Jump to content

The GOP's myth of an 'open border'


BarryLaverty
 Share

Recommended Posts

The truth is that we need a workable solution that is common sense, but the GOP has hardened its stance to fit the overheated, scared tactic that we are being 'invaded.' 

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/desantis-abbott-using-open-border-myth-to-justify-moving-migrants-rcna48844

 

The GOP's myth of an 'open border'

The U.S. borders are guarded by a vast and well-funded national security agency that has grown far larger and more powerful in recent years.
 

Yuma Arizona Border CrossingImmigrants are processed by the U.S. Border Patrol after crossing the border from Mexico in Yuma, Ariz. on Aug. 19, 2022.Qian Weizhong / VCG via Getty Images file

 
By Debu Gandhi, senior director of Immigration Policy at the Center for American Progress Action Fund

The news cycle has been dominated by Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ recent use of appropriated state funds to fly Venezuelan migrants from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, essentially using the asylum-seekers as pawns to make a political statement about immigration. His action is being examined for violating Florida law, is already the subject of at least one criminal investigation, and has resulted in a federal lawsuit alleging that he orchestrated a premeditated, fraudulent and illegal scheme. 

One would think that those perpetuating the “open border” myth would be eager to seize every opportunity to strengthen border security.

Whether or not DeSantis’ stunt is found to have violated the law, it was cruel and dehumanizing. This action — and similar ones orchestrated by other GOP governors — have also deliberately elevated the “open border” narrative, which falsely represents that unlawful immigrants are waltzing into the U.S. through a porous southern border in droves. The purported lawless and open border has been the main justification cited by DeSantis and other GOP governors, who have doubled down on their decision to transport migrants to prominent locations with Democratic elected officials — even though the GOP governors have deliberately made no attempt to coordinate these transfers.

 

Contrary to the “open border” myth, U.S. borders are guarded by a vast and well-funded national security agency that has grown far larger and more powerful in recent years. Since 2001, U.S. Border Patrol has nearly doubled in capacity, from fewer than 10,000 agents to now more than 19,500. The Biden administration has requested $97.3 billion in funding for the Department of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2023, including billions of dollars for border security and interior immigration enforcement.     

 

Migrants are detained by U.S. Customs and Border ProtectionMigrants attempting to cross in to the United States from Mexico are detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at the border in San Luis, Ariz. on Aug. 20, 2022.Nick Ut / Getty Images file

One would think that those perpetuating the “open border” myth would be eager to seize every opportunity to strengthen border security. Last year, however, a large majority of congressional Republicans voted against the bipartisan infrastructure bill, which provided billions of dollars to strengthen border security, among other investments in critical infrastructure.

This year, most Senate Republicans voted not to fund the government, thereby choosing not to vote for even 1 cent for the Transportation Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection, and also Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The 2022 omnibus appropriations bill not only funded the nation’s border security, but it also had Federal Emergency Management Agency funds for food and shelter to help border communities manage migration. Ultimately, the “no” votes by the majority of Senate Republicans for investing in infrastructure and funding the federal government were overcome, and these massive investments in border security enhancements were signed into law by President Joe Biden.  

 

Put simply, U.S. borders under this administration do not lack security. Thousands of law enforcement personnel bolstered by billions of dollars in technology infrastructure patrol the northern and the southern borders. Furthermore, U.S. borders are not “open” because the Biden administration is processing asylum-seekers, as it is obligated to do under long-standing, bipartisan laws.  

Additionally, the Biden administration has, in fact, drastically limited the opportunity to apply for asylum for many migrants at the border by continuing the controversial usage of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Title 42 public health authorities initiated under the Trump administration in response to the pandemic. As a result, the administration has carried out more than 1 million expulsions in the first 11 months of this fiscal year, on top of the million-plus expulsions conducted during the previous fiscal year. An attempt to end this policy earlier this year has been tied up in litigation, so the use of Title 42 continues at present. But when it ends, the borders will not suddenly be “open”— rather, the Title 42 system will be replaced by the expanded application of Title 8 proceedings that were in place at the border before Covid and which can bring criminal charges for repeated improper entries, thus further adding to the administration’s border enforcement capabilities.   

 

Characterizing the humanitarian challenge at the southern border as a solely U.S. “open border” problem also presents an inaccurate picture of the global forced displacement crisis. In fact, there are currently more forcibly displaced people on record worldwide than ever before. Sheltering them and processing their protection claims are national, regional and global challenges. The entire region of the Americas — not just the United States — is impacted by this vast displacement. For instance, according to the United Nations refugee agency, there are more than 6 million displaced Venezuelans who have fled violence and insecurity, as well as a lack of food and medicine. Yet only a limited percentage have come to the U.S. border; most are still in the region, with millions being hosted in countries such as Colombia

The Biden administration is actively working with countries in the region to manage the root causes of migration and improve coordination and protections for migrants. On the law enforcement side, DHS and the Justice Department have launched a major international effort to disrupt human smuggling operations, resulting in arrests, drug seizures and criminal prosecutions. 

Ultimately, the solutions to comprehensively fix the badly broken immigration system must come from Congress. However, in recent years, notwithstanding the urgent need for immigration reform, many “MAGA” extremists have embraced former President Donald Trump’s rhetoric of invasion, “open borders“ and restrictionist immigration policies. The legacy of this damaging brand of immigration politics has bolstered many right-wing attacks on immigration reform

 

 

 
 

The last major overhaul of the immigration system to legalize undocumented immigrants took place in 1986. Two decades later, bipartisan reform efforts supported by then-President George W. Bush failed, mainly due to opposition from congressional Republicans. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s 2012 loss to President Barack Obama, preceded by Romney’s call for self-deportion of undocumented immigrants, led to condemnation of his remarks from the Republican National Committee chairman and an “autopsy“ report by the RNC calling on Republicans to back comprehensive immigration reform. After the report, 14 Senate Republicans joined all Senate Democrats to pass a landmark, bipartisan, comprehensive immigration reform bill in 2013. However, the House Republican leadership never took up the Senate bill.

Republicans failed to unite on immigration reform during the Trump administration, as well. In 2018, the Senate tried earnestly — yet failed — to pass bipartisan immigration reform. One proposal centered on protecting “Dreamers” and acceding to Trump’s border wall wish. Trump’s own plan received the fewest votes. From the very beginning of the current Congress, Republicans showed little interest in working with the Biden administration on its immigration reform proposals.    

Immigrants are playing a vital role in our nation’s recovery from the Covid pandemic — and passing immigration reform would boost economic growth and create new jobs. Divisive, anti-immigration “MAGA” extremism ignores this reality. Last year, a study from the Center for American Progress found that providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants would bring significant benefits to the entire U.S. economy, boosting the national gross domestic product by $1.7 trillion and creating 438,800 new jobs over the next decade.

The myth of “open borders” will persist in perpetuity for those who wish to find every way to get to a “no” vote on any kind of meaningful immigration reform. But progressive legislative action is needed more with each passing year. It’s time for Congress to debunk the “open borders” myth and act on a bipartisan basis to fix our broken immigration system. 

  • SMH 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monte1076 said:

I'd like to ask Barry how it's a "myth" if people can literally just walk across. What word would you use for that?

Is the entire border OPEN? That's the image I know many of you like to put out there. People are going to find a way, by hook or crook, to get across, but they may also be arrested or deported or jailed. Then, they try again. Why not come up with a more workable system than we have? What is the GOP scared of? 'Voters' would be my guess. 

  • Thanks 1
  • LOL! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Is the entire border OPEN? That's the image I know many of you like to put out there. People are going to find a way, by hook or crook, to get across, but they may also be arrested or deported or jailed. Then, they try again. Why not come up with a more workable system than we have? What is the GOP scared of? 'Voters' would be my guess. 

Or they may beat Paul Pelosi about the head with a hammer after being arrested and not deported.

We have story after story of illegals being arrested and released to commit more crimes.

Reform the immigration process, that's fine.  But you have to start with enforcing the rules on the books now!!!!  The democratic party continues to entice illegals here by promising them a path to citizenship.  Secure the border, then reform the system.  Otherwise, I believe your intent is to get as many illegals into the country as possible and then grant them citizenship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, picking out that Republicans voted against HUGE bills that included overspending in many areas and just happened to include some border funding is BS and you know it.  That is the tactic of Democrats to include things like that along with their pet projects to say "see they voted against securing the border."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BarryLaverty said:

So? You are not for immigration reform? You are just for mass deportation and no more immigration? Am I getting that right? 

No I am not for more immigration reform--we haven't even tried to enforce the laws we have on the books since the 1970s. How do we know if they work? We don't because all politicians talk about borders, but if it takes away their funding, personally, they just talk and no action. 

Yes, we should deport every ILLEGAL CRIMINAL in this country--that is every single person who has come into this country without PROPER PAPERS!!!!!

So yes, you are getting it correct.....if they can't come into the country legally--they should NOT be here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Monte1076 said:

The point, Barry, is that the guy who assaulted Paul Pelosi was here illegally. Where he's from is irrelevant.

So we have moved beyond the asinine 'gay lover drug deal gone bad' to blaming illegal immigration for Pelosi's attack? Not seeing dangerous inflammatory words by right wingers as a root cause just yet. We headed that way? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BarryLaverty said:

So we have moved beyond the asinine 'gay lover drug deal gone bad' to blaming illegal immigration for Pelosi's attack? Not seeing dangerous inflammatory words by right wingers as a root cause just yet. We headed that way? 

Since his gay dope pal lover was also an illegal alien...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

So we have moved beyond the asinine 'gay lover drug deal gone bad' to blaming illegal immigration for Pelosi's attack? Not seeing dangerous inflammatory words by right wingers as a root cause just yet. We headed that way? 

No Larry, we just found out Paul Pelosi's gay lover was ALSO an illegal alien ... follow me for more insightful revelations ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

So we have moved beyond the asinine 'gay lover drug deal gone bad' to blaming illegal immigration for Pelosi's attack? Not seeing dangerous inflammatory words by right wingers as a root cause just yet. We headed that way? 

How likely do you think it would have been for this guy to attack Paul Pelosi if he'd read, to quote you, "dangerous inflammatory words" if he was in Canada?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BarryLaverty said:

So we have moved beyond the asinine 'gay lover drug deal gone bad' to blaming illegal immigration for Pelosi's attack? Not seeing dangerous inflammatory words by right wingers as a root cause just yet. We headed that way? 

Was he here illegally? If he was not allowed to be here, would he have attacked Mr Pelosi?

Good chat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Monte1076 said:

How likely do you think it would have been for this guy to attack Paul Pelosi if he'd read, to quote you, "dangerous inflammatory words" if he was in Canada?

 

1 hour ago, JBizzle said:

Was he here illegally? If he was not allowed to be here, would he have attacked Mr Pelosi?

Good chat.

Inane connection and dodges the fact that there has been violent exhortation going on, shamelessly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

 

Inane connection and dodges the fact that there has been violent exhortation going on, shamelessly. 

You make zero sense. The man is in the country illegally. If he were not allowed to be in the country, he could not in fact beat Paul Pelosi with a hammer after their sexy drug-deal went wrong...or super right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JBizzle said:

You make zero sense. The man is in the country illegally. If he were not allowed to be in the country, he could not in fact beat Paul Pelosi with a hammer after their sexy drug-deal went wrong...or super right...

Again, ignoring the fact that violence has been encouraged. It's just a specious copout. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...