Jump to content

“Nice try; Earth is FLAT:” Conspiracy Theorists on Earth /space videos


CarthDawg77
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/24/2021 at 5:17 PM, mav01 said:

 

The first video was not flat, it was slightly curved .... dont know why the difference,  but it still doesnt prove the earth is flat ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, KirtFalcon said:

The first video was not flat, it was slightly curved .... dont know why the difference,  but it still doesnt prove the earth is flat ....

It's not slightly curved, the light bending over the horizon can make you think that for a second or two, especially if the camera is jumpy. No curvature or spin has ever been observed. This would be the easiest thing to prove if it were real. Why would mainstream continually add their own curve? Why not just let it be? The last video is from higher up(almost double)and still no curve...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CarthDawg77 said:

You would think they could just fly over to the edge & peek below... I can’t see Any soldiers up here! Or, at least reach out & slap that invisible wall for us....🧐🤔😬

Would be nice, but no private forms of transportation using fuel is allowed within a certain distance of Antarctica. We gotta keep them penguins safe but everywhere else on earth is fair game to trash and remove resources. Btw, Antarctica is full of natural resources.

I dont know why you keep saying it's full of soldiers.?  Military isn't even allowed due to the treaty. Why not look up the treaty to get a better understanding of things if you question it? That "edge" has you baffled.

I understand others having a hard time with FE but I didnt figure you of all people would struggle so much. Then again, it took me way longer than most to finally realize it without any doubts. I probably still would be iffy on it if not for the Bible backing it up with about 200 verses.

  • LOL! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mav01 said:

It's not slightly curved, the light bending over the horizon can make you think that for a second or two, especially if the camera is jumpy. No curvature or spin has ever been observed. This would be the easiest thing to prove if it were real. Why would mainstream continually add their own curve? Why not just let it be? The last video is from higher up(almost double)and still no curve...

It WAS slightly curved ... also i have seen hundreds of unretouched reconnaissance air still and video raw footage taken at high altitude from SR71 and U2 aircraft that shows the earths curvature ... also zero footage of your imaginary "wall" or "edge" .... I had regular contact with a few of those pilots who flew recon missions out of Osan, AB and a couple of other classified bases and if your flat earth nonsense was true, those brave and patriotic pilots would have been talking about it .... I have given you a few other examples that blow your flat earth nonsense out of the water but you are so gullible   :bait:  with all this manufactured  internet flat earth nonsense you don't know your  10164.pngfrom a hole in the ground ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KirtFalcon said:

It WAS slightly curved ... also i have seen hundreds of unretouched reconnaissance air still and video raw footage taken at high altitude from SR71 and U2 aircraft that shows the earths curvature ... also zero footage of your imaginary "wall" or "edge" .... I had regular contact with a few of those pilots who flew recon missions out of Osan, AB and a couple of other classified bases and if your flat earth nonsense was true, those brave and patriotic pilots would have been talking about it .... I have given you a few other examples that blow your flat earth nonsense out of the water but you are so gullible   :bait:  with all this manufactured  internet flat earth nonsense you don't know your  10164.pngfrom a hole in the ground ....

You really think the military industrial complex is going to allow lower ranking individuals or anyone they cant trust to do anything that blatantly disproves what NASA has been working so hard to prove? Theres tons of pilots AND military specialists that have spoken out,  saying that they couldn't do their job correctly unless the earth was flat and stationary. Just took a little extra thought on their part to realize it. Your "pilots" saw curve from what heights,  because I've seen countless amateur footage from high altitudes that show no curve.? Unless a wide angle lense was used to create the convex and concave effect. 

Air"planes" on their own disprove the globe with just a tiny bit of critical thinking. "Cruising altitude" would not be possible over long distances. Then spin adds a whole new set of problems. Unless you actually believe that the atmosphere AND blackness of outer space spin with us everywhere we go. Which is 3 or 4 different directions according to "science". This sir is " gullible" in my book, but agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mav01 said:

Would be nice, but no private forms of transportation using fuel is allowed within a certain distance of Antarctica. We gotta keep them penguins safe but everywhere else on earth is fair game to trash and remove resources. Btw, Antarctica is full of natural resources.

I dont know why you keep saying it's full of soldiers.?  Military isn't even allowed due to the treaty. Why not look up the treaty to get a better understanding of things if you question it? That "edge" has you baffled.

I understand others having a hard time with FE but I didnt figure you of all people would struggle so much. Then again, it took me way longer than most to finally realize it without any doubts. I probably still would be iffy on it if not for the Bible backing it up with about 200 verses.

You are the one who keeps saying “Antarctica is on lockdown”... that takes Soldiers; Lots of them to prevent ANYBODY from getting by to see, touch & Feel the Dome you speak of;  With respect to “The Treaty”; What treaty? & The Military isn’t even allowed to go to the edge?😳😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CarthDawg77 said:

You are the one who keeps saying “Antarctica is on lockdown”... that takes Soldiers; Lots of them to prevent ANYBODY from getting by to see, touch & Feel the Dome you speak of;  With respect to “The Treaty”; What treaty? & The Military isn’t even allowed to go to the edge?😳😂

Antarctic Treaty that was signed by all major countries shortly after it was explored by the military in the 50s.  Admiral Byrd had some interesting things to say about it after exploring by plane. One being that it was stocked full with resources. It's the longest standing treaty still in place.. Treaties dont tend to last this long. Especially if theres money to be made.

You do realize Antarctica is the coldest most barren place in the world? It's also the highest land mass in the world.  The ice wall ranges from 200 to 500 feet in most places. Military isnt directly needed to keep people away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mav01 said:

Antarctic Treaty that was signed by all major countries shortly after it was explored by the military in the 50s.  Admiral Byrd had some interesting things to say about it after exploring by plane. One being that it was stocked full with resources. It's the longest standing treaty still in place.. Treaties dont tend to last this long. Especially if theres money to be made.

You do realize Antarctica is the coldest most barren place in the world? It's also the highest land mass in the world.  The ice wall ranges from 200 to 500 feet in most places. Military isnt directly needed to keep people away. 

Okay... Have a nice day!😬👌

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mav01 said:

You really think the military industrial complex is going to allow lower ranking individuals or anyone they cant trust to do anything that blatantly disproves what NASA has been working so hard to prove? Theres tons of pilots AND military specialists that have spoken out,  saying that they couldn't do their job correctly unless the earth was flat and stationary. Just took a little extra thought on their part to realize it. Your "pilots" saw curve from what heights,  because I've seen countless amateur footage from high altitudes that show no curve.? Unless a wide angle lense was used to create the convex and concave effect. 

Air"planes" on their own disprove the globe with just a tiny bit of critical thinking. "Cruising altitude" would not be possible over long distances. Then spin adds a whole new set of problems. Unless you actually believe that the atmosphere AND blackness of outer space spin with us everywhere we go. Which is 3 or 4 different directions according to "science". This sir is " gullible" in my book, but agree to disagree.

You are as full of :poop: as a th.jpeg-20.jpgth.jpeg-21.jpg

Edited by KirtFalcon
yo mama
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hang in there Mav01, lots of folks in history considered crazy until they were proven right! 
 

 

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. – Arthur Schopenhauer

95AA6218-6939-4421-B7D9-7FA41D255585.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
  • LOL! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/22/2021 at 12:54 PM, Mavchamp said:

Lmaoooooo 

That’s really all I can say 

I did same thing after realizing what I used to believe was so crazy. Which is why they start teaching it to us when our imagination is running wild. After all, we believe in Santa, tooth fairy and Easter bunny around the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mav01 said:

After all, we believe in Santa, tooth fairy and Easter bunny around the same time.

I DID believe in all of those at one time….but then I grew up and learned mathematics, physics, chemistry and other sciences.

There are basic laws that are irrefutable in math and science that drive the physical universe. They cannot be undone or unexplained.

The smartest people to have ever walked this Earth can rarely agree on much of anything.  But there ARE things that 99.99999% CAN agree.  And it’s those basic laws of thermodynamics and gravity and motion, speed, etc etc etc.

Anyone can find a detractor on anything if you look hard enough.  The thirst for online clicks is powerful. 

For some… the thirst for fame is a higher priority than good science. 

And for the record,,,, if I still believed in Santa, the tooth fairy, or the Easter bunny given the evidence…. Then I’d be labeled crazy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mavchamp said:

I DID believe in all of those at one time….but then I grew up and learned mathematics, physics, chemistry and other sciences.

There are basic laws that are irrefutable in math and science that drive the physical universe. They cannot be undone or unexplained.

The smartest people to have ever walked this Earth can rarely agree on much of anything.  But there ARE things that 99.99999% CAN agree.  And it’s those basic laws of thermodynamics and gravity and motion, speed, etc etc etc.

Anyone can find a detractor on anything if you look hard enough.  The thirst for online clicks is powerful. 

For some… the thirst for fame is a higher priority than good science. 

And for the record,,,, if I still believed in Santa, the tooth fairy, or the Easter bunny given the evidence…. Then I’d be labeled crazy.  

Chemistry is basically the only science you mentioned. Anybody can come up with equations to help explain their hypothesis of why things happen in nature. Theres a reason they try to combine math with science. It's easier to manipulate because after all, correct math is true.  

What about the things that cant be tested in nature? Well first they come up with their model, then try to build a foundation around it. Even if the model is faulty. 

The math doesnt add up when it comes to things like finding curvature. So they just dont teach in those areas. What about no tests being able to show that large bodies of water at rest can curve? What about all the failed tests that were designed to find the spin? Why are most of these people that just happen to come up with these faulty foundations all a part of occult mysticism? Research Newton and Cavendish. 

 

 

 

quote-today-s-scientists-have-substituted-mathematics-for-experiments-and-they-wander-off-nikola-tesla-29-23-43.jpg

  • LOL! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like I don’t take my medical advice from a veterinarian…. I don’t take my scientific advice from a Jesuit (or priest or pastor etc etc). 

And I say that as a Christian.

Anyone that that discounts physics, thermodynamics and other sciences loses all credibility. 

Denying science is an even bigger reach than atheists have denying God.

The two are not diametrically opposed to one another.  But people are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mavchamp said:

Just like I don’t take my medical advice from a veterinarian…. I don’t take my scientific advice from a Jesuit (or priest or pastor etc etc). 

And I say that as a Christian.

Anyone that that discounts physics, thermodynamics and other sciences loses all credibility. 

Denying science is an even bigger reach than atheists have denying God.

The two are not diametrically opposed to bother other.  But people are. 

We don't deny science,  we discount contradictions in science by people who teach us mostly to regurgitate and very little on critical thinking. When people like the Rockefellers gain control of the education system through private funding, we should begin to ask ourselves why.

The Jesuit wasnt a flat earther. He was just making a point that the bible is not to be taken literally because it says we are flat/motionless with a dome firmament. Some of us say it is literal. Which is why they made sure to inform the reader when they were speaking in parables.

The Jesuits are the ones mostly responsible for getting things like this put in the education system in other parts of the world and the catholic schools. Back in 1892, 90 percent of the world went by the Gleason "scientifically accurate", FE map/model. It was in the mainstream encyclopedias as fact. They lie when they tell us that we've known it was a globe for 500 years. 500 years ago there were only small(but rich) sectors trying to build their foundation. 1904 is when John Rockefeller began his mass educational funding. By the 1920s we were split on the topic. 1930s theres newspaper articles on a few schools still persecuting the globe model as being a luciferian doctrine. By 1940, our biblical cosmology was officially dead. Now it's close to the end, when the lord says that all things that were hidden must be revealed.

Atheistic beliefs would not be such a big thing these days if not for this massive influx of "science". All ancient civilizations believed in god or gods because they were aware of our true cosmology.  You cant deny a creator knowing we live under a firmament. This life is way more than just eat, sleep, die. We are in a battle to keep our soul. Satan is having a field day(or century)with this deception.

Even top members of our own CIA are on record stating, "we'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." So at the very least, our own government has a program thats meant to greatly deceive its citizens. If you were tasked with this agenda,  what would be your best avenues of deception? Probably the educational system and tell-lie-vision "programming"? NASA ?(caught in dozens of lies) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“we discount contradictions in science by people who teach us mostly to regurgitate and very little on critical thinking”

Pot. Meet kettle.

What about the contradictions in the Bible?  Even theologians agree there are scriptures that contradict each other.   But people’s heads spin off their necks if you mention them.  

And no one regurgitates what they have been taught with very little critical thinking better than a religious fanatic.   Of ANY religion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...