Jump to content

When are you anti-GOPers going to trot out your 3rd party minoin?


KirtFalcon

Recommended Posts

 

 

"semi-automatic rifles" = assault rifle in libspeak......you are the one living in the land of confusion........:P

+1. SAR=AR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Ben_Carson_Gun_Control.htm

 

From the article....."Semi-automatic weapons ok in countryside, but not cities

 

Appearing on Glenn Beck's radio show this past week, Carson took a vastly different stance from most conservatives on the issue of gun control, claiming you shouldn't be able to own semi-automatic weapons in large cities.

Asked by Beck for his thoughts on the Second Amendment, Carson gave the popular pro-gun argument: "There's a reason for the Second Amendment; people do have the right to have weapons."

But when asked whether people should be allowed to own "semi-automatic weapons," the doctor replied: "It depends on where you live. I think if you live in the midst of a lot of people, and I'm afraid that that semi-automatic weapon is going to fall into the hands of a crazy person, I would rather you not have it," Carson elaborated. However, if you live "out in the country somewhere by yourself" and want to own a semi-automatic weapon, he added, "I've no problem with that"

 

 

WEAK.... NRA and Gun Owners of America will never support him even though he's changed his tune.......I'm right, your wrong.......as usual........

You got it right dog. Quit wasting time with him. Anyone familiar with firearms as you already know that a semi-automatic, or self-loading, firearm is one that performs all steps necessary to prepare it to discharge again after firing, whether it be a long gun or handgun.

 

Carson is talking about both long and hand guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got it right dog. Quit wasting time with him. Anyone familiar with firearms as you already know that a semi-automatic, or self-loading, firearm is one that performs all steps necessary to prepare it to discharge again after firing, whether it be a long gun or handgun.

 

Carson is talking about both long and hand guns.

Whatever bro I know as much as anyone on this forum about guns. I'll vote for Carson and you can vote for whatever 3rd party fruitcake you want to. :) :) :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Ben Carson not a conservative? I already disproved Colmes assertion that he is anti-gun. So what else is wrong with him besides the ® beside his name?

I'd vote for him, but there are two points that stick out that keep him below who I have as my front runner. As Colmes did point out he is against people that live in cities to restrict their rights to bear certain arms. He is also lax in his immigration stance. America has a huge burden with immigration, and the solutions that many politicians are offering will not stop the burden, but only increase it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Ben_Carson_Gun_Control.htm

 

From the article....."Semi-automatic weapons ok in countryside, but not cities

 

Appearing on Glenn Beck's radio show this past week, Carson took a vastly different stance from most conservatives on the issue of gun control, claiming you shouldn't be able to own semi-automatic weapons in large cities.

Asked by Beck for his thoughts on the Second Amendment, Carson gave the popular pro-gun argument: "There's a reason for the Second Amendment; people do have the right to have weapons."

But when asked whether people should be allowed to own "semi-automatic weapons," the doctor replied: "It depends on where you live. I think if you live in the midst of a lot of people, and I'm afraid that that semi-automatic weapon is going to fall into the hands of a crazy person, I would rather you not have it," Carson elaborated. However, if you live "out in the country somewhere by yourself" and want to own a semi-automatic weapon, he added, "I've no problem with that"

 

 

WEAK.... NRA and Gun Owners of America will never support him even though he's changed his tune.......I'm right, your wrong.......as usual........

Here's that article since Immortal doesn't feel he should do any research, and will not take anyone's word on it : http://www.mediaite.com/tv/conservative-hero-ben-carson-to-beck-you-have-no-right-to-semi-automatic-weapons-in-large-cities/ .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have four words for you side-show dupes ....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time To Face Reality .....

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked up on Carson's opinion of big city firearms restrictions a long time ago listening to Chris Krok. Where the hell has immortal been?

++++++++++++

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump was right about 1 thing. The Reublican party didn't give 2 #### about Immigration until he stated his stance. It was going to be a cordial bash Obama campaign for everyone. Or "I can beat Hillary" which my guy Huck clings tight to...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump was right about 1 thing. The Reublican party didn't give 2 #### about Immigration until he stated his stance. It was going to be a cordial bash Obama campaign for everyone. Or "I can beat Hillary" which my guy Huck clings tight to...

Spot on post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If Romney would have won, we wouldn't have the hundreds of destructive executive orders Obama has issued, we wouldn't have Kagan, we wouldn't have Sotomayor, ......................................

........................

.... .. COMPRENDE?

.....

You are too ignorant to be allowed to vote. but do humor us and tell us how Romney being elected in 2012 would have retroactively kept Sotomayor and Kagan off the SCOTUS. They have been there since Aug 8, 2009 and Aug 7, 2010, respectively.

 

COMPRENDE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are too ignorant to be allowed to vote. but do humor us and tell us how Romney being elected in 2012 would have retroactively kept Sotomayor and Kagan off the SCOTUS. They have been there since Aug 8, 2009 and Aug 7, 2010, respectively.

 

COMPRENDE?

 

So Barry nominated them during his first term, big deal .... either way that's what you get when you elect an ultra liberal nutjob like Obama in the first place. The point is, we most likely wouldn't have added any more anti-constitutional liberals to the SC if we keep anti-constitutional liberals out of the White House ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Barry nominated them during his first term, big deal .... either way that's what you get when you elect an ultra liberal nutjob like Obama in the first place. The point is, we most likely wouldn't have added any more anti-constitutional liberals to the SC if we keep anti-constitutional liberals out of the White House ....

True, we could then add some more anti-constitutional "conservatives" like Roberts........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Checkmate.

 

.... or we could elect another ultra liberal dimocrat and guarantee nothing but ultra liberal SC justices for the next 4/8 years. Nothing is 100% guaranteed but the chances of getting a conservative with a republican in the WH is probably 75% vs 0% with a dim .... Checkmate ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same old holds true for your argument. Same old scratch on the record that repeats the same worthless message. I can refute with certainty you are held hostage by the one party dupe and bound by the shackles of dupe. Crawl out from under your rock. What will be different this time Charlie Brown?

No, the facts are clearly on my side. Name one sitting conservative SC justice nominated by a dimocrat .... you are delusional, dude. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry Kirt, they will vote republican. They sure as hell won't vote SHillary, Average Joe, or Socialist Bernie

I will vote third party or for myself like I did the LAST election......those of us who are TRULY conservative will not vote for a liberal just because he has an "R" as his "party" affiliation.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will vote third party or for myself like I did the LAST election......those of us who are TRULY conservative will not vote for a liberal just because he has an "R" as his "party" affiliation.........

Stupidity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result .... where did I hear that before? .... :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...