Smoaky Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 http://www.fox26houston.com/news/55296226-story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFootball Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 About time. It always felt like something was going on at Katy. Nothing ever came to light, though. They always seemed to get a lot of "move ins" and whatnot. I hope that whatever happens, the right decision is made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoboFan07 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 About time. It always felt like something was going on at Katy. Nothing ever came to light, though. They always seemed to get a lot of "move ins" and whatnot. I hope that whatever happens, the right decision is made. Minus 1998, nothing came to light at least... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pack007 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 About time. It always felt like something was going on at Katy. Nothing ever came to light, though. They always seemed to get a lot of "move ins" and whatnot. I hope that whatever happens, the right decision is made. Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboi2k13 Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 UIL has scheduled an emergency hearing concerning possible eligibility violations by Katy High School's football team. The violations are still unclear but a source told Fox 26 that the unspecified player's eligibility status may be in question because he is a "move in." Depending upon why he moved into the area, it could make him ineligible for varsity postseason play.The emergency UIL hearing is schedule for 10:05am in Austin. Look for more news as it breaks. http://texashsfootball.com/katy-might-be-disqualified-from-playoffs/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1WildCat Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 UIL has scheduled an emergency hearing concerning possible eligibility violations by Katy High School's football team. The violations are still unclear but a source told Fox 26 that the unspecified player's eligibility status may be in question because he is a "move in." Depending upon why he moved into the area, it could make him ineligible for varsity postseason play.The emergency UIL hearing is schedule for 10:05am in Austin. Look for more news as it breaks. http://texashsfootball.com/katy-might-be-disqualified-from-playoffs/ I'm sure he moved into Katy HS because of the superior educational opportunities afforded the vast majority of students attending said institution!! ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
in10sz Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 After reading the article (link from smoaky), it appears that the player just moved in and played this last weekend. Does not seem feasible to me how any player would be able come into a storied program such as Katy's in week 13 and even see a uniform, much less playing time. Must be something I didn't read right ..smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beardawg1970 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I think he was already enrolled but only participated in the one game maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mavchamp Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Minus 1998, nothing came to light at least... The 1998 debacle was LUDICROUS! A player forged a teacher's signature and changed his grade from failing to passing. He played a total of THREE plays in a blowout playoff win near the end of the game in the semi-finals. The entire team missed out on that state title game. IMHO.... that was on the SINGLE student.... NOT on KHS or the coaching staff. HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUNISHED. Not the program. He committed forgery!!!! HE LIED!!!! Forgery??? How in the world was the staff to know something like that??? It was a pitiful ruling by UIL. I have no love for KHS at all.... but that ruling was RIDICULOUS. Midland Lee was going to win that state title game regardless of who they faced..... they were a MACHINE with Cedric Benson. But still.... Katy should have never been tossed out IMHO. I can't help but wonder though...... these last second whistleblowers on "flimsy" allegations..... is this actual concern of broken rules? Or is this just a simple case of JEALOUSY????? I'll leave that laying right here...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachc45 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Katy self-reported. Supposedly there is a question of whether the kid had been enrolled 15 days before playing at the tail-end of last weeks blowout win. It is a hearing for clarification of the rule. 15 school days or 15 days. They are clearing up the timeline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachc45 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RETIREDFAN1 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I can't help but wonder though...... these last second whistleblowers on "flimsy" allegations..... is this actual concern of broken rules? Or is this just a simple case of JEALOUSY????? Katy self reported.......:P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OA5II Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 No no no. Everyone knows that only private schools do this. Gov't schools are there for the community and the light on the hill as thr example of the community standards and above anything like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoboFan07 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Live stream: http://abc13.com/live/23375/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachjo Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 http://abc13.com/live/23375/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoboFan07 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 So far... Not there to debate if an ineligible player actually played. That's already been determined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachjo Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Not sounding good for Katy early on. Hope they have some facts. They did say a mistake was made. They will be held accountable in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoboFan07 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Basically sounds like Katy is saying we made a mistake, don't punish us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pack007 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Basically sounds like Katy is saying we made a mistake, don't punish us. Yep.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoboFan07 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 @aasdannyJoseph says that the player appeared in about 10 offensive plays. Not the solitary extra point that was previously reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pack007 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Their fans lie so much 07. The lady was a little arrogant too, basically said yea we broke the rules, but we didn't need this new kid because we win by an average of 47 points per game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lufkin06 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I don't give a damn if you win by 100. Rules are rules 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pack007 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Well the kid played when the score was 66-0. I highly doubt they would jeapodize the season. I mean if he was star qb or the game was in question I could see some foul play. I doubt he is that stupid especially when the Head coach has been there since 1981. He wasn't the HC that long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoboFan07 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Well the kid played when the score was 66-0. I highly doubt they would jeapodize the season. I mean if he was star qb or the game was in question I could see some foul play. I doubt he is that stupid especially when the Head coach has been there since 1981. Meh, rule is a rule for a reason. We had to forfeit a game for a guy playing just one play back in 08..when the game was 52-14. Their officials are definitely just begging not to be punished. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachjo Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Through sufficient diligence in believing every player was eligible, that may help them in the final decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now