Sportsfanatic1 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Preseason - 2017 Class 3A Playoff Regional RankingsIncludes team ranking in parenthesis, playoff team with 2016 record, 2017 preseason rating, and 2017 Playoff Projection 3A Div. I Bracket Region I Rating Projected Playoff Finish1 3A - 4 (3) Brock (13-1) 164.83 Projected 3A Div. I State Finalist2 3A - 2 (6) Wall (11-4) 161.36 Projected 3A Div. I Quarters3 3A - 1 (21) Muleshoe (8-5) 144.21 Projected 3A Div. I Regional4 3A - 3 (23) Comanche (7-4) 143.24 Projected 3A Div. I Regional5 3A - 1 (24) Shallowater (2-9) 143.05 Projected 3A Div. I Area6 3A - 3 (33) Clyde (9-2) 138.93 Projected 3A Div. I Area7 3A - 1 (42) Littlefield (9-4) 136.10 Projected 3A Div. I Area8 3A - 4 (47) Breckenridge (5-7) 131.63 Projected 3A Div. I Area9 3A - 4 (48) Bowie (6-6) 131.52 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District10 3A - 3 (51) Merkel (4-6) 131.04 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District11 3A - 2 (54) Kermit (4-7) 129.31 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District12 3A - 2 (62) San Angelo Grape Creek (6-4) 127.20 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District13 3A - 3 (63) Brady (4-7) 126.68 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District14 3A - 4 (66) Ponder (6-5) 123.34 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District15 3A - 1 (71) Amarillo River Road (7-5) 122.08 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District16 3A - 2 (85) Crane (3-8) 114.49 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District 3A Div. I Bracket Region II Rating Projected Playoff Finish1 3A - 7 (8) Farmersville (11-2) 156.30 Projected 3A Div. I Semis2 3A - 5 (9) Pottsboro (11-3) 154.82 Projected 3A Div. I Quarters3 3A - 7 (11) Mineola (14-2) 154.23 Projected 3A Div. I Regional4 3A - 6 (16) Grandview (8-3) 148.80 Projected 3A Div. I Area5 3A - 6 (17) Kemp (7-4) 148.19 Projected 3A Div. I Area6 3A - 8 (18) Jefferson (9-3) 148.03 Projected 3A Div. I Regional7 3A - 8 (19) White Oak (10-2) 147.65 Projected 3A Div. I Area8 3A - 5 (20) Whitesboro (5-7) 144.81 Projected 3A Div. I Area9 3A - 6 (22) Sunnyvale (11-1) 144.00 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District10 3A - 5 (37) Howe (9-4) 137.79 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District11 3A - 6 (38) Dallas Madison (8-3) 137.64 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District12 3A - 5 (46) Van Alstyne (7-4) 132.05 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District13 3A - 7 (49) Mount Vernon (5-5) 131.35 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District14 3A - 8 (56) Redwater (5-6) 128.73 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District15 3A - 7 (57) Winnsboro (6-5) 128.29 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District16 3A - 8 (64) Hughes Springs (4-6) 125.93 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District 3A Div. I Bracket Region III Rating Projected Playoff Finish1 3A - 10 (1) Cameron Yoe (11-3) 165.90 Projected 3A Div. I State Champion2 3A - 9 (5) Malakoff (14-1) 162.08 Projected 3A Div. I Regional3 3A - 9 (7) Teague (10-3) 156.49 Projected 3A Div. I Quarters4 3A - 10 (10) Rockdale (11-2) 154.75 Projected 3A Div. I Regional5 3A - 10 (12) Franklin (8-3) 152.24 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District6 3A - 11 (14) Woodville (10-2) 150.80 Projected 3A Div. I Area7 3A - 12 (15) La Marque (8-3) 149.23 Projected 3A Div. I Area8 3A - 11 (26) Coldspring-Oakhurst (5-6) 142.53 Projected 3A Div. I Area9 3A - 11 (29) Kirbyville (8-4) 140.61 Projected 3A Div. I Area10 3A - 12 (32) Hitchcock (7-4) 139.49 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District11 3A - 12 (34) Hempstead (6-5) 138.79 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District12 3A - 9 (35) West (5-6) 138.77 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District13 3A - 10 (41) McGregor (4-6) 136.71 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District14 3A - 9 (45) Groesbeck (5-6) 134.85 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District15 3A - 11 (60) Buna (7-5) 127.49 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District16 3A - 12 (65) East Chambers (4-6) 125.35 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District 3A Div. I Bracket Region IV Rating Projected Playoff Finish1 3A - 14 (2) Hallettsville (13-1) 165.51 Projected 3A Div. I Semis2 3A - 14 (4) Yoakum (11-5) 164.74 Projected 3A Div. I Quarters3 3A - 15 (13) Goliad (9-4) 152.06 Projected 3A Div. I Area4 3A - 14 (25) Edna (6-6) 142.56 Projected 3A Div. I Regional5 3A - 15 (27) George West (10-2) 141.36 Projected 3A Div. I Area6 3A - 16 (28) Lyford (8-4) 140.74 Projected 3A Div. I Area7 3A - 14 (30) Altair Rice Consolidated (8-4) 139.82 Projected 3A Div. I Regional8 3A - 13 (31) Lago Vista (8-3) 139.63 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District9 3A - 13 (36) Marion (6-5) 137.82 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District10 3A - 16 (39) Bishop (7-4) 137.37 Projected 3A Div. I Area11 3A - 15 (40) Mathis (6-5) 136.80 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District12 3A - 13 (43) Luling (4-7) 136.07 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District13 3A - 16 (44) Santa Gertrudis Academy (7-5) 135.07 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District14 3A - 13 (53) San Antonio Cole (4-7) 129.62 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District15 3A - 16 (67) San Diego (2-8) 123.04 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District16 3A - 15 (69) Taft (4-6) 122.94 Projected 3A Div. I Bi-District 3A Div. II Bracket Region I Rating Projected Playoff Finish1 3A - 1 (5) Canadian (12-3) 161.74 Projected 3A Div. II Semis2 3A - 3 (6) Sonora (12-2) 157.83 Projected 3A Div. II Quarters3 3A - 4 (10) Cisco (9-2) 149.18 Projected 3A Div. II Regional4 3A - 4 (14) Eastland (8-4) 144.34 Projected 3A Div. II Area5 3A - 2 (20) Idalou (8-4) 139.45 Projected 3A Div. II Regional6 3A - 1 (23) Childress (9-4) 138.41 Projected 3A Div. II Area7 3A - 4 (26) Coleman (9-4) 136.38 Projected 3A Div. II Area8 3A - 3 (33) Reagan County (9-2) 129.68 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District9 3A - 2 (38) Colorado City (4-7) 126.40 Projected 3A Div. II Area10 3A - 4 (51) Tolar (7-4) 123.22 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District11 3A - 1 (58) Spearman (7-5) 121.51 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District12 3A - 1 (61) Dimmitt (6-5) 120.75 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District13 3A - 2 (63) Coahoma (3-7) 120.11 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District14 3A - 3 (67) Ballinger (3-7) 116.19 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District15 3A - 3 (68) Alpine (4-7) 115.59 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District16 3A - 2 (91) Stanton (0-9) 100.88 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District 3A Div. II Bracket Region II Rating Projected Playoff Finish1 3A - 6 (3) Gunter (16-0) 162.44 Projected 3A Div. II State Finalist2 3A - 8 (12) Gilmer Harmony (9-3) 146.81 Projected 3A Div. II Quarters3 3A - 8 (15) Winona (8-6) 142.36 Projected 3A Div. II Regional4 3A - 5 (16) Henrietta (10-3) 142.26 Projected 3A Div. II Area5 3A - 7 (17) Daingerfield (6-5) 140.27 Projected 3A Div. II Regional6 3A - 5 (24) Nocona (7-4) 138.21 Projected 3A Div. II Area7 3A - 6 (25) Leonard (9-3) 136.92 Projected 3A Div. II Area8 3A - 7 (27) Paul Pewitt (6-5) 133.29 Projected 3A Div. II Area9 3A - 5 (32) Holliday (7-4) 130.06 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District10 3A - 8 (34) Edgewood (9-3) 129.52 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District11 3A - 8 (39) Lone Oak (6-5) 125.96 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District12 3A - 6 (44) Whitewright (8-5) 125.62 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District13 3A - 7 (47) Hooks (6-6) 123.83 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District14 3A - 6 (49) Sadler S&S Consolidated (5-6) 123.57 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District15 3A - 5 (54) Jacksboro (6-5) 122.77 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District16 3A - 7 (55) New Diana (3-7) 122.06 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District 3A Div. II Bracket Region III Rating Projected Playoff Finish1 3A - 10 (4) Newton (13-1) 161.76 Projected 3A Div. II Semis2 3A - 9 (7) Elysian Fields (12-1) 156.21 Projected 3A Div. II Regional3 3A - 9 (9) Arp (12-3) 154.03 Projected 3A Div. II Quarters4 3A - 10 (11) Crockett (11-2) 147.30 Projected 3A Div. II Regional5 3A - 9 (13) New London West Rusk (7-4) 144.57 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District6 3A - 12 (19) Buffalo (8-4) 140.04 Projected 3A Div. II Area7 3A - 11 (21) Clifton (7-5) 139.41 Projected 3A Div. II Area8 3A - 9 (28) Waskom (4-7) 132.93 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District9 3A - 10 (29) Garrison (6-5) 130.76 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District10 3A - 10 (37) Corrigan-Camden (5-6) 126.53 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District11 3A - 12 (41) Hearne (5-6) 125.75 Projected 3A Div. II Area12 3A - 11 (46) Rice (6-5) 124.00 Projected 3A Div. II Area13 3A - 11 (50) Corsicana Mildred (5-6) 123.37 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District14 3A - 12 (56) New Waverly (9-3) 122.02 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District15 3A - 12 (64) Bruceville-Eddy (6-4) 118.64 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District16 3A - 11 (76) Rio Vista (4-6) 111.98 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District 3A Div. II Bracket Region IV Rating Projected Playoff Finish1 3A - 13 (1) Lexington (11-3) 165.67 Projected 3A Div. II State Champion2 3A - 14 (2) East Bernard (11-2) 163.65 Projected 3A Div. II Regional3 3A - 14 (8) Boling (13-3) 155.33 Projected 3A Div. II Quarters4 3A - 16 (18) Odem (11-2) 140.05 Projected 3A Div. II Regional5 3A - 14 (22) Tidehaven (8-3) 139.01 Projected 3A Div. II Area6 3A - 16 (30) Hebbronville (7-4) 130.51 Projected 3A Div. II Area7 3A - 14 (31) Wallis Brazos (5-6) 130.08 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District8 3A - 15 (35) Poth (8-3) 128.06 Projected 3A Div. II Area9 3A - 15 (36) Dilley (6-6) 127.28 Projected 3A Div. II Area10 3A - 16 (40) Banquete (8-3) 125.83 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District11 3A - 13 (42) Comfort (6-5) 125.74 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District12 3A - 15 (43) Stockdale (6-6) 125.64 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District13 3A - 13 (45) Rogers (3-8) 125.56 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District14 3A - 15 (48) Nixon-Smiley (6-6) 123.61 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District15 3A - 13 (52) Blanco (3-7) 123.16 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District16 3A - 16 (70) Corpus Christi London (4-7) 114.54 Projected 3A Div. II Bi-District Now, don't get upset with me Nick2011. It's just projections :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballFanatic16 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Have West Rusk butting heads with Crockett in the first round... Reasonable predictions though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mavfanpanamacity Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 EF vs Newton in regional final. I can see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewtonNation Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 I like it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Looks to me like they are predicting the district to play out similar to what it did last year. It's a new year!seems that way dont it, I dont agree with some of the standings but time will prove some of us wrong good luck all teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Im not a big believer in last years great talent teams being the same the next year, alot of teams are good and can repeat but I just dont see how the same few teams that made a big run last year are the top teams this year, sure they deserve their respect for last year but not the crown yet, just my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sportsfanatic1 Posted July 20, 2017 Author Share Posted July 20, 2017 I never get upset over predictions. Anyone can make a prediction but rarely is that person right. I'll take being an underdog. Don't be surprised to see us win the district and make a nice run in the playoffs though! New Diana? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88YoePride Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Now, don't get upset with me Nick2011. It's just projections :blink: This your own, or get it from another source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLEMAN Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 As usual there will be those that disappoint and those that exceed expetations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sportsfanatic1 Posted July 20, 2017 Author Share Posted July 20, 2017 New Diana will be better this year too! But no your back to being your ignorant self, it's obvious I have a West Rusk helmet as my picture so that's who I'm talking about. Use your brain if you even have one Dtrump Sorry, just confused. I mean it was New Diana what 2 months ago? But, who cares. Just giving you a hard time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mavfanpanamacity Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 http://www.scout.com/high-school/texas/story/1792419-the-old-coach-preseason-3a-dii-top-ten 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sportsfanatic1 Posted July 21, 2017 Author Share Posted July 21, 2017 Now, don't get upset with me Nick2011. It's just projections :blink: This your own, or get it from another source? Pigskin Prep. It's a heck if a HS website once the season starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastTxFinest Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 http://www.scout.com/high-school/texas/story/1792419-the-old-coach-preseason-3a-dii-top-tenAll these teams should be in the top 10. No argument here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewtonNation Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 http://www.scout.com/high-school/texas/story/1792419-the-old-coach-preseason-3a-dii-top-ten Those may be the best rankings I've seen yet! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger1995 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I'm still scratching my head on EF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I'm still scratching my head on EF.I don't see it either ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I'm still scratching my head on EF.seems like there basing their rankings off last year, this is a new year/season, alot of changes since last season, not taking nothing from EF, they should be good yhis season just have to fill in the gaps they lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jacket Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 EF will be fine. They have some returning from last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionpride08 Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 Clifton in the top ten? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger1995 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 EF will be fine. They have some returning from last year.oh they're always fine.....it's years like this one when EF comes out of no where and goes to state lolol.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allheartnoquit Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 lionpride08 only reason Clifton is in top 10 is because they will win their district. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballFanatic16 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 http://etsn.fm/west-rusk-footballs-etsn-fm-photo-days-shoot-at-a-glance-3/ The Wilson kid looks bigger than last year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now