2022 District 7-5A Division I Football Thread

[Bigredcujo4eva]

4 hours ago, LoboFan07 said:

Once again wrong.
Against Tyler's 8 or more plus win teams...15-15-2
1926 - Tyler 32-19
1927 - n/a
1930 - n/a
1931 - Tyler 60-0
1933 - Tied 0-0
1935 - Longview 2-0
1937 - Longview 27-7
1938 - Tyler 20-0
1939 - Tied 6-6
1940 - Longview 14-7
1941 - Tyler 18-13
1944 - Longview 14-7
1955 - n/a
1964 - Tyler 14-0
1972 - Longview 25-12
1973 - Tyler 16-0
1974 - Longview 29-7
1975 - Longview 23-0
1976 - Longview 22-12
1978 - Tyler 39-12
1980 - Longview 21-6
1981 - Tyler 19-10
1985 - Longview 7-3
1994 - Tyler 19-7
1995 - Tyler 28-7
1996 - Tyler 42-7
1997 - Longview 20-14
2000 - Tyler 27-14
2005 - Longview 42-13
2009 - n/a
2010 - Tyler 28-14
2011 - Longview 38-22
2012 - n/a
2014 - Tyler 41-25
2015 - Longview 31-14
2016 - Tyler 38-24
2018 - Longview 41-13

You might be confused as it's actually Tyler that has a massive losing record when facing a Longview squad that has 8 or more wins. To the tune of 37-8-2 in favor of Longview.
1924 - Longview 3-0
1927 - n/a
1933 - Tied 0-0
1935 - Longview 2-0
1936 - Longview 19-6
1937 - Longview 27-7
1940 - Longview 14-7
1942 - Longview 21-7
1943 - Tyler 2-0
1944 - Longview 14-7
1947 - Longview 3-0
1951 - Longview 14-0
1959 - Tied 0-0
1967 - Longview 34-8
1972 - Longview 25-12
1973 - Tyler 16-0
1974 - Longview 29-7
1975 - Longview 23-0
1976 - Longview 22-12
1977 - Longview 35-0
1980 - Longview 21-6
1981 - Tyler 19-10
1983 - Longview 28-22
1984 - Longview 21-7
1985 - Longview 7-3
1986 - Longview 14-9
1987 - Longview 35-8
1991 - Tyler 17-14
1992 - Longview 17-16
1993 - Longview 35-13
1996 - Tyler 42-7
1997 - Longview 20-14
2002  - Longview 28-7, Longview 42-7
2004 - Longview 48-14
2005 - Longview 42-13
2006 - Longview 28-21
2007 - Longview 10-6
2008 - n/a
2009 - n/a
2010 - Tyler 28-14
2011 - Longview 38-22
2012 - n/a
2013 - n/a
2014 - Tyler 41-25
2015 - Longview 31-14
2016 - Tyler 38-24
2017 - Longview 28-19
2018 - Longview 41-13
2019 - Longview 42-0
2020 - Longview 58-14
2021 - Longview 49-0

Were are the records so we can be sure each year was vs vcd a 8 plus win Tyler team and where is Legacy?  Thats a Tyler team. See u Longview fans love to decieve people and and try to trick like. Smh u proved a point. Lmao!!! Only a fool would sit and accept you and this garbage 

[Bigredcujo4eva]

7 hours ago, WolverBean said:

Still no point lose lose playing them Oh y'all beat a little 4a no biggie 

What are u talking about?

[Bigredcujo4eva]

4 hours ago, LOL said:

And it's @LoboFan07 from the top rope! Outta nowhere! Bah gawwwwd! That man has a family! Somebody stop the match! 

Like i said only a few sit and fooled by this deception. . Bigredcujo wins . Just admit it and pretending like u actually proved and your buddies just laughing and really don't understand what point u even made,they just laughing and riding with ya,like simps.

[ANTI]

5 hours ago, LoboFan07 said:

Once again wrong.
Against Tyler's 8 or more plus win teams...15-15-2
1926 - Tyler 32-19
1927 - n/a
1930 - n/a
1931 - Tyler 60-0
1933 - Tied 0-0
1935 - Longview 2-0
1937 - Longview 27-7
1938 - Tyler 20-0
1939 - Tied 6-6
1940 - Longview 14-7
1941 - Tyler 18-13
1944 - Longview 14-7
1955 - n/a
1964 - Tyler 14-0
1972 - Longview 25-12
1973 - Tyler 16-0
1974 - Longview 29-7
1975 - Longview 23-0
1976 - Longview 22-12
1978 - Tyler 39-12
1980 - Longview 21-6
1981 - Tyler 19-10
1985 - Longview 7-3
1994 - Tyler 19-7
1995 - Tyler 28-7
1996 - Tyler 42-7
1997 - Longview 20-14
2000 - Tyler 27-14
2005 - Longview 42-13
2009 - n/a
2010 - Tyler 28-14
2011 - Longview 38-22
2012 - n/a
2014 - Tyler 41-25
2015 - Longview 31-14
2016 - Tyler 38-24
2018 - Longview 41-13

You might be confused as it's actually Tyler that has a massive losing record when facing a Longview squad that has 8 or more wins. To the tune of 37-8-2 in favor of Longview.
1924 - Longview 3-0
1927 - n/a
1933 - Tied 0-0
1935 - Longview 2-0
1936 - Longview 19-6
1937 - Longview 27-7
1940 - Longview 14-7
1942 - Longview 21-7
1943 - Tyler 2-0
1944 - Longview 14-7
1947 - Longview 3-0
1951 - Longview 14-0
1959 - Tied 0-0
1967 - Longview 34-8
1972 - Longview 25-12
1973 - Tyler 16-0
1974 - Longview 29-7
1975 - Longview 23-0
1976 - Longview 22-12
1977 - Longview 35-0
1980 - Longview 21-6
1981 - Tyler 19-10
1983 - Longview 28-22
1984 - Longview 21-7
1985 - Longview 7-3
1986 - Longview 14-9
1987 - Longview 35-8
1991 - Tyler 17-14
1992 - Longview 17-16
1993 - Longview 35-13
1996 - Tyler 42-7
1997 - Longview 20-14
2002  - Longview 28-7, Longview 42-7
2004 - Longview 48-14
2005 - Longview 42-13
2006 - Longview 28-21
2007 - Longview 10-6
2008 - n/a
2009 - n/a
2010 - Tyler 28-14
2011 - Longview 38-22
2012 - n/a
2013 - n/a
2014 - Tyler 41-25
2015 - Longview 31-14
2016 - Tyler 38-24
2017 - Longview 28-19
2018 - Longview 41-13
2019 - Longview 42-0
2020 - Longview 58-14
2021 - Longview 49-0

Ouch.

[WolverBean]

2 hours ago, Bigredcujo4eva said:

What are u talking about?

What's the point in playing a smaller school then us? Gain nothing we don't need to play smaller schools to get wins 

[ANTI]

 

[LoboFan07]

Beat Boyd.

[Mr. P]

Ya love to see it...

[ANTI]

We look goood.

[VonG]

2 hours ago, ANTI said:

We look goood.

I agree. 

[ANTI]

1 hour ago, VonG said:

I agree. 

You've seen some of LV's practices so far?

[cujoforlife]

On 4/20/2022 at 2:53 AM, Bigredcujo4eva said:

I agree! I think they would have went deep if the QB wouldn't have gotten hurt. I never seen Qb make that much a difference to team. The backups were not developed at all. The offense could not function at. Turned from good team to horrible. 

We all saw the same thing.

[VonG]

6 hours ago, ANTI said:

You've seen some of LV's practices so far?

No just the videos on ketk.

[ANTI]

19 minutes ago, VonG said:

No just the videos on ketk.

How y'all looking?

I see y'all got 4 players with at least one D1 offer now.

[Bigredcujo4eva]

On 4/25/2022 at 10:16 PM, WolverBean said:

What's the point in playing a smaller school then us? Gain nothing we don't need to play smaller schools to get wins 

Who played smaller schools? Man u need to pay attention to what u read. Ur attention skills are not up high enough. 

[WolverBean]

6 hours ago, Bigredcujo4eva said:

Who played smaller schools? Man u need to pay attention to what u read. Ur attention skills are not up high enough. 

You saying we havnt played chapel hill which is correct we have no reason to, you asked what I mean  and I explained why

[WolverBean]

1 minute ago, WolverBean said:

You saying we havnt played chapel hill which is correct we have no reason to, you asked what I mean  and I explained why,what don't you understand we don't need to play smaller school chapel hill to prove we are  better then Tyler.

 

[VonG]

14 hours ago, ANTI said:

How y'all looking?

I see y'all got 4 players with at least one D1 offer now.

My projected record for the Tyler schools for the 2022 season 

Lions: 6-4, 7-3 regular season. 

Raiders: 4-6, 5-5 regular season. 

Bonus.

Chapel Hill: 9-1 regular season. 

[Mr. P]

Lobo Up and Boomer Sooner! 

[RogerDorn]

2 minutes ago, LOL said:

Lobo Up and Boomer Sooner! 

didn’t turn out the way it should have , but loved watchin him play vs McKinney North. Went all out the whole game ! Hope he gets many more 

[WolverBean]

13 minutes ago, LOL said:

Lobo Up and Boomer Sooner! 

Thats huge! Niiice I have a friend from Oklahoma he liked what saw from Willie all year hoped ou would end up offer one day first power five? Heck ya

[JTFAN99]

7 hours ago, VonG said:

My projected record for the Tyler schools for the 2022 season 

Lions: 6-4, 7-3 regular season. 

Raiders: 4-6, 5-5 regular season. 

Bonus.

Chapel Hill: 9-1 regular season. 

so with that record, are they beating the raiders?

[LoboFan07]

7 hours ago, VonG said:

My projected record for the Tyler schools for the 2022 season 

Lions: 6-4, 7-3 regular season. 

Raiders: 4-6, 5-5 regular season. 

Bonus.

Chapel Hill: 9-1 regular season. 

That's intriguing. Interested to hear where 3/4 losses are coming from.

[VonG]

1 hour ago, JTFAN99 said:

so with that record, are they beating the raiders?

JT is not beating Longview. Lee, Lufkin,  Lancaster, and Lufkin are 50/50 games to me. I can see the Lions winning them all. I can also see the Lions losing them all. I can't even discredit McKinney North. Since they have been playing in the same district with JT. All games have pretty much been competitive. 

JT is deep at all the skill positions except one. The most important position for the type of offense that the Lions run. The qb position is up in the air right now. I don't care how many receiver's you have or how many running backs you have. JT success is predicated on how good the qb is. You can't be a average qb, sorry qb, or terrible qb. JT has to have at minimum a good qb for their offense to roll. All the great years JT had since 09 was because they had good to great qb play. All the bad years. Well you know. So that's just my take on why I predicted JT record to be what it is. It all depends on the qb development and play. Right now it's a big question mark. 

[kingwolf]

13 minutes ago, VonG said:

JT is not beating Longview. Lee, Lufkin,  Lancaster, and Lufkin are 50/50 games to me. I can see the Lions winning them all. I can also see the Lions losing them all. I can't even discredit McKinney North. Since they have been playing in the same district with JT. All games have pretty much been competitive. 

JT is deep at all the skill positions except one. The most important position for the type of offense that the Lions run. The qb position is up in the air right now. I don't care how many receiver's you have or how many running backs you have. JT success is predicated on how good the qb is. You can't be a average qb, sorry qb, or terrible qb. JT has to have at minimum a good qb for their offense to roll. All the great years JT had since 09 was because they had good to great qb play. All the bad years. Well you know. So that's just my take on why I predicted JT record to be what it is. It all depends on the qb development and play. Right now it's a big question mark. 

I could be wrong but I think JT is the dark horse in the district.  If they answer the QB question and the weaker parts of the defense, they are going to be a hard out.  With Lufkin seemingly about to come of age, this district has the potential to be tougher than I first thought.