elkhart and trinity but i know malakoff will be good.now what you dont understand is how good teague will be and thats fine but you will before too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger15 Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 teague's speed will match up just fine with crockett and malakoff.with that being said and reading what yall say about yall's speed it looks like these games could come down to the men in the trenches.i like the lions chances down there also. Malakoff went to state and got third in the 4x100 and 4x200 relays. and only lost one kid that was on there. So all this talk about teague and crockett having speed is ridiculous. It will be a very tough district but malakoff has more speed, and a very good defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budkilmer99 Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 Malakoff went to state and got third in the 4x100 and 4x200 relays. and only lost one kid that was on there. So all this talk about teague and crockett having speed is ridiculous. It will be a very tough district but malakoff has more speed, and a very good defense. go do your homework son, Teague's starting RB won the 100 meter dash last spring in 2-A. He's just a junior this season and you throw in other kids that can run with the best of them like Gibson, McClain and Burns and those are 4.5's or better. Malakoff will see the speed come October Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budkilmer99 Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 And not to mention Samuels, Carter, Lynch, and Henderson who can go too but the other 4 I mentioned can run with anyone in 2-A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger15 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 go do your homework son, Teague's starting RB won the 100 meter dash last spring in 2-A. He's just a junior this season and you throw in other kids that can run with the best of them like Gibson, McClain and Burns and those are 4.5's or better. Malakoff will see the speed come October Malakoff has two kids that run a 4.44 and two kids that run a 4.5, they 4 other kids running low 4.6's and i know that kid won the 100, i was there watching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger15 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 And not to mention Samuels, Carter, Lynch, and Henderson who can go too but the other 4 I mentioned can run with anyone in 2-A and we also have the 6th best track program in 2A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 AS IS,BE HONEST PEOPLE HOW WOULD TROUP ,TEAUGE,MALAKOFF FAIRED AGAINST THESE TEAMS. I AM STILL WAITING FOR SOME FORM OF A ANSWER.. :sleeping: :sleeping: :sleeping: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blesseddaily Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 There is no reason to answer a ridiculous, hypothetical question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 I AM STILL WAITING FOR SOME FORM OF A ANSWER.. :sleeping: :sleeping: :sleeping: STILL NO ANSWER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 Maybe they would of went 1-9 also.. Or maybe they would of went 9-1.. Never know when dealing with kids.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 Maybe they would of went 1-9 also.. Or maybe they would of went 9-1.. Never know when dealing with kids.. YOUR STILL RIDING ON HOPE THAT MY PREDICTION DON'T COME TRUE.YOU KNOW NONE OF THOSE TEAMS WOULD HAVE CROSSED MID-FIELD AGAINST THOSE TEAMS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 So its ok to go 1-9 just as long as you cross midfield? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 So its ok to go 1-9 just as long as you cross midfield? WORD PLAY WILL STILL COUNT AS NO ANSWER YET......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blesseddaily Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 "WORD PLAY" WILL STILL COUNT AS NO ANSWER YET......... Is that something like "fore play"...you know...you holler fore and play through??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjean Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 "WORD PLAY" WILL STILL COUNT AS NO ANSWER YET......... Is that something like "fore play"...you know...you holler fore and play through??? EDUMACATED PEOPLE WILL GET THAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger15 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 I AM STILL WAITING FOR SOME FORM OF A ANSWER.. :sleeping: :sleeping: :sleeping: Malakoff plays sabine opening week, and new diana as there last preseason game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
card1988 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 go do your homework son, Teague's starting RB won the 100 meter dash last spring in 2-A. He's just a junior this season and you throw in other kids that can run with the best of them like Gibson, McClain and Burns and those are 4.5's or better. Malakoff will see the speed come October You should not have put McClain in this group of speedsters, moves like his dad!!!. How is Teauge looking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franksnbeans Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 STILL NO ANSWER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now