RETIREDFAN1 Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=7&article=1692 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilgamesh Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 http://apologeticspr...=7&article=1692 Yes, vote for the man who wants to do the least, for the least among us... ...take away health care coverage for the most needy. ...take away the common man's job (and keep his unemployment benefits as low as possible), send his job overseas, all while ensuring enourmous profit for himself. Rig the tax system so the rich pay even lower tax rates than the common man (whose job he has no qualms of eliminating). If only he truly believed he is making his job more difficult than that of the camel (who must thread the eye of the needle) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Yes, vote for the man who wants to do the least, for the least among us... ...take away health care coverage for the most needy. ...take away the common man's job (and keep his unemployment benefits as low as possible), send his job overseas, all while ensuring enourmous profit for himself. Rig the tax system so the rich pay even lower tax rates than the common man (whose job he has no qualms of eliminating). If only he truly believed he is making his job more difficult than that of the camel (who must thread the eye of the needle) You watch to much MSNBC sound like someone who wants someone to pay your way grow up and get a job and pay some taxes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 Yes, vote for the man who wants to do the least, for the least among us... ...take away health care coverage for the most needy. ...take away the common man's job (and keep his unemployment benefits as low as possible), send his job overseas, all while ensuring enourmous profit for himself. Rig the tax system so the rich pay even lower tax rates than the common man (whose job he has no qualms of eliminating). If only he truly believed he is making his job more difficult than that of the camel (who must thread the eye of the needle) You assume too much...I'm writing myself in because NONE of the candidates are against any abortion for any reason.......:P AND you sound like a dim supporter....so you are no different than the goppers....supporters of BOTH parties are slaves to the system which only gives the illusion of a choice, but in acutality gives you the same candidate running for both parties..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 That was EPIC. Just like you, and just like the goppers....all slaves to the international bankers and war profiteers who really control BOTH parties and are making inroads with the third parties...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 You watch to much MSNBC sound like someone who wants someone to pay your way grow up and get a job and pay some taxes +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 Obviously my comment was over your head so please keep moving along Obviously you didn't read what I was replying too....:P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayseed Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 There are folks who would vote for John Edwards still today because of a GOP label beside his name. It would be their morals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wild74 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 There are folks who would vote for John Edwards still today because of a GOP label beside his name. It would be their morals. I wouldn't vote for a GOP label if they did what John Edwards did, of course Johnny boy was a dim but you are right Edwin Edwards would come close to getting electing in Louisiana if he could run again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now