Jump to content

New Information On Capitol Protests


DannyZuco

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, JETT said:

Deflection how? You asked have I watched cops and I answered 

Now answer mine, have you seen a person handcuffed and forced out of a car with 3 officers on him and 1 of the officers on the neck

Your deflection was changing topic  from perps always complaining of medical issues to try and get out of trouble to you going back to knees in necks. That’s what i meant by your deflection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trashyhound said:

Your deflection was changing topic  from perps always complaining of medical issues to try and get out of trouble to you going back to knees in necks. That’s what i meant by your deflection

I thought it was related but ok.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between Maxine Waters and Biden, I’m fairly certain the verdict will be overturned.  As it should be.  No way the guy got a fair trial.   Guilty or not, that trial was nothing more than a lynch mob.    When mob violence decides guilt or innocence, Justice is longer an option.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hagar said:

Between Maxine Waters and Biden, I’m fairly certain the verdict will be overturned.  As it should be.  No way the guy got a fair trial.   Guilty or not, that trial was nothing more than a lynch mob.    When mob violence decides guilt or innocence, Justice is longer an option.

I'm confused as to when it's ok to trust justice system? For once they seem to get it right, yet ppl scream from the beginning unfair and political gain.... 

The system just took a huge step in gaining ppl to trust it, but let's find anything and everything to overturn the jurors anyway we can.... thats the new America for ya SMH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JETT said:

I'm confused as to when it's ok to trust justice system? For once they seem to get it right, yet ppl scream from the beginning unfair and political gain.... 

The system just took a huge step in gaining ppl to trust it, but let's find anything and everything to overturn the jurors anyway we can.... thats the new America for ya SMH

He was over charged to appease....

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gamewatcher63 said:

He was over charged to appease....

This case doesn’t create trust.  When politicians go out of their way to interfere with proper justice there’s no trust earned.  Chauvin’s family should sue Maxine Waters for interfering with the case.  This doesn’t mean I don’t think the man is guilty, I have said a few times I think this was manslaughter.  Murder should’ve never been a charge, but the prosecution was looking to get him one way or the other.  Manslaughter case was open and shut in my opinion, but now the guy will serve whatever is handed down for murder.  That’s not proper justice, that’s trying to appease a group you don’t want tearing up your city.  Proper justice is based on facts and evidence, not emotions and fear.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JETT said:

If the justice system is as you claim he would've been acquitted if that was the case

Incorrect, they would’ve gotten him on manslaughter.  Thinking about it, this wasn’t really flawed justice system, it was jury intimidation.  Chauvin’s family should sue the pants off of Maxine Waters and BLM.  Throw *biden in the suit as well.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DB2point0 said:

Incorrect, they would’ve gotten him on manslaughter.  Thinking about it, this wasn’t really flawed justice system, it was jury intimidation.  Chauvin’s family should sue the pants off of Maxine Waters and BLM.  Throw *biden in the suit as well.  
 

 

I don't mind them being sued, jurors were anonymous if I recall... how was it intimidation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, JETT said:

I don't mind them being sued, jurors were anonymous if I recall... how was it intimidation 

Jurors aren’t anonymous. I believe in criminal trials that names and addresses of jurors are available open records. 
If I’m correct on that, i can’t see how that’s a good idea. Probably didn’t help with true justice, just aided in giving the lynch  mob outside what they wanted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, trashyhound said:

Jurors aren’t anonymous. I believe in criminal trials that names and addresses of jurors are available open records. 
If I’m correct on that, i can’t see how that’s a good idea. Probably didn’t help with true justice, just aided in giving the lynch  mob outside what they wanted. 

I'd like to see that on this specific case

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DB2point0 said:

How were they anonymous?  Then I’ll answer the intimidation question

I may be wrong on the anonymous part... I must be the only person who hasn't seen their faces or heard there names in the public... of course ppl in the courtroom know who they are but I haven't seen anything on TV etc showing who they were 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, JETT said:

I'd like to see that on this specific case

No, i think i was wrong. Apparently in manysoda the judge can keep them anonymous if they choose. He did in this case, but who knows how well it actually works. I did read about one jurors house having blood sprayed on it a few days ago, but im not sure how accurate that is. Regardless, I’m really glad i wasn’t on that jury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, trashyhound said:

No, i think i was wrong. Apparently in manysoda the judge can keep them anonymous if they choose. He did in this case, but who knows how well it actually works. I did read about one jurors house having blood sprayed on it a few days ago, but im not sure how accurate that is. Regardless, I’m really glad i wasn’t on that jury

***it was a witness for Chauvin that was vandalized, not a juror. My bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, trashyhound said:

No, i think i was wrong. Apparently in manysoda the judge can keep them anonymous if they choose. He did in this case, but who knows how well it actually works. I did read about one jurors house having blood sprayed on it a few days ago, but im not sure how accurate that is. Regardless, I’m really glad i wasn’t on that jury

That's my point how is it juror intimidation if they were anonymous other than the ppl in court? May not have been you who said that but someone did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JETT said:

That's my point how is it juror intimidation if they were anonymous other than the ppl in court? May not have been you who said that but someone did

So would you trust the legal system that assured you that you were anonymous? 
I have a feeling your answer will be the same as mine and everyone else’s: HECK NO! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, JETT said:

I may be wrong on the anonymous part... I must be the only person who hasn't seen their faces or heard there names in the public... of course ppl in the courtroom know who they are but I haven't seen anything on TV etc showing who they were 

I haven’t seen them either, but don’t know why they’d be anonymous.  
 

it’s intimidation due to the possibility of their identities being released, and certain groups who have already threatened harm if “the right” verdict wasn’t handed out.  Groups that have already burned cities and destroyed public property were the ones making the threats too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest problem I have had with the entire trial--that the jury was NOT sequestered. That is the one thing that I wish they had done to insure a trial without a decent appeals reason. Otherwise, the jury made the decision, I will live with that, because they got to see the evidence up close and personal--where as I did not. 

As for everything else--the only thing that I have NOT gotten answered on another thread is whether the liberals support Mad Max being impeached from Congress as they called for when the former president used less offensive and confrontational words, but was still impeached. Just wondering if they are hypocrites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JETT said:

If the justice system is as you claim he would've been acquitted if that was the case

Please explain how you know my thought progress....FYI ...back when this first broke in the news last year and I saw the video I said it was manslaughter...I've never said he would walk...anyway...as I predicted the BLM gang is still not happy, one of the leaders said that the only reason for the guilty verdict was because of VIOLENT protests...said peaceful protests don't work...Yeah that's progress....SMDH 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DB2point0 said:

I haven’t seen them either, but don’t know why they’d be anonymous.  
 

it’s intimidation due to the possibility of their identities being released, and certain groups who have already threatened harm if “the right” verdict wasn’t handed out.  Groups that have already burned cities and destroyed public property were the ones making the threats too. 

Lock those folks up.... this was easily murder 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...