88YoePride Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 11 hours ago, tigernationfan said: Y’all got jokes Coming from a Yoemen, I hope the Tigers are getting all this "locker room wall" inspiration. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyzNdaHood Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 54 minutes ago, tigernationfan said: https://sfajacks.evenue.net/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/SEGetEventInfo?ticketCode=GS%3ASFASU%3AF21%3AF09%3A&linkID=sfasu&shopperContext=&pc=&caller=&appCode=&groupCode=HSFB&cgc=&dataAccId=467&locale=en_US&siteId=ev_sfasu Appreciate it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTFN Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 1 hour ago, 88YoePride said: Coming from a Yoemen, I hope the Tigers are getting all this "locker room wall" inspiration. I guess you skipped over all the DF BS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HS1988 Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 6 hours ago, Pax said: Waskom scoring 55.5 a game vs teams that give up 26.9 per game (+28.6). Also holding teams to 11.4 who score 31.0 per game (+19.6). Total swing for Waskom = +48.2. Daingerfield scoring 45.4 per game vs teams that allow 25.2 per game (+20.2) and holding teams that score 34.1 per game to 18.4 (+15.7). Total swing for Daingerfield = +35.9. This is considering all games played including pre-district. Predicted score based on these games is Waskom 44, Daingerfield 29. Considering only playoff games, both teams have stepped it up - Daingerfield more so compared to their regular season. Waskom is scoring 53.3 per game vs teams that give up 20.9 (+32.4) and holding teams that score 20.9 per game to 11.0 (+24.4). Swing in the playoffs would be a +56.8 for Waskom. For Daingerfield, they are scoring 52.0 per game vs teams that only give up 16.1 per game (+35.9) and they are holding teams that score 39.0 per game to 17.7 (+21.3) for a total swing of +57.2 in the playoffs. Based on playoff games, I still get a Waskom win, but much closer at 41-38. Both teams score a lot of points, and both teams have solid defenses. It makes sense to only consider competent opponents - those that also score a lot or have good defenses, so... When only considering opponents of each team that hold teams to fewer than 20 points per game, Waskom - having played 3 opponents that hold teams to fewer than 20 ppg - score 37.3 per game vs these opponents. Those three opponents give up 14.1 per game on average, giving Waskom a +23.3 on offense. Daingerfield has played 6 opponents that hold teams to fewer than 20 points per game, so double the sample size. In other words, they have played a lot more better defenses. Those 6 teams give up 16.5 ppg on average and DF is scoring 42.3 ppg against these teams for a +25.8 offensive swing. Waskom has played 3 teams that average more than 35 points per game, and those 3 teams average 47.9 per game overall, and Waskom holds those teams to 22.3 per game for a +25.6 on the defensive swing. Daingerfield has played 6 teams that average over 35 per game - those 6 teams averaging 41.1 per game and DF holding them to 23.2 per game for a defensive swing of 17.9. Waskom has a significant defensive advantage here I think. Overall - considering opponents that hold teams to fewer than 20 points per game and teams that average over 35 per game, the overall swing is +48.9 for Waskom and +43.7 for Daingerfield. Of course you never know with these teams, but these are the numbers, and they have Waskom in a close one. I'll take Waskom in a 44-29 win. Lord have mercy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigernationfan Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 14 minutes ago, HS1988 said: Lord have mercy! Gonna be a helluva Cat Fight 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boot1615 Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 20 hours ago, Jasin said: I’m from Gladewater for your info Well y’all are at home now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quickshot Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 24 minutes ago, HS1988 said: Lord have mercy! Pax don't play 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrookedWolfe Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 All this nonsense about who chose to play the game at SFA. Fact is the game is there and that's where the Tigers are gonna issue out a good lesson for all to see. Who really cares where they win the game 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HS1988 Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 47 minutes ago, quickshot said: Pax don't play Dude prolly works for Dominion Voting Systems..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrookedWolfe Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 7 hours ago, Pax said: Waskom scoring 55.5 a game vs teams that give up 26.9 per game (+28.6). Also holding teams to 11.4 who score 31.0 per game (+19.6). Total swing for Waskom = +48.2. Daingerfield scoring 45.4 per game vs teams that allow 25.2 per game (+20.2) and holding teams that score 34.1 per game to 18.4 (+15.7). Total swing for Daingerfield = +35.9. This is considering all games played including pre-district. Predicted score based on these games is Waskom 44, Daingerfield 29. Considering only playoff games, both teams have stepped it up - Daingerfield more so compared to their regular season. Waskom is scoring 53.3 per game vs teams that give up 20.9 (+32.4) and holding teams that score 20.9 per game to 11.0 (+24.4). Swing in the playoffs would be a +56.8 for Waskom. For Daingerfield, they are scoring 52.0 per game vs teams that only give up 16.1 per game (+35.9) and they are holding teams that score 39.0 per game to 17.7 (+21.3) for a total swing of +57.2 in the playoffs. Based on playoff games, I still get a Waskom win, but much closer at 41-38. Both teams score a lot of points, and both teams have solid defenses. It makes sense to only consider competent opponents - those that also score a lot or have good defenses, so... When only considering opponents of each team that hold teams to fewer than 20 points per game, Waskom - having played 3 opponents that hold teams to fewer than 20 ppg - score 37.3 per game vs these opponents. Those three opponents give up 14.1 per game on average, giving Waskom a +23.3 on offense. Daingerfield has played 6 opponents that hold teams to fewer than 20 points per game, so double the sample size. In other words, they have played a lot more better defenses. Those 6 teams give up 16.5 ppg on average and DF is scoring 42.3 ppg against these teams for a +25.8 offensive swing. Waskom has played 3 teams that average more than 35 points per game, and those 3 teams average 47.9 per game overall, and Waskom holds those teams to 22.3 per game for a +25.6 on the defensive swing. Daingerfield has played 6 teams that average over 35 per game - those 6 teams averaging 41.1 per game and DF holding them to 23.2 per game for a defensive swing of 17.9. Waskom has a significant defensive advantage here I think. Overall - considering opponents that hold teams to fewer than 20 points per game and teams that average over 35 per game, the overall swing is +48.9 for Waskom and +43.7 for Daingerfield. Of course you never know with these teams, but these are the numbers, and they have Waskom in a close one. I'll take Waskom in a 44-29 win. Nice work! In a few days all this will be settled. Taking my Tigers 48-28 , 42-21 W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purpleforever Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 20 minutes ago, KrookedWolfe said: All this nonsense about who chose to play the game at SFA. Fact is the game is there and that's where the Tigers are gonna issue out a good lesson for all to see. Who really cares where they win the game I told them to hold the game there, so I could watch it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrookedWolfe Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 Just now, Purpleforever said: I told them to hold the game there, so I could watch it. Good deal, you got what ya asked for . Come check it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purpleforever Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 I will be there with my Newton Eagles hat on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigernationfan Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 1 minute ago, Purpleforever said: I will be there with my Newton Eagles hat on. Wear your Newton shirt too. We don’t mind just wear your Tiger shoes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purpleforever Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 1 minute ago, tigernationfan said: Wear your Newton shirt too. We don’t mind just wear your Tiger shoes Probably have my coat on and you wouldn't be able to see it any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigernationfan Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 22 minutes ago, KrookedWolfe said: Nice work! In a few days all this will be settled. Taking my Tigers 48-28 , 42-21 W Don’t get me wrong Pax does a great job and I always look forward to his statistics..... but at this level I Believe that these stats don’t promise to be true and correct on the score prediction part because it’s gonna come down to the team who has the most heart and who wants to go to the ship. GO TIGERS !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrookedWolfe Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 15 minutes ago, tigernationfan said: Don’t get me wrong Pax does a great job and I always look forward to his statistics..... but at this level I Believe that these stats don’t promise to be true and correct on the score prediction part because it’s gonna come down to the team who has the most heart and who wants to go to the ship. GO TIGERS !!!! I agree with ya on that, he really breaks it down and gives #'s to support his predictions. Only thing I raise a eyebrow about is when I look at the opponents and records each team has played that the numbers are being based on. I look at the strength vs weakness of both teams and the Tigers definitely are favored in that observation in my honest opinion. Waskoms strength is running the ball where the Tigers can do both quick and fast. I can't see them being able to contain or consistently stop the Tigers to notch a victory. I can see the Tigers stopping a team from simply running the ball on us to get a win. We have the secondary to stop the Hail Mary lol.. If they pass to often they drift from their strength and that won't bold well . We shall see. It could be a high scoring game, but because of their strength and what they rely on they'll run out of time to keep up with the boys. Tigers roll, GO BLUE 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigernationfan Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 4 minutes ago, KrookedWolfe said: I agree with ya on that, he really breaks it down and gives #'s to support his predictions. Only thing I raise a eyebrow about is when I look at the opponents and records each team has played that the numbers are being based on. I look at the strength vs weakness of both teams and the Tigers definitely are favored in that observation in my honest opinion. Waskoms strength is running the ball where the Tigers can do both quick and fast. I can't see them being able to contain or consistently stop the Tigers to notch a victory. I can see the Tigers stopping a team from simply running the ball on us to get a win. We shall see. It could be a high scoring game, but because of their strength and what they rely on they'll run out of time to keep up with the boys. Tigers roll, GO BLUE 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrookedWolfe Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 8 minutes ago, KrookedWolfe said: I agree with ya on that, he really breaks it down and gives #'s to support his predictions. Only thing I raise a eyebrow about is when I look at the opponents and records each team has played that the numbers are being based on. I look at the strength vs weakness of both teams and the Tigers definitely are favored in that observation in my honest opinion. Waskoms strength is running the ball where the Tigers can do both quick and fast. I can't see them being able to contain or consistently stop the Tigers to notch a victory. I can see the Tigers stopping a team from simply running the ball on us to get a win. We have the secondary to stop the Hail Mary lol.. If they pass too often they drift from their strength and that won't bold well . We shall see. It could be a high scoring game, but because of their strength and what they rely on they'll run out of time to keep up with the boys. Tigers roll, GO BLUE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 53 minutes ago, Purpleforever said: I told them to hold the game there, so I could watch it. Me too ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrookedWolfe Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 Waskom has to respect the Tiger passing game so I'd imagine they'll have to go man on our recievers. If they do I like our chances because their secondary is indeed weak. If the put emphasis on stopping the pass I see Dco putting up big ##. I think if the Tigers load the box and go man we limit the rushing attack and make them grind to get positive yardage with takes time off the clock. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong I'll admit it and congratulate them. I just can't see it. The best thing going for them is our starting QB is out, but I think our backups will step up. We'll see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirtFalcon Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 32 minutes ago, KrookedWolfe said: I agree with ya on that, he really breaks it down and gives #'s to support his predictions. Only thing I raise a eyebrow about is when I look at the opponents and records each team has played that the numbers are being based on. I look at the strength vs weakness of both teams and the Tigers definitely are favored in that observation in my honest opinion. Waskoms strength is running the ball where the Tigers can do both quick and fast. I can't see them being able to contain or consistently stop the Tigers to notch a victory. I can see the Tigers stopping a team from simply running the ball on us to get a win. We have the secondary to stop the Hail Mary lol.. If they pass to often they drift from their strength and that won't bold well . We shall see. It could be a high scoring game, but because of their strength and what they rely on they'll run out of time to keep up with the boys. Tigers roll, GO BLUE Laughable .... you played a tougher schedule? Put the crack pipe down, dude .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boot1615 Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 Nelson gone to run 5 down lineman this Friday. May the best big man win in the trenches. Have his ends contain the outside and let his linebackers make plays 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrookedWolfe Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 4 minutes ago, Boot1615 said: Nelson gone to run 5 down lineman this Friday. May the best big man win in the trenches. Have his ends contain the outside and let his linebackers make plays Go man on the recievers and I like our chances with that. As you'd say Pick 6 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrookedWolfe Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 10 minutes ago, KirtFalcon said: Laughable .... you played a tougher schedule? Put the crack pipe down, dude .... Is what it is Kirtis, you know the caliber of teams Waskom has played. The one and only balanced team they've played beat them. Just like Friday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now