Jump to content

President Bush? We know which side he's on


RETIREDFAN1

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ConservativeCitizen said:

You against vaccine mandates?

Partially, if the workers voted for them, then I would be for them, if not, I am hesitant. I do view the vaccine as a positive of course, but the only people who should be mandating them should be the people who have to take them. If a majority of the employees voted for them, I would be for the mandate at that specific workplace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CreateMyAccount said:

Partially, if the workers voted for them, then I would be for them, if not, I am hesitant. I do view the vaccine as a positive of course, but the only people who should be mandating them should be the people who have to take them. If a majority of the employees voted for them, I would be for the mandate at that specific workplace. 

You do know that “majority rule” can be dangerous? It’s why we were founded as a Republic. I shouldn’t be able to force you to do anything to your body. No matter how many people I can get behind me to make you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CreateMyAccount said:

I wish I could vote with the socialists/communists, but there are none to vote for, sadly. All I see on the ballots are neoliberals. If there was an actual left winged candidate, I would most likely vote for them. I am all for democracy and freedom which can only come true in a system of socialism. Our elections aren't by the will of the people, it is by the will of the political parties, they control a large part of who is on the ballot. You can't be free when you live in a system that forces you to conform to the will of the rich. Democrats, Republicans, they are all the same, neoliberals who benefit the most from the current system and suppress any attempt away, you can see from the first and second red scares. We need to get rid of this government that prevents us from organizing labor and allow for us to have employee owned stores flourish as an example. I wish I could vote socialist/communist, but sadly, there are none to vote for. 

No need to vote for them.  Hop on a plane to China.  If that is too far, surely Cuba would do.  Maybe Venezuela?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CreateMyAccount said:

Even if this was true, this would not make them socialist/communist, it would just make them corrupt, which almost every politician is, including Trump. Socialism/communism is an economic theory and what you are describing as socialism is not, it is just corruption. 

Trump was NOT a politician......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ConservativeCitizen said:

You do know that “majority rule” can be dangerous? It’s why we were founded as a Republic. I shouldn’t be able to force you to do anything to your body. No matter how many people I can get behind me to make you. 

We were taught by the oligarchs that majority rule is bad because they want to keep their power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ObiOne said:

No need to vote for them.  Hop on a plane to China.  If that is too far, surely Cuba would do.  Maybe Venezuela?

China is quite far from socialist or communist, they are officially, "socialism with Chinese characteristics." In other words, state capitalism, authoritarian in nature. Cuba is a bit of an enigma, they are authoritarian as well. Venezuela in the same boat. I am for socialism by the people, not by elites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RETIREDFAN1 said:

You VOTED for Romney and McCain.....both socialists.....i did NOT.......

What your pea brain fails to understand is that you have to control the agenda to get conservative priorities passed and BLOCK the progressive socialist agenda.  To do that, you must control congress and the White House or at least enough of it to call the shots .... even with GWB we were far better off than had aLGore or the Hilldabeast been elected, God forbid ... getting 50% of what conservatives want is better than 0% ... yes even RINOs like Romney or McCain would have been better than the alternative dimocrat libtard .... why? .... because YOU HAVE TO CONTROL THE AGENDA  ....  that's not going to happen if you back 3rd party losers and that only helps elect liberal dimocrats .... your all or nothing strategy is a loser ... politics is a tactical game, it's like chess .... it's time you learn how the system works  ....  i don't like it worth a :poop: but that's the way the game is played until somebody is able to change it  ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CreateMyAccount said:

China is quite far from socialist or communist, they are officially, "socialism with Chinese characteristics." In other words, state capitalism, authoritarian in nature. Cuba is a bit of an enigma, they are authoritarian as well. Venezuela in the same boat. I am for socialism by the people, not by elites. 

You are for a utopian dream world that has never and can never exist.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, CreateMyAccount said:

Partially, if the workers voted for them, then I would be for them, if not, I am hesitant. I do view the vaccine as a positive of course, but the only people who should be mandating them should be the people who have to take them. If a majority of the employees voted for them, I would be for the mandate at that specific workplace. 

You should form the Flotsam Party, since you just go along with the tide..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CreateMyAccount said:

That's what we've been taught due to oligarchs wanting to remain in power. It is not some utopian dream, we've gotten fed propaganda our entire life telling us so to keep people against their own class interests. 

I'm all ears.  Is this how inside prison government works?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, KirtFalcon said:

What your pea brain fails to understand is that you have to control the agenda to get conservative priorities passed and BLOCK the progressive socialist agenda.  To do that, you must control congress and the White House or at least enough of it to call the shots .... even with GWB we were far better off than had aLGore or the Hilldabeast been elected, God forbid ... getting 50% of what conservatives want is better than 0% ... yes even RINOs like Romney or McCain would have been better than the alternative dimocrat libtard .... why? .... because YOU HAVE TO CONTROL THE AGENDA  ....  that's not going to happen if you back 3rd party losers and that only helps elect liberal dimocrats .... your all or nothing strategy is a loser ... politics is a tactical game, it's like chess .... it's time you learn how the system works  ....  i don't like it worth a :poop: but that's the way the game is played until somebody is able to change it  ....

Commie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CreateMyAccount said:

He is an oligarch, part of the elite, then got elected and bent the knee... sounds like a politician. 

Nope....he was totally INDEPENDENT from the Rothschilds....thats why every media and politician was against him.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...