Coach0001 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 62-61 triple overtime Pottsboro wins in triple overtime just read about Little problem after Potts scored in 3rd they kicked the extra point and won on that point Game will not be changed but we all know what a huge error by the officials this was Thoughts on what should happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flukeshot Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Can't find a writeup on the game. I assume order of events was: CM scored first in third OT, went for two believing that they would be required to by rule. Didn't get it. Potts then scored on their possession, wrongly allowed to kick the winning extra point. Is that it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach0001 Posted October 13, 2013 Author Share Posted October 13, 2013 What I am reading on 2a is no that Potts scored first kicked then Caddo scored and went for 2 and did not get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flukeshot Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Interesting. So then CM was just going for the win and no one realized at the time that an error had been made? Heh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach0001 Posted October 13, 2013 Author Share Posted October 13, 2013 Correct just following the rule that you must go for 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonDellaRosa Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Pottsboro's coach said they talked to the ref at the end of regulation. Both coaches were told they didn't have to go for two until after third OT. Before the third OT, Pottsboro's coach asked again to make sure. Was told the same -- not until after third OT. Caddo Mills coach was going for the win after Pottsboro had scored and kicked PAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior09 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Two things should happen. 1. game should be declared a tie 2. refs game checks should get lost in the mail. sounds like Caddo got hosed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upullinmychain Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Nope, coach elected to go for two not one and came up short. I. E. ( chump or champ ) play. Gambled and lost, is he gonna complain about it, or take it in stride and move on? JMHO they both had the same choices , leave it alone and get ready for next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderriver1 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Nope, One coach followed the rules. One coach benefitted from an on the spot rule change. It would be interesting to see the reaction from the other side if the shoe was on the other foot. There is no choice but to move on, but Pottsboro gets the win only because of the refs ignorrance of the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlSpangler Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Hate to say it but it pot kicked and it was allowed even through protest at the time then caddo should have kicked. Understand it's a mess up but everyone would have been on even playing ground in the order of events. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Two things should happen. 1. game should be declared a tie 2. refs game checks should get lost in the mail. sounds like Caddo got hosed. Uhh, no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now