Jump to content

Pigskin Prep playoff projections for 3AD1-3AD2


Sportsfanatic1

Recommended Posts

Preseason - 2017 Class 3A Playoff Regional Rankings
Includes team ranking in parenthesis, playoff team with 2016 record, 2017 preseason rating, and 2017 Playoff Projection

 

3A Div. I Bracket Region I Rating Projected Playoff Finish
1 3A - 4 (3) Brock (13-1) 164.83 Projected 3A Div. I State Finalist
2 3A - 2 (6) Wall (11-4) 161.36 Projected 3A Div. I Quarters
3 3A - 1 (21) Muleshoe (8-5) 144.21 Projected 3A Div. I Regional
4 3A - 3 (23) Comanche (7-4) 143.24 Projected 3A Div. I Regional
5 3A - 1 (24) Shallowater (2-9) 143.05 Projected 3A Div. I Area
6 3A - 3 (33) Clyde (9-2) 138.93 Projected 3A Div. I Area
7 3A - 1 (42) Littlefield (9-4) 136.10 Projected 3A Div. I Area
8 3A - 4 (47) Breckenridge (5-7) 131.63 Projected 3A Div. I Area
9 3A - 4 (48) Bowie (6-6) 131.52 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
10 3A - 3 (51) Merkel (4-6) 131.04 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
11 3A - 2 (54) Kermit (4-7) 129.31 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
12 3A - 2 (62) San Angelo Grape Creek (6-4) 127.20 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
13 3A - 3 (63) Brady (4-7) 126.68 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
14 3A - 4 (66) Ponder (6-5) 123.34 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
15 3A - 1 (71) Amarillo River Road (7-5) 122.08 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
16 3A - 2 (85) Crane (3-8) 114.49 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District

 

3A Div. I Bracket Region II Rating Projected Playoff Finish
1 3A - 7 (8) Farmersville (11-2) 156.30 Projected 3A Div. I Semis
2 3A - 5 (9) Pottsboro (11-3) 154.82 Projected 3A Div. I Quarters
3 3A - 7 (11) Mineola (14-2) 154.23 Projected 3A Div. I Regional
4 3A - 6 (16) Grandview (8-3) 148.80 Projected 3A Div. I Area
5 3A - 6 (17) Kemp (7-4) 148.19 Projected 3A Div. I Area
6 3A - 8 (18) Jefferson (9-3) 148.03 Projected 3A Div. I Regional
7 3A - 8 (19) White Oak (10-2) 147.65 Projected 3A Div. I Area
8 3A - 5 (20) Whitesboro (5-7) 144.81 Projected 3A Div. I Area
9 3A - 6 (22) Sunnyvale (11-1) 144.00 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
10 3A - 5 (37) Howe (9-4) 137.79 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
11 3A - 6 (38) Dallas Madison (8-3) 137.64 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
12 3A - 5 (46) Van Alstyne (7-4) 132.05 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
13 3A - 7 (49) Mount Vernon (5-5) 131.35 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
14 3A - 8 (56) Redwater (5-6) 128.73 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
15 3A - 7 (57) Winnsboro (6-5) 128.29 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
16 3A - 8 (64) Hughes Springs (4-6) 125.93 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District

 

3A Div. I Bracket Region III Rating Projected Playoff Finish
1 3A - 10 (1) Cameron Yoe (11-3) 165.90 Projected 3A Div. I State Champion
2 3A - 9 (5) Malakoff (14-1) 162.08 Projected 3A Div. I Regional
3 3A - 9 (7) Teague (10-3) 156.49 Projected 3A Div. I Quarters
4 3A - 10 (10) Rockdale (11-2) 154.75 Projected 3A Div. I Regional
5 3A - 10 (12) Franklin (8-3) 152.24 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
6 3A - 11 (14) Woodville (10-2) 150.80 Projected 3A Div. I Area
7 3A - 12 (15) La Marque (8-3) 149.23 Projected 3A Div. I Area
8 3A - 11 (26) Coldspring-Oakhurst (5-6) 142.53 Projected 3A Div. I Area
9 3A - 11 (29) Kirbyville (8-4) 140.61 Projected 3A Div. I Area
10 3A - 12 (32) Hitchcock (7-4) 139.49 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
11 3A - 12 (34) Hempstead (6-5) 138.79 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
12 3A - 9 (35) West (5-6) 138.77 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
13 3A - 10 (41) McGregor (4-6) 136.71 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
14 3A - 9 (45) Groesbeck (5-6) 134.85 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
15 3A - 11 (60) Buna (7-5) 127.49 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
16 3A - 12 (65) East Chambers (4-6) 125.35 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District

 

3A Div. I Bracket Region IV Rating Projected Playoff Finish
1 3A - 14 (2) Hallettsville (13-1) 165.51 Projected 3A Div. I Semis
2 3A - 14 (4) Yoakum (11-5) 164.74 Projected 3A Div. I Quarters
3 3A - 15 (13) Goliad (9-4) 152.06 Projected 3A Div. I Area
4 3A - 14 (25) Edna (6-6) 142.56 Projected 3A Div. I Regional
5 3A - 15 (27) George West (10-2) 141.36 Projected 3A Div. I Area
6 3A - 16 (28) Lyford (8-4) 140.74 Projected 3A Div. I Area
7 3A - 14 (30) Altair Rice Consolidated (8-4) 139.82 Projected 3A Div. I Regional
8 3A - 13 (31) Lago Vista (8-3) 139.63 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
9 3A - 13 (36) Marion (6-5) 137.82 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
10 3A - 16 (39) Bishop (7-4) 137.37 Projected 3A Div. I Area
11 3A - 15 (40) Mathis (6-5) 136.80 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
12 3A - 13 (43) Luling (4-7) 136.07 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
13 3A - 16 (44) Santa Gertrudis Academy (7-5) 135.07 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
14 3A - 13 (53) San Antonio Cole (4-7) 129.62 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
15 3A - 16 (67) San Diego (2-8) 123.04 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District
16 3A - 15 (69) Taft (4-6) 122.94 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District

 

3A Div. II Bracket Region I Rating Projected Playoff Finish
1 3A - 1 (5) Canadian (12-3) 161.74 Projected 3A Div. II Semis
2 3A - 3 (6) Sonora (12-2) 157.83 Projected 3A Div. II Quarters
3 3A - 4 (10) Cisco (9-2) 149.18 Projected 3A Div. II Regional
4 3A - 4 (14) Eastland (8-4) 144.34 Projected 3A Div. II Area
5 3A - 2 (20) Idalou (8-4) 139.45 Projected 3A Div. II Regional
6 3A - 1 (23) Childress (9-4) 138.41 Projected 3A Div. II Area
7 3A - 4 (26) Coleman (9-4) 136.38 Projected 3A Div. II Area
8 3A - 3 (33) Reagan County (9-2) 129.68 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
9 3A - 2 (38) Colorado City (4-7) 126.40 Projected 3A Div. II Area
10 3A - 4 (51) Tolar (7-4) 123.22 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
11 3A - 1 (58) Spearman (7-5) 121.51 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
12 3A - 1 (61) Dimmitt (6-5) 120.75 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
13 3A - 2 (63) Coahoma (3-7) 120.11 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
14 3A - 3 (67) Ballinger (3-7) 116.19 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
15 3A - 3 (68) Alpine (4-7) 115.59 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
16 3A - 2 (91) Stanton (0-9) 100.88 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District

 

3A Div. II Bracket Region II Rating Projected Playoff Finish
1 3A - 6 (3) Gunter (16-0) 162.44 Projected 3A Div. II State Finalist
2 3A - 8 (12) Gilmer Harmony (9-3) 146.81 Projected 3A Div. II Quarters
3 3A - 8 (15) Winona (8-6) 142.36 Projected 3A Div. II Regional
4 3A - 5 (16) Henrietta (10-3) 142.26 Projected 3A Div. II Area
5 3A - 7 (17) Daingerfield (6-5) 140.27 Projected 3A Div. II Regional
6 3A - 5 (24) Nocona (7-4) 138.21 Projected 3A Div. II Area
7 3A - 6 (25) Leonard (9-3) 136.92 Projected 3A Div. II Area
8 3A - 7 (27) Paul Pewitt (6-5) 133.29 Projected 3A Div. II Area
9 3A - 5 (32) Holliday (7-4) 130.06 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
10 3A - 8 (34) Edgewood (9-3) 129.52 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
11 3A - 8 (39) Lone Oak (6-5) 125.96 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
12 3A - 6 (44) Whitewright (8-5) 125.62 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
13 3A - 7 (47) Hooks (6-6) 123.83 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
14 3A - 6 (49) Sadler S&S Consolidated (5-6) 123.57 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
15 3A - 5 (54) Jacksboro (6-5) 122.77 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
16 3A - 7 (55) New Diana (3-7) 122.06 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District

 

3A Div. II Bracket Region III Rating Projected Playoff Finish
1 3A - 10 (4) Newton (13-1) 161.76 Projected 3A Div. II Semis
2 3A - 9 (7) Elysian Fields (12-1) 156.21 Projected 3A Div. II Regional
3 3A - 9 (9) Arp (12-3) 154.03 Projected 3A Div. II Quarters
4 3A - 10 (11) Crockett (11-2) 147.30 Projected 3A Div. II Regional
5 3A - 9 (13) New London West Rusk (7-4) 144.57 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
6 3A - 12 (19) Buffalo (8-4) 140.04 Projected 3A Div. II Area
7 3A - 11 (21) Clifton (7-5) 139.41 Projected 3A Div. II Area
8 3A - 9 (28) Waskom (4-7) 132.93 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
9 3A - 10 (29) Garrison (6-5) 130.76 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
10 3A - 10 (37) Corrigan-Camden (5-6) 126.53 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
11 3A - 12 (41) Hearne (5-6) 125.75 Projected 3A Div. II Area
12 3A - 11 (46) Rice (6-5) 124.00 Projected 3A Div. II Area
13 3A - 11 (50) Corsicana Mildred (5-6) 123.37 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
14 3A - 12 (56) New Waverly (9-3) 122.02 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
15 3A - 12 (64) Bruceville-Eddy (6-4) 118.64 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
16 3A - 11 (76) Rio Vista (4-6) 111.98 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District

 

3A Div. II Bracket Region IV Rating Projected Playoff Finish
1 3A - 13 (1) Lexington (11-3) 165.67 Projected 3A Div. II State Champion
2 3A - 14 (2) East Bernard (11-2) 163.65 Projected 3A Div. II Regional
3 3A - 14 (8) Boling (13-3) 155.33 Projected 3A Div. II Quarters
4 3A - 16 (18) Odem (11-2) 140.05 Projected 3A Div. II Regional
5 3A - 14 (22) Tidehaven (8-3) 139.01 Projected 3A Div. II Area
6 3A - 16 (30) Hebbronville (7-4) 130.51 Projected 3A Div. II Area
7 3A - 14 (31) Wallis Brazos (5-6) 130.08 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
8 3A - 15 (35) Poth (8-3) 128.06 Projected 3A Div. II Area
9 3A - 15 (36) Dilley (6-6) 127.28 Projected 3A Div. II Area
10 3A - 16 (40) Banquete (8-3) 125.83 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
11 3A - 13 (42) Comfort (6-5) 125.74 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
12 3A - 15 (43) Stockdale (6-6) 125.64 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
13 3A - 13 (45) Rogers (3-8) 125.56 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
14 3A - 15 (48) Nixon-Smiley (6-6) 123.61 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
15 3A - 13 (52) Blanco (3-7) 123.16 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District
16 3A - 16 (70) Corpus Christi London (4-7) 114.54 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District

 

Now, don't get upset with me Nick2011. It's just projections :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to me like they are predicting the district to play out similar to what it did last year. It's a new year!

seems that way dont it, I dont agree with some of the standings but time will prove some of us wrong good luck all teams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not a big believer in last years great talent teams being the same the next year, alot of teams are good and can repeat but I just dont see how the same few teams that made a big run last year are the top teams this year, sure they deserve their respect for last year but not the crown yet, just my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Diana will be better this year too! But no your back to being your ignorant self, it's obvious I have a West Rusk helmet as my picture so that's who I'm talking about. Use your brain if you even have one Dtrump

Sorry, just confused. I mean it was New Diana what 2 months ago?

 

But, who cares. Just giving you a hard time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still scratching my head on EF.

seems like there basing their rankings off last year, this is a new year/season, alot of changes since last season, not taking nothing from EF, they should be good yhis season just have to fill in the gaps they lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...