When will they be through printing votes. And are they stealing the senate and house?

[Doomer]

Hey. Now that they stole the Senate race are they gonna printout enough to take the house? We sunk? Is this gonna still be America?

Edited November 13, 2022 by Doomer

[RETIREDFAN1]

No election is legitimate until they dump the machines and everyone votes in person.....with the votes being counted by a dim a gopper and an independent at every station .......

[country]

Watermarks on all of em

[Hagar]

10 hours ago, Doomer said:

Hey. Now that they stole the Senate race are they gonna printout enough to take the house? We sunk? Is this gonna still be America?

It’ll be over when they’ve (Democrats) falsified enough votes to win.  They’ve found a weakness in the system.  Like termites or roaches who’ve found a way into the house.  They’ll come until it’s destroyed.  There’s no morals in their Party.  Why else would Arizona still be counting votes?  Texas is nearly 2.5 times bigger in land mass.  Texas has 29 million, while Arizona has 7 million.  So why do Texans know the vote count the next morning, and Arizona is still counting?  Only one good reason - So we can cheat Grasshopper!  It’s really as simple as that!

 

[RETIREDFAN1]

[Hagar]

States can have votes counted.  Why not do it?  Name a valid reason to not have them counted.  No?  Me neither.  Name a Machiavellian reason for not having them counted.  Only reason I can think of is cheating.

If anyone else can think of a valid reason, please post.  
The votes may be all in
But to count would be a sin
For we don’t count
Don’t care the amount
Just count until the Democrats win.

[BarryLaverty]

Here, a primer on why it takes longer to count votes in some states, so put down your pearls, ladies, no one is trying to rob you. 

 

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/why-does-it-take-so-long-count-mail-ballots-key-states-blame-legislatures

ANALYSIS

Why Does It Take So Long to Count Mail Ballots in Key States?

Blame Legislatures

The slow count of mail ballots has been used to cast doubt on election results, but these delays are a deliberate choice by lawmakers in battleground states.

 

 

 

 

Joe Raedle/Getty

The slow pace of counting mail ballots in states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin was a key source of election disinformation in 2020. The delays provided President Trump and his allies with a pretext to claim that the election was being stolen from them as mail ballots, which overwhelmingly went for Biden, were counted and added to vote totals. “We were winning everything, and all of a sudden it was just called off,” Trump complained. “This is a fraud on the American public.” 

Far from being a fraud, a conspiracy, or even an accident, the slow count of mail ballots is a deliberate choice that lawmakers in key battleground states have made — and with disastrous consequences for public trust in elections. By building these delays into the system, lawmakers give oxygen to false claims of “ballot dumps” and other nonsense that has been used to sow distrust and has led to threats and violence against election workers. We will hear the same false claims after the 2022 election — in which mail ballots again appear to be tilting Democratic — and in every subsequent election until state legislatures fix the process.

State law prescribes the timing of the vote-counting process. Most states allow election workers to remove ballots from their envelopes and confirm the voter’s eligibility before Election Day, sometimes weeks in advance as the ballots arrive at processing centers. Nearly half of states — including Florida, Ohio, and Texas — allow election officials to scan ballots into tabulators ahead of Election Day so that these ballots can be counted immediately and included in results on election night. (No state allows results to be released before then.)

The process is drastically different in a minority of states, including key election battlegrounds such as Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. In those states, election workers are, with few exceptions, prohibited from opening mail ballots before Election Day. Election officials in these states have begged their state legislatures for increased flexibility over the past few years and have been repeatedly rebuffed, including by many legislators who criticized slow counting in 2020 or backed claims that the vote count showed evidence of fraud. Only in Michigan did some cities successfully convince their legislature to allow any processing before Election Day. But even in those rare cases, the time permitted is far less than election officials asked for (just two days before Election Day), and the change came too late for many cities to implement it by the 2022 election. As a result of these legislative failures, state officials in each of these three states are warning voters that counting may go on for at least a day or two after polls close.

As in 2020, the media has done an excellent job of explaining that results won’t be final on election night, and voters should be prepared for counts to change in the following days. But as long as there are election deniers running for office, delays in counting ballots will be used to seed conspiracy theories and spread lies about the trustworthiness of the election process. Indeed, a top reason given by voters who doubt the outcome of the 2020 election is that the results seemed to change after election night. (“When I went to bed, Trump was so in the lead, and then (I got) up and he’s not in the lead. I mean, that’s crazy,” one Georgia voter recalled.)

Political leaders in these battleground states know that the whole country will be watching them once again in 2022. Given this, and how clearly election officials have expressed their need for more time to process and scan ballots, the lack of legislative action in several states appears likely to facilitate more chaos and disinformation as election workers try to do their jobs, in turn spurring more threats and attacks on these workers.

To be sure, in particularly close elections, it may take days or even weeks before a winner can be declared, regardless of when a state begins to process mail ballots. And accuracy should always be prioritized above speed. But if, as expected, there are more false claims of rigged elections and more threats of violence because of delays caused by election officials being forced to wait until Election Day to process mail ballots, much of the blame should fall on the state legislators who failed to address a known source of conspiracy theories, not the election workers who labor tirelessly within their given authority to ensure a secure and accurate vote count.

[KirtFalcon]

^ TOTAL   ....

[BarryLaverty]

12 minutes ago, KirtFalcon said:

^ TOTAL   ....

Keep toting that water for The Big Lie. You will be like this guy before too long. 

Of course, he dropped dead at the end of Inherit The Wind during his last rant...I wouldn't wish that on you. 

[Hagar]

Old Barry is a prime example of the gullible Democrat.  Oh, we’re not cheating.  It’s just so hard to count.  Durn, where were we?  Oh well,  one, two, three……………. 
 

 

[BarryLaverty]

9 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Old Barry is a prime example of the gullible Democrat.  Oh, we’re not cheating.  It’s just so hard to count.  Durn, where were we?  Oh well,  one, two, three……………. 
 

 

Who more than the old white guys think that somehow the whole world has cheated him these days, amiright? Here's the thing, if the GOP doesn't run crazies or TV doctors, they may have a better chance of winning, then I would predict it would get startingly quiet if they won, with the same time frame being needed to count votes, as dictated by state laws. 

Edited November 14, 2022 by BarryLaverty

[KirtFalcon]

Does anybody believe what's going on is not being done on purpose to "massage" the outcome of elections in favor of the dimocrats? .... I don't care if they are following laws the state legislators put in place to set election procedures .... it was all done to allow corrupt election officials to manipulate the outcome in their favor .... it needs to be cleaned up and corrected through the courts ... Election day should be brought back in line with what it used to be ... one verified voter equals one vote cast througha paper ballot .... get rid of all electronic vote machines that are flawed and can be manipulated  ....  drastically cutback on mail in manufactured ballots ... 95% of the voting should be in person votes .... The dimocrats have created a way to cheat with all the mail in ballot box stuffing with bogus ballots .... it has to be stopped or we will never have fair elections .... Election results have to be announced no later than the day after the election ....

[JBizzle]

4 hours ago, BarryLaverty said:

Here, a primer on why it takes longer to count votes in some states, so put down your pearls, ladies, no one is trying to rob you. 

 

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/why-does-it-take-so-long-count-mail-ballots-key-states-blame-legislatures

ANALYSIS

Why Does It Take So Long to Count Mail Ballots in Key States?

Blame Legislatures

The slow count of mail ballots has been used to cast doubt on election results, but these delays are a deliberate choice by lawmakers in battleground states.

 

 

 

 

Joe Raedle/Getty

The slow pace of counting mail ballots in states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin was a key source of election disinformation in 2020. The delays provided President Trump and his allies with a pretext to claim that the election was being stolen from them as mail ballots, which overwhelmingly went for Biden, were counted and added to vote totals. “We were winning everything, and all of a sudden it was just called off,” Trump complained. “This is a fraud on the American public.” 

Far from being a fraud, a conspiracy, or even an accident, the slow count of mail ballots is a deliberate choice that lawmakers in key battleground states have made — and with disastrous consequences for public trust in elections. By building these delays into the system, lawmakers give oxygen to false claims of “ballot dumps” and other nonsense that has been used to sow distrust and has led to threats and violence against election workers. We will hear the same false claims after the 2022 election — in which mail ballots again appear to be tilting Democratic — and in every subsequent election until state legislatures fix the process.

State law prescribes the timing of the vote-counting process. Most states allow election workers to remove ballots from their envelopes and confirm the voter’s eligibility before Election Day, sometimes weeks in advance as the ballots arrive at processing centers. Nearly half of states — including Florida, Ohio, and Texas — allow election officials to scan ballots into tabulators ahead of Election Day so that these ballots can be counted immediately and included in results on election night. (No state allows results to be released before then.)

The process is drastically different in a minority of states, including key election battlegrounds such as Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. In those states, election workers are, with few exceptions, prohibited from opening mail ballots before Election Day. Election officials in these states have begged their state legislatures for increased flexibility over the past few years and have been repeatedly rebuffed, including by many legislators who criticized slow counting in 2020 or backed claims that the vote count showed evidence of fraud. Only in Michigan did some cities successfully convince their legislature to allow any processing before Election Day. But even in those rare cases, the time permitted is far less than election officials asked for (just two days before Election Day), and the change came too late for many cities to implement it by the 2022 election. As a result of these legislative failures, state officials in each of these three states are warning voters that counting may go on for at least a day or two after polls close.

As in 2020, the media has done an excellent job of explaining that results won’t be final on election night, and voters should be prepared for counts to change in the following days. But as long as there are election deniers running for office, delays in counting ballots will be used to seed conspiracy theories and spread lies about the trustworthiness of the election process. Indeed, a top reason given by voters who doubt the outcome of the 2020 election is that the results seemed to change after election night. (“When I went to bed, Trump was so in the lead, and then (I got) up and he’s not in the lead. I mean, that’s crazy,” one Georgia voter recalled.)

Political leaders in these battleground states know that the whole country will be watching them once again in 2022. Given this, and how clearly election officials have expressed their need for more time to process and scan ballots, the lack of legislative action in several states appears likely to facilitate more chaos and disinformation as election workers try to do their jobs, in turn spurring more threats and attacks on these workers.

To be sure, in particularly close elections, it may take days or even weeks before a winner can be declared, regardless of when a state begins to process mail ballots. And accuracy should always be prioritized above speed. But if, as expected, there are more false claims of rigged elections and more threats of violence because of delays caused by election officials being forced to wait until Election Day to process mail ballots, much of the blame should fall on the state legislators who failed to address a known source of conspiracy theories, not the election workers who labor tirelessly within their given authority to ensure a secure and accurate vote count.

Lovely opinion piece passed off as facts!

Even if they can't count mail-in ballots before election day, there's still no reason they can't be done the day of the election.  It's a sham.

[JBizzle]

11 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Who more than the old white guys think that somehow the whole world has cheated him these days, amiright? Here's the thing, if the GOP doesn't run crazies or TV doctors, they may have a better chance of winning, then I would predict it would get startingly quiet if they won, with the same time frame being needed to count votes, as dictated by state laws. 

As opposed to running guys who can't even control their own bowels or form coherent sentences?

[BarryLaverty]

1 minute ago, JBizzle said:

As opposed to running guys who can't even control their own bowels or form coherent sentences?

Still classy in your fixation/attack on a man who was clearly more qualified than a TV quack, who had a stroke and is recovering from it? Good for you. 

[BarryLaverty]

4 minutes ago, JBizzle said:

Lovely opinion piece passed off as facts!

Even if they can't count mail-in ballots before election day, there's still no reason they can't be done the day of the election.  It's a sham.

Nope, it isn't, actually, although it is a pain for those who have to do it the way the law dictates. 

[Monte1076]

2 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Nope, it isn't, actually, although it is a pain for those who have to do it the way the law dictates. 

You'd think after a couple of elections, though, they'd make it where the results can come much sooner like, oh, I don't know, a lot of other states. That's their prerogative, though.

[Hagar]

24 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Still classy in your fixation/attack on a man who was clearly more qualified than a TV quack, who had a stroke and is recovering from it? Good for you. 

Fetterman?  More qualified than who?  Anyone?  Qualified for what, worst dressed man?  Guy is an incompetent buffoon.

[BarryLaverty]

11 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Guy is an incompetent buffoon.

Based on your knowledge of what? 

WIKIPEDIA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Fetterman

John Karl Fetterman (born August 15, 1969) is an American politician who is the senator-elect from Pennsylvania.^[1] A member of the Democratic Party, he has served as the 34th lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania since 2019. He previously served as mayor of Braddock from 2006 to 2019.^[2]

Beginning his professional career in the insurance industry, Fetterman studied finance at Albright College and earned an MBA from the University of Connecticut. He went on to join AmeriCorps and earned a Master of Public Policy degree from Harvard University. Fetterman's service with AmeriCorps led him to Braddock, where he moved in 2004 and was elected mayor the next year. As mayor, Fetterman sought to revitalize the former steel town through art and youth programs.

 

Now, you go. 

 

Edited November 14, 2022 by BarryLaverty

[JBizzle]

32 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Still classy in your fixation/attack on a man who was clearly more qualified than a TV quack, who had a stroke and is recovering from it? Good for you. 

When did Joe have a stroke?

[JBizzle]

6 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Based on your knowledge of what? 

John Karl Fetterman (born August 15, 1969) is an American politician who is the senator-elect from Pennsylvania.^[1] A member of the Democratic Party, he has served as the 34th lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania since 2019. He previously served as mayor of Braddock from 2006 to 2019.^[2]

Beginning his professional career in the insurance industry, Fetterman studied finance at Albright College and earned an MBA from the University of Connecticut. He went on to join AmeriCorps and earned a Master of Public Policy degree from Harvard University. Fetterman's service with AmeriCorps led him to Braddock, where he moved in 2004 and was elected mayor the next year. As mayor, Fetterman sought to revitalize the former steel town through art and youth programs.

 

Now, you go. 

 

You left out the part where he put a gun in the chest of an innocent black guy...

Also, the past means nothing if the guy is too brain-damaged to communicate.  He gets his point across worse than Steven Hawking.

Edited November 14, 2022 by JBizzle

[JBizzle]

1 minute ago, BarryLaverty said:

Based on your knowledge of what? 

John Karl Fetterman (born August 15, 1969) is an American politician who is the senator-elect from Pennsylvania.^[1] A member of the Democratic Party, he has served as the 34th lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania since 2019. He previously served as mayor of Braddock from 2006 to 2019.^[2]

Beginning his professional career in the insurance industry, Fetterman studied finance at Albright College and earned an MBA from the University of Connecticut. He went on to join AmeriCorps and earned a Master of Public Policy degree from Harvard University. Fetterman's service with AmeriCorps led him to Braddock, where he moved in 2004 and was elected mayor the next year. As mayor, Fetterman sought to revitalize the former steel town through art and youth programs.

 

Now, you go. 

 

Also, as LT Gov, he helped usher in the voting regulations, using covid as a smoke screen, that were put in place in Pennsylvania without legislative approval which allowed the state to harvest tons of votes...

Good Work!

[RETIREDFAN1]

2 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Based on your knowledge of what? 

John Karl Fetterman (born August 15, 1969) is an American politician who is the senator-elect from Pennsylvania.^[1] A member of the Democratic Party, he has served as the 34th lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania since 2019. He previously served as mayor of Braddock from 2006 to 2019.^[2]

Beginning his professional career in the insurance industry, Fetterman studied finance at Albright College and earned an MBA from the University of Connecticut. He went on to join AmeriCorps and earned a Master of Public Policy degree from Harvard University. Fetterman's service with AmeriCorps led him to Braddock, where he moved in 2004 and was elected mayor the next year. As mayor, Fetterman sought to revitalize the former steel town through art and youth programs.

 

Now, you go. 

 

That needs to have a citation or it'll have to come down..... plagiarism is a violation of the law and the rules of this site.......

[JBizzle]

36 minutes ago, BarryLaverty said:

Still classy in your fixation/attack on a man who was clearly more qualified than a TV quack, who had a stroke and is recovering from it? Good for you. 

Also, I don't ever use qualifications for political office.  That's crap.  None of these idiots should be qualified because it shouldn't be a way of making a living.  It should be every day working people who choose to represent their communities, counties, states that can relate to what their constituents are going through.

[BarryLaverty]

5 minutes ago, RETIREDFAN1 said:

That needs to have a citation or it'll have to come down..... plagiarism is a violation of the law and the rules of this site.......

Fixed. Sorry about that.