WP4L Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Nope , really wouldn't talk & 2011 Tenaha really. Bigger doesn't mean better. South Lake Carrol is a team that was better just saying. I agree with North shore gotta love a champion just saying. I realize that you don't know much, but Tenaha is 1A. D-Field was 3A in 83', which in turn is probably a modern day low 2A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTobinReid Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Dangerfield football teams and Big Sandy football teams. All back in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franksnbeans Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 I realize that you don't know much, but Tenaha is 1A. D-Field was 3A in 83', which in turn is probably a modern day low 2A. Wow. Uninformed is all I can say. Daingerfield was boardering on 4A in '83. With the enrollment numbers they had in the early 80's they would be solidly 3A based on today's alignment numbers. Do some homework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franksnbeans Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 The cutoff number for 3A/4A in 1982 was 645. Daingerfield came in around 600 I believe. So, if Daingerfield had those numbers today, they would be solidly in 3A. Not low 2A. Good God man! You accuse someone of not knowing anything and then in the next sentence prove to everyone how uninformed you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hookemhorns88 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Wow. Uninformed is all I can say. Daingerfield was boardering on 4A in '83. With the enrollment numbers they had in the early 80's they would be solidly 3A based on today's alignment numbers. Do some homework. If I remember correctly Daingerfield was 4A during the '82 season and then dropped a class and went on the long run from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle34 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Nope, that would be you and anyone else who thinks 83' D-Field would whoop anyone in the state, when they wouldn't even beat 11' Tenaha. Some of you small school fans in EAST TEXAS can't except the fact that you're the best in your respective class. What's wrong with that? 2006 Cedar Hill is the best football team I've ever seen. You're crazy to think otherswise unless you bring some good names to the table, like 03' North Shore. Best defense I've ever seen and a bunch of others would agree. Shut down numerous offenses and did it against stiff competition. 2006 Cedar HIll. Is that the year they beat Garland High at Texas Stadium in the quarter finals? Garland had 1st and goal at the 1 yard line with less than a minute left to win the game and the Garland Coach ran 4 straight sweeps instead of letting his 210 lb. QB run the sneak. Cedar Hill was not better than Garland that year but did get out coached. Best Ever. Heck no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle34 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 2006 Cedar HIll. Is that the year they beat Garland High at Texas Stadium in the quarter finals? Garland had 1st and goal at the 1 yard line with less than a minute left to win the game and the Garland Coach ran 4 straight sweeps instead of letting his 210 lb. QB run the sneak. Cedar Hill was not better than Garland that year but did get out coached. Best Ever. Heck no Just to add, This is one of the most exciting games I have seen with 4 straight goal line stands by Cedar Hill with seconds left. IMO if the Owls would have ran the sneak they would have won the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pops Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 2006 Cedar HIll. Is that the year they beat Garland High at Texas Stadium in the quarter finals? Garland had 1st and goal at the 1 yard line with less than a minute left to win the game and the Garland Coach ran 4 straight sweeps instead of letting his 210 lb. QB run the sneak. Cedar Hill was not better than Garland that year but did get out coached. Best Ever. Heck no And certainly not the most DOMINANT..............Wolfie lost in a 5A fog........with his "You're crazy to think otherswise", along with his lack of knowledge concerning classification size, and his recent babble of the competetion is toughter in 5A.......we're all just rasslin' with a pig...............some of the recent competiton during the playoffs in 3A and 2A disproves the wolf......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackflag79 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 If I remember correctly Daingerfield was 4A during the '82 season and then dropped a class and went on the long run from there. If I'm not mistaken, they remained 3A in 1980 when they changed Class B to Class A, Class A to AA, AA to AAA, AAA to AAAA, and AAAA to AAAAA. I think there were a lot of East Texas schools that stayed in 3A then, including Gilmer, Atlanta, Clarksville, etc. Hey, if we're going to bring up teams from way back yonder, how about the 1941 Gilmer Buckeyes who went 12-0 (that's as far as they could go in them days), beating opponents 369-6. The only TD given up was against a good Mineola team at the time, late, against all scrubs who were playing out of position -- positions they had never played before. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachc45 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 It's #### near impossible for a program to achieve the same thing in 4A or 5A, a fool would think otherwise. There's a reason why it hasn't been done. Competition is way more stiff. It has absolutely nothing to do with how "talented" the 83' D-Field team was. Therefore, the 1983 Daingerfield Tigers are the most dominant team of their own classification. And I find it funny that you still follow me around this board. Clearly I don't respect you, so why do you continue quoting me? Its dang near impossible to do it at 3A also....which is why its only been done once!!! Moron! Oh and I don't really care if you respect me....I think you are a complete MORON and I don't need MORONS to respect me. I quote you because it is sooooooo easy and fun to expose you as the MORON that you are!!!!! Dang dude, you are totally easy to Rile up! LMAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hookemhorns88 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 It's #### near impossible for a program to achieve the same thing in 4A or 5A, a fool would think otherwise. There's a reason why it hasn't been done. Competition is way more stiff. It has absolutely nothing to do with how "talented" the 83' D-Field team was. Therefore, the 1983 Daingerfield Tigers are the most dominant team of their own classification. And I find it funny that you still follow me around this board. Clearly I don't respect you, so why do you continue quoting me? How can the competition be more stiff if you are playing your peers in the same classification? And just why would that theory not play itself out in the lower classifications? Are there more stud athletes per capita in a 5A school versus a 3A school? Anomalies are not class sensitive. The simple truth is that Daingerfield had an exceptional amount of talent that flat out dominated. It is true that Yates, SLC, or some other large school may have had more talent on the team by quantity than Daingerfield but they did not put it to use as Daingerfield did by dominating their opponents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowboyforchrist Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 It's #### near impossible for a program to achieve the same thing in 4A or 5A, a fool would think otherwise. There's a reason why it hasn't been done. Competition is way more stiff. It has absolutely nothing to do with how "talented" the 83' D-Field team was. Therefore, the 1983 Daingerfield Tigers are the most dominant team of their own classification. And I find it funny that you still follow me around this board. Clearly I don't respect you, so why do you continue quoting me? You do know Carthage played in the semi final game in 4a, right. They crossed the fifty yard line one time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pops Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 How can the competition be more stiff if you are playing your peers in the same classification? And just why would that theory not play itself out in the lower classifications? Are there more stud athletes per capita in a 5A school versus a 3A school? Anomalies are not class sensitive. The simple truth is that Daingerfield had an exceptional amount of talent that flat out dominated. It is true that Yates, SLC, or some other large school may have had more talent on the team by quantity than Daingerfield but they did not put it to use as Daingerfield did by dominating their opponents. Well said........... wolfie.....we'd love to hear your rebuttle.........remember, Most Dominant, is the category....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclejohn Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 It's #### near impossible for a program to achieve the same thing in 4A or 5A, a fool would think otherwise. There's a reason why it hasn't been done. Competition is way more stiff. It has absolutely nothing to do with how "talented" the 83' D-Field team was. Therefore, the 1983 Daingerfield Tigers are the most dominant team of their own classification. And I find it funny that you still follow me around this board. Clearly I don't respect you, so why do you continue quoting me? +1. I'm sure if TK Gorman donkey stomps everybody they will also have 10+ kids go play college ball also. 4a and 5a is for the big boys. I'm a CH fan and can admit that the comp. in the playoffs is WAY more tougher than 3a and lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
collincoguy Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 With each jump in classification the competition gets tougher. There is a reason everyone gets excited when they see their school move down a classification, and why so many get upset when they have to move up a classification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pops Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 4a and 5a is for the big boys. I'm a CH fan and can admit that the comp. in the playoffs is WAY more tougher than 3a and lower. WAY more tougher.........how so? Are all 4A and 5A playoff teams all equally matched?? Even with the number of team that make the playoffs?? So your saying all the teams 4A Aledo smashed last year in the playoffs were really tough??? Their 59 to 10 win over Ft. Worth Dunbar was a "way tough" game?? That would make the lowly 3A Argyle wins over Prosper, Carthage and Gilmer what.......... non-tough??? Wimberley's wins over Coldspring and Argyle.......... easy????.............Jump off the wolfie bandwagon............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pops Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 With each jump in classification the competition gets tougher. There is a reason everyone gets excited when they see their school move down a classification, and why so many get upset when they have to move up a classification. Schools like Gilmer and Celina are still competive as small schools in 3A, much like Longview is competive in 5A as a small school and competitive as a large 4A................Kilgore was competive as a small 4A school and will be as a large 3A. Tatum was tough in two different classifications.................when they were big and small school.......... If you line up against any on those schools, Gilmer, Celina, Longview, Kilgore, Tatum, Daingerfield, Carthage, and so many more and they are in your classification the competition is TOUGH!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachc45 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 With each jump in classification the competition gets tougher. There is a reason everyone gets excited when they see their school move down a classification, and why so many get upset when they have to move up a classification. Do you think that maybe they are excited because they were the small guy in the classification above and by moving down they have the numbers advantage? I've never heard the competition factor as the reason for excitement, its always been the numbers. Competition is directly related to your size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pops Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 Do you think that maybe they are excited because they were the small guy in the classification above and by moving down they have the numbers advantage? I've never heard the competition factor as the reason for excitement, its always been the numbers. Competition is directly related to your size. Exactly!!!! Do you think the teams that played Daingerfield 08-09-10 thouht they were competitive? Celina over the last 10 years.....competitive??? I don't understand why we even have to argue the point................................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pops Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 Yes henderson was excited not to play the power houses of Nac, Whitehouse, Pine Tree, Kilgore for Defending Champions in Carthage and Gilmer. Numbers yes being placed in the District of Doom not so much. Great point Henderson moving down to the lowly levels of 3A and getting put into the District of Doom.............competitive??? Ya I think so.............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WP4L Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 I beat they could've beat Longview also See, non-sense like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WP4L Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 +1. I'm sure if TK Gorman donkey stomps everybody they will also have 10+ kids go play college ball also. 4a and 5a is for the big boys. I'm a CH fan and can admit that the comp. in the playoffs is WAY more tougher than 3a and lower. You being a CH fan, you'd think they would understand. Guess not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pops Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 You being a CH fan, you'd think they would understand. Guess not. If he's a CH fan and doesn't get it.......what's there to understand?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLEMAN Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 DF i one of the most dominate in recent years just because of their win loss average. There are a few other teame building programs in their div but building real programs takes time. In 3a i see LE ans Paris moving up in status. They have always had the kids to compete. Coaching will make a difference. Especially Paris. I see no big changes in the short term but i do see changes in the cream in the next 5 years. Even cream will sour after a while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachc45 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 Exactly!!!! Do you think the teams that played Daingerfield 08-09-10 thouht they were competitive? Celina over the last 10 years.....competitive??? I don't understand why we even have to argue the point................................... Wolfie thinks that 5A automatically makes you better. Well talk about my experiences, I have coached at 4A then 3A down to 2A up to 3A then 3A again up to 4A now I am at at 5A. Guess what....they are all competitive!!!!!! It is amazing how that no matter what school I've been at, no matter what size, As long as I have comparable numbers I can compete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now