JasperDawg Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 TASO needs to foot the bill for schools uniforms then if they disapprove of current ones 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasperDawg Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 Just now, JasperDawg said: TASO needs to foot the bill for schools uniforms then if they disapprove of current ones we all know that won't happen. so leave well enough alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PelvisPresley Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 On 8/31/2021 at 12:36 PM, StoneColdSteveAustin said: Hendo's white jerseys, heck all their jerseys, were ridiculous a few years back. it was the advertisements for all the cafe's on the town square listed on the front that were really over the top (2" x 2" each in neon) and the parents and siblings names, along with baby pics on the back...in boxes (CHEERING YOU ALL THE WAY TO THE LAKE) that pushed it over the top...but they needed sponsors to get them...getting similar style to pro fisherman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue82 Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 2 hours ago, JasperDawg said: TASO needs to foot the bill for schools uniforms then if they disapprove of current ones If the uniforms fail to meet the criteria set forth by the UIL, then it’s on the school. If it does meet it, TASO needs to get a life. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasperDawg Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 33 minutes ago, trueblue82 said: If the uniforms fail to meet the criteria set forth by the UIL, then it’s on the school. If it does meet it, TASO needs to get a life. I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERKAT17 Posted September 1, 2021 Share Posted September 1, 2021 Schools have been given 4 years now to correct this. It didn’t just pop up. TASO doesn’t MAKE rules. It’s either an NCAA rule or a UIL exception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBizzle Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 13 hours ago, SUPERKAT17 said: Schools have been given 4 years now to correct this. It didn’t just pop up. TASO doesn’t MAKE rules. It’s either an NCAA rule or a UIL exception. Schools have had 4 years to change their school colors? How thoughtful of the UIL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfingnut Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 As long as I can make out the numbers I don't have a problem with dark on dark. Gilmer's last Thursday night were fine. Most problem I have reading numbers is when players pull their jerseys up revealing their mid sections and hiding half of their number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackofalltrades Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 The dark jerseys with the same color numbers and outlined in a light color is what I would consider dark numbers on dark jerseys or A light jersey (white or grey) with a light number on it (yellow, gold, lt. blue, etc). Gilmer's Black jerseys with orange numbers is not hard to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardCubFan Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 7 hours ago, Golfingnut said: As long as I can make out the numbers I don't have a problem with dark on dark. Gilmer's last Thursday night were fine. Most problem I have reading numbers is when players pull their jerseys up revealing their mid sections and hiding half of their number. Actually, by definition from the powers=that-be at the UIL (Dr.Elzra to be exact), thos dark jerseys worn by Gilmer (along with the same color & style worn by Gladewater and Dekalb) are, by the UIL's definition - "illegal." And it is NOT TASO, it is the UIL who is behind this issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 9 hours ago, JBizzle said: Schools have had 4 years to change their school colors? How thoughtful of the UIL. To fix uniform issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 7 hours ago, Golfingnut said: As long as I can make out the numbers I don't have a problem with dark on dark. Gilmer's last Thursday night were fine. Most problem I have reading numbers is when players pull their jerseys up revealing their mid sections and hiding half of their number. That’s against the rules as well I believe. Just never enforced. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfingnut Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 4 hours ago, DieHardCubFan said: Actually, by definition from the powers=that-be at the UIL (Dr.Elzra to be exact), thos dark jerseys worn by Gilmer (along with the same color & style worn by Gladewater and Dekalb) are, by the UIL's definition - "illegal." And it is NOT TASO, it is the UIL who is behind this issue. I didn't say it wasn't against the rules. I just said I didn't have a problem with Gilmer's last Thursday. If the purpose of the rule is to make sure the numbers could clearly be seen, I'm not sure why those worn by Gilmer were against the rules. I could easily see their numbers. As far as Gladewater's last Thursday, they were in all white with black numbers. Although all 3 teams have the same colors they don’t necessarily wear the same style. On second thought I think Dekalb's colors are orange and white. Not sure why you brought these 3 teams up. Are you saying they should change their colors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardCubFan Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 11 hours ago, Golfingnut said: I didn't say it wasn't against the rules. I just said I didn't have a problem with Gilmer's last Thursday. If the purpose of the rule is to make sure the numbers could clearly be seen, I'm not sure why those worn by Gilmer were against the rules. I could easily see their numbers. As far as Gladewater's last Thursday, they were in all white with black numbers. Although all 3 teams have the same colors they don’t necessarily wear the same style. On second thought I think Dekalb's colors are orange and white. Not sure why you brought these 3 teams up. Are you saying they should change their colors? Golf, First, I personally don’t have a problem with any of the three team’s jerseys. it is the head of UIL that apparently has the problem. As far as Dekalb, their colors are orange and black and their mascot is the bears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfingnut Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 13 minutes ago, DieHardCubFan said: Golf, First, I personally don’t have a problem with any of the three team’s jerseys. it is the head of UIL that apparently has the problem. As far as Dekalb, their colors are orange and black and their mascot is the bears. I've lived in North East Texas long enough to know Dekalb's mascot although I did think their colors were orange and white. My mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBizzle Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 19 hours ago, Eagleborn said: To fix uniform issues. If the schools colors are orange and black, and the UIL says Black/Orange uniform combinations are a no go, then fixing the uniform is changing school colors, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleborn Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 6 minutes ago, JBizzle said: If the schools colors are orange and black, and the UIL says Black/Orange uniform combinations are a no go, then fixing the uniform is changing school colors, no? There’s a law against white numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBizzle Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 3 minutes ago, Eagleborn said: There’s a law against white numbers? Nope, no law. Just a lack of common sense being applied to this topic, as with most things in life. The numbers should be legible, no problem at all. Some of the examples listed as not legible are clearly legible and shouldn’t be an issue. So instead of telling schools to ensure their numbers are legible, the have to list specific examples to not allow leeway in a situation. It’s just stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIMRIGGINS Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 17 minutes ago, JBizzle said: Nope, no law. Just a lack of common sense being applied to this topic, as with most things in life. The numbers should be legible, no problem at all. Some of the examples listed as not legible are clearly legible and shouldn’t be an issue. So instead of telling schools to ensure their numbers are legible, the have to list specific examples to not allow leeway in a situation. It’s just stupid. I agree. STUPID Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang1113 Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 2:18 PM, JasperDawg said: TASO needs to foot the bill for schools uniforms then if they disapprove of current ones They have had 3 years to get new ones and order the right ones so should have known Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBizzle Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 43 minutes ago, mustang1113 said: They have had 3 years to get new ones and order the right ones so should have known So all schools order uniforms every 2 or 3 years? Glad we have all that cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now