Jump to content

Vin Scully was wise. RIP


ObiOne

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, RETIREDFAN1 said:

Socialism is the last step to communism....read the Manifesto dumass.....

Name more than one developed country in the past 100 years with a democratic government that went from socialism to capitalism. Lets see what your dumass come up with. I'll wait for your dumass to come up with some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ctown81 said:

Name more than one developed country in the past 100 years with a democratic government that went from socialism to capitalism. Lets see what your dumass come up with. I'll wait for your dumass to come up with some.

So no sense at all from a dimtard.....

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, RETIREDFAN1 said:

Read the Comminist Manifesto dumass......

I've read it dumass. I asked you to give me examples and you can't.  As a matter of fact, your dumass didn't even read chapter one. If you actually read it, it starts with capitalism. So capitalism is the actual first step to be honest. You know the divide between the working class and the upper class. Marx also stated a revolution would take place in which the working class would rise up.  So with that being said, CAPITALISM that you say is so GREAT, gets the ball running. So did you skip to chapter 3. You wanna call someone dumb but you haven't even read it yourself or you just pick and choose whatever fits your agenda. So if you want to talk crap, lets start with CHAPTER ONE dumass. I'm here for it all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EnjoyLife said:

I agree...but most right wing folks would say differently since Norway has universal Healthcare and a robust social safety net.

Incorrect.  It’s the left that constantly points to the Nordic model to back their argument that socialism works.  Time and again those countries have set them straight.  Socialism is Cuba, Venezuela, etc….  Where people are revolting at the moment.  
 

the US govt hasn’t proven they could manage a dog and pony show, much less govt healthcare.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DB2point0 said:

Incorrect.  It’s the left that constantly points to the Nordic model to back their argument that socialism works.  

Idk, man. Anytime I point out that every advanced nation on the face of the earth (including Norway)...except the US... has universal Healthcare the right wing folks start ranting about socialism. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EnjoyLife said:

Idk, man. Anytime I point out that every advanced nation on the face of the earth (including Norway)...except the US... has universal Healthcare the right wing folks start ranting about socialism. 

I will acknowledge it usually is a part of socialism.  But that alone doesn’t make a country socialist.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DB2point0 said:

But that alone doesn’t make a country socialist.  

I agree. Universal healthcare does not make a country "socialist" any more than driving on public roads or getting a drink from a public water system makes a country socialist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DB2point0 said:

the US govt hasn’t proven they could manage a dog and pony show, much less govt healthcare.  

That is a fair argument.

Let me ask you this...the governments of other advanced nations seem to manage their healthcare systems pretty efficiently. They spend roughly 40% less per capita on healthcare than we do and they get measurably better results (although we do better with cancer) while covering all of their people. Why can the govts of France/Germany/the Nordic countries/Japan/Australia/the UK/the Netherlands/Austria/South Korea etc do it efficiently...but the govt of the US can not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnjoyLife said:

That is a fair argument.

Let me ask you this...the governments of other advanced nations seem to manage their healthcare systems pretty efficiently. They spend roughly 40% less per capita on healthcare than we do and they get measurably better results (although we do better with cancer) while covering all of their people. Why can the govts of France/Germany/the Nordic countries/Japan/Australia/the UK/the Netherlands/Austria/South Korea etc do it efficiently...but the govt of the US can not?

Because they are socialist slaves......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ObiOne said:

This and I don't think they allow their politicians to be bought by Big Pharma.

I agree completely about our reps being bought by pharma...and other special interest groups. No one has ever explained to me the difference between lobbying and bribery.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...